Current Practice and Variation in Same-Day Services in Breast Imaging: A Multi-Institutional National Survey of the Society of Breast Imaging Membership.

OBJECTIVE: The availability of same-day services in breast imaging is an important topic given potential advantages for timely diagnoses and patient experiences, but there are potential barriers that lead facilities to not offer these services. We sought to understand current practice patterns and radiologist perspectives on offering same-day services. METHODS: The Society of Breast Imaging (SBI) Patient Care & Delivery Committee developed a 19-question survey that was emailed to all 3449 active members of the SBI in May 2023. An exemption from the institutional review board was obtained at the lead author's institution. The survey consisted of 19 questions that were designed to understand the scope, perceptions, barriers, and logistics of same-day services. Comparisons were made between responses for offering same-day services (screening interpretation, diagnostic examinations, biopsies) and respondent demographics. RESULTS: A total of 437 American and Canadian members participated, yielding a response rate of 12.7%. Respondents were most commonly in private practice (43.0%, 188/437), working in an outpatient medical center-based clinic (41.9%, 183/437), and without trainees (64.5%, 282/437). Respondents estimated 12.1% of screening examinations were interpreted while patients waited, which was significantly more common in free-standing breast imaging clinics (P = .028) and practices without trainees (P = .036). Respondents estimated 15.0% of diagnostic examinations were performed same day, which was more common in academic and private practices (P = .03) and practices without trainees (P = .01). Respondents estimated 11.5% of biopsies were performed the same day as the recommendation, which had no association with practice type/context, presence of trainees, number of mammography units, number of radiologists, or number of technologists. Long patient travel distance and limited patient mobility were the most cited reasons for offering patients same-day services. CONCLUSION: Offering same-day breast imaging services varies among institutions and may be influenced by factors such as practice context and type and the presence of trainees.

Breast Radiologists' Perceptions on the Detection and Management of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma: Most Agree Imaging Beyond Mammography Is Warranted.

OBJECTIVE: To determine breast radiologists' confidence in detecting invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) on mammography and the perceived need for additional imaging in screening and preoperative settings. METHODS: A 16-item anonymized survey was developed, and IRB exemption obtained, by the Society of Breast Imaging (SBI) Patient Care and Delivery Committee and the Lobular Breast Cancer Alliance. The survey was emailed to 2946 radiologist SBI members on February 15, 2023. The survey recorded demographics, perceived modality-specific sensitivity for ILC to the nearest decile, and opinions on diagnosing ILC in screening and staging imaging. Five-point Likert scales were used (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree). RESULTS: Response rate was 12.4% (366/2946). Perceived median (interquartile range) modality-specific sensitivities for ILC were MRI 90% (80-90), contrast-enhanced mammography 80% (70-90), molecular breast imaging 80% (60-90), digital breast tomosynthesis 70% (60-80), US 60% (50-80), and 2D mammography 50% (30-60). Only 25% (85/340) respondents were confident in detecting ILC on screening mammography in dense breasts, while 67% (229/343) were confident if breasts were nondense. Most agreed that supplemental screening is needed to detect ILC in women with dense breasts (272/344, 79%) or a personal history of ILC (248/341, 73%), with 34% (118/334) indicating that supplemental screening would also benefit women with nondense breasts. Most agreed that additional imaging is needed to evaluate extent of disease in women with newly diagnosed ILC, regardless of breast density (dense 320/329, 97%; nondense 263/329, 80%). CONCLUSION: Most breast radiologists felt that additional imaging beyond mammography is needed to more confidently screen for and stage ILC.

Artificial Intelligence Decision Support for Triple-Negative Breast Cancers on Ultrasound.

