HER2 status and efficacy of adjuvant anthracyclines in early breast cancer: a pooled analysis of randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy with anthracyclines improves disease-free and overall survival compared with non-anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of early breast cancer. The role of HER2 status as a marker of anthracycline responsiveness has been explored by subset analyses within randomized clinical trials, with inconsistent results. We performed a pooled analysis of the interaction between HER2 status and the efficacy of adjuvant anthracyclines based on the published subset data. METHODS: We searched literature databases to identify randomized trials that compared anthracycline-based with non-anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of early breast cancer and reported efficacy data according to HER2 status. Log hazard ratios (HRs) for disease-free and overall survival were pooled across the studies according to HER2 status by inverse variance weighting. A pooled test for treatment by HER2 status interaction was performed by weighted linear meta-regression. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Eight studies (with 6564 randomly assigned patients, of whom 5354 had HER2 status information available) were eligible for this analysis. In HER2-positive disease (n = 1536 patients), anthracyclines were superior to non-anthracycline-based regimens in terms of disease-free (pooled HR of relapse = 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.61 to 0.83; P < .001) and overall (pooled HR of death from any cause = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.85; P < .001) survival. In HER2-negative disease (n = 3818 patients), anthracyclines did not improve disease-free (HR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.90 to 1.11; P = .75) or overall (HR = 1.03; 95% CI = 0.92 to 1.16; P = .60) survival. The test for treatment by HER2 status interaction yielded statistically significant results: for disease-free survival, the chi-square statistic for interaction was 13.7 (P < .001), and for overall survival, it was 12.6 (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The added benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy with anthracyclines appear to be confined to women who have HER2 overexpressed or amplified breast tumors.

Weekly docetaxel versus CMF as adjuvant chemotherapy for elderly breast cancer patients: safety data from the multicentre phase 3 randomised ELDA trial.

Within an ongoing multicentre phase 3 randomised trial (ELDA, cancertrials.gov ID: NCT00331097), early breast cancer patients, 65-79 years old, with average to high risk of recurrence, are randomly assigned to receive CMF (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, methotrexate 40 mg/m2, fluorouracil 600 mg/m2, days 1-8) or docetaxel (35 mg/m2 days 1-8-15), every 4 weeks. Here we report an unplanned safety analysis prompted by an amendment introducing creatinine clearance as a tool to adjust methotrexate dose. Before such change, 101 patients with a median age of 70 were randomly assigned CMF (53 patients) or docetaxel (48 patients). At least one grades 3-4 toxic event of any type was reported in 40 (75.5%) and 19 (39.6%) patients with CMF and docetaxel, respectively (p=0.0002). Grades 3-4 hematological events were observed in 37 (69.8%) vs. 4 (8.3%) cases (p<0.0001) and grades 3-4 non-hematological toxicity in 12 (22.6%) vs. 15 (31.2%) patients (p=0.11), with CMF and docetaxel, respectively. A higher incidence of anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and febrile neutropenia was reported with CMF. Constipation, mucositis, nausea and vomiting were more common with CMF; diarrhoea, abdominal pain, dysgeusia, neuropathy and liver toxicity were more frequent with docetaxel. No significant interaction was found between the occurrence of severe toxicity and baseline variables, including creatinine clearance and geriatric activity scales. In conclusion, weekly docetaxel appears to be less toxic than CMF in terms of hematological toxicity.

Central nervous system metastases in HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab: incidence, survival, and risk factors.

BACKGROUND: A higher incidence of central nervous system (CNS) metastases in HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has recently been reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Aims of this observational study were to evaluate the incidence of CNS metastases in HER-2-positive MBC patients, to define the outcome of patients with CNS metastases, and to identify the risk factors for CNS relapse. RESULTS: Between April 1999 and June 2005 we treated 122 consecutive HER-2-positive MBC patients with chemotherapy and trastuzumab. At a median follow-up of 28 months from the occurrence of metastatic disease, 43 patients (35.2%) developed CNS metastases. The median time to death from the diagnosis of CNS metastases was 23.46 months. At multivariate analysis we found that only premenopausal status at diagnosis of breast cancer and visceral metastases as the dominant site at relapse were significantly associated with a higher risk for CNS metastases. CONCLUSION: The CNS metastasis incidence is very high in HER-2-positive MBC, but the survival after CNS relapse in these patients is longer than in patients unselected for HER-2 status, because of the better control of extracranial disease obtained by trastuzumab. The identified risk factors for CNS relapse could allow us to select a subgroup of HER-2-positive MBC patients as candidates for active surveillance for CNS progression (by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging) and/or as candidates for accrual in trials of prevention of CNS relapse.

Achievements in systemic therapies in the pregenomic era in metastatic breast cancer.

Over the last decades, the introduction of several new agents into clinical practice has significantly improved disease control and obtained some, albeit rare, survival benefits in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Despite these results, the choice of treatment for the majority of patients is still empirically based, since the only two predictive factors with level 1 evidence for clinical use are hormonal receptor status for endocrine therapy and HER-2 status for trastuzumab therapy. Important improvements in the endocrine therapy of both pre- and postmenopausal women with hormone-responsive disease have been achieved. For premenopausal women, ovarian function suppression with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogs combined with tamoxifen has become the standard treatment, although aromatase inhibitors plus ovarian function suppression are under evaluation. In postmenopausal patients, aromatase inhibitors have proved to be superior to standard endocrine therapies in either first- or second-line treatment and a novel antiestrogen compound, fulvestrant, has been introduced in clinical practice. Chemotherapy remains the treatment of choice for hormone unresponsive or resistant patients. Anthracyclines and taxanes have been used either alone or in combination as first-line chemotherapy, but with the more frequent use of these agents in the adjuvant setting, new standards are needed for first-line chemotherapy, and new and more efficacious treatments are required. In the subgroup of patients with tumors that overexpress HER-2, the use of trastuzumab alone or in combination with chemotherapy has modified the natural history of these tumors, even if only about one out of two patients obtains a clinical response. In this review we summarize the main achievements and the currently available treatment options for patients with MBC.

Safety of epirubicin adjuvant chemotherapy in a breast cancer patient with chronic renal failure undergoing hemodialytic treatment.

Anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy is very effective in early breast cancer, but there are limited data on the use of epirubicin in patients with chronic renal failure undergoing hemodialytic treatment. We report the case of a patient with early breast cancer and chronic renal failure who was treated with adjuvant weekly epirubicin. Treatment was well tolerated. The patient is still alive and relapse free 58 months after surgery. If the patient will be disease free after 5 years, she will be reconsidered for renal transplantation. In conclusion, weekly epirubicin appears to be a safe adjuvant chemotherapy option for early breast cancer patients with chronic renal failure undergoing hemodialytic treatment.

Breast cancer: achievements in adjuvant systemic therapies in the pre-genomic era.

In recent decades, the use of adjuvant systemic therapies for early breast cancer has increased extensively and has most likely contributed to the decline in breast cancer mortality observed in the U.S. and in some European countries. The last few years have witnessed accelerated progress in the treatment of early breast cancer, with the introduction of taxanes and aromatase inhibitors and, most impressively, trastuzumab to the adjuvant portfolio. When compared with anthracycline-based regimens, the addition of taxanes to treatments for patients with node-positive breast cancer has shown benefits in disease-free survival and, in some trials, in overall survival; however, these drugs are not yet universally accepted as standard treatment. Significant improvements in endocrine therapy in both pre- and postmenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive disease have been made. In the postmenopausal setting, aromatase inhibitors have shown superiority over tamoxifen in a direct comparison upfront or when given in sequence after 2-5 years of tamoxifen, but the optimal modality of administration remains unclear. For premenopausal women, ovarian function suppression with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogues combined with tamoxifen has generated similar results to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF)-based regimens. Recently, trastuzumab has had a dramatic impact on the evolution of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)-positive early breast cancer treated with standard adjuvant modalities; specifically, relapses, including distant relapses, have been halved. In this review, we summarize these main achievements, discuss the currently available adjuvant treatment options for breast cancer patients, and emphasize the need for more efficient translational research to improve individual treatment tailoring.

HER2 overexpression as a predictive marker in a randomized trial comparing adjuvant cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil with epirubicin in patients with stage I/II breast cancer: long-term results.

BACKGROUND: HER2 overexpression/amplification has been reported to be a predictor of prognosis in breast cancer and a potential marker for selecting the optimal adjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: HER2 expression and its interaction with treatment were retrospectively evaluated in 266 of 348 patients in a trial comparing adjuvant CMF (cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil) with weekly epirubicin in stage I/II breast cancer. HER2 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using the monoclonal antibody CB11. Initially, any cell showing definite membrane staining was counted, and HER2 overexpression was analyzed as a continuous variable and as a dichotomous variable, with a cutoff of > 50% of positively stained cells. Subsequently, the same slides were reanalyzed with the HercepTest. RESULTS: Of the 266 tumors immunostained for HER2, 34% exhibited nearly homogeneous staining with > 50% positive cells. When the HercepTest was applied, 8% of tumors were IHC 3+ and 8% were IHC 2+. At 8 years, no statistically significant difference in relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) was observed between the treatment arms in patients with low versus high HER2 overexpression, although the number of events is low. The OS was statistically shorter in patients with high HER2 overexpression in the CMF arm, whereas no difference was observed in the epirubicin arm, suggesting that patients whose cancer overexpresses HER2 could benefit more from anthracycline-based therapy. CONCLUSION: HER2 overexpression was associated with a poorer OS but not a poorer RFS. However, a Cox regression model did not confirm the prognostic role of HER2 for OS.

Bringing molecular prognosis and prediction to the clinic.

In the past 30 years, important advances have been made in the knowledge of breast cancer biology and in the treatment of the disease. However, the translation of these advances into clinical practice has been slow. With the advent of molecular-based medicine, it is hoped that the bridge between the bench and the bedside will continue to be shortened. Because breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with wide-ranging subsets of patients who have different prognoses and who respond differently to treatments, the identification of patients who need treatment and the definition of the best therapy for an individual have become the priorities in breast cancer care. This article will review the crucial role of prognostic and predictive factors in achieving these goals. A critical review of classical and newer individual molecular markers, such as hormone receptors, HER2, urokinase-type plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, cyclin E, topoisomerase II, and p53, was performed, and the preliminary results obtained using the new gene expression profiling technology are described along with their potential clinical implications.

Weekly paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer patients: a phase II study.

UNLABELLED: AIMS ANID BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel, a microtubule inhibitor, is one of the most active drugs in metastatic breast cancer. A weekly schedule, at a median dose-intensity of 91 mg/m2, is effective and has less side effects than a 3-week schedule. In this phase II study, we evaluated the toxicity and the activity of weekly 1 hr paclitaxel infusions in metastatic breast cancer patients. STUDY DESIGN: Between February 1999 and February 2001, 26 patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with weekly paclitaxel (60-90 mg/m2/1 hour iv infusion/weekly). The treatment was planned to continue until disease progression or prohibitive toxicity; in patients with responsive or stable disease, paclitaxel was stopped after 6 months of therapy. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 18.7 months (range, 6.8-30.8), all patients are assessable for response and toxicity. We obtained 8 partial responses (30.8%), 8 stable disease (30.8%) and 10 disease progression (38.4.%). The overall response was 30.8% (95% CI, 13.1-48.5). The median duration of response was 7.6 months (range, 1.8-12.4); median time to progression was 4.86 months (range, 1.4-12.4); median overall survival was 9.9 months (range, 1.7-29.2+). Treatment was well tolerated. Hematological toxicity was mild and only one patient developed grade 3 anemia. Two patients experienced grade 3 cardiovascular toxicity; both had received anthracycline-based regimens. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, weekly administration of paclitaxel shows a substantial degree of activity even in pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients. The toxicity profile is favorable.