Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 43
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Virol ; 84: 74-81, 2016 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27728850

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A randomized trial was conducted in Tuscany, Italy, to evaluate the effectiveness of HPV vaccination for 25year old (yo) women who attend at the first time cervical cancer screening. The trial also evaluated immune response after vaccination, reductions of cytological abnormalities and the impact of vaccination on screening activity. STUDY DESIGN: During 2010-2011, all 25 yo women who were invited to the Florence cervical cancer screening programme were also asked to participate in the trial. Enrolled women were randomized into study and control groups. Those in the study group were offered HPV vaccination after the usual Pap test. The cytology distribution and prevalence for any high risk (hr) HPV type were compared at the subsequent screening round in an intention-to-treat analysis. The impact of HPV vaccination was evaluated per protocol comparing vaccinated women with the control group. RESULTS: Our results showed a reduction in HPV prevalence at recall for any hr-HPV type but it was not statistically significant, being 17.1% vs 21.4%, p=0.20 in the study and control groups, respectively. If we restricted the analysis to vaccinated women, strong reductions of the HPV 16,18,31,33,45 and HPV 31,33,45 infections were observed, being 5.3% vs 12.8%, p<0.01 and 2.1% vs 6.5%, p=0.02, respectively. Significant reductions for any hr-HPV infection and for HPV 16 infection were also observed in women HPV 16/18 negative at enrolment, being 12% vs 21.4%, p<0.01 and 0.6% vs 6.7%, p-value<0.01, respectively. In women hr-HPV negative at enrolment no infections due to HPV 16 or HPV 18 were observed and there was a big reduction for any hr-HPV infection (7.1% vs 21.4% p<0.01). A strong antibody response was observed not only for HPV 16 & 18 but also for their related types. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that HPV vaccination at the age 25 is beneficial if it is offered to hr-HPV negative women. Our data will assist in developing a cost effectiveness model for choosing the best strategy to integrate screening and vaccination for the coming years. Clinical trial registration number is NCT02296255.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Papillomavirus Humano 16 , Papillomavirus Humano 18 , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Papillomavirus Humano 16/imunologia , Papillomavirus Humano 16/isolamento & purificação , Papillomavirus Humano 18/imunologia , Papillomavirus Humano 18/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Teste de Papanicolaou , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Prevalência , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/virologia , Vacinação/economia , Esfregaço Vaginal , Displasia do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Displasia do Colo do Útero/virologia
2.
Cytopathology ; 27(1): 35-42, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25123613

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: An important internal quality control system used in the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute cytopathology laboratory in Florence is the peer review procedure, based on the review of all abnormal cytological smears which routinely emerge. Peer review is an important training opportunity for all cytologists, especially for those with less experience. This article shows the results of the peer review procedure. METHODS: Of the 63 754 Papanicolaou (Pap) smears screened in 2011, 1086 were considered to be abnormal [at least atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US+)] on primary screening (selected by a single cytologist) and were subjected to the peer review procedure. The overall performance of the laboratory's cytologists was evaluated using a multiple rater analysis and the comparison of each cytologist with the final diagnosis. Further, the agreement was assessed by means of Cohen's kappa and weighted kappa statistics. RESULTS: In general, a moderate/substantial level of agreement between the ten cytologists and the final diagnoses was evident. Kappa values for each reader compared with the final diagnosis ranged from 0.54 to 0.69. The overall kappa value was 0.62 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.58-0.66] and overall weighted kappa value was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.74-0.79). The category-specific agreement showed the lowest values for atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H). CONCLUSION: In summary, peer review represents an important internal quality control in the evaluation and improvement of inter-observer agreement and of the functioning of the laboratory as a whole. Multi-head microscope sessions may improve particularly the reproducibility of borderline diagnoses and, above all, can be an important training contribution for cytologists.


Assuntos
Células Escamosas Atípicas do Colo do Útero/patologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/normas , Teste de Papanicolaou/normas , Revisão dos Cuidados de Saúde por Pares/métodos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Esfregaço Vaginal/normas , Biologia Celular , Feminino , Humanos , Laboratórios , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Revisão dos Cuidados de Saúde por Pares/normas , Controle de Qualidade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
3.
J Med Screen ; 22(1): 38-48, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25431452

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We present the results of the first screening round and the first year of the second round of the Valcamonica Human Papillomavirus (HPV) pilot screening project. SETTING: From 2010 to 2012, the entire target female population (aged 25-64) was invited to the first HPV screening round in an area where Pap test screening had been active since 2002. METHODS: For HPV-negative women, the interval was three years. For HPV-positive women, a cytological smear was stained and interpreted. Positive cytologies were referred to colposcopy; negatives were referred to repeat HPV after one year. If HPV was persistently positive, women were referred to colposcopy; if negative, to normal screening. RESULTS: In 2010-12 18728 women were screened, slightly higher participation than with Pap test (18233 64.7%); 1633 were HPV-positive (8.7%); 843 were positive at cytology triage (referral rate at baseline 4.5%). Of those referred at the one year HPV test, 84% complied (660/780); 356 were persistently positive (1.9%). The total referral rate was 6.4% compared with 3.7% for the Pap test. The detection rate was 9.2/1000 compared with 5.0% for the Pap test. The HPV positivity rate during the second round in women previously negative was 3.9% and the detection rate in HPV-positive cytology-positive women was 0.8/1000. CONCLUSIONS: HPV-based screening increases colposcopies at the first round, but also strongly increases the detection rate. At the second round, HPV prevalence was much lower and the detection rate also fell, corroborating the need for longer screening intervals in HPV-negative women.


Assuntos
Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Displasia do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Adulto , Alphapapillomavirus/isolamento & purificação , Colposcopia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Feminino , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Projetos Piloto , Gravidez , Prevalência , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/virologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Displasia do Colo do Útero/virologia
4.
Br J Cancer ; 109(7): 1766-74, 2013 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24008667

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The follow-up after abnormal Pap smear and negative colposcopy is not clearly defined. This study aimed at investigating the role of hr-HPV testing in the management of abnormal Pap test and negative colposcopy for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+). methods: The study enrolled 1029 women with abnormal screening cytology (years 2006-2010) and negative colposcopy for CIN2+, which subsequently performed a hr-HPV test. Incident CIN2+ lesions were identified through linkage with cancer registry, hospital discharge records, neoplastic pathology reports and the archive of screening programme (2006-2011). RESULTS: During the follow-up, the cohort developed 133 CIN2+ lesions; only one among hr-HPV-negative women. The probability of developing CIN2+ on follow-up time was 0.44% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1-3.1) and 41.8% (95% CI 31.8-53.5) for hr-HPV-negative women and hr-HPV-positive women, respectively. A woman with a positive hr-HPV test had about 105 times higher probability of developing a CIN2+ lesion than a woman with a negative hr-HPV test (hazard ratio (HR)=104.5, 95% CI 14.5-755.1), adjusted for index Pap test result, age and cervix squamocolumnar junction visualisation. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that hr-HPV testing is able to select the real group of women at risk of developing CIN2+ lesions in the follow-up of abnormal cytology and first negative colposcopy.


Assuntos
Colposcopia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Displasia do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Displasia do Colo do Útero/virologia , Esfregaço Vaginal , Adulto , Técnicas Citológicas , DNA Viral/isolamento & purificação , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Papillomaviridae/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/virologia
5.
J Clin Microbiol ; 49(4): 1446-51, 2011 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21325553

RESUMO

Randomized trials have produced sound evidence about the efficacy of screening with human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA tests in reducing cervical cancer incidence and mortality. We evaluated the clinical performance and reproducibility of the Abbott RealTime High Risk (HR) HPV test compared with that of the HR hybrid capture 2 (HC2) assay as assessed by a noninferiority score test. A random sample of 998 cervical specimens (914 specimens of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia less severe than grade 2 [

Assuntos
Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Papillomaviridae/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Virologia/métodos , Adulto , Colo do Útero/virologia , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
6.
Cytopathology ; 22(2): 75-81, 2011 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20482719

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to measure interobserver agreement among cytologists on using a set of digital images. METHODS: A set of 90 selected Papanicolaou-stained cervical smears were digitalized and the digital images circulated among 117 readers, from laboratories spread across almost all Italian regions. Three representative fields of each smear were displayed at 20× and 40× magnification (overall six images for each case). The diagnoses made by the cytologists who provided the images were taken as target diagnoses. RESULTS: The κ values were: very low for the categories atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US), and atypical squamous cells - cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H); poor for the categories atypical glandular cells (AGC), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and invasive cancer; and fair to good for the categories negative and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL). However, we found a cluster of 42 best concordant readers. The overall κ value and overall weighted κ with the target diagnosis for these 42 readers were 0.45 and 0.66, respectively. This finding is in contrast with the overall κ value and overall weighted κ for the other readers of 0.39 and 0.59, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: As this finding is an estimate of the accuracy of the readers, we can infer that it will be very important to reach this level of concordance for all the participating readers. Future effort will facilitate common experiences in order to improve the reproducibility of diagnostic criteria. Digital images could be the key to reach this aim.


Assuntos
Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Teste de Papanicolaou , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Esfregaço Vaginal/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Padrões de Referência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
7.
Br J Cancer ; 104(2): 248-54, 2011 Jan 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21179038

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In Italy, cervical cancer screening programmes actively invite women aged 25-64 years. Programmes are hindered by low participation. METHODS: A sample of non-responder women aged 35-64 years, belonging to three different programmes (in Rome, Florence and Teramo), was randomly split into four arms: two control groups received standard recall letters to perform either Pap-test (first group) or human papillomavirus (HPV) test (second group) at the clinic. A third arm was sent letters offering a self-sampler for HPV testing, to be requested by phone, whereas a fourth group was directly sent the self-samplers home. RESULTS: Compliance with standard recall was 13.9% (N619). Offering HPV test at the clinic had a nonsignificant effect on compliance (N616, relative risk (RR)=1.08; 95% CI=0.82-1.41). Self-sampler at request had the poorest performance, 8.7% (N622, RR=0.62; 95% CI=0.45-0.86), whereas direct mailing of the self-sampler registered the highest compliance: 19.6% (N616, RR=1.41; 95% CI=1.10-1.82). This effect on compliance was observed only in urban areas, Florence and Rome (N438, RR=1.69; 95% CI=1.24-2.30), but not in Abruzzo (N178, RR=0.95; 95% CI=0.61-1.50), a prevalently rural area. CONCLUSIONS: Mailing self-samplers to non-responders may increase compliance as compared with delivering standard recall letters. Nevertheless, effectiveness is context specific and the strategy costs should be carefully considered.


Assuntos
Alphapapillomavirus/isolamento & purificação , Programas de Rastreamento , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Cooperação do Paciente , Inquéritos e Questionários , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/virologia , Esfregaço Vaginal
8.
BJOG ; 117(9): 1067-73, 2010 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20604775

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the rate of unsatisfactory cervical cell samples in liquid-based cytology (LBC) versus conventional cytology (CC) by age. DESIGN: Randomised clinical trials. SETTING: Population-based cervical cancer screening in the Netherlands and Italy. POPULATION: Asymptomatic women invited for screening enrolled in two randomised trials: Netherlands ThinPrep versus conventional cytology (NETHCON; 39 010 CC, 46 064 LBC) and New Technologies in Cervical Cancer Screening (NTCC; 22 771 CC, 22 403 LBC). METHODS: Comparison of categorical variables using Pearson's chi-square test, logistic regression and trend tests. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of unsatisfactory samples, ratio of LBC versus CC, and variation by 5-year group. RESULTS: In NETHCON, a lower percentage of LBC samples were judged to be unsatisfactory compared with CC samples (0.33 versus 1.11%). There was no significant trend in unsatisfactory results by age group for conventional cytology (P(trend) = 0.54), but there was a trend towards an increasing percentage of unsatisfactory results with increasing age for LBC (P(trend) < 0.001). In NTCC, a lower percentage of LBC samples were judged to be unsatisfactory compared with conventional cytology (2.59 versus 4.10%). There was a decrease in the unsatisfactory results by age group with conventional cytology (P(trend) < 0.001) and with LBC (P(trend) = 0.01), although the latter trend arose from the 55-60-years age group (P(trend) = 0.62 when excluding this group). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical trial in which the results were collected and the cytologic method used were the most important determinants of unsatisfactory cytology. In all situations, the proportion of unsatisfactory samples was lower in LBC compared with CC. The effects of age depended on the criteria used to define unsatisfactory results.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer/normas , Teste de Papanicolaou , Displasia do Colo do Útero/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Esfregaço Vaginal/normas , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
9.
Br J Cancer ; 100(2): 259-65, 2009 Jan 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19142185

RESUMO

Immunochemical faecal occult blood tests have shown a greater sensitivity than guaiac test in colorectal cancer screening, but optimal number of samples and cutoff have still to be defined. The aim of this multicentric study was to evaluate the performance of immunochemical-based screening strategies according to different positivity thresholds (80, 100, 120 ng ml(-1)) and single vs double sampling (one, at least one, or both positive samples) using 1-day sample with cutoff at 100 ng ml(-1) as the reference strategy. A total of 20 596 subjects aged 50-69 years were enrolled from Italian population-based screening programmes. Positivity rate was 4.5% for reference strategy and 8.0 and 2.0% for the most sensitive and the most specific strategy, respectively. Cancer detection rate of reference strategy was 2.8 per thousand, and ranged between 2.1 and 3.4 per thousand in other strategies; reference strategy detected 15.6 per thousand advanced adenomas (range=10.0-22.5 per thousand). The number needed to scope to find a cancer or an advanced adenoma was lower than 2 (1.5-1.7) for the most specific strategies, whereas it was 2.4-2.7, according to different thresholds, for the most sensitive ones. Different strategies seem to have a greater impact on adenomas rather than on cancer detection rate. The study provides information when deciding screening protocols and to adapt them to local resources.


Assuntos
Adenoma/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Sangue Oculto , Adenoma/sangue , Idoso , Neoplasias Colorretais/sangue , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Reações Falso-Positivas , Feminino , Humanos , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Padrões de Referência
10.
Diagn Cytopathol ; 35(9): 541-4, 2007 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17703457

RESUMO

Within a multicentre controlled trial framework, an external quality control (EQC) was scheduled to evaluate the interlaboratory reproducibility of liquid-based cytology. In particular, this EQC intended to evaluate the reproducibility of the ASCUS diagnosis.A selected set of 30 slides (4 within normal limit cases, 16 atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; 4 low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and 6 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions) circulated among the 13 laboratories involved in the trial.Kappa values were obtained from the comparison between individual laboratory diagnoses and majority diagnoses with target diagnoses. Specific kappa values resulted moderate to high for HSIL and low to moderate for LSIL and WNL. Meanwhile, the specific kappa for ASCUS was below 0.4 in 12 of 13 participating laboratories. The lack of reproducibility for ASCUS was not a result of the introduction of this new technology but rather to the low reproducibility of the ASCUS category itself stemming from intrinsic uncertainties in the reporting criteria.


Assuntos
Técnicas Citológicas/métodos , Displasia do Colo do Útero/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Esfregaço Vaginal/métodos , Esfregaço Vaginal/normas , Técnicas Citológicas/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Controle de Qualidade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
11.
Dig Liver Dis ; 39(4): 321-6, 2007 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17314076

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer may be suspected with otherwise unexplained positive faecal occult blood testing. AIMS: To assess the frequency of gastric cancer following positive faecal occult blood testing and negative colonoscopy. SUBJECTS: Age 40-74 cohort at first screening (1985-2001) with (a) faecal occult blood testing- (83,489), (b) faecal occult blood testing +/colonoscopy+ (2025), or faecal occult blood testing+/colonoscopy- (3555). METHODS: Gastric cancer incidence in faecal occult blood testing subsets, compared with expected standardized incidence rates. RESULTS: Gastric cancer risk was increased (standardized incidence rate=146.7; 95% confidence interval: 105.8-203.4) in faecal occult blood testing+/colonoscopy- subjects. A four-fold excess incidence occurred during first year (observed cases=10, standardized incidence rate=408.3; 95% confidence interval: 219.7-758.8), irrespective of faecal occult blood testing type (guaiac, immunological). No excess risk occurred in faecal occult blood testing- (observed cases=53, standardized incidence rate=91.2; 95% confidence interval: 84.1-98.8) or in faecal occult blood testing+/colonoscopy+ subjects (observed cases=2, standardized incidence rate=101.9; 95% confidence interval: 25.5-407.4). Assuming a 100% 3-year study sensitivity for gastric cancer, faecal occult blood testing positive predictive value would be 0.4% (40-74 years) or 0.7% (> or =60 years) in faecal occult blood testing+/colonoscopy- subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Data suggest an association of faecal occult blood testing+/colonoscopy- and excess gastric cancer incidence in the following year. Due to low faecal occult blood testing+ positive predictive value, routine upper digestive tract endoscopy in these subjects is questionable.


Assuntos
Sangue Oculto , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Colonoscopia , Neoplasias Colorretais/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Sistema de Registros
12.
Br J Cancer ; 96(2): 218-21, 2007 Jan 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17211476

RESUMO

We assessed the correlation between quantitative results of immunological faecal occult blood testing (I-FOBT) and colonic lesions (191 colorectal cancers, 890 adenomas) detected at colonoscopy in 2597 FOBT+ (cutoff 100 ng ml(-1) Hb) subjects. At univariate analysis, a higher average faecal Hb content was significantly associated with male gender (P=0.003), age (P=0.02), and colonoscopy findings (P=0.000). Among adenomas, higher faecal Hb content was significantly associated with size (P=0.0000), presence of severe dysplasia (P=0.0001), presence of villous component (P=0.0002), and location in the left colon (P=0.003). At multivariate analysis adjusting for potential confounders, age (P=0.03), size (P=0.0000), and location in the left colon (P=0.0005) were confirmed as having an independent association with higher faecal Hb content. Immunological FOBT is confirmed to be a specific screening test to detect cancer and adenoma, with a low positivity rate (3.7%) and a high positive predictive value (41.5%). Faecal Hb content is significantly higher for those lesions (cancer and high-risk adenomas) screening is aimed at detecting.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Fezes/química , Hemoglobinas/análise , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Sangue Oculto , Idoso , Análise de Variância , Neoplasias Colorretais/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
13.
Cytopathology ; 17(6): 353-60, 2006 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17168918

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the inter-laboratory reproducibility for atypical glandular cells (AGC) (The Bethesda System (TBS) 2001) of the laboratories involved in the screening programmes in Italy. METHODS: A set of 35 selected slides were circulated among 167 laboratories involved in local population-based cervical screening programmes. Each laboratory provided one single diagnosis per smear. The smears were read blind to the original diagnosis and to the diagnoses provided by other laboratories. A 'majority' diagnosis was defined for each case and assumed as the reference standard. The diagnosis provided from each laboratory was compared with the majority diagnosis. RESULTS: According to the majority report the 35 slides in the set were classified as negative in nine cases, AGC in eight, adenocarcinoma in eight, and squamous lesion or squamous + glandular lesion in 10. The crude agreement between all pairs of laboratories was 49.43%. K-values were 0.46, 0.21, 0.34, 0.36 and 0.32 for negative, AGC/AIS (adenocarcinoma in situ of endocervix), AdenoCa, Sq/Sq + Gl and all reporting categories respectively. Concordance according to overall K was moderate to substantial in 77% of the participating laboratories. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that the AGC category is not easily reproducible. The data confirmed the importance, in a screening scenario, of AGC/AIS diagnoses, but also presented difficulties in differentiating between the two diagnoses. In addition to the results obtained from the circulation of the slides, laboratories which had annually a low number of cervical smears were able to gain experience focused on particular morphological pictures.