OBJECTIVE: To assess performance of an artificial intelligence (AI) decision support software in assessing and recommending biopsy of triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) on US. METHODS: Retrospective institutional review board-approved review identified patients diagnosed with TNBC after US-guided biopsy between 2009 and 2019. Artificial intelligence output for TNBCs on diagnostic US included lesion features (shape, orientation) and likelihood of malignancy category (benign, probably benign, suspicious, and probably malignant). Artificial intelligence true positive was defined as suspicious or probably malignant and AI false negative (FN) as benign or probably benign. Artificial intelligence and radiologist lesion feature agreement, AI and radiologist sensitivity and FN rate (FNR), and features associated with AI FNs were determined using Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Fisher's exact test, chi-square test of independence, and kappa statistics. RESULTS: The study included 332 patients with 345 TNBCs. Artificial intelligence and radiologists demonstrated moderate agreement for lesion shape and orientation (k = 0.48 and k = 0.47, each P <.001). On the set of examinations using 6 earlier diagnostic US, radiologists recommended biopsy of 339/345 lesions (sensitivity 98.3%, FNR 1.7%), and AI recommended biopsy of 333/345 lesions (sensitivity 96.5%, FNR 3.5%), including 6/6 radiologist FNs. On the set of examinations using immediate prebiopsy diagnostic US, AI recommended biopsy of 331/345 lesions (sensitivity 95.9%, FNR 4.1%). Artificial intelligence FNs were more frequently oval (q < 0.001), parallel (q < 0.001), circumscribed (q = 0.04), and complex cystic and solid (q = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Artificial intelligence accurately recommended biopsies for 96% to 97% of TNBCs on US and may assist radiologists in classifying these lesions, which often demonstrate benign sonographic features.

Revisiting Screening in Women With a Family History of Breast Cancer.

Women with a family history (FH) of breast cancer and without known genetic susceptibility represent a unique population whose lifetime probability of developing breast cancer varies widely depending on familial factors, breast density, and the risk assessment tool used. Recently updated guidelines from the American College of Radiology recommend supplemental annual screening with contrast-enhanced MRI or contrast-enhanced mammography for women with an FH who are high risk (≥20% lifetime risk) or have dense breasts. To date, most screening studies addressing outcomes in women with FH have largely included those also with confirmed or suspected gene mutations, in whom the lifetime risk is highest, with limited data for women at average to intermediate risk who are not known to be genetically susceptible and may not benefit as much from the same screening approaches. Further research focusing specifically on women with FH as the only breast cancer risk factor is warranted to refine risk assessment and optimize a multimodality personalized screening approach.

Short-term follow-up of contrast-enhanced mammography lesions after negative breast MRI in women with elevated breast cancer risk.

PURPOSE: To determine the outcome of enhancing lesions detected on contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) that had no correlate on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and underwent short-term follow-up CEM. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center study, we identified patients with elevated breast cancer risk who had a CEM between 2014 and 2021 showing indeterminate enhancement on recombined images (BI-RADS 0, 3, 4) that had no correlate on subsequent MRI (performed within one month), and therefore underwent short-term follow-up CEM (performed within eight months). Medical records and imaging studies were reviewed to collect data on patient and lesion characteristics, and outcomes. Cancer incidence with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. RESULTS: This study included 71 women (median age 49 years) with 81 enhancing CEM lesions who underwent short-term follow-up CEM (median 6.2 months) after MRI reported no correlate. Of 81 lesions (median size = 0.7 cm), 73 (90%) were non-mass enhancement and 8 (10%) were enhancing masses. No sonographic correlate was identified for 75 lesions that had a same-day targeted ultrasound. Two cancers (2.5%, 95% CI 0.3-8.6) were diagnosed during the short-term follow-up period, one at 6-months (invasive ductal carcinoma) and one at 12-months (ductal carcinoma in situ). The remaining 79 lesions were benign at 6-month follow-up CEM and at one-year mammographic follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Follow-up CEM of MRI-occult lesions is prudent and may be reasonable to perform at one-year given the low incidence of cancer detected at six-months (one of 81) in our small study sample.

A role for breast ultrasound Artificial Intelligence decision support in the evaluation of small invasive lobular carcinomas.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) decision support (DS) system in the ultrasound (US) assessment of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast, a cancer that can demonstrate variable appearance and present insidiously. METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of 75 patients with 83 ILC diagnosed by core biopsy or surgery between November 2017 and November 2019. ILC characteristics (size, shape, echogenicity) were recorded. AI DS output (lesion characteristics, likelihood of malignancy) was compared to radiologist assessment. RESULTS: The AI DS system interpreted 100% of ILCs as suspicious or probably malignant (100% sensitivity, and 0% false negative rate). 99% (82/83) of detected ILCs were initially recommended for biopsy by the interpreting breast radiologist, and 100% (83/83) were recommended for biopsy after one additional ILC was identified on same-day repeat diagnostic ultrasound. For lesions in which the AI DS output was probably malignant, but assigned a BI-RADS 4 assessment by the radiologist, the median lesion size was 1 cm, compared with a median lesion size of 1.4 cm for those given a BI-RADS 5 assessment (p = 0.006). These results suggest that AI may offer more useful DS in smaller sub-centimeter lesions in which shape, margin status, or vascularity is more difficult to discern. Only 20% of patients with ILC were assigned a BI-RADS 5 assessment by the radiologist. CONCLUSION: The AI DS accurately characterized 100% of detected ILC lesions as suspicious or probably malignant. AI DS may be helpful in increasing radiologist confidence when assessing ILC on ultrasound.

Contrast-enhanced mammography in breast cancer screening.

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is a promising vascular-based breast imaging technique with high diagnostic performance in detecting breast cancer. Dual-energy acquisition using low and high energy x-ray spectra following intravenous iodinated contrast injection provides both anatomic and functional information in the same examination. The low-energy images are equivalent to standard digital mammography and the post-processed recombined images depict enhancement analogous to contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thus, CEM has the potential to detect abnormal morphologic features as well as neovascularity associated with breast cancer. Since its emergence in 2011, CEM has consistently demonstrated superior performance compared with standard mammography and mammography plus ultrasound, particularly in women with dense breasts, with high sensitivity approaching that of MRI, supporting its use as a cost-effective diagnostic and screening tool. CEM has been primarily used in the diagnostic setting to evaluate patients with screening abnormalities or with symptomatic breasts, to perform preoperative staging of newly diagnosed breast cancer, and to evaluate response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. More recently, CEM has been performed to screen women who have an intermediate to high lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. In addition to its high diagnostic performance, CEM is less expensive and more accessible than MRI and potentially better tolerated by patients. Minor drawbacks to CEM include a slightly increased radiation dose compared with standard mammography and a low risk for contrast allergy reaction. The aim of this study is to review the background, current literature, and future applications of CEM in breast cancer screening.

Bone Lesions Detected on Breast MRI: Clinical Outcomes and Features Associated with Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Objective: To determine prevalence and frequency of malignancy among bone lesions detected on breast MRI and to identify clinical and imaging features associated with bone metastases from breast cancer (BC), as bone lesions are suboptimally evaluated on breast imaging protocols and can present a diagnostic challenge. Methods: This IRB-approved retrospective review of breast MRIs performed from June 2009 to June 2018 identified patients with bone lesions. Demographic, clinical, and MRI features were reviewed. Clinical outcome of bone lesions was determined based on pathology and/or additional diagnostic imaging. All benign lesions had ≥ 2 years of imaging follow-up. Statistics were computed with Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Results: Among all patients with breast MRI, 1.2% (340/29 461) had bone lesions. Of these, 224 were confirmed benign or metastatic BC by pathology or imaging follow-up, with 70.1% (157/224) be- nign and 29.9% (67/224) metastatic. Bone metastases were associated with BC history (P < 0.001), with metastases occurring in 58.2% (53/91) of patients with current BC, 17.9% (14/78) patients with prior BC, and 0.0% (0/55) without BC. Bone metastases were associated with invasive and ad- vanced stage BC and, on MRI, with location in sternum, ribs, or clavicles, larger size, multiplicity, andT1 hypointensity (all P < 0.01 in tests of overall association). Conclusion: Of clinically confirmed breast MRI-detected bone lesions, 30% were bone metastases; all were detected in patients with current or prior BC. Metastases were associated with advanced stage, invasive carcinoma, larger lesion size, multiplicity, low T1 signal, and non-spine location.

Morphologic subtypes of lobular carcinoma in situ diagnosed on core needle biopsy: clinicopathologic features and findings at follow-up excision.

Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is currently classified as classic (CLCIS), florid (FLCIS), and pleomorphic (PLCIS). Given the rarity of FLCIS and PLCIS, information on their clinico-pathologic features and biologic potential remains limited. We evaluated the upgrade rates at excision of FLCIS and PLCIS diagnosed on inhouse core needle biopsy (CNB) and their clinical presentation and follow-up. Over a period of 11 and a half years, there were a total of 36 inhouse CNBs with pure PLCIS (n = 8), FLCIS (n = 24), or LCIS with pleomorphic features (LCIS-PF) (n = 4). The upgrade rates to invasive carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were 25% for PLCIS (2/8), 17% for FLCIS (4/24), and 0% for LCIS-PF (0/4). The overall upgrade rate of PLCIS and FLCIS combined was 19% (6/32). All but one case (not upgraded at excision) were radiologic-pathologic concordant. Apocrine features, previously reported only in PLCIS, were also noted in FLCIS. HER2 overexpression was seen in 13% of cases. This study highlights the more aggressive biologic features of PLCIS and FLCIS compared to CLCIS and supports surgical management for these lesions.

Utility of Targeted Ultrasound to Predict Malignancy Among Lesions Detected on Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography.

BACKGROUND. Targeted ultrasound (US) can be performed to characterize and potentially biopsy areas of enhancement detected on contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM). OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of targeted US in predicting malignancy of lesions with indeterminate or suspicious enhancement on CEM. METHODS. One thousand consecutive CEM examinations with same-day targeted breast US at one institution between October 2013 and May 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients with indeterminate or suspicious enhancement detected on CEM that underwent US evaluation were included. Patients with palpable or symptomatic lesions, those with suspicious findings on low-energy mammograms or images obtained with another modality, and those with less than 1 year of follow-up were excluded. Medical records, imaging, and pathology data were reviewed. Histopathologic analysis was used as the reference standard for biopsied lesions, and follow-up imaging was used for unbiopsied lesions. Associations between pathologic diagnosis, presence of a US correlate, and lesion characteristics were assessed by Fisher exact, chi-square, and Wilcox-on rank sum tests. RESULTS. Among 153 enhancing lesions detected on CEM in 144 patients, 47 (31%) had a US correlate. The frequency of a correlate between CEM and US was significantly higher among enhancing masses (28/43 [65%]) than among lesions exhibiting nonmass enhancement (19/110 [17%]) (p < .001). The likelihood of malignancy was significantly greater among lesions with a US correlate (12/47 [26%]) than among those without a US correlate (11/106 [10%]) (p = .03), and among mass lesions (11/43 [26%]) than among nonmass lesions (12/110 [11%]) (p = .04). The PPV of US-guided biopsy after CEM-directed US was 32%. CONCLUSION. Enhancing CEM-detected lesions that have a US correlate are more likely to be malignant and can be evaluated with US-guided biopsy to obviate additional breast MRI. CLINICAL IMPACT. CEM-directed US of enhancing lesions is useful given that lesions with a US correlate are more likely to be malignant and can be used as targets for US-guided biopsy until a CEM biopsy system becomes commercially available.

The Impact of Patient-Initiated Subspecialty Review on Patient Care.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of subspecialty review of breast imaging on patients without a diagnosis of breast cancer who self-referred for a second opinion. METHODS: Institutional review board-approved retrospective review was performed of 415 breast imaging studies submitted to our cancer center for second-opinion review by 245 patients in 2014, excluding cases without follow-up or change in original BI-RADS 0 assessment. One hundred forty-seven patients with 176 lesions were included. Original and second-opinion interpretations and recommendations were compared with histopathology or follow-up imaging. RESULTS: Ninety-six of 176 (55%) lesions were reported as suspicious in the original interpretation. Second-opinion review was discordant with the original interpretation in 82 of 176 (47%) lesions. Second-opinion review downgraded 24 of 96 (25%) lesions originally reported as suspicious to benign or probably benign, averting biopsy of these lesions. Second-opinion review upgraded 31 of 80 (39%) lesions originally reported as benign or probably benign to suspicious. A total of 87 lesions were biopsied yielding malignancy in 23 (26%) biopsies. Twenty-eight of 87 (32%) biopsies performed were recommended after second-opinion review, with 8 of 28 (29%) of these biopsies yielding cancer. Eight of 23 (35%) cancers detected represented malignancy not initially detected in the original interpretation. CONCLUSION: Second-opinion review is valuable in patients pursuing a breast imaging specialist's opinion, even before they are diagnosed with breast cancer. Second-opinion review disagreed with the original interpretation for 47% of lesions, averted 25% of originally recommended biopsies, and detected cancer in 29% of additional biopsies recommended. Thirty-five percent of cancers diagnosed after second-opinion review were not initially detected in the original interpretation.

Second-Opinion Review of Breast Imaging at a Cancer Center: Is It Worthwhile?

OBJECTIVE: Second-opinion review of breast imaging studies can be a time-consuming and labor-intensive process. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether reinterpretation of studies obtained at institutions outside a cancer center influences clinical management, specifically by revealing additional cancer and preventing unnecessary biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review was conducted of breast imaging studies of 200 patients who underwent ultrasound and MRI at community facilities and had the images submitted for second opinions at a cancer center between January and April 2014. Each case was evaluated for concordance between the original report and the second-opinion interpretation. Second-opinion review resulting in the recommendation and performance of new biopsies was further subdivided into benign, high-risk, and malignant categories based on the histopathologic results obtained at the cancer center. RESULTS: Second-opinion review of the 200 cases showed a change in interpretation in 55 cases (28%; 95% CI, 21-34%). Overall, 26 recommendations (13%; 95% CI, 9-18%) led to a major change in management. Twenty new biopsies were performed, yielding 10 malignancies (5%; 95% CI, 2-9%) and four high-risk lesions (2%; 95% CI, 1-5%). Surgical management was changed to mastectomy for 6 of 10 patients (60%) with new sites of biopsy-proven malignancy. Eight biopsies were averted (4%; 95% CI, 2-8%) on the basis of benign interpretation of the imaging findings, and no disease was found at 1-year follow-up evaluation. CONCLUSION: Reinterpretation of studies obtained outside a cancer center resulted in a change in interpretation in more than one-fourth of submitted studies. Additional cancer was detected in 5% of patients, and biopsy was averted for 4%. The practice of second-opinion review influences clinical management and adds value to patient care.

Schistosoma haematobium Infection That Mimics Bladder Cancer in a 66-Year-Old Ethnic Egyptian Man.

PATIENT: 66-year-old ethnic Egyptian man. CHIEF COMPLAINT: Hematuria. HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: The patient had a history of multiple episodes of gross hematuria for the past 5 years. Because the hematuria usually resolved on its own, he did not seek medical attention during that time. Bladder cancer was suspected. PAST MEDICAL HISTORY: The patient had a history of coronary artery disease, hypertension, nephrolithiasis, congestive heart failure, lifelong smoking, and ischemic cardiomyopathy. He has been taking the anticoagulants clopidogrel (Plavix) and warfarin (Coumadin). RESIDENCY HISTORY: The patient is originally from Egypt and has been living in the United States for the past 10 years. PRINCIPAL LABORATORY FINDINGS: A complete blood count showed a hemoglobin of 13.0 g per dL (reference range, 14.0 to 18.0 g per dL), hematocrit 40% (40% to 54%), red blood cell count (RBC) 4.65 × 10(9) per L (4.60 to 6.00), and platelet count 179 × 10(9) per L (150 to 450). The urinalysis results showed 3+ protein, 4+ blood, and urine RBC of greater than 100 per high power field (hpf). The urinalysis results did not indicate the presence of parasitic ova or adult parasites. Based on these results, the physician ordered cystoscopic testing, suspecting bladder cancer. Analysis of the bladder tissue showed inflammation (Image 1) and several ova that were consistent with developing Schistosoma (Image 2). Many of the ova were calcified and surrounded by severely inflamed tissue (Image 3).

Temporal bone imaging.

Temporal bone imaging is performed for a variety of clinical conditions addressed in the outpatient and acute care setting ranging from hearing loss to trauma. Recent advances in magnetic resonance technology have enhanced the assessment of fine anatomic temporal bone detail and improved the diagnostic sensitivity for important pathology. For example, non-echo planar diffusion weighted imaging increases detection rate and diagnostic confidence of recurrent cholesteatoma. This chapter will focus on relevant temporal bone clinical entities and new MR developments that have come into clinical practice.