Potential, Pitfalls, and Future Directions for Remote Monitoring of Chronic Respiratory Diseases: Multicenter Mixed Methods Study in Routine Cystic Fibrosis Care.

BACKGROUND: The current literature inadequately addresses the extent to which remote monitoring should be integrated into care models for chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs). OBJECTIVE: This study examined a remote monitoring program (RMP) in cystic fibrosis (CF) by exploring experiences, future perspectives, and use behavior over 3 years, with the aim of developing future directions for remote monitoring in CRDs. METHODS: This was a mixed methods, multicenter, observational study in 5 Dutch CF centers following a sequential explanatory design. Self-designed questionnaires using the technology acceptance model were sent out to people with CF who had a minimum of 12 months of experience with the RMP and local health care professionals (HCPs). Questionnaire outcomes were used to inform semistructured interviews with HCPs and people with CF. Qualitative findings were reported following the COREQ (Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research) checklist. Anonymous data on use frequency of all people with CF were analyzed. RESULTS: Between the second quarter of 2020 and the end of 2022, a total of 608 people with CF were enrolled in the program, and a total of 9418 lung function tests and 2631 symptom surveys were conducted. In total, 65% (24/37) of HCPs and 89% (72/81) of people with CF responded to the questionnaire, and 7 HCPs and 12 people with CF participated in semistructured interviews. Both people with CF and HCPs were positive about remote monitoring in CF care and found the RMP a good addition to daily care (people with CF: 44/72, 61%; HCPs: 21/24, 88%). Benefits ranged from supporting individual patients to reducing health care consumption. The most valued monitoring tool was home spirometry by both people with CF (66/72, 92%) and HCPs (22/24, 92%). Downsides included the potential to lose sight of patients and negative psychosocial effects, as 17% (12/72) of people with CF experienced some form of stress due to the RMP. A large majority of people with CF (59/72, 82%) and HCPs (22/24, 92%) wanted to keep using the RMP in future, with 79% (19/24) of HCPs and 75% (54/72) of people with CF looking forward to more replacement of in-person care with digital care during periods of well-being. Future perspectives for the RMP were centered on creating hybrid care models, personalizing remote care, and balancing individual benefits with monitoring burden. CONCLUSIONS: Remote monitoring has considerable potential in supporting people with CF and HCPs within the CF care model. We identified 4 practice-based future directions for remote monitoring in CF and CRD care. The strategies, ranging from patient driven to prediction driven, can help clinicians, researchers, and policy makers navigate the rapidly changing digital health field, integrate remote monitoring into local care models, and align remote care with patient and clinician needs.

ERS International Congress 2023: highlights from the Airway Diseases Assembly.

In this review, early career and senior members of Assembly 5 (Airway Diseases, Asthma, COPD and Chronic Cough) present key recent findings pertinent to airway diseases that were presented during the European Respiratory Society International Congress 2023 in Milan, Italy, with a particular focus on asthma, COPD, chronic cough and bronchiectasis. During the congress, an increased number of symposia, workshops and abstract presentations were organised. In total, 739 abstracts were submitted for Assembly 5 and the majority of these were presented by early career members. These data highlight the increased interest in this group of respiratory diseases.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Current knowledge, future perspectives and its importance in radiation oncology.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive, fibrotic lung disease with an unknown cause. Uncertainties still remain regarding the pathogenesis of IPF, and the prognosis of this disease is poor despite some recent improvements in treatment. Radiation induced lung injury (RILI) is a common complication and a dose-limiting toxicity of thoracic radiotherapy. Importantly, IPF is a crucial risk factor for pulmonary toxicity after thoracic radiotherapy. Although IPF is not universally accepted as a definite contraindication for thoracic radiotherapy at present, it has been shown that IPF can increase the risk of severe and fatal complications after thoracic radiotherapy. Proton beam therapy has shown promising results in reducing the incidence of thoracic radiotherapy related life-threatening complications in IPF patients, but the current evidence is not sufficient to recommend the standard use of it. Many similarities are noticeable between IPF and RILI in terms of pathogenesis and underlying mechanisms. Better understanding of the mechanisms of IPF and RILI may enable clinicians to provide safer and more effective thoracic radiotherapy treatments in cancer patients with IPF. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of IPF, present the importance of IPF in radiation oncology practice, and highlight the similarities and relationship between IPF and RILI.