RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Patients with spina bifida (SB) were historically followed by pediatric providers throughout their entire lives. Through medical and surgical advancements, now more pediatric SB patients are living well into adulthood. Nonetheless, many patients fail to successfully transition to appropriate adult healthcare providers. The goal of this study was to identify factors that helped facilitate or hinder the successful transition of adolescent and young adult (AYA) SB patients to adult providers. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted exploring the transition care of SB patients using the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. Titles and abstracts from articles identified were read and selected for full-text review. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were reviewed in full and analyzed for study design, populations, interventions, and factors influencing transition. RESULTS: The primary search identified 2050 articles, of which 20 were included in the final review. Thirteen studies discussed factors relating to neurosurgical care, 8 referenced gastrointestinal and genitourinary considerations, 11 examined cognitive and psychosocial factors, and 17 explored healthcare system factors. Several barriers were consistently reported regarding communication, patient and parental attitudes and perceptions, and failure to embrace formalized and transparent protocols. Conflicting results were reported regarding the influence medical comorbidities had on a patient's ability to transition. CONCLUSIONS: The process of transitioning AYA SB patients to adult care is complex, involving an interplay of structural and psychosocial factors. The findings in this review suggest that some barriers can be alleviated with improved education, planning, and awareness of factors that influence transition care.
Assuntos
Disrafismo Espinal , Transição para Assistência do Adulto , Humanos , Disrafismo Espinal/terapia , Disrafismo Espinal/psicologia , Transição para Assistência do Adulto/tendências , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , AdultoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of epidural spinal injections (ESIs) on postoperative surgical complications. METHODS: This retrospective all-payer database analysis identified 202,181 adult patients undergoing one- to three-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) from 2010 to 2020. A 1:1 exact matching on comorbidities and demographics was performed, creating 2 cohorts: 1) patients who received an ESI within 90 days of surgery and 2) patients who did not receive an ESI. The primary outcome was surgical complication rates between groups at 30 days postoperatively. For the secondary outcome, patients were stratified based on injection time before surgery: 1-30, 31-45, 46-60, 61-75, and 76-90 days. Logistic regression was performed between groups to identify temporal associations of complication rates. The P value was set to 0.05 for the primary analysis, and the Bonferroni correction was utilized for the secondary outcome. RESULTS: Exact matching produced 12,491 pairs for analysis. Groups were well-matched on demographics, comorbidities, and fusion levels. The 30-day postoperative rates of surgical complications, hematomas, wound disruptions, or surgical site infections did not differ between groups (P > 0.05). The rate of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak was increased in the ESI group (0.19% vs. 0.09%, P = 0.042). When temporally stratified, patients receiving an ESI within 30 days had significantly higher odds of CSF leak (odds ratio: 4.24, 95% confidence interval: 1.97-9.14). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who receive an ESI within 30 days of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion are at an increased risk for CSF leak. While the incidence of CSF leak remains small, it may be advisable to avoid ESIs at least 30 days before surgery for certain patients.
Assuntos
Vértebras Lombares , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Fusão Vertebral , Humanos , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Adulto , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Fatores de Tempo , Vazamento de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/epidemiologia , Vazamento de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/etiologia , Injeções EpiduraisRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Craniopharyngiomas (CP) are rare brain tumors that often result in visual impairment due to their proximity to the optic pathway. The optimal management approach to preserve visual function in these patients remains controversial. We sought to investigate visual outcomes of children with craniopharyngiomas based on treatment modality. METHODS: A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched in December 2022 for relevant articles. Articles were screened by title/abstract for relevance, then by full-text. Relevant demographic, intervention, and outcome data were extracted from included studies. RESULTS: A total of 59 studies were included, representing 2655 patients. The overall visual status (OVS) of patients receiving surgery alone was improved in 27.6% of reported outcomes, unchanged in 50.3%, and deteriorated in 22.1%. The OVS for patients receiving radiation alone was improved in 21.1%, unchanged in 42.1%, and deteriorated in 36.8%. Patients receiving surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy had OVS improvement in 27.4%, unchanged in 63.2%, and deteriorated in 9.4%. Of those receiving intracystic bleomycin, 23.1% had improvement in OVS, 46.2% remained unchanged, and 30.8% deteriorated. Of patients receiving interferon-α, 34.8% improved, 54.5% remained unchanged, and 10.6% deteriorated. CONCLUSION: OVS most frequently remained unchanged regardless of intervention. The greatest improvement in OVS was seen in those receiving interferon-α or surgery alone. The greatest OVS deterioration was noted with radiation alone. Future standardized, randomized, large-scale studies with focused assessment of ophthalmologic findings are key to further understanding the impact different interventions have on visual outcomes in these children.
Assuntos
Craniofaringioma , Neoplasias Hipofisárias , Transtornos da Visão , Criança , Humanos , Craniofaringioma/cirurgia , Craniofaringioma/terapia , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodos , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/cirurgia , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento , Transtornos da Visão/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Implantable devices are increasingly more common for management of movement disorders, pain, and epilepsy. These devices are often complex and constructed of nonbiodegradable or hazardous materials. Therefore, proper postmortem handling of these devices is exceedingly important. Unfortunately, there is no consolidated resource available for postmortem neuromodulation device protocols. Thus, we surveyed and catalogued the protocols for implantable devices to summarize proper postmortem device protocols for implantable neurosurgical devices currently on the market. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of companies producing commonly implanted neurosurgical devices. Using information from company websites, user manuals, and catalogs we categorized devices into 3 groups: A (formal recommendation for explantation), B (recommendation for explantation without formal company protocol), and C (explantation is not necessary). We then compiled the data into a stoplight diagram, providing a clear postmortem disposal algorithm for each device category. RESULTS: Twelve companies were queried regarding 46 devices. Postmortem protocols were available for 50% (23/46) of devices; the remaining devices did not have formal recommendations. Overall, 50% of devices were classified as category A "red light" on the stoplight diagram based on recommendations, 10.9% as category B "yellow light," and the remaining 39.1% were classified as category C "green light" indicating they are safe to bury or cremate. CONCLUSIONS: Evolution in therapies and growth in functional neurosurgery has expanded the range of implantable neurosurgical devices. We provide an educational document summarizing their postmortem protocols. This resource aims to aid health-care providers and encourage proper disposal practices during burial or cremation.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/instrumentação , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodos , Remoção de Dispositivo/métodos , Próteses e Implantes , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are the most common cause of intracranial hemorrhage in children, although they are rarer in neonates. Age, location, lesion architecture, and rupture status define treatment options. Sparse literature exists to guide the management of clinically symptomatic intraventricular AVM rupture in neonates. We highlight the case of a neonate with a ruptured intraventricular AVM to showcase considerations in treatment, discuss surgical technique, and help guide management. OBSERVATIONS: An 18-day-old female presented with lethargy in extremis and was found to have new intraventricular hemorrhage. Angiogram revealed a Spetzler-Martin grade 2 AVM with a right posterior choroidal feeder and deep venous drainage within the ventricle. Her age limited radiosurgical and endovascular interventions. She underwent an interhemispheric, transcollosal, intraventricular approach for complete AVM resection. Perioperative care was managed by a multidisciplinary team, successfully mitigating the patient's high risk of hemovascular collapse. LESSONS: Stereotactic radiosurgery, endovascular embolization, and microsurgery are options for AVM obliteration, and multimodal therapy must be tailored to the lesion and patient. Conservative management can also be considered. Each intervention carries risks and varying likelihoods of success. Balancing these outcomes is challenging without definitive, high-quality, evidence-based guidance. The best treatment maximizes the chance of AVM obliteration while minimizing morbidity.
RESUMO
Stroke is a debilitating neurovascular injury that those effects hundreds of thousands of Americans each year. Despite the high prevalence, disease morbidity and mortality, options for stroke intervention and rehabilitation are still limited. Stem cells have shown promise in stroke treatment due to their ability to self-renew and differentiate into different cell types. The primary sources of stem cells used today are bone marrow and fetal brain tissue, with mesenchymal stem cells, bone marrow stem cells and neural stem cells being particularly well-studied. By secreting therapeutic and neurogenic substances they are hypothesized to help foster recovery at the site of injury. Delivery mechanisms for stem cell therapy include intracerebral, intra-arterial, intraperitoneal, intravenous, intraventricular and intranasal routes with radiographic imaging now being used to monitor the progress of stem cell therapies. Stem cell implants have been found to be safe but optimal treatment strategies are still being established with several promising studies underway. Future efforts should continue to focus on improving efficacy, exploring alternative stem cell sources, enhancing migration capability and survival and educating stroke patients on the benefits and risks of stem cell therapy.
RESUMO
Neurologic injury often influences various bodily functions associated with digestion. It is imperative for an individual to obtain proper nutrients to maintain a healthy lifestyle and recover from injury. In this review, we explore variables and methods of enteral tube placement in neurologic injury patients influencing recovery, specifically G- and J-tubes. We will first review the patient population by identifying leading causes for enteral tube placement among both pediatric and adult neurologic patients. We will then discuss the general procedures for placement and safety considerations for specified patient populations. We will explore interventions limiting placement of the G- and J-tubes by focusing on two interventions: ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) and intrathecal baclofen (ITB). Then, we will highlight nutritional enhancers that may influence general treatment. Finally, we discuss proper weaning procedures and eJective methods fitting patient needs.