Using implementation science to develop a familial hypercholesterolemia screening program in primary care: The CARE-FH study.

BACKGROUND: We designed the Collaborative Approach to Reach Everyone with Familial Hypercholesterolemia (CARE-FH) clinical trial to improve FH screening in primary care and facilitate guideline-based care. OBJECTIVE: The goal was to incorporate perspectives from end-users (healthcare system leaders, primary care clinicians, cardiologists, genetic counselors, nurses, and clinic staff) and improve translation of screening guidance into practice. METHODS: We partnered with end-users to sequentially define the current state of FH screening, assess acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness of implementing an FH screening program, and select clinically actionable strategies at the patient-, clinician-, and system-level to be deployed as a package in the CARE-FH clinical trial. Methods informed by implementation science and human centered design included: contextual inquiries, surveys, and deliberative engagement sessions. RESULTS: Screening for FH occurred rarely in primary care, and then only after a cardiovascular event or sometimes due to a family history of high cholesterol or early heart attack. Surveys suggested FH screening in primary care was acceptable, appropriate, and feasible. Reported and observed barriers to screening include insufficient time at patient encounters to screen, cost and convenience of testing for patients, and knowledge regarding causes of dyslipidemia. Facilitators included clear guidance on screening criteria and new therapies to treat FH. These results led to the development of multilevel strategies that were presented to end-users, modified, and then pilot tested in one primary care clinic. CONCLUSIONS: A refined implementation strategy package for FH screening was created with a goal of improving FH awareness, identification, and initiation of guideline-based care. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05284513?id=NCT05284513&rank=1 Unique Identifier: NCT05284513.

Translating Evidence-based Approaches into optimal Care for individuals at High-risk of ASCVD: Pilot testing of case-based e-learning modules and design of the TEACH-ASCVD study.

BACKGROUND: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains the leading cause of death in the United States. Case-based learning using electronic delivery of the modules can educate clinicians and improve translation of evidence-based guidelines into practice for high-risk ASCVD patients. OBJECTIVE: To develop and optimize module design, content, and usability of e-learning modules to teach clinicians evidence-based management in accordance with multi-society guidelines for high-risk ASCVD patients that will be implemented and evaluated in U.S. health systems in the TEACH-ASCVD study. METHODS: Seven e-learning modules were created by a committee of lipid experts. Focus groups were conducted with lipid experts to elicit feedback on case content followed by interviews with a target audience of clinicians to assess usability of the online module platform. Responses from both groups were evaluated, and appropriate changes were made to improve the e-learning modules. Design of the TEACH-ASCVD study is presented. RESULTS: Feedback regarding case content by lipid experts included providing more detailed patient histories, clarifying various diagnostic criteria, and emphasizing clinical best practices based on evidence-based guidelines. The target audience clinician group reported an agreeable experience with the e-learning modules but noted a discordance between the evidence-based guidelines and clinical decision-making in their own practices. Participants felt the modules would help educate clinicians in managing high-risk ASCVD patients. CONCLUSION: Clinicians must be informed of best practices as the field of lipidology continues to evolve. E-learning modules provide a concise, valuable, and accessible mechanism for educating clinicians regarding changes in the field to deliver the best patient care.

Statin Intolerance: an Overview of US and International Guidance.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review recent international and domestic definitions, considerations, and treatment algorithms for statin intolerance, and specifically, statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS). RECENT FINDINGS: Multiple organizations around the world have produced guidance documents to aid clinicians on managing statin intolerance. A common theme resides among all the guidance documents that most patients can tolerate statins. For those patients who cannot, healthcare teams need to evaluate, rechallenge, educate, and ensure adequate reduction of atherogenic lipoproteins. Statin therapy remains the cornerstone of lipid-lowering therapies to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and reduce mortality and morbidity. The common theme throughout all these guidance documents is the importance of statin therapy to reduce ASCVD and continual adherence to treatment. Because adverse events occur and inhibit patients from achieving adequate lowering of their atherogenic lipoproteins, trial and rechallenge of statin therapy, as well as addition of non-statin therapies, especially in high-risk patients, is also undisputed. The main differences stem from laboratory monitoring and the classification of the severity of the adverse effect. Future research should focus on consistently diagnosing SAMS so that these patients can be easily identified in the electronic health records.

Impact of telehealth on the current and future practice of lipidology: a scoping review.

Telehealth services have been implemented to deliver care for patients living with many chronic conditions and have expanded greatly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Little is known about the current or future impacts of telehealth on lipid management practices. The PubMed database was searched from inception to June 25, 2021, with the keywords "lipids or cholesterol" and "telehealth," which yielded 376 published articles. Telehealth was defined as a synchronous visit between a patient and clinician that replaced an in-office appointment. Studies that solely used remote monitoring, mobile health technologies, or callbacks of results, were excluded. Articles must have measured lipid values. Review articles and protocol papers were not included. After evaluation, 128 abstracts were included for full text evaluation, with 55 full-text articles eventually included. Of the articles, 29 were randomized clinical trials, 15 were pre-post evaluations, and 11 were other study designs. Telehealth had positive to neutral impacts on lipid management. Reported facilitators include easier implementation of multidisciplinary approaches to care, and utilization of patient-centered programs. Reported barriers to telehealth services include technological barriers, such as various skill levels with technology; systems barriers, such as cost and reimbursement; patient-related barriers, including patient non-adherence; and clinician-related barriers, such as difficulty standardizing care. Clinicians reported improved satisfaction among patients but had mixed feelings regarding their ability to deliver quality care. Telemedicine use to provide care for individuals with lipid conditions has expanded during the COVID-19 pandemic, but more research is needed to determine its potential as a sustainable tool for lipid management.