Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Autoimmun ; 84: 87-96, 2017 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28844827

RESUMO

Autoimmune and dysimmune inflammatory mechanisms on a genetically susceptible background are implicated in the etiology of Behçet's Disease (BD). Heat-shock protein-65 (HSP-65) derived from Streptococcus sanguinis was proposed as a triggering factor based on its homology with human HSP-60. However, none of the autoantigens identified so far in sera from BD share common epitopes with bacterial HSP-65 or has a high prevalence. Here, we report that sera from BD patients are immunoreactive against filamentous neuronal processes in the mouse brain, retina and scrotal skin in great majority of patients. By using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and peptide mass fingerprinting, Western blotting and peptide blocking experiments, we have identified neurofilament medium (NF-M) as the probable antigen for the serologic response observed. Clustal Omega analyses detected significant structural homology between the human NF-M and bacterial HSP-65 corresponding to amino acids 111-126, 213-232 and 304-363 of mycobacterial HSP-65, which were previously identified to induce proliferation of lymphocytes obtained from BD patients. We also found that sera immunoreactive against NF-M cross-reacted with bacterial HSP-65. These findings suggest that NF-M may be involved in autoimmunity in BD due to its molecular mimicry with bacterial HSP-65.


Assuntos
Autoantígenos/imunologia , Proteínas de Bactérias/imunologia , Síndrome de Behçet/imunologia , Chaperonina 60/imunologia , Epitopos de Linfócito B/imunologia , Proteínas de Choque Térmico/imunologia , Proteínas de Neurofilamentos/imunologia , Neurônios/fisiologia , Streptococcus sanguis/imunologia , Adulto , Animais , Anticorpos/sangue , Autoantígenos/genética , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Encéfalo/patologia , Células Cultivadas , Chaperonina 60/genética , Reações Cruzadas , Epitopos de Linfócito B/genética , Feminino , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Proteínas de Choque Térmico/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Camundongos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Homologia Estrutural de Proteína , Adulto Jovem
2.
Handb Clin Neurol ; 137: 103-17, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27638066

RESUMO

The differential diagnosis of patients with vestibular symptoms usually begins with the question: is the lesion central or is it peripheral? The answer commonly emerges from a careful examination of eye movements, especially when the lesion is located in otherwise clinically silent areas of the brain such as the vestibular portions of the cerebellum (flocculus, paraflocculus which is called the tonsils in humans, nodulus, and uvula) and the vestibular nuclei as well as immediately adjacent areas (the perihypoglossal nuclei and the paramedian nuclei and tracts). The neural circuitry that controls vestibular eye movements is intertwined with a larger network within the brainstem and cerebellum that also controls other types of conjugate eye movements. These include saccades and pursuit as well as the mechanisms that enable steady fixation, both straight ahead and in eccentric gaze positions. Navigating through this complex network requires a thorough knowledge about all classes of eye movements to help localize lesions causing a vestibular disorder. Here we review the different classes of eye movements and how to examine them, and then describe common ocular motor findings associated with central vestibular lesions from both a topographic and functional perspective.


Assuntos
Movimentos Oculares/fisiologia , Doenças Vestibulares/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Doenças Vestibulares/diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA