Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Haematol ; 96(6): 643-9, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26277477

RESUMO

At present, very few data are available on deferasirox (DFX) in the treatment of patients with Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms in fibrotic phase (FP-MPN) and transfusion dependence. To address this issue, a retrospective analysis of 28 patients (22 male and 6 female) with FP-MPN and iron overload secondary to transfusion dependence was performed, based on patients enrolled in the database of our regional cooperative group who received treatment with DFX. DFX was started after a median interval from diagnosis of 12.8 months (IR 7.1-43.1) with median ferritin values of 1415 ng/mL (IR 1168-1768). Extra-hematological toxicity was reported in 16 of 28 patients (57.1%), but only two patients discontinued treatment due to toxicity. Among 26 patients evaluable for response (≥6 months of treatment), after a median treatment period of 15.4 months (IR 8.1-22.3), 11 patients (42.3%) achieved a stable and consistent reduction in ferritin levels <1000 ng/mL. As for hematological improvement, 6 of 26 patients (23%) showed a persistent (>3 months) rise of Hb levels >1.5 g/dL, with disappearance of transfusion dependence in four cases. Treatment with DFX is feasible and effective in FP-MPN with iron overload. Moreover, in this setting, an erythroid response can occur in a significant proportion of patients.


Assuntos
Benzoatos/uso terapêutico , Eritropoese/efeitos dos fármacos , Quelantes de Ferro/uso terapêutico , Sobrecarga de Ferro/tratamento farmacológico , Sobrecarga de Ferro/etiologia , Transtornos Mieloproliferativos/complicações , Transtornos Mieloproliferativos/patologia , Triazóis/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Benzoatos/administração & dosagem , Benzoatos/efeitos adversos , Terapia por Quelação , Deferasirox , Índices de Eritrócitos , Feminino , Fibrose , Seguimentos , Humanos , Quelantes de Ferro/administração & dosagem , Quelantes de Ferro/efeitos adversos , Sobrecarga de Ferro/sangue , Sobrecarga de Ferro/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos Mieloproliferativos/mortalidade , Transtornos Mieloproliferativos/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Reação Transfusional , Resultado do Tratamento , Triazóis/administração & dosagem , Triazóis/efeitos adversos
2.
Leuk Res ; 39(8): 801-4, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26065981

RESUMO

To highlight the role of azacytidine (AZA) in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms developing blast phase (MPN-BP), we evaluated retrospectively 19 patients [M/F 15/4, median age 71.3 years, interquartile range (IQR) 64.5-77.7] reported in the database of our cooperative group. Median time from diagnosis to BP evolution was 52.7 months (IQR 11.2-181.8). All patients were treated with AZA at the standard dosage of 75 mg/m(2). Two patients died early after 5-AZA initiation from pulmonary fungal infection and respiratory failure respectively, 4 patients had a disease progression, 4 patients a stable disease, 3 patients had an hematological improvement, 1 patient a partial response and 5 pts (26.3%) a complete response (CR) after 4, 4, 4, 5, and 12 months. The median cumulative survival from BP evolution was 9.9 months (95%CI 6.6-13.1): the comparison with an historical cohort of 72 patients with MPN-BP treated with approaches other than AZA (median cumulative survival 3.1 months, 95%CI 1.1-5.0) showed a significant advantage for patients treated with AZA (p=0.02). Our data confirm the relative efficacy and safety of AZA in this group of patients with otherwise dismal prognosis, underlining the possible achievement of long-lasting responses in a sizeable portion of them.


Assuntos
Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Azacitidina/uso terapêutico , Crise Blástica/tratamento farmacológico , Leucemia Mieloide Crônica Atípica BCR-ABL Negativa/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Crise Blástica/patologia , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Crônica Atípica BCR-ABL Negativa/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Clin Cancer Res ; 12(24): 7374-9, 2006 Dec 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17189410

RESUMO

PURPOSE: ABL kinase domain mutations have been implicated in the resistance to the BCR-ABL inhibitor imatinib mesylate of Philadelphia-positive (Ph+) leukemia patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Using denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography and sequencing, we screened for ABL kinase domain mutations in 370 Ph+ patients with evidence of hematologic or cytogenetic resistance to imatinib. RESULTS: Mutations were found in 127 of 297 (43%) evaluable patients. Mutations were found in 27% of chronic-phase patients (14% treated with imatinib frontline; 31% treated with imatinib post-IFN failure), 52% of accelerated-phase patients, 75% of myeloid blast crisis patients, and 83% of lymphoid blast crisis/Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients. Mutations were associated in 30% of patients with primary resistance (44% hematologic and 28% cytogenetic) and in 57% of patients with acquired resistance (23% patients who lost cytogenetic response; 55% patients who lost hematologic response; and 87% patients who progressed to accelerated phase/blast crisis). P-loop and T315I mutations were particularly frequent in advanced-phase chronic myeloid leukemia and Ph+ ALL patients, and often accompanied progression from chronic phase to accelerated phase/blast crisis. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that (a) amino acid substitutions at seven residues (M244V, G250E, Y253F/H, E255K/V, T315I, M351T, and F359V) account for 85% of all resistance-associated mutations; (b) the search for mutations is important both in case of imatinib failure and in case of loss of response at the hematologic or cytogenetic level; (c) advanced-phase chronic myeloid leukemia and Ph+ ALL patients have a higher likelihood of developing imatinib-resistant mutations; and (d) the presence of either P-loop or T315I mutations in imatinib-treated patients should warn the clinician to reconsider the therapeutic strategy.


Assuntos
Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos/genética , Genes abl/fisiologia , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/tratamento farmacológico , Mutação/fisiologia , Piperazinas/uso terapêutico , Pirimidinas/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Benzamidas , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão , Análise Mutacional de DNA/métodos , Frequência do Gene , Humanos , Mesilato de Imatinib , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/genética , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Proteínas Quinases/genética , Estrutura Terciária de Proteína/genética
4.
J Clin Oncol ; 22(13): 2654-61, 2004 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15159414

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Promising new therapeutic options for follicular lymphoma (FL) include fludarabine plus mitoxantrone (FM) and the mouse/human anti-CD20 antibody, rituximab. We performed a randomized comparative trial of FM with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) front-line chemotherapy with and without sequential rituximab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All previously untreated CD20(+) FL patients presenting in 15 Italian cooperative institutions from October 1999 were randomly allocated to FM or CHOP. Following clinical or molecular restaging, patients in complete remission (CR) with bcl-2/IgH negativity (CR(-)) received no further treatment; those in CR with bcl-2/IgH positivity (CR(+)) received rituximab, as did those in partial remission (PR) with bcl-2/IgH negativity (PR(-)) or positivity (PR(+)); nonresponders (NR subgroup) were off study. RESULTS: After chemotherapy, the FM arm achieved higher rates of CR (68% [49 of 72 patients] v 42% [29 of 68 patients]; P =.003) and CR(-) (39% [28 of 72 patients] v 13 of 68 patients [19%]; P =.001). Rituximab elicited CR(-) in 55 of 95 treated patients (58%). The final CR(-) rate was higher in the FM arm (71% [51 of 72 patients] v 51% [35 of 68 patients]; P =.01). However, with a median follow-up of 19 months (range, 9 to 37 months), no statistically significant difference was found among the various study arms in terms of both progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that FM is superior to CHOP for front-line treatment of FL and that rituximab is an effective sequential treatment option. However, they also confirm that this superiority is unlikely to translate into either better PFS or OS.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Linfoma Folicular/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oral , Adulto , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais/farmacologia , Anticorpos Monoclonais Murinos , Antineoplásicos/farmacologia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Ciclofosfamida/administração & dosagem , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Doxorrubicina/administração & dosagem , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Linfoma Folicular/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prednisona/administração & dosagem , Rituximab , Resultado do Tratamento , Vincristina/administração & dosagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA