Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
World J Pediatr ; 8(2): 123-8, 2012 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22573422

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) may present as hematemesis, coffee-ground emesis, or melena requiring esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for diagnosis and/or therapy. Worldwide, differences exist for the etiology of UGIB reflecting geographical differences in common disease states. In the past 25 years, there have been improvements in endoscopic optics. This study was undertaken to determine: 1) if identifying a bleeding source in UGIB have improved with better endoscopic optics, 2) geographic differences in causes of UGIB, 3) differences in severity of UGIB based on clinical factors, and 4) the likelihood of finding a bleeding source based on symptom duration and time to endoscopy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was made on children having EGD for evaluation of UGIB. Data collected included type, etiology, and degree of bleeding. RESULTS: Of 2569 diagnostic procedures, 167 (6.5%) were performed for UGIB. The most common presentation was hematemesis (73.4%). Melena was associated with lower hemoglobin levels and higher transfusion rates. A source of UGIB was found in 57.0%, no cause in 11.4% and a questionable cause in 29.7%. A source was found less commonly in children with a history of UGIB less than one month and in those undergoing endoscopy over 48 hours after a bleeding episode. CONCLUSIONS: Improved endoscopic optics has not changed diagnostic ability for UGIB. Etiologic differences for UGIB in children from varying geographic areas are related to indication for endoscopy, patient selection, and co-morbid conditions. Duration of bleeding and time to endoscopy after a bleeding episode may help predict when endoscopy should be performed to determine a bleeding source.


Assuntos
Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Trato Gastrointestinal Superior , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
3.
J Pediatr Surg ; 44(3): 546-50, 2009 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19302856

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Perceptions on the role and timing of surgical intervention for high-output or massive chylothorax in small and premature babies remain varied. We reviewed our experience with this challenging group of patients to help refine our thinking and devise a more consistent strategy for management. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients in our institutions' neonatal populations diagnosed with chylothorax from June 2000 to April 2008. RESULTS: Of a total of 23 patients (birth weight, 0.54-4.5 kg; gestational age, 23-41 weeks), 17 were treated conservatively, and 6 with massive chylothorax (>50 mL/kg per day) were treated surgically. Surgical treatment varied, including en masse thoracic duct ligation, mechanical pleurodesis, and application of fibrin glue. Survival in the surgically treated group was 83% vs 59% in the conservatively treated group. Median duration of chest tube drainage was 5 days (postoperative, range, 4-16) in the surgically treated group vs 14 days (range, 1-68) in the conservatively treated group. CONCLUSION: Surgery has a definitive role in the care of small babies with massive chylothorax. Daily output exceeding 50 mL/kg per day with no or minimal response to 3 days of maximal medical therapy may indicate a potential therapeutic benefit of surgery.


Assuntos
Quilotórax/terapia , Quilotórax/cirurgia , Drenagem , Adesivo Tecidual de Fibrina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Doenças do Prematuro , Ligadura , Pleurodese , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ducto Torácico/cirurgia , Adesivos Teciduais/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA