Mast cell silencing: A novel therapeutic approach for urticaria and other mast cell-mediated diseases.

Chronic urticaria (CU) is a mast cell (MC)-dependent disease with limited therapeutic options. Current management strategies are directed at inhibiting IgE-mediated activation of MCs and antagonizing effects of released mediators. Due to the complexity and heterogeneity of CU and other MC diseases and mechanisms of MC activation-including multiple activating receptors and ligands, diverse signaling pathways, and a menagerie of mediators-strategies of MC depletion or MC silencing (i.e., inhibition of MC activation via binding of inhibitory receptors) have been developed to overcome limitations of singularly targeted agents. MC silencers, such as agonist monoclonal antibodies that engage inhibitory receptors (e.g., sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin8 -[Siglec-8] [lirentelimab/AK002], Siglec-6 [AK006], and CD200R [LY3454738]), have reached preclinical and clinical stages of development. In this review, we (1) describe the role of MCs in the pathogenesis of CU, highlighting similarities with other MC diseases in disease mechanisms and response to treatment; (2) explore current therapeutic strategies, categorized by nonspecific immunosuppression, targeted inhibition of MC activation or mediators, and targeted modulation of MC activity; and (3) introduce the concept of MC silencing as an emerging strategy that could selectively block activation of MCs without eliciting or exacerbating on- or off-target, immunosuppressive adverse effects.

Patients With Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Who Have Wheals, Angioedema, or Both, Differ Demographically, Clinically, and in Response to Treatment-Results From CURE.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) have spontaneous wheals (W), angioedema (AE), or both, for longer than 6 weeks. Clinical differences between patients with standalone W, standalone AE, and W and AE (W+AE) remain incompletely understood. OBJECTIVE: To compare W, AE, and W+AE CSU patients regarding demographics, disease characteristics, comorbidities, disease burden, and treatment response. METHODS: Baseline data from 3,698 CSU patients in the ongoing, prospective, international, multicenter, observational Chronic Urticaria REgistry (CURE) were analyzed (data cut: September 2022). RESULTS: Across all CSU patients, 59%, 36%, and 5% had W+AE, W, and AE, respectively. The W+AE patients, compared with W and AE patients, showed the lowest male-to-female ratio (0.33), higher rates of concomitant psychiatric disease (17% vs 11% vs 6%, respectively), autoimmune disease (13% vs 7% vs 9%, respectively), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) hypersensitivity (9% vs 5% vs 2%, respectively) and the highest disease impact. The W patients, compared with W+AE and AE patients, showed the lowest rates of concomitant hypertension (15% vs 21% vs 40%, respectively) and obesity (11% vs 16% vs 17%, respectively), the highest rate of concomitant inducible urticaria (24% vs 22% vs 6%, respectively), and shorter W duration. The AE patients, compared with W+AE and W patients, were older at disease onset, showed longer AE duration, and the best response to increased doses of H1-antihistamines (58% vs 24% vs 31%, respectively) and omalizumab (92% vs 67% vs 60%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide a better understanding of CSU phenotypes and may guide patient care and research efforts that aim to link them to pathogenic drivers.

An evaluation of remission rates with first and second line treatments and indicators of antihistamine refractoriness in chronic urticaria.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend standard doses of antihistamines as first-line, and updosing of antihistamines as second-line treatment for the management of chronic urticaria (CU). However, remission rates with different types of first- and second-line treatments and indicators of antihistamine response are largely lacking in the literature. OBJECTIVES: To examine response rates to first- and second-line treatments in CU, and to identify patient characteristics that can predict antihistamine treatment outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed treatment outcomes of 657 CU (556 chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), 101 chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU)) patients who had at least 3-months of follow-up data. RESULTS: A standard dose of second generation antihistamines (sgAH) was effective in 43.1 % of the patients. An additional 28.8 % of patients were in remission with second-line treatments. Among patients whose disease was in remission with a standard dose of sgAHs, 14.8 % benefited from switching from their current sgAH to another sgAH. Updosing sgAHs, combination of two different sgAHs, sgAH and first generation H1-antihistamine combination, and sgAH and leukotriene receptor antagonist combination provided remission in 38.3 %, 35.8 %, 37.5 % and 25 % of patients who were given these treatments, respectively. Baseline UCT score ≤ 4, emergency referral and family history of CSU were found to be risk factors for antihistamine refractoriness in patients with CSU. CONCLUSIONS: A step-wise approach to the management of CU is practical as more patients respond to treatment at each step. The presence of baseline UCT score ≤ 4, emergency referral and family history of CSU might be helpful to determine patients who require third-line treatments in advance.

Evidence for histamine release in chronic inducible urticaria - A systematic review.

Background: Chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU) constitutes a group of nine different CIndUs in which pruritic wheals and/or angioedema occur after exposure to specific and definite triggers. Histamine released from activated and degranulating skin mast cells is held to play a key role in the pathogenesis of CIndU, but evidence to support this has, as of yet, not been reviewed systematically or in detail. We aim to characterize the role and relevance of histamine in CIndU. Methods: We systematically searched 3 electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Embase) for studies that reported increased serum or skin histamine concentration (direct evidence) or in vitro or ex vivo histamine release (indirect evidence) following trigger exposure. Results: An initial total of 3,882 articles was narrowed down to 107 relevant studies of which 52 were in cold urticaria, 19 in cholinergic urticaria, 14 in heat urticaria, 10 in contact urticaria, 7 each in solar urticaria and vibratory angioedema, 4 each in symptomatic dermographism and aquagenic urticaria, and 3 in delayed pressure urticaria. The results of our review support that histamine has a key pathogenic role in the pathogenesis of all CIndUs, but it is not the sole mediator as evidenced by the often poor relationship between the level of histamine and severity of symptoms and the variable clinical efficacy of H1-antihistamines. Conclusions: Histamine released from skin mast cells is a key driver of the development of signs and symptoms and a promising therapeutic target in CIndU.

Urticaria in Pregnancy and Lactation.

Chronic urticaria (CU) is a mast cell-driven chronic inflammatory disease with a female predominance. Since CU affects mostly females in reproductive age, pregnancy is an important aspect to consider in the context of this disease. Sex hormones affect mast cell (MC) biology, and the hormonal changes that come with pregnancy can modulate the course of chronic inflammatory conditions, and they often do. Also, pregnancy-associated changes in the immune system, including local adaptation of innate and adaptive immune responses and skewing of adaptive immunity toward a Th2/Treg profile have been linked to changes in the course of inflammatory diseases. As of now, little is known about the effects of pregnancy on CU and the outcomes of pregnancy in CU patients. Also, there are no real-life studies to show the safety of urticaria medications during pregnancy. The recent PREG-CU study provided the first insights on this and showed that CU improves during pregnancy in half of the patients, whereas it worsens in one-third; and two of five CU patients experience flare-ups of their CU during pregnancy. The international EAACI/GA2LEN/EuroGuiDerm/APAAACI guideline for urticaria recommends adopting the same management strategy in pregnant and lactating CU patients; starting treatment with standard doses of second-generation (non-sedative) H1 antihistamines, to increase the dose up to 4-folds in case of no response, and to add omalizumab in antihistamine-refractory patients; but also emphasizes the lack of evidence-based information on the safety and efficacy of urticaria treatments during pregnancy. The PREG-CU study assessed treatments and their outcomes during pregnancy. Here, we review the reported effects of sex hormones and pregnancy-specific immunological changes on urticaria, we discuss the impact of pregnancy on urticaria, and we provide information and guidance on the management of urticaria during pregnancy and lactation.

Mast cells, cortistatin, and its receptor, MRGPRX2, are linked to the pathogenesis of chronic prurigo.

BACKGROUND: Chronic prurigo (CPG) is characterized by intensive itch and interactions among nerves, neuropeptides, and mast cells (MCs). The role of some neuropeptides such as cortistatin (CST) and its receptor, Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor X2 (MRGPRX2), in CPG remains poorly investigated. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated first whether CST activates human skin MCs, and second whether CST and MRGPRX2 are expressed in the skin of CPG patients, and by which cells. METHODS: Skin prick tests and microdialysis with CST were performed in 6 and 1 healthy volunteers, respectively. Degranulation of human skin MCs was assessed using ß-hexosaminidase and histamine release assays. Skin samples from 10 patients with CPG and 10 control subjects were stained for CST, MCs, and MRGPRX2 (protein and mRNA) using immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, and/or in situ hybridization. Flow cytometry was used to assess CST in human skin MCs. MRGPRX2 levels were measured in serum by ELISA. RESULTS: CST induced concentration-dependent degranulation of human skin MCs in vivo and ex vivo. Skin lesions of CPG patients exhibited markedly higher numbers of CST-expressing cells, CST-expressing MCs, MRGPRX2-expressing cells, and MRGPRX2 mRNA-expressing cells than nonlesional skin. MCs were the main MRGPRX2 mRNA-expressing cells in the lesions of most CPG patients (70%). Stimulation of human skin MCs with anti-IgE led to a release of CST. The number of MRGPRX2-expressing cells correlated with disease severity (r = 0.649, P = .04). MRGPRX2 serum levels in CPG patients correlated with disease severity (r = 0.704, P = .023) and quality-of-life impairment (r = 0.687, P = .028). CONCLUSIONS: CST and MRGPRX2 may contribute to the pathogenesis of CPG and should be evaluated in further studies as potential biomarkers and novel therapeutic targets.

A European survey of management approaches in chronic urticaria in children: EAACI pediatric urticaria taskforce.

BACKGROUND: Although well described in adults, there are scarce and heterogeneous data on the diagnosis and management of chronic urticaria (CU) in children (0-18 years) throughout Europe. Our aim was to explore country differences and identify the extent to which the EAACI/GA²LEN/EDF/WAO guideline recommendations for pediatric urticaria are implemented. METHODS: The EAACI Task Force for pediatric CU disseminated an online clinical survey among EAACI pediatric section members. Members were asked to answer 35 multiple choice questions on current practices in their respective centers. RESULTS: The survey was sent to 2,773 physicians of whom 358 (13.8%) responded, mainly pediatric allergists (80%) and pediatricians (49.7%), working in 69 countries. For diagnosis, Southern European countries used significantly more routine tests (eg, autoimmune testing, allergological tests, and parasitic investigation) than Northern European countries. Most respondents (60.3%) used a 2nd -generation antihistamine as first-line treatment of whom 64.8% updosed as a second line. Omalizumab was used as a second-line treatment by 1.7% and third line by 20.7% of respondents. Most clinicians (65%) follow EAACI/WAO/GA2LEN/EDF guidelines when diagnosing CU, and only 7.3% follow no specific guidelines. Some clinicians prefer to follow national guidelines (18.4%, mainly Northern European) or the AAAAI practice parameter (1.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Even though most members of the Pediatric Section of EAACI are familiar with the EAACI/WAO/GA2LEN/EDF guidelines, a significant number do not follow them. Also, the large variation in diagnosis and treatment strengthens the need to re-evaluate, update, and standardize guidelines on the diagnosis and management of CU in children.

The international EAACI/GA²LEN/EuroGuiDerm/APAAACI guideline for the definition, classification, diagnosis, and management of urticaria.

This update and revision of the international guideline for urticaria was developed following the methods recommended by Cochrane and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group. It is a joint initiative of the Dermatology Section of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (EAACI), the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA²LEN) and its Urticaria and Angioedema Centers of Reference and Excellence (UCAREs and ACAREs), the European Dermatology Forum (EDF; EuroGuiDerm), and the Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology with the participation of 64 delegates of 50 national and international societies and from 31 countries. The consensus conference was held on 3 December 2020. This guideline was acknowledged and accepted by the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS). Urticaria is a frequent, mast cell-driven disease that presents with wheals, angioedema, or both. The lifetime prevalence for acute urticaria is approximately 20%. Chronic spontaneous or inducible urticaria is disabling, impairs quality of life, and affects performance at work and school. This updated version of the international guideline for urticaria covers the definition and classification of urticaria and outlines expert-guided and evidence-based diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for the different subtypes of urticaria.

Efficacy and Safety of Non-brain Penetrating H1-Antihistamines for the Treatment of Allergic Diseases.

H1 receptor antagonists, known as H1-antihistamines (AHs), inactivate the histamine H1-receptor thereby preventing histamine causing the primary symptoms of allergic diseases, such as atopic dermatitis, pollinosis, food allergies, and urticaria. AHs, which are classified into first-generation (fgAHs) and second-generation (sgAHs) antihistamines, are the first line of treatment for allergic diseases. Although fgAHs are effective, they cause adverse reactions such as potent sedating effects, including drowsiness, lassitude, and cognitive impairment; anticholinergic effects, including thirst and tachycardia. Consequently, the use of fgAHs is not recommended for allergic diseases. Today, sgAHs, which are minimally sedating and, therefore, may be used at more effective doses, are the first-line treatment for alleviating the symptoms of allergic diseases. Pharmacologically, the use of sedating fgAHs is limited to antiemetics, anti-motion sickness drugs, and antivertigo drugs. The use of histamine H1-receptor occupancy (H1RO) based on positron emission tomography (PET) has been developed for the evaluation of brain penetrability. Based on the results of the H1RO-PET studies, non-brain-penetrating AHs (nbpAHs) have recently been reclassified among sgAHs. The nbpAHs are rapidly acting and exhibit minimal adverse reactions and, thus, are considered first-line drugs for allergic diseases. In this review, we will introduce recent topics on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of AHs and make recommendations for the use of nbpAHs as first-line treatment options for allergic diseases.

Acetylcholine-induced whealing in cholinergic urticaria - What does it tell us?

BACKGROUND: Cholinergic urticaria (CholU) is characterized by the occurrence of itchy wheals induced by sweating. Intradermal injections of acetylcholine (ACh) have been proposed to help with diagnosing CholU and subgrouping of patients, but controlled studies are largely missing. OBJECTIVE: To compare the rates of positive ACh test results in well characterized CholU patients and controls and to identify clinical features of CholU linked to ACh reactivity. METHODS: Acetylcholine was injected intradermally into 38 CholU patients and 73 matched healthy controls. Wheal and flare skin responses were assessed after 15 and 30 min and correlated with clinical features of CholU. RESULTS: At 15 min after intradermal injections of ACh, wheal and flare responses were significantly more frequent in CholU patients than healthy controls, wheals: 34 % vs.15% (P = 0.028); flares: 50 % vs.18 % (P <0.001). Also, wheals were 37 % and flares 172 % larger and of longer duration in CholU patients than in healthy controls (both P < 0.01). CholU patients with ACh-induced wheals (ACh+) had larger flare but not wheal responses in response to histamine than those without (ACh-; P = 0.011). Also, ACh-induced wheal responses were significantly correlated with sweating (r = 0.54, P = 0.046) in CholU patients. Finally, wheal responses lasted longer in ACh+ than in ACh- patients (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Intradermal ACh testing does not allow for the identification of CholU patients due to its low sensitivity. ACh-induced wheals, in patients with CholU, is linked to sweating and longer lasting symptoms. Intradermal ACh testing is an interesting tool for mechanistic studies in CholU.

Predictors of treatment response in chronic spontaneous urticaria.

The current therapeutic algorithm for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), endorsed by the international guideline, entails treatment escalation from second-generation H1 -antihistamines (sgAHs) to omalizumab and cyclosporine until complete response is achieved. Recently, several predictors of response to these treatment options have been described. Here, we discuss the most promising predictors of response and nonresponse to these treatments in CSU. A systematic search was performed by two independent researchers using the MEDLINE/PubMed database with specific keywords and 73 studies included in the review. Levels of evidence were categorized as strong (robust predictors), weak (emerging predictors) or no association, based on the outcome and number of studies available. High disease activity, high levels of C-reactive protein and D-dimer are robust predictors for a poor or no response to sgAHs. Poor or no response to omalizumab is robustly predicted by low serum levels of total IgE. A good response to cyclosporine is robustly predicted by a positive basophil histamine release assay, whereas low total IgE is an emerging predictor. The response to treatment with sgAHs, omalizumab and cyclosporine can be predicted by the use of markers that are readily available in routine clinical practice. Further studies are needed to confirm these predictors.

Total IgE as a Marker for Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.

OBJECTIVE: Immunoglobulin E (IgE) and its receptor, FcɛRI, importantly contribute to the pathophysiology of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). Recent findings point to a possible role of total IgE as a marker of CSU disease activity, endotypes, and responses to treatment. The evidence in support of total IgE included in the diagnostic workup of patients with CSU has not yet been reviewed. METHODS: Publications were searched via PubMed. The search terms used were "chronic urticaria" and "total IgE." Studies were screened by titles and abstracts, and 141 were used in the review. RESULTS: CSU patients frequently had elevated total IgE serum levels (up to 50%), but normal or very low total IgE levels also occurred. High total IgE may represent high disease activity, longer disease duration, high chance of responding to omalizumab treatment, quick relapse after stopping omalizumab, and lower chance of responding to cyclosporine. Low IgE, in contrast, may suggest Type IIb autoimmune CSU, poor response to treatment with omalizumab and a better chance to benefits from cyclosporine treatment. Furthermore, IgE in different CSU cohorts may have different physicochemical properties that could explain differences in treatment responses to IgE-directed therapies. CONCLUSION: The results of our review suggest that total IgE is a valuable marker for CSU, and we recommend its assessment in the routine diagnostic workup of CSU patients.

IgM and IgA in addition to IgG autoantibodies against FcɛRIα are frequent and associated with disease markers of chronic spontaneous urticaria.

BACKGROUND: IgG autoantibodies against the high-affinity IgE receptor, FcɛRIα, contribute the pathogenesis of autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). However, it is not known whether such patients also exhibit IgM or IgA autoantibodies against FcɛRIα. To address this question we developed an ELISA to assess serum levels of IgG, IgM, and IgA autoantibodies against FcɛRIα and investigated whether their presence is linked to clinical features of CSU including the response to autologous serum skin testing (ASST). METHODS: Serum samples of 35 CSU patients (25 ASST-positive) and 52 healthy control individuals were analyzed using a newly developed competitive ELISA for IgG, IgM, and IgA autoantibodies to FcɛRIα. RESULTS: One in four CSU patients (8/35, 24%) had elevated serum levels of IgG-anti-FcɛRIα compared with (3/52, 6%) healthy controls. More than half of patients had IgM (21/35, 60%) and IgA (20/35, 57%) vs (3/52, 5%) each in healthy controls. Elevated IgM, but not IgG or IgA, autoantibodies were significantly more frequent in ASST-positive CSU patients (18/25, 72%) compared with ASSTnegative patients (3/10, 33%, P = .022). Also, elevated levels of IgM-anti-FcɛRIα, but not of IgG or IgA against FcɛRIα, were linked to low blood basophil (r = .414, P = .021) and eosinophil (r = .623, P < .001) counts. CONCLUSIONS: Increased serum levels of IgM-anti-FcɛRIα are common in patients with CSU and linked to features of autoimmune CSU. The role and relevance of autoantibodies to FcɛRIα in CSU can and should be further characterized in future studies, and our novel assay can help with this.

The role of eosinophils in chronic spontaneous urticaria.

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is considered to be primarily a mast cell-driven disease. However, recent evidence suggests that eosinophils may also have an axial role in symptomology. Histologic studies have demonstrated the presence of both eosinophils and eosinophil granules, indicative of activation, in CSU lesions. Although many allergic and inflammatory conditions are associated with a peripheral blood eosinophilia, the converse appears to be the case in CSU, with a peripheral blood eosinopenia being observed in many patients. Possible mechanisms include the depletion of blood eosinophils by recruitment into the skin during active disease and immunologic destruction in the blood. We also address in some detail the interactions between eosinophils and mast cells, particularly the cytokine cross-talk of these cells and mediator release possibly leading to clinical symptoms. Also, activation by eosinophil proteins of the coagulation pathway leads to the generation of thrombin and increased mast cell degranulation. Finally, treatments aimed at reducing eosinophil accumulation and activation, such as the anti-IL-5 antibodies mepolizumab, reslizumab, and benralizumab, have been reported to reduce CSU symptoms. Clearly, a new picture of an important role of eosinophils in the pathogenesis of CSU is emerging.

Cold-induced urticarial autoinflammatory syndrome related to factor XII activation.

Hereditary autoinflammatory diseases are caused by gene mutations of the innate immune pathway, e.g. nucleotide receptor protein 3 (NLRP3). Here, we report a four-generation family with cold-induced urticarial rash, arthralgia, chills, headache and malaise associated with an autosomal-dominant inheritance. Genetic studies identify a substitution mutation in gene F12 (T859A, resulting in p.W268R) which encodes coagulation factor XII (FXII). Functional analysis reveals enhanced autocatalytic cleavage of the mutated protein and spontaneous FXII activation in patient plasma and in supernatant of transfected HEK293 cells expressing recombinant W268R-mutated proteins. Furthermore, we observe reduced plasma prekallikrein, cleaved high molecular weight kininogen and elevated plasma bradykinin. Neutrophils are identified as a local source of FXII. Interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß) is upregulated in lesional skin and mononuclear donor cells exposed to recombinant mutant proteins. Treatment with icatibant (bradykinin-B2-antagonist) or anakinra (interleukin-1-antagonist) reduces disease activity in patients. In conclusion, our findings provide a link between contact system activation and cytokine-mediated inflammation.

Eosinopenia, in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria, Is Associated with High Disease Activity, Autoimmunity, and Poor Response to Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is characterized by the degranulation of skin mast cells and the influx of basophils and eosinophils to affected skin sites. Blood basopenia has been linked to severe antihistamine-resistant CSU and type IIb autoimmunity, whereas the role of eosinophils in CSU is largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To analyze data from 1613 patients with CSU from 2 centers to study the prevalence, role, and relevance of eosinopenia in CSU. METHODS: Peripheral blood eosinophil and basophil counts were measured by automated hematology analyzers. Patient files were screened for clinical characteristics, results of laboratory tests, the autologous serum skin test, the serum-induced basophil histamine release assay, and response to second-generation H1-antihistamines and omalizumab. RESULTS: Ten percent of patients with CSU had eosinopenia. Eosinopenia was associated with the female sex, high disease activity, autologous serum skin test and basophil histamine release assay positivity, low total IgE, and high levels of C-reactive protein and IgG-antithyroperoxidase (P ≤ .007). Nonresponders to second-generation H1-antihistamines or omalizumab had significantly lower eosinophils as compared with responders (P < .05 and P < .01, respectively). Blood eosinophil counts correlated with basophil counts (r = 0.396; P < .001), and 81% of patients with CSU with undetectable eosinophils had basopenia. The combination of eosinopenia and basopenia is a better predictor of nonresponse to second-generation H1-antihistamines than eosinopenia alone (odds ratio of 9.5 vs 4.8). CONCLUSIONS: Eosinopenia in patients with CSU is associated with type IIb autoimmunity, high disease activity, and poor response to treatment. Eosinophils should be explored as biomarkers and investigated for their contribution to the pathogenesis of CSU.

Bilastine: a lifetime companion for the treatment of allergies.

Objective: Bilastine is a potent and highly selective H1-antihistamine approved for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and urticaria. This article summarizes available data on the use of bilastine in the treatment of allergic disorders in different age groups, including younger and older adults, and school-age children and adolescents.Methods: A PubMed literature search ("bilastine") was conducted on 25 February 2019. Additional literature known to the authors and identified from the reference lists of cited publications was included.Results: Bilastine is administered orally at a dose of 20 mg once daily in adults and adolescents aged ≥12 years and 10 mg once daily in children aged 6 to <12 years. Clinical trials have demonstrated its efficacy at improving nasal and ocular symptoms in patients with allergic rhinitis, and wheals and itching in patients with urticaria. It has a rapid onset of action and long duration of action. Bilastine does not undergo significant metabolism and does not interact with the CYP450 system, which limits its potential for drug-drug interactions. No dosage adjustments are required in patients with renal or hepatic impairment, or in the elderly. Bilastine is generally well tolerated, even when administered at above-standard doses. It does not exhibit anticholinergic effects or cardiotoxic effects, shows no central nervous system penetration and has minimal sedative properties. It has been shown to improve health-related quality of life.Conclusions: Bilastine is a suitable option for the treatment of patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis or urticaria across age groups from school-age children to elderly patients.

Cardiac safety of second-generation H1 -antihistamines when updosed in chronic spontaneous urticaria.

The symptoms of chronic urticaria, be it chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) or chronic inducible urticaria (CindU), are mediated primarily by the actions of histamine on H1 receptors located on endothelial cells (the weal) and on sensory nerves (neurogenic flare and pruritus). Thus, second-generation H1 antihistamines (sgAHs) are the primary treatment of these conditions. However, many patients are poorly responsive to licensed doses of antihistamines. In these patients, the current EAACI/GA2 LEN/EDF/WAO guideline for urticaria suggests updosing of sgAHs up to fourfold. However, such updosing is off-label and the responsibility resides with the prescribing physician. Therefore, the safety of the drug when used above its licensed dose is of paramount importance. An important aspect of safety is potential cardiotoxicity. This problem was initially identified some 20 years ago with cardiotoxic deaths occurring with astemizole and terfenadine, two early sgAHs. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms and assessments of potential cardiotoxicity of H1 antihistamines when updosed to four times their licensed dose. In particular, we have focused on the potential of H1 antihistamines to block hERG (human Ether-a-go-go-Related Gene) voltage-gated K+ channels, also known as Kv11.1 channels according to the IUPHAR classification. Blockade of these channels causes QT prolongation leading to torsade de pointes that may possibly degenerate into ventricular fibrillation and sudden death. We considered in detail bilastine, cetirizine, levocetirizine, ebastine, fexofenadine, loratadine, desloratadine, mizolastine and rupatadine and concluded that all these drugs have an excellent safety profile with no evidence of cardiotoxicity even when updosed up to four times their standard licensed dose, provided that the prescribers carefully consider and rule out potential risk factors for cardiotoxicity, such as the presence of inherited long QT syndrome, older age, cardiovascular disorders, hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia, or the use of drugs that either have direct QT prolonging effects or inhibit sgAH metabolism.