A systems approach reveals species differences in hepatic stress response capacity.

To minimize the occurrence of unexpected toxicities in early phase preclinical studies of new drugs, it is vital to understand fundamental similarities and differences between preclinical species and humans. Species differences in sensitivity to acetaminophen (APAP) liver injury have been related to differences in the fraction of the drug that is bioactivated to the reactive metabolite N-acetyl-p-benzoquinoneimine (NAPQI). We have used physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling to identify oral doses of APAP (300 and 1000 mg/kg in mice and rats, respectively) yielding similar hepatic burdens of NAPQI to enable the comparison of temporal liver tissue responses under conditions of equivalent chemical insult. Despite pharmacokinetic and biochemical verification of the equivalent NAPQI insult, serum biomarker and tissue histopathology analyses revealed that mice still exhibited a greater degree of liver injury than rats. Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses highlighted the stronger activation of stress response pathways (including the Nrf2 oxidative stress response and autophagy) in the livers of rats, indicative of a more robust transcriptional adaptation to the equivalent insult. Components of these pathways were also found to be expressed at a higher basal level in the livers of rats compared with both mice and humans. Our findings exemplify a systems approach to understanding differential species sensitivity to hepatotoxicity. Multiomics analysis indicated that rats possess a greater basal and adaptive capacity for hepatic stress responses than mice and humans, with important implications for species selection and human translation in the safety testing of new drug candidates associated with reactive metabolite formation.

Mechanistic in vitro studies indicate that the clinical drug-drug interactions between protease inhibitors and rosuvastatin are driven by inhibition of intestinal BCRP and hepatic OATP1B1 with minimal contribution from OATP1B3, NTCP and OAT3.

Previous use of a mechanistic static model to accurately quantify the increased rosuvastatin exposure due to drug-drug interaction (DDI) with coadministered atazanavir underpredicted the magnitude of area under the plasma concentration-time curve ratio (AUCR) based on inhibition of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) and organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1. To reconcile the disconnect between predicted and clinical AUCR, atazanavir and other protease inhibitors (darunavir, lopinavir and ritonavir) were evaluated as inhibitors of BCRP, OATP1B1, OATP1B3, sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP) and organic anion transporter (OAT) 3. None of the drugs inhibited OAT3, nor did darunavir and ritonavir inhibit OATP1B3 or NTCP. All drugs inhibited BCRP-mediated estrone 3-sulfate transport or OATP1B1-mediated estradiol 17ß-D-glucuronide transport with the same rank order of inhibitory potency (lopinavir>ritonavir>atazanavir>>darunavir) and mean IC50 values ranging from 15.5 ± 2.80 µM to 143 ± 14.7 µM or 0.220 ± 0.0655 µM to 9.53 ± 2.50 µM, respectively. Atazanavir and lopinavir also inhibited OATP1B3- or NTCP-mediated transport with a mean IC50 of 1.86 ± 0.500 µM or 65.6 ± 10.7 µM and 5.04 ± 0.0950 µM or 20.3 ± 2.13 µM, respectively. Following integration of a combined hepatic transport component into the previous mechanistic static model using the in vitro inhibitory kinetic parameters determined above for atazanavir, the newly predicted rosuvastatin AUCR reconciled with the clinically observed AUCR confirming additional minor involvement of OATP1B3 and NTCP inhibition in its DDI. The predictions for the other protease inhibitors confirmed inhibition of intestinal BCRP and hepatic OATP1B1 as the principal pathways involved in their clinical DDI with rosuvastatin.