Robustness of outcomes in trials evaluating sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors for heart failure.

AIMS: Recent trials have evaluated sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure (HF). We sought to assess the robustness of findings from these trials using the fragility index (FI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Fragility index is defined as the minimum number of patients that must be moved from the 'non-event' to the 'event' group to turn a statistically significant result to non-significant. In addition to FI, fragility quotient [(FQ); FI divided by the sample size] was calculated to assess the proportion of events that must be moved to change the significance. For statistically non-significant outcomes, reverse fragility index (RFI) and reverse fragility quotient (RFQ) were calculated. Robustness of findings after pooling data from all three trials was also assessed. A robust reduction in first HF hospitalization or cardiovascular mortality was seen with dapagliflozin (FI = 62 and FQ = 0.013), empagliflozin (FI = 50 and FQ = 0.013), and sotagliflozin (FI = 60 and FQ = 0.049). Dapagliflozin nominally improved all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, with modest FI (n = 8 and 5) and FQ (0.002 and 0.001). Empagliflozin and sotagliflozin did not demonstrate statistically significant reductions in all-cause mortality, with modest RFI (empagliflozin: RFI = 26 and RFQ = 0.007; sotagliflozin: RFI = 6 and RFQ = 0.005). A similar trend was seen with cardiovascular mortality (empagliflozin: RFI = 24 and RFQ = 0.006; sotagliflozin: RFI = 7 and RFQ = 0.006). Upon meta-analysis, the result for first HF hospitalization or cardiovascular mortality was robust (FI = 95 and FQ = 0.010). The reductions in all-cause (FI = 12 and FQ = 0.001) and cardiovascular mortality (FI = 9 and FQ = 0.001), while statistically significant, were fragile. CONCLUSION: Improvement in the composite outcome of first HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death was highly concordant and robust across sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor trials. In contrast, secondary endpoints of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were statistically fragile, underscoring the need to power trials for mortality to fully understand the benefit of therapies on fatal events.

'Time is prognosis' in heart failure: time-to-treatment initiation as a modifiable risk factor.

In heart failure (HF), acute decompensation can occur quickly and unexpectedly because of worsening of chronic HF or to new-onset HF diagnosed for the first time ('de novo'). Patients presenting with acute HF (AHF) have a poor prognosis comparable with those with acute myocardial infarction, and any delay of treatment initiation is associated with worse outcomes. Recent HF guidelines and recommendations have highlighted the importance of a timely diagnosis and immediate treatment for patients presenting with AHF to decrease disease progression and improve prognosis. However, based on the available data, there is still uncertainty regarding the optimal 'time-to-treatment' effect in AHF. Furthermore, the immediate post-worsening HF period plays an important role in clinical outcomes in HF patients after hospitalization and is known as the 'vulnerable phase' characterized by high risk of readmission and early death. Early and intensive treatment for HF patients in the 'vulnerable phase' might be associated with lower rates of early readmission and mortality. Additionally, in the chronic stable HF outpatient, treatments are often delayed or not initiated when symptoms are stable, ignoring the risk for adverse outcomes such as sudden death. Consequently, there is a dire need to better identify HF patients during hospitalization and after discharge and treating them adequately to improve their prognosis. HF is an urgent clinical scenario along all its stages and disease conditions. Therefore, time plays a significant role throughout the entire patient's journey. Therapy should be optimized as soon as possible, because this is beneficial regardless of severity or duration of HF. Time lavished before treatment initiation is recognized as important modifiable risk factor in HF.

Functional outcomes with Carillon device over 1 year in patients with functional mitral regurgitation of Grades 2+ to 4+: results from the REDUCE-FMR trial.

AIMS: The objective of this study was to compare functional outcomes through 1 year in patients with core-lab verified moderate to severe (Grades 2+ to 4+) functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) treated with the Carillon device or control in the blinded sham-controlled REDUCE-FMR (Carillon Mitral Contour System for Reducing Functional Mitral Regurgitation) study. METHODS AND RESULTS: The main outcomes of this analysis were the change in 6 min walk test (6MWT) distance, incidence of heart failure hospitalization or death, change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, and change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score through 1 year of follow-up. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was defined as a ≥30 m increase in 6MWT distance, an NYHA decrease in ≥1 class, and a ≥3 point increase in KCCQ score. The proportion of patients achieving the MCID in each treatment group was compared using Fisher's exact test, and the number needed to treat (NNT) with the Carillon device was calculated. Among 83 patients (62 Carillon and 21 sham), no statistically significant group differences were observed in the baseline characteristics. All outcomes at 1 year numerically favoured the Carillon group, including MCID for the 6MWT distance (59% vs. 23%, P = 0.029; NNT = 2.8), NYHA class (48% vs. 33%, P = 0.38; NNT = 6.9), KCCQ score (69% vs. 47%, P = 0.14; NNT = 4.5), and freedom from heart failure hospitalization or death (60% vs. 48%, P = 0.45; NNT = 8.3). CONCLUSIONS: REDUCE-FMR was the first blinded sham-controlled trial to report outcomes with percutaneous therapy for the treatment of FMR. Trends towards improvement in mean 6MWT distance, KCCQ score, and NYHA class were observed with the Carillon device. A substantially higher number of patients achieved MCID for all patient-centred outcomes with the Carillon device compared with the sham procedure.

Efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors in heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: We sought to conduct a meta-analysis regarding the safety and efficacy of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in patients with heart failure (HF). METHODS AND RESULTS: MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from their inception to November 2020 for placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials of SGLT2 inhibitors. Randomized controlled trials were selected if they reported at least one of the prespecified outcomes in patients with HF. Hazard ratios (HRs) or risk ratios and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals were pooled using a random-effects model. A total of seven trials including 16 820 HF patients (N = 8884 in the SGLT2 inhibitor arms; N = 7936 in the placebo arms) were included. In the overall HF cohort, SGLT2 inhibitors compared with placebo significantly reduced the risk of the composite endpoint of first HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death [HR: 0.77 (0.72-0.83); P < 0.001; I2 = 0%], time to first HF hospitalization [HR: 0.71 (0.64-0.78); P < 0.001; I2 = 0], cardiovascular mortality [HR: 0.87 (0.79-0.96); P = 0.005; I2 = 0%], and all-cause mortality [HR: 0.89 (0.82-0.96); P = 0.004; I2 = 0%]. Results remained consistent across HF-specific trials and according to diabetes mellitus status. A trend towards benefit was observed in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction for the composite of HF hospitalization and cardiovascular death [HR: 0.80 (0.63-1.00); P = 0.05; I2 = 29%]. No increased risk of hypovolaemia, hyperkalaemia, and hypotension was seen with SGLT2 inhibitors compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: SGLT2 inhibitors significantly improve cardiovascular outcomes including cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in patients with HF without an increased risk of serious adverse events. A trend towards benefit was observed in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction.

Individual patient data meta-analysis of the effects of the CARILLON® mitral contour system.

AIMS: Functional mitral regurgitation (MR) (FMR) is common in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and worsens morbidity and mortality, even when mild. The CARILLON® mitral contour system (Cardiac Dimensions, Kirkland, WA, USA), a mitral annuloplasty device delivered percutaneously to the coronary sinus, is designed to reduce the mitral annular dimension by virtue of the close anatomic relationship between the coronary sinus and the posterior mitral annulus. We performed a comprehensive individual patient data meta-analysis of all studies that used CARILLON® device vs. control that have measured mitral regurgitation severity, left ventricular (LV) remodelling, functional status, and heart failure-related outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and EMBASE were searched in July 2020. Primary outcomes of interest were measures of MR severity, LV remodelling, New York Heart Association functional class and heart failure-related outcomes [mortality and heart failure hospitalization (HFH) during follow up]. All data were received as individual patient and individual time point data-points. Mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for continuous data using a fixed-effects model. Three studies (REDUCE FMR, TITAN and TITAN II) enrolling 209 participants were identified and included. Pooled analysis showed that, compared with control, CARILLON® device significantly improved both MR volume (mean difference MD -9.20, 95% C.I. -16.11 to -2.29 mL, P = 0.009) and MR grade (MD -1.12, 95% CI -1.36 to -0.88, P < 0.00001) and this was associated with a significant reduction in LA volume, MD -7.54 mL, 95% CI -14.90 to - 0.18, P = 0.04. Significant LV reverse remodelling was also seen in terms of EDV (MD -16.53, 95% CI -28.61 to -44.4 mL, P = 0.007), and a trend in ESV (MD -8.68, 95% CI -18.69 to -1.34 mL, P = 0.09) but no significant effect on LVEF (MD 0.88, 95% CI -1.52% to 2.38%, P = 0.47), due presumably to the greater residual MR in the control patients falsely elevating the LVEF. In addition, the CARILLON® device significantly improved New York Heart Association functional Class (MD -0.22, 95% CI -0.24 to -0.16, P < 0.00001), associated with a lower rate of HFH compared with controls (45.3% vs. 64%, respectively, P = 0.04). As a sensitivity analysis we also restricted the analyses to those patients with Class 3+/4+ MR at baseline. In this cohort, the echocardiographic results were similar, and the reduction in HFH rates was even more marked (43.9% vs. 82.9%, respectively, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive meta-analysis of individual patient data has shown that CARILLON® device provides statistically significant and clinically meaningful benefits on MR severity, LA and LV volumes, and remodelling and rates of subsequent heart failure hospitalization.

Ageing, demographics, and heart failure.

Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome resulting from structural or functional cardiac disorders. In the developed world, HF is primarily a disorder of the elderly. It is one that is accompanied by many non-cardiac comorbidities that affect treatments given, the patient's response and treatment tolerance and outcomes. Even the pathophysiological mechanisms of HF change as we look at older patient populations. Younger HF patients typically have ischaemic heart disease and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), whereas older patients have more hypertension HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The prevalence of HF has progressively increased for many years and rises even more steeply with age. The outcomes of older especially HFpEF patients have not progressed as much younger HFrEF cohorts. We need more studies specifically recruiting older HF patients with more comorbidities, to guide real-world practice, and we need more assessment of patient-reported outcomes and quality of life rather than just mortality effects. The management of elderly patients with HF requires a more holistic approach recognizing individual needs and necessary support mechanisms and our future trials need to guide us more in achieving these gains.

Heart failure management of the elderly patient: focus on frailty, sarcopaenia, cachexia, and dementia: conclusions.

With the ageing of populations heart failure is becoming more common and more complex. It is affecting ever older patients and the number of prevalent comorbidities is rising. Even as we continue to gain success in large-scale clinical trials with more effective therapies so our patients are becoming more complex. One of the biggest challenges is the effect of age. Frailty, comorbidity, sarcopaenia, cachexia, polypharmacy, and cognitive decline are all challenging our patients as never before and these challenges will be difficult for cash strapped health care systems to manage. For these reasons, the Heart Failure Association brought together a panel of experts to debate and review this complex area, championing the need for us to establish better ways of caring for the patients of the future.

Monitoring for sleep-disordered breathing in heart failure.

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is extremely common in heart failure (HF) and it carries with it adverse symptoms and impaired survival. Sleep-disordered breathing has two main types; obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and central sleep apnoea (CSA), which can overlap. The differentiation between CSA and OSA is important and is recommended in recent HF guidelines, by recommending a formal sleep study. The reason is that for OSA the main therapy is a positive pressure airway mask, whereas for patients with HFrEF and CSA this mask therapy actually increases cardiovascular mortality, and therefore alternative therapies are required, such as implantable phrenic nerve stimulation to improve sleep and related daytime symptoms attributable to the CSA. This article discusses the detection, screening, and monitoring of SDB in HF patients.

Benefits and limitations of implementing Chronic Care Model (CCM) in primary care programs: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Chronic Care Model (CCM) has been developed to improve patients' health care by restructuring health systems in a multidimensional manner. This systematic review aims to summarize and analyse programs specifically designed and conducted for the fulfilment of multiple CCM components. We have focused on programs targeting diabetes mellitus, hypertension and cardiovascular disease. METHOD AND RESULTS: This review was based on a comprehensive literature search of articles in the PubMed database that reported clinical outcomes. We included a total of 25 eligible articles. Evidence of improvement in medical outcomes and the compliance of patients with medical treatment were reported in 18 and 14 studies, respectively. Two studies demonstrated a reduction of the medical burden in terms of health service utilization, and another two studies reported the effectiveness of the programs in reducing the risk of heart failure and other cardiovascular diseases. However, CCMs were still restricted by limited academic robustness and social constraints when they were implemented in primary care. Higher professional recognition, tighter system collaborations and increased financial support may be necessary to overcome the limitations of, and barriers to CCM implementation. CONCLUSION: This review has identified the benefits of implementing CCM, and recommended suggestions for the future development of CCM.

Physical function and exercise training in older patients with heart failure.

Heart failure (HF) is a common end point for numerous cardiovascular conditions, including coronary artery disease, valvular disease, and hypertension. HF predominantly affects older individuals (aged ≥70 years), particularly those living in developed countries. The pathophysiological sequelae of HF progression have a substantial negative effect on physical function. Diminished physical function in older patients with HF, which is the result of combined disease-related and age-related effects, has important implications on health. A large body of research spanning several decades has demonstrated the safety and efficacy of regular physical activity in improving outcomes among the HF population, regardless of age, sex, or ethnicity. However, patients with HF, especially those who are older, are less likely to engage in regular exercise training compared with the general population. To improve initiation of regular exercise training and subsequent long-term compliance, there is a need to rethink the dialogue between clinicians and patients. This Review discusses the need to improve physical function and exercise habits in patients with HF, focusing on the older population.

Measuring therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of central sleep apnoea in patients with heart failure.

The goal of treating sleep disordered breathing (SDB) has traditionally focused on improving daytime sleepiness and fatigue. In heart failure (HF) patients with SDB, this is not as easy to ascertain as their symptoms overlap with HF. Thus, improvement in treating SDB in HF patients must focus more on overall quality of life. Over the past 5 years, there has been a shift in sleep medicine from only improving symptoms in SDB, to preventing the long term consequences. The specialist Heart Failure community is, however, desirous of also seeing benefit in reduction of major clinical events for their patients with interventions, such as effects on mortality or re-hospitalisation rates and so may wish to see other benefits beyond a reduction in sleep apnea events before either commencing therapy or referring their patients for sleep study evaluation and further management. To expect lower mortality as well may be asking for too much. Consequently, success in the treatment in SDB should focus on three items: 1) proof that the underlying disease is treated, 2) symptomatic benefit and 3) demonstration that the pathological consequences are prevented. These benefits must then be balanced with a strong safety profile. Here we evaluate a variety of end-points of value to our CSA patients, in an effort to see what may reasonably be required for treating physicians to recommend an intervention for their CHF patients with CSA by looking at candidate measures of treatment success in CSA within a heart failure population.

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

The role of spironolactone and eplerenone in patients with Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) is not well defined. Since a growing medical literature has suggested that mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists may be beneficial for patients with HFpEF, this review gives an in-depth update on the role of spironolactone and eplerenone and their implications for therapy in the setting of HFpEF. Eleven clinical studies, including seven randomized trials, were reviewed. Two randomized controlled trials evaluated the effect of eplerenone on different end-points, including 6 minute walk distance (6 MWD), cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal reinfarction, hospitalization for unstable angina and congestive heart failure. Eplerenone did not affect either 6 MWD or event-free survival rates in the overall study population in these two reports. The effects of spironolactone on similar composite endpoints were evaluated in 7 studies in patients with HFpEF. Compared to placebo, hospitalization for heart failure was significantly lower in the spironolactone group and spironolactone was also shown to improve diastolic function and induced beneficial remodeling through a reduction in myocardial fibrosis. The safety profile of spironolactone and eplerenone has been assessed in two recent studies. Data showed that eplerenone and spironolactone are both associated with the occurrence of gynecomastia, mastodynia, and abnormal vaginal bleeding and in addition, they can increase natriuresis and cause renal retention of potassium; furthermore, eplerenone may cause hyperkalemia and promote the onset of metabolic acidosis or hyponatremia. In conclusion although the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists eplerenone and spironolactone improve clinical outcomes in patients with HFrEF, additional data will be necessary to better define their risk-benefit profile, especially for eplerenone, in the treatment of HFpEF.