Trauma bay virtual reality-A game changer for ATLS instruction and assessment.

BACKGROUND: Medical educational research highlights the need for high-fidelity, multidisciplinary simulation training to teach complex decision-making skills, such as those taught in Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS). This approach is, however, expensive and time-intensive. Virtual reality (VR) education simulation may improve skill acquisition in a cost-effective and time-sensitive manner. We developed a novel trauma VR simulator (TVRSim) for providers to apply ATLS principles. We hypothesized in this pilot study that TVRSim could differentiate practitioner competency with increasing experience and would be well accepted. METHODS: Providers at a Level I trauma center (acute care surgeons, novice (MS4 & PGY1), junior (PGY2 & 3), senior (PGY4-6) residents) ran a blunt, polytrauma VR code. Ten critical decision points were assessed: intubation, cricothyroidotomy, chest tube, intravenous access, focused abdominal sonography for trauma examination, pelvic binder, activation of massive transfusion protocol, administration of hypertonic saline, hyperventilation and decision to go to the operating room (OR). Learner assessment was based on frequency and time to correct decisions. Participant satisfaction was measured using validated surveys. RESULTS: All 31 providers intubated and obtained intravenous access. Novices and juniors frequently failed at hypertonic saline and hyperventilation decisions. Juniors often failed at cricothyroidotomy (60%) and OR (100%) decisions. Mean time to all decisions except going to the OR was longer for all groups compared to acute care surgeons. Mean number of decisions/min was significantly higher for surgeons and seniors compared to juniors and novices. Mortality was 92.3% for novices, 80% for juniors, 25% for seniors and 0% for the attendings. Participants found TVRSim comfortable, easy to use/interact with/performance enhancing, and helped develop skills and learning. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study using a sample of convenience, TVRSim was able to discern decision-making abilities among trainees with increasing experience. All trainees felt that the platform enhanced their performance and facilitated skill acquisition and learning. TVRSim could be a useful adjunct to teach and assess ATLS skills. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Test or Criteria; Level IV.

Reducing the pain: A cost-effectiveness analysis of transversus abdominis plane block using liposomal bupivacaine for outpatient laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: Transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine has been studied as an effective method of reducing the need for postoperative opioids and increasing same-day discharge rates. However, less is known about the cost-effectiveness of this strategy relative to opioids alone for hernia repair. We performed an economic evaluation of these strategies using a computer simulation model. METHODS: A decision tree was constructed to determine cost-effectiveness as measured by incremental cost-effectiveness ratios per quality-adjusted life-year. Base-case costs, quality-adjusted life-year values, and probabilities were derived from published studies and Medicare fee schedules. For input parameters for which we could not find values in the published literature, we used expert opinion. A 1-month time horizon was selected to focus on the immediate postoperative period. Finally, we performed 1-way, 2-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: The liposomal bupivacaine transversus abdominis plane block was a dominant strategy yielding a $456.75 decrease in cost and an 0.1 increase in quality-adjusted life-years relative to opioids alone. In 1-way sensitivity analysis of cost incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, values were most sensitive to variations in the amount saved by same-day discharge and the cost of bupivacaine. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, transversus abdominis plane strategy was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/quality-adjusted life-year in 94.5% of iterations and at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/quality-adjusted life-year in 97.1% of iterations. CONCLUSION: The use of liposomal bupivacaine transversus abdominis plane block resulted in cost savings and improved quality-adjusted life-years in base-case analyses and was cost-effective at conventional willingness-to-pay thresholds in the majority of iterations in probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

Telephone Follow-Up for Emergency General Surgery Procedures: Safety and Implication for Health Resource Use.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether replacing clinic follow-up visits with telephone follow-up for low-risk core emergency general surgery (cEGS) procedures is safe. We measured the efficacy of telephone follow-up to determine if it could safely reduce the need for routine postoperative clinic visits in this population. STUDY DESIGN: Low-risk nonelective laparoscopic appendectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, umbilical hernia, and inguinal hernia repair patients received telephone follow-up for symptoms concerning for surgical complication within 10 days of discharge. Clinic appointments were made if critical thresholds were reached. Outcomes of interest included rates of completed telephone screens, clinic visits avoided, and missed complications at 30 days postoperatively. RESULTS: Of 402 patients screened, 62 (15.4%) were scheduled for a clinic visit due to threshold responses and 27 (6.7%) were scheduled per patient request, while 275 (68.4%) patients screened negative and did not attend a clinic visit. One hundred sixty-three (59.3%) of the negative screen cohort were contacted after 30 days. Nine (5.5%) patients in this cohort were diagnosed with low-grade complications; no high-grade (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) complications were missed by telephone screening. Twenty surgery-related complications were identified in the full patient population; early telephone screening successfully identified the single high-grade complication. CONCLUSIONS: Post-discharge telephone follow-up in cEGS patients reduced the need for clinic follow-up visits by 68%. Missed complications were infrequent and low grade; telephone screening identified the single high-grade complication. Telephone follow-up for low-risk EGS patients is safe and increases efficiency of postoperative resource use.

Cholecystostomy: Are we using it correctly?

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Tubes (PCT) have become an accepted and common modality of treating acute cholecystitis in patients that are not appropriate surgical candidates. As percutaneous gallbladder drainage has rapidly increased newer research suggests that the technique may be overused, and patients may be burdened with them for extended periods. We examined our experience with PCT placement to identify independent predictors of interval cholecystectomy versus destination PCT. METHODS: All patients with cholecystitis initially treated with PCT from 2014 to 2017 were stratified by whether they underwent subsequent interval cholecystectomy. Demographic data, initial laboratory values, Tokyo Grade, Charlson Comorbidity Index, ASA Class, complications related to PCT, complications related to cholecystectomy, and mortality data were retrospectively collected. Descriptive statistics, univariable, and multivariable Poisson regression were performed. RESULTS: 165 patients received an initial cholecystostomy tube to treat cholecystitis. 61 (37%) patients went on to have an interval cholecystectomy. There were 4 complications reported after cholecystectomy. A total of 46 (27.9%) deaths were reported, only one of which was in the cholecystectomy group. Age, Tokyo Grade, liver function tests, ASA Class, and Charlson Comorbidity Index were significantly different between the interval cholecystectomy and no-cholecystectomy groups. Univariable regression was performed and variables with p < 0.2 were included in the multivariable model. Multivariable Poisson regression showed that increasing Tokyo Grade (IRR 0.454, p = 0.042, 95% CI 0.194-0.969); and increasing Charlson Comorbidity Score (IRR 0.890, p = 0.026, 95% CI 0.803-0.986) were associated with no-cholecystectomy. Higher Albumin (IRR 1.580, p = 0.011, 95% CI 1.111-2.244) was associated with having an interval cholecystectomy. CONCLUSION: Patients in the no-cholecystectomy group were older, had more comorbidities, higher Tokyo Grade, ASA Class, and initial liver function test values than those that had interval cholecystectomy. Since interval cholecystectomy was performed with a low rate of complications, we may be too conservative in performing cholecystectomy after drainage and condemning many patients to destination tubes.

Nonoperative management of adhesive small bowel obstruction: what is the break point?

BACKGROUND: The current management paradigm for recurrent adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO) is nonoperative. Rates of recurrence differ based on time interval between and number of previous occurrences. Optimal time to intervene has not been determined. METHODS: We constructed a Markov model to evaluate costs and quality of life on a hypothetical cohort of 40-year-old patients after their first episode of medical management for postoperative SBO. We estimated a relative risk reduction of .55 with surgical intervention and a relative risk increase of 2.1, 2.9, and 5.7 after the medical management of the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th SBO. RESULTS: Surgery performed after earlier episodes of SBO was more costly but also more effective. The cost difference between surgery after the 1st SBO recurrence vs the 2nd SBO recurrence was $1,643, with an increase of .135 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $12,170 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery after the first episode of SBO provides a small increase in QALY at a small cost since surgical intervention lowers the risk of recurrence.

An innovative approach to predict the development of adult respiratory distress syndrome in patients with blunt trauma.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary contusion (PC) is a common injury associated with blunt chest trauma. Complications such as pneumonia and adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) occur in up to 50% of patients with PC. The ability to predict which PC patients are at increased risk of developing complications would be of tremendous clinical utility. In this study, we test the hypothesis that a novel method that objectively measures percent PC can be used to identify patients at risk to develop ARDS after injury. METHODS: Patients with unilateral or bilateral PC with an admission chest computed tomographic angiogram were identified from the trauma registry. Demographic, infectious, and outcome data were collected. Percent PC was determined on admission chest computed tomography using our novel semiautomated, attenuation-defined computer-based algorithm, in which the lung was segmented with minimal manual editing. Factors contributing to the development of ARDS were identified by both univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses. ARDS was defined as PaO2/FiO2 ratio of less than 200 with diffuse bilateral infiltrates on chest radiograph with no evidence of congestive heart failure. RESULTS: Quantifying percent PC from our objective computer-based approach proved successful. We found that a contusion size of 24% of total lung volume or greater was most significant at predicting ARDS, which occurred in 78% of these patients. Such patients also had a significantly higher incidence of pneumonia when compared with those with contusions less than 24%. The specificity of contusion size of 24% or greater was 94%, although sensitivity was 37%; positive predictive value was 78%, and negative predictive value was 72%. CONCLUSION: We developed and describe a software-based methodology to accurately measure the size of lung contusion in patients of blunt trauma. In our analyses, contusions of 24% or greater most significantly predict the development of ARDS. Such an objective approach can identify patients with PC who are at increased risk for developing respiratory complications before they happen. Further research is needed to use this novel methodology as a means to prevent posttraumatic lung injury in patients with blunt trauma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic/epidemiologic study, level III; diagnostic study, level IV.