Insulin resistance, and not ß-cell impairment, mediates association between Mycobacterium tuberculosis sensitization and type II diabetes mellitus among US adults.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) may be a long-term sequela of infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) by mechanisms that remain to be fully explained. We evaluated association between M.tb sensitization and T2DM among U.S adults and, via formal mediation analysis, the extent to which this association is mediated by insulin resistance and/or ß-cell failure. These evaluations accounted for demographic, socio-economic, behavioral and clinical characteristics. T2DM was assessed by fasting plasma glucose, 2-hour oral glucose tolerance testing and HbA1c; homoeostasis model assessment 2 (HOMA2) was used to estimate ß-cell dysfunction (HOMA2-B) and insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR); while M.tb sensitization status was ascertained by tuberculin skin testing (TST). Exposure to M.tb was associated with increased risk for T2DM, likely driven by an increase in insulin resistance. Definitive prospective studies examining incident T2DM following tuberculosis are warranted. Research in Context: What is already known about this subject?: Accumulating evidence suggests that pre-diabetes and new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) may be a long-term complication of exposure to Mycobacterium tuberculosis ( M.tb ) via mechanisms that remain to be unraveled What is the key question?: To what extent do insulin resistance and ß-cell failure mediate the association between M.tb sensitization with T2DM among US adults? What are the new findings?: M.tb sensitization is characterized by distinct glucose metabolic disturbances manifesting as increased risk of T2DM and isolated impaired fasting glucose (IFG) Insulin resistance, and not ß-cell impairment, likely independently mediate the observed diabetogenic effects of M.tb sensitization How might this impact on clinical and/or public health practice in the foreseeable future?: If corroborated by prospective studies, both TB programs and individual clinical care must incorporate monitoring of serum glucose and long-term metabolic outcomesThis will be particularly urgent in sub-Saharan Africa and South-East Asia where scarce health resources coincide with overlapping endemic TB and epidemic T2DM.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: breastfeeding and the risk of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding is a modifiable factor that may influence development of inflammatory bowel diseases. However, literature on this has been inconsistent and not accounted for heterogeneity in populations and exposure. AIM: To conduct a meta-analysis to examine the association between breastfeeding in infancy and risk of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: A systematic search of Medline/PubMed and Embase was performed for full text, English-language literature through November 2016. Studies were included if they described breastfeeding in infancy in patients with CD or UC, and healthy controls. Data were pooled using a random effects model for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 35 studies were included in the final analysis, comprising 7536 individuals with CD, 7353 with UC and 330 222 controls. Ever being breastfed was associated with a lower risk of CD (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.59-0.85) and UC (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.67-0.91). While this inverse association was observed in all ethnicity groups, the magnitude of protection was significantly greater among Asians (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.20-0.48) compared to Caucasians (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.66-0.93; P = .0001) in CD. Breastfeeding duration showed a dose-dependent association, with strongest decrease in risk when breastfed for at least 12 months for CD (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.08-0.50) and UC (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.10-0.43) as compared to 3 or 6 months. CONCLUSION: Breastfeeding in infancy protects against the development of CD and ulcerative colitis.

Pulse pressure is not an independent predictor of outcome in type 2 diabetes patients with chronic kidney disease and anemia--the Trial to Reduce Cardiovascular Events with Aranesp Therapy (TREAT).

Pulse pressure (PP) remains an elusive cardiovascular risk factor with inconsistent findings. We clarified the prognostic value in patients with type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and anemia in the Trial to Reduce cardiovascular Events with Aranesp (darbepoetin alfa) Therapy. In 4038 type 2 diabetes patients, darbepoetin alfa treatment did not affect the primary outcome. Risk related to PP at randomization was evaluated in a multivariable model including age, gender, kidney function, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and other conventional risk factors. End points were myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, end stage renal disease (ESRD) and the composite of cardiovascular death, MI or hospitalization for myocardial ischemia, heart failure or stroke (CVD composite). Median (interquartile range) age, gender, eGFR and PP was 68 (60-75) years, 57.3% women, 33 (27-42) ml min(-1) per 1.73 m2 and 60 (50-74) mm Hg. During 29.1 months (median) follow-up, the number of events for composite CVD, MI, stroke and ESRD was 1010, 253, 154 and 668. In unadjusted analyses, higher quartiles of PP were associated with higher rates per 100 years of follow-up of all end points (P⩽0.04), except stroke (P=0.52). Adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) per one quartile increase in PP were 1.06 (0.99-1.26) for MI, 0.96 (0.83-1.11) for stroke, 1.01 (0.94-1.09) for ESRD and 1.01 (0.96-1.07) for CVD composite. Results were similar in continuous analyses of PP (per 10 mm Hg). In patients with type 2 diabetes, CKD and anemia, PP did not independently predict cardiovascular events or ESRD. This may reflect confounding by aggressive antihypertensive treatment, or PP may be too rough a risk marker in these high-risk patients.

Augmented cross-sectional studies with abbreviated follow-up for estimating HIV incidence.

Cross-sectional HIV incidence estimation based on a sensitive and less-sensitive test offers great advantages over the traditional cohort study. However, its use has been limited due to concerns about the false negative rate of the less-sensitive test, reflecting the phenomenon that some subjects may remain negative permanently on the less-sensitive test. Wang and Lagakos (2010, Biometrics 66, 864-874) propose an augmented cross-sectional design that provides one way to estimate the size of the infected population who remain negative permanently and subsequently incorporate this information in the cross-sectional incidence estimator. In an augmented cross-sectional study, subjects who test negative on the less-sensitive test in the cross-sectional survey are followed forward for transition into the nonrecent state, at which time they would test positive on the less-sensitive test. However, considerable uncertainty exists regarding the appropriate length of follow-up and the size of the infected population who remain nonreactive permanently to the less-sensitive test. In this article, we assess the impact of varying follow-up time on the resulting incidence estimators from an augmented cross-sectional study, evaluate the robustness of cross-sectional estimators to assumptions about the existence and the size of the subpopulation who will remain negative permanently, and propose a new estimator based on abbreviated follow-up time (AF). Compared to the original estimator from an augmented cross-sectional study, the AF estimator allows shorter follow-up time and does not require estimation of the mean window period, defined as the average time between detectability of HIV infection with the sensitive and less-sensitive tests. It is shown to perform well in a wide range of settings. We discuss when the AF estimator would be expected to perform well and offer design considerations for an augmented cross-sectional study with abbreviated follow-up.