Development of a multivariable prediction model to identify dairy calves too young to be transported to auction markets in Canada using simple physical examination and body weight.

Calves born on Eastern Canadian dairy farms that are not kept in the herds are traditionally sold through auction markets and are raised for meat purposes such as veal calves. Since February 2020, a new Canadian federal regulation has forbidden calves <9 d old to be sold through auction markets. However, in the absence of a real-time birth registry consultation system, it would be of interest to look for predictors that could be associated with age to allow identification of calves too young to be transported. In the current retrospective cross-sectional study, 1,178 calves with a declared birth date (411 calves aged <9 d old; 34.9%) were assessed in 2 large Québec auction sites. Easy-to-record covariates [body weight (BW), breed phenotype, and presence of an umbilical cord remnant] as well as other clinical signs (umbilical swelling, enlargement, umbilical pain, wet umbilicus, skin tent, sunken eyes, ocular and nasal secretion, and hide cleanliness) were assessed. Two logistic regression models using age as a dichotomous dependent variable (<9 d old vs ≥9 d old) were built. The first model (model 1) considered all covariates, which were selected after univariable analyses and a backward stepwise selection process, whereas a more pragmatic model (model 2) only included the 3 easy-to-record variables (i.e., BW, breed, umbilical cord). Both models had similar accuracy to detect calves <9 d old (sensitivity of 38.4 and 37.5%, and specificity of 85.7 and 84.6% for model 1 and 2, respectively). Model 2 was subsequently more specifically studied as it employs a faster and easier assessment. Decision thresholds were tested for their robustness based on misclassification cost term (MCT) analysis with various prevalence of calves <9 d old and various costs of false-negative:false-positive ratio. Despite statistical significance, model accuracy, even if refined with MCT analysis, was limited at the individual level, showing the limits of using physical signs and BW or their combination as a reliable proxy of age. The sensitivity of these models to find calves <9 d old was not to be used for monitoring compliance with the Canadian federal regulation. The relatively high model specificity may help to use this model as a rule-in test (i.e., targeting positive calves for further investigation) rather than a rule-out test (due to its low sensitivity).

[Cyclorotation of the eye in wavefront-guided LASIK using a static eyetracker with iris recognition]. / Zyklorotation des Auges bei wellenfrontgeführter LASIK mit statischem Iriserkennungstracker.

PURPOSE: Centration of the ablation zone decisively influences the result of wavefront-guided LASIK. Cyclorotation of the eye occurs as the patient changes from the sitting position during aberrometry to the supine position during laser surgery and may lead to induction of lower and higher order aberrations. METHODS: Twenty patients (40 eyes) underwent wavefront-guided LASIK (B&L 217z 100 excimer laser) with a static eyetracker driven by iris recognition (mean preoperative SE: -4.72+/-1.45 D; range: -1.63 to -7.00 D). The iris patterns of the patients' eyes were memorized during aberrometry and after flap creation. RESULTS: The mean absolute value of the measured cyclorotation was -1.5+/-4.2 degrees (range: -11.0 to 6.9 degrees ). The mean cyclorotation was 3.5+/-2.7 masculine (range: 0.1 to 11.0 degrees ). In 65% of all eyes cyclorotation was >2 masculine. CONCLUSIONS: A static eyetracker driven by iris recognition demonstrated that cyclorotation of up to 11 degrees may occur in myopic and myopic astigmatic eyes when changing from a sitting to a supine position. Use of static eyetrackers with iris recognition may provide a more precise positioning of the ablation profile as they detect and compensate cyclorotation.

[Optical quality after refractive corneal surgery]. / Optische Qualität nach refraktiver Hornhautchirurgie.

Correction of myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism within its indicated margin by means of refractive corneal surgical procedures such as LASIK and surface ablation (e.g. PRK) is one of the standard procedures in ophthalmology. Now that advances in the fields of surgical techniques and the technical devices employed have further progressed in terms of safety and predictability, research also focuses on optical quality. "Optical quality" is not a clearly defined parameter, but can be captured indirectly by means of directly measured data. One has to start with the anatomical properties of the eye, which determine the optical images on the retinal level. The quality of the retinal image influences the eye's function, i.e. acuity and contrast perception. Finally, there is the subjective perception of the image we receive. "Optical quality" as such is reflected by the patient's evaluation of this image perception. Three phenomena are especially responsible for deterioration of the quality of the retinal image: diffraction, aberrations and dispersion. Some of the methods for measuring optical quality are subjective questionnaires, functional testing procedures for measuring visual acuity and contrast sensitivity, optical measuring procedures for the determination of optical quality, as well as biomicroscopy, aberrometry and corneal topography for assessing anatomical changes.

[Intraocular lenses for the correction of refraction errors. Part 1: phakic anterior chamber lenses]. / Intraokularlinsen zur Korrektur von Refraktionsfehlern. Teil I: Phake Vorderkammerlinsen.

In this overview, the current status of intraocular lens surgery to correct refractive error is reviewed. The interventions are divided into additive surgery with intraocular lens implantation without extraction of the crystalline lens (phakic intraocular lens, PIOL) or the removal of the crystalline lens with implantation of an IOL (refractive lens exchange, RLE). Phakic IOLs are constructed as angle-supported or iris-fixated anterior chamber lenses and posterior chamber lenses that are fixated in the ciliary sulcus. The implantation of phakic IOLs has been demonstrated to be an effective, safe, predictable and stable procedure to correct higher refractive errors. Complications are rare and differ for the three types of PIOL; for anterior chamber lenses these are mainly pupil ovalization and endothelial cell loss.

[LASIK using a scanning spot excimer laser for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism 3-Jahresergebnisse]. / Laser-in-situ-Keratomileusis mittels Scanning-Spot-Excimerablation zur Korrektur von Myopie und myopem Astigmatismus 3-Jahresergebnisse.

PURPOSE: The correction of refractive errors using laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) has become the primary refractive procedure worldwide. The purpose of this study was to evaluate LASIK within a retrospective cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The mean preoperative spherical equivalent for the 34 consecutively treated eyes was -6.67+/-2.69 D. The LASIK operations were performed by a Hansatome microkeratome (Bausch and Lomb) and a scanning spot excimer laser (Technolas Keracor 217, Bausch and Lomb). For pre- and postoperative analysis the Datagraph med software (Version 2.7) was used. RESULTS: None of the treated eyes lost 2 or more lines of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). At the 36-month examination the spherical equivalent had changed to -0.47 D (mean increase of myopia: 0.13 D). No long-term complications were found in the study period. CONCLUSION: LASIK with superior hinge and scanning spot excimer ablation is an effective treatment for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism in the refractive range described above.

[Laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism using a scanning spot excimer laser. Results of a prospective clinical study after 1 year]. / Laser-in-situ-Keratomileusis zur Korrektur von Hyperopie und hyperopem Astigmatismus mit Scanning-Spot-Excimer-Laser. Einjahresergebnisse einer prospektiven klinischen Studie.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, predictability, stability and complications of LASIK for the treatment of hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism using a scanning spot excimer laser. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 64 consecutive LASIK operations (37 patients, mean age 41 years, range 22-68 years) have been evaluated. The Hansatome microkeratome producing a superior hinge (flap diameter 9.5 mm) and a scanning spot excimer laser with an optical zone of 6.0 mm were used. Examinations were performed preoperatively, after 1 day, 7 days, 1 month, 4 and 12 months. RESULTS: One year after the primary procedure only 1 eye lost 2 or more lines of best-corrected visual acuity, 91% were within +/-1 line and 4 eyes gained 2 lines. Of these eyes 50 (86%) reached an uncorrected visual acuity of > or=0.5, 32 (55%) > or=0.8, 16 (28%) > or=1.0, 24 eyes (41%) needed a refractive correction of +/-0.5 D, 44 eyes (76%) of +/-1.0 D and 55 eyes (95%) of +/-2.0 D. The mean spherical equivalent after 1 year was +0.17+/-0.85 D. CONCLUSIONS: LASIK is suitable for the correction of hyperopia (up to a maximum of +5 D) and for hyperopic astigmatism (up to a maximum of -5 D). However, results were better in lower hyperopia (up to +3 D) than in the moderate hyperopia. The refractive results showed overall a good stability during the 12-month study period, but higher regression occurred in a few cases.

[Diffuse lamellar keratitis after laser in situ keratomileusis. Clinical and confocal microscopy findings]. / Diffuse lamelläre Keratitis (DLK) nach Laser-in-situ-Keratomileusis. Klinische und konfokalmikroskopische Befunde.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK) is a sterile inflammation after lamellar corneal surgery. A clinical staging for DLK was recently set up. In this observational case series, the clinical and confocal microscopic findings of stages 1-3 are reported. METHODS: Six eyes of six patients (three eyes with DLK stage 1, two eyes with DLK stage 2, and one eye with DLK stage 3) were examined by slit lamp biomicroscopy and confocal microscopy. RESULTS: In all cases, confocal microscopy showed an infiltration of inflammatory cells into the anterior stroma and the flap interface. The number of cells varied between the eyes with DLK stage 1, and both stage 2 corneas had dense infiltrates. In the eye with stage 3 DLK, an aggregation of decayed cells, most likely granulocytes, was noticed clinically and by confocal microscopy. CONCLUSIONS: The DLK stages represent different clinical intensities of interface inflammation after LASIK. While stages 1 and 2 have a similar confocal microscopic appearance, stage 3 is a result of aggregation of a high amount of inflammatory cells.