Polyurethane-biomacromolecule combined foam dressing containing asiaticoside: fabrication, characterization and clinical efficacy for traumatic dermal wound treatment.

Polyurethane combined (PUC) foam dressings with various biomacromolecules were fabricated with the adsorption of asiaticoside and silver nanoparticles for traumatic wound treatment. Biomacromolecules had varying effects on physicochemical and mechanical properties of PU foam. With 2% incorporation, starches, high molecular weight chitosan and gelatin provided stiffer and more porous foams while carboxymethylcellulose had the highest compression strength but the lowest water vapor transmission. High water absorption was from foams with carboxymethylcellulose, alginate, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and low molecular weight chitosan. Increasing the concentrations up to 12% had more prominent effect. However, powdery surface was noticed with poorer tensile properties that 6% incorporation was selected. FTIR spectra and DSC thermograms suggested interaction of PU formulation with biomacromolecules. EDS analysis confirmed existence of active compounds while acceptable stability was from sterilized PUC foam with alginate. On healthy volunteers, this selected foam dressing caused no skin irritation and retained moisture comparable to commercial product. In patients with traumatic dermal wounds, healing improvement with shorter wound closure time, higher reepithelialization and less pain score were from the selected foam dressing compared to standard gauze soaked with chlorhexidine. This PU-alginate combined foam dressing adsorbed with asiaticoside and silver nanoparticles proved advantages for traumatic dermal wound management.

Clinical Efficacy Test of Polyester Containing Herbal Extract Dressings in Burn Wound Healing.

Technological advancement has assisted in developing various availabilities of wound products that help in not only in healing and preventing infection but also in providing patients' comfort and pain reduction during application. However, most of advanced wound healing products in Thailand were imported at high costs to patients. Nowadays, there are increased numbers of local researches of herbs that could provide healing environment for successful wound care. Herbal wound products are currently being introduced as alternatives to those imported dressings. The aim of this study was to report the clinical efficacy of using polyester containing herbal extract dressings in healing of second-degree burns. The volunteers were divided by simply randomized method into the study group of patient using polyester containing herbal extract dressing and the control group of patients treating with dressings that are commercially available and common use. The standard treatment protocols were performed at every 3 days of dressing change. Comparative evaluation consisted of time of healing, length of hospital stays, pain analog score assessment, percentage of infection, and descriptive notification of unfavorable clinical symptoms or signs or side effects.

Benefit of hydrocolloid SSD dressing in the outpatient management of partial thickness burns.

Silver sulfadiazine has been used as topical medication in the treatment of partial-thickness burns or secondary degree burns for many years. Pain during daily wound cleansing is the main problem. Urgotul SSD, a hydrocolloid dressing with silver sulfadiazine (SSD) has been reported to reduce infection and exhibit antimicrobial activity in burn wounds. The purpose of the present study was to compare the efficacy of Urgotul SSD and 1% silver sulfadiazine for treatment of partial thickness burn wounds. The authors reviewed 68 patients who had partial thickness burn wound less than 15% total body surface area (TBSA%) and were treated at Siriraj outpatient burn clinic during July 2005-December 2006. All patients were divided into two groups: Urgotul SSD treated group (34 patients) and 1% silver sulfadiazine treated group (34 patients). The two groups were compared by the demographic data including age, gender, % total body surface area (TBSA) burn, % TBSA deep burn, type of burn as well as percent of wound infection, total cost of wound dressing, pain medication, level of pain and time of wound healing. There were no differences in demographic data of age, % TBSA burn, % wound infection, total treatment cost of burn wound care (52 +/- 38 US$ for Urgotul SSD versus 45 +/- 34 US$ for silver sulfadiazine treated group). Time of wound closure was significantly shorter in the Urgotul SSD treated group (10 +/- 4 days in Urgotul SSD versus 12 +/- 6 in 1% silver sulfadiazine treated group) between both groups (p < 0.05). Average pain scores and pain medication in Urgotul SSD treated group was significantly lower than 1% silver sulfadiazine treated group (3 +/- 1 versus 6 +/- 2 and respectively, p < 0.05). All of the patients who developed wound infection responded well to targeted topical and oral antibiotic treatment. The authors conclude that Urgotul SSD has advantages of reducing pain symptom, pain medication requirement, increased patient convenience due to decreased time of follow-up at outpatient burn clinic, limiting the frequency of replacement of the dressing at comparable total cost and incidence of burn wound infection. The present study confirms the efficacy of Urgotul SSD in the treatment of partial thickness or secondary degree burn wound at the outpatient clinic.

Comparison of efficacy of 1% silver sulfadiazine and Acticoat for treatment of partial-thickness burn wounds.

BACKGROUND: Acticoat (Smith & Nephew, Hull, UK) is a silver-coated dressing reported to reduce infection and exhibit antimicrobial activity in wounds. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to compare the efficacy ofacticoat and 1% silver sulfadiazine (1% AgSD) for treatment of partial thickness burn wounds. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The authors reviewed 50 patients who had partial thickness burn wounds less than 25% admitted to Siriraj Burn Unit from May 2002 to September 2005. All patients were divided into 2 groups: the acticoat treated group (25 patients) and the 1% silver sulfadiazine treated group (25 patients). The 2 groups were compared for the etiology of burn wound, demographic data including age, sex, % Total Body Surface Area burn (TBSA%), cultured organisms, wound infection and outcome of Length Of hospital Stay (LOS) and level of pain. RESULTS: The authors found no significant differences in age, TBSA (%) between both groups. 7 patients (28%) developed wound infection. There were no differences in wound infection and LOS between both groups (p > 0.05). All of the patients who developed wound infection responded well to targeted topical and systemic antibiotic treatment. The 1% AgSD treated group (6 of 25, 24%) obtained more split thickness skin graft to close the granulation defects compared to patients who were treated with acticoat (4 of 25, 16%) but no statistical significance, p = 0.32). Average pain scores in the acticoat treated groups were significantly lower than the 1% AgSD treated group (4 +/- 0.6 versus 5 +/- 0.7, respectively). CONCLUSION: The present study confirms the efficacy of acticoat treatment in partial thickness burn wound. The authors conclude that acticoat has an advantage of limiting the frequency of replacement of the dressing and provides a less painful alternative to wound care with 1% AgSD with comparable incidence of burn wound infection. This is due to its long wear time and the ease of application and removal.

Comparison of a immunonutrition formula enriched arginine, glutamine and omega-3 fatty acid, with a currently high-enriched enteral nutrition for trauma patients.

UNLABELLED: The severe trauma or burn patients required aggressive resuscitation, operation and metabolic support to reduce morbidity and motality. Nutrition is one of the most important treatment for these patients, improving body protein and immune function, reducing rate of infection and shortening hospitalization. METHOD: To evaluate the metabolic and immune effects of dietary arginine, glutamine and omega-3 fatty acids (fish oil) supplementation, we performed a prospective study in patients age 15-60 yrs after severe trauma (Injury Severity Scores (ISS) 15-30) or burn patients (body surface area (BSA) 30-60%) in Siriraj Hospital. They were randomized to receive either Neomune or Traumacal. The nasogastric feeding was started in post-injury day 2 (PID2) with half of concentration at the rate of 30 ml/h. From PID3 to PID10, the normal concentration was administered at the rate of 80-100 ml/h depending on optimal caloric requirement. All patients received 5 per cent dextrose in half or full strength saline solution as clinically indicated. No other oral nutrients apart from study formula were allowed during the study. Blood sample was with-drawn on PID2, PID6 and PID11 for measurements of CBC, coagulogram, albumin, transferrin, CRP, LFT, BUN, Cr, CD3, CD19, CD4, CD8, C3, IgG, IgM, and IgA. Nitrogen balance was calculated from UUN. Unpaired student t-test was applied to compare variables between the two groups. RESULTS: 36 patients were selected (16 trauma and 20 burn), male = 29, mean age = 29.86 yrs. The patients were divided equally into two groups to receive Neomune or Traumacal. The data were compared and showed significance on total protein on PID11 (Neomune = 6.52 +/- 1.29, Traumacal = 5.59 +/- 1.21, p = 0.03) and serum triglycerides on PID11 (Neomune = 128.39 +/- 53.45, Traumacal = 186.25 +/- 84.07, p = 0.02). The ICU stay was observed shorter in Neomune than in Traumacal group (3.41 and 7.83 days) with no statistical significance. The wean-off respirator day was also shorter in Neomune than in Traumacal group (2.71 and 7.39 days). One patient in each group died. CONCLUSIONS: The feeding of Neomune in critically injured patients was well tolerated as Traumacal and significant improvement was observed in serum protein. Shorten ICU stay and wean-off respirator day may benefit from using the immunonutrient formula.