Utility of common bile duct measurement in the diagnosis of cholecystitis and choledocholithiasis in children.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound is an integral part of evaluating for acute cholecystitis and choledocholithiasis in pediatric patients. Finding the common bile duct (CBD), a structure which is normally <4 mm in children, can be very challenging. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of isolated sonographic CBD dilation in pediatric patients with acute cholecystitis and/or choledocholithiasis without laboratory abnormalities or pathologic findings on radiology based biliary ultrasound, apart from cholelithiasis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients ≤21-years-old, at a single free-standing tertiary care children's hospital, who received a biliary ultrasound in the radiology department (RADUS) from September 2005 to February 2020. We identified patients who had a diagnosis of acute cholecystitis and/or choledocholithiasis on RADUS. Based on prior studies, a positive ultrasound was defined as having gallbladder wall thickening (GWT), pericholecystic fluid (PCF), or sonographic Murphy's sign (SMS). The final diagnosis was confirmed using the gold standard, cholecystectomy pathology diagnosis for patients with cholecystitis and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) diagnosis for patients with choledocholithiasis. Ultrasound data and contemporaneous laboratory values were collected. RESULTS: 180 patients met inclusion criteria. For the study population, 97 (53.9%) had a positive ultrasound, 127 patients (70.6%) had a dilated CBD, and 170 (94.4%) had at least one abnormal laboratory finding. Within the study population there were 76 patients (42.3%) with acute cholecystitis, 55 patients (30.5%) with choledocholithiasis, and 49 patients (27.2%) with acute cholecystitis and choledocholithiasis. Of the 127 patients with a dilated CBD, 80 (62.9%) had a normal ultrasound, apart from cholelithiasis. In this group of 80, 78 patients (97.5%) had at least one abnormal laboratory finding. Thus, for the entire study population, isolated CBD dilation without a positive ultrasound or laboratory abnormalities occurred in 2 patients (1.1%). Of note, these 2 patients had an ultrasound diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of isolated sonographic CBD dilation in pediatric patients with cholecystitis and/or choledocholithiasis was 1.1%. Thus, biliary ultrasound without CBD measurement is unlikely to result in missed cholecystitis and/or choledocholithiasis if the biliary ultrasound does not demonstrate GWT, PCF, SMS, or choledocholithiasis, and the patient has normal laboratory values.

The effect of point-of-care ultrasound on length of stay in the emergency department in children with neck swelling.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound is the imaging modality of choice in children presenting to the emergency department (ED) with soft tissue neck swelling. Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) has good accuracy when compared to comprehensive radiology department ultrasound (RADUS). POCUS could potentially improve ED length of stay (LOS) by improving efficiency. We aimed to evaluate the LOS of pediatric patients seen in ED with soft tissue neck swelling who received POCUS compared to RADUS. We determined unscheduled 30-day return visit rates in both groups as a balancing measure. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of the electronic medical record for our cross-sectional study of discharged patients ≤21 years of age who had a neck ultrasound performed by a credentialed POCUS physician or by the radiology department between July 2014 and January 2020. We included patients who had both POCUS and RADUS in the POCUS group. We compared median ED LOS in both groups using the Mann Whitney U test and proportion of unscheduled return visits to the ED in both groups using odds ratio and 95% CI. RESULTS: There were 925 patients: 76 with only POCUS, 6 with POCUS and RADUS, and 843 with only RADUS performed. Median LOS in the POCUS group was 68.5 min (IQR 38.3120.3) versus 154.0 min (IQR 111.0, 211.0) in the RADUS group (p < 0.001). Return visit overall was 7.6%: 13.2% in the POCUS group versus 7.1% in the RADUS group (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Pediatric patients evaluated in the ED for soft tissue neck swelling had a shorter LOS with POCUS than with RADUS without a statistically significant increase in 30-day return visits. We suggest a "POCUS First" approach to the care of these patients.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Confirmation of Nasogastric and Orogastric Tube Placement in Pediatric Patients.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to investigate the role of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) as an alternative imaging modality to confirm proper placement for nasogastric tubes (NGTs) and orogastric tubes (OGTs) in pediatric patients. METHODS: This was a prospective descriptive study performed at a tertiary care free-standing children's hospital. Patients 21 years and younger requiring radiographic confirmation of NGT or OGT placement were eligible for enrollment. Bedside ultrasonography examination of the epigastric area was performed by a blinded pediatric emergency medicine physician. An abdominal radiograph was obtained to confirm NGT or OGT placement in all patients. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients with a mean age of 2.6 years (standard deviation, 3.9 years) were enrolled. All 26 patients had x-ray confirmation of NGT and OGTs correctly placed in the stomach. Confirmation of NGT or OGT placement by ultrasound was obtained in 23 patients. For these 23 patients, POCUS agreed with radiographic findings. For 3 patients, the NGT and OGT was unable to be identified by ultrasound. The sensitivity of ultrasound for detecting a properly placed tube was 88% (95% confidence interval, 70.0%-97.6%). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study described ultrasound confirmation of NGT or OGT placement. If confirmed in larger studies, POCUS can be used as an objective tool for the confirmation of NGT or OGT placement in pediatric patients and limit the need for routine x-ray confirmation.

Comparison of Prehospital Calculated Age-Adjusted Pediatric Shock Index (SIPA) to Those Calculated in the ED for Identifying Trauma Patients That Needed the Highest-Level Activation Based on Consensus Criteria.

Background: The shock index (SI) is defined as the ratio of the heart rate to systolic blood pressure and a pediatric age-adjusted SI (SIPA) is more specific than the standard adult cutoff of 0.9 in identifying the sickest children presenting to a trauma center.Goal: To utilize prehospital vital signs to calculate the SIPA score and compare them to the SIPA calculated in the trauma bay to determine if they have the same validity in identifying critically ill children as determined by the consensus based standard criteria for trauma activation.Methods: Retrospective study using a cohort of patients transferred by EMS to a free standing, urban, level one, pediatric trauma center aged 1 to 16 years inclusive, and seen between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2017. Vital signs collected during the patch call from the EMS agency were used to calculate the EMS SIPA. The first set of vital signs collected in the trauma bay was used to calculate the ED SIPA. Patients were dichotomized to an elevated or non-elevated ED SIPA and an elevated or non-elevated EMS SIPA.Results: Our cohort consisted of 2651 patients. 546 (20.6%) patients had an elevated EMS SIPA and 438 (16.5%) had an elevated ED SIPA. When compared to their non-elevated counterparts, EMS and ED SIPA were both able to identify patients who met consensus criteria in all areas except the need for IR intervention, and unstable spinal fracture/spinal cord injury. For these criteria, the ED SIPA was better than the EMS SIPA. Sensitivity and specificity analysis reveal poor sensitivity for both measures but a high specificity for ED and EMS SIPA. Both SI and SIPA have a poor PPV but high NPV.Conclusions: This study utilized prehospital vital signs to calculate the SIPA score and compare them to the SIPA calculated in the trauma bay. Both scores had similar test metrics when based on the consensus based standard trauma criteria and could be utilized in the triage traumatic injuries.

Predictive value of the shock index (SI) compared to the age-adjusted pediatric shock index (SIPA) for identifying children that needed the highest-level trauma activation based on the presence of consensus criteria.

OBJECTIVES: In previous studies, SIPA was shown to be better than the SI in identifying children who have an elevated ISS, required transfusion, or were at a high risk of death. No comparison has been made to the consensus-based criteria that identify patients requiring the highest-level trauma activation. The objective of this study was to determine if the SIPA was more accurate than the SI in identifying children with increased need for trauma team activation as defined by the criterion standard definition, and secondly the sensitivity and specificity of the SI and SIPA. METHODS: Retrospective review of prospectively collected trauma based data. Children aged 1-17 years admitted to a pediatric level 1 trauma center between 1/1/16 and 12/31/17 and met the prehospital criteria for level 1 or 2 trauma activation were included. We evaluated the ability of SI > 0.9 at ED presentation and elevated SIPA to predict need for trauma activation based on consensus criteria. SIPA cutoffs were > 1.22 (age 4-6), >1.0 (age 7-12), and > 0.9 (age 13-17). RESULTS: Among 3378 children, 1486 (44%) had an elevated SI and 590 (18%) had an elevated SIPA. There were 160 (5%) patients who met at least one consensus criterion. Broadly, sensitivity and specificity analyses reveal poor sensitivity for both SI and SIPA (59.4% versus 43.1% respectively) measures but a moderate specificity for SIPA (83.8%). Both SI and SIPA have a poor PPV (6.4% versus 11.7%) but high NPV (96.6% versus 96.7%). Overall, SIPA has higher accuracy than SI in predicting consensus criteria 82% versus 57%). CONCLUSION: SIPA is more accurate than the SI in identifying children who meet a consensus criterion defining the need for highest-level trauma activation. The low PPV and sensitivity suggest that SIPA alone, while somewhat less likely to lead to overtriage than SI is not ideal for ruling in the need for level one resources as defined by the consensus criteria. Prognosis study, retrospective. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Broadly reactive pan-paramyxovirus reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and sequence analysis for the detection of Canine distemper virus in a case of canine meningoencephalitis of unknown etiology.

Despite the immunologic protection associated with routine vaccination protocols, Canine distemper virus (CDV) remains an important pathogen of dogs. Antemortem diagnosis of systemic CDV infection may be made by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and/or immunohistochemical testing for CDV antigen; central nervous system infection often requires postmortem confirmation via histopathology and immunohistochemistry. An 8-month-old intact male French Bulldog previously vaccinated for CDV presented with multifocal neurologic signs. Based on clinical and postmortem findings, the dog's disease was categorized as a meningoencephalitis of unknown etiology. Broadly reactive, pan-paramyxovirus RT-PCR using consensus-degenerate hybrid oligonucleotide primers, combined with sequence analysis, identified CDV amplicons in the dog's brain. Immunohistochemistry confirmed the presence of CDV antigens, and a specific CDV RT-PCR based on the phosphoprotein gene identified a wild-type versus vaccinal virus strain. This case illustrates the utility of broadly reactive PCR and sequence analysis for the identification of pathogens in diseases with unknown etiology.