Assuntos
Colo do Útero/citologia , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Esfregaço Vaginal/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Esfregaço Vaginal/normas
14.
Int J Biol Markers ; 21(3): 157-61, 2006.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17013797

RESUMO

We evaluated a new immunological fecal occult blood testing assay (FOB Gold, Sentinel = SENT) compared to the assay currently employed in the Florence screening program (OC-Hemodia, Eiken = OC). A total of 4,133 subjects were screened with both tests and underwent colonoscopy if positive (100 ng/mL Hb cutoff) to either test: 190 (4.59%) were positive (OC =140 (3.4%); SENT = 131 (3.2%)). The relative sensitivity for 7 cancers was 100% with OC and 67.9% with SENT, and for 48 high-risk adenomas (HRAs) it was 77.0% with OC and 66.6% with SENT. The positive predictive value (PPV) for cancer+HRA was 31.4% for OC and 28.2% for SENT and the specificity was 97.7 for both. The differences were not statistically significant. Adding SENT to OC increased the positivity rate by 32% and the cancer+HRA detection rate by 25%, and decreased the PPV by 10%. Both tests were performed on the same tubes in 1,601 cases, and in 18 of 47 cases they differed on different tubes but not on the same tube, suggesting inhomogeneous Hb content or varying fecal matrix influence in different samples. SENT has practical advantages for screening [corrected] (fully automated, high output, requires no dedicated instrument), a comparable specificity and a lower sensitivity, though the latter difference may be partially ascribed to differences in sampling and not to the assay itself [corrected] Because of the statistical insignificance of the differences, further studies are needed for confirmation.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Sangue Oculto , Adenoma/diagnóstico , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
15.
Int J Biol Markers ; 21(1): 1-5, 2006.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16711507

RESUMO

The free-to-total prostate-specific antigen ratio (F/T PSA) is associated with the presence of prostate cancer and is thus used as an indicator for suspicion of prostate cancer and as a determinant for biopsy. We reviewed a recent retrospective series of 966 consecutive prostate biopsies where F/T PSA was blindly determined and did not influence biopsy indication. We simulated the association of F/T PSA with biopsy outcome and its impact as a biopsy determinant. When adopting an F/T PSA cutoff of 10%, 13%, 16% or 20% among random sextant biopsies in the 4-10 ng/mL total PSA range, the sensitivity was 15%, 37%, 55% and 72% and the specificity 89%, 80%, 64% and 44%, respectively. Using F/T PSA as a biopsy determinant, from 1.7 to 2.6 cancer biopsies would have been delayed to avoid 10 benign biopsies. As this balance is not acceptable, F/T PSA has no role as a biopsy indicator and its clinical use is questionable.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Biópsia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Masculino , Hiperplasia Prostática/diagnóstico , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
16.
Diagn Cytopathol ; 33(6): 387-93, 2005 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16299751

RESUMO

The CellSlide Processor (Menarini Diagnostics) is an automatic computer-controlled instrument, designed to prepare standardized, thin-layer cytological preparations using a filtration process. In this report, this new processor has been tested in a multicentric investigation, designed to evaluate cell recovery, cellular morphology and possible time saved in reading the slide. The results of this study show that the CellSlide processing system is suitable for use in the preparation of liquid-based gynaecology samples. Furthermore, the high-quality smear produced by the CellSlide decreases the reading time by approximately 20-25%.


Assuntos
Histocitoquímica/instrumentação , Esfregaço Vaginal , Histocitoquímica/métodos
18.
Int J Biol Markers ; 19(4): 257-61, 2004.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15646830

RESUMO

The study purpose was to investigate the association of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection with prostate cancer. The presence and type of HPV DNA were investigated by polymerase chain reaction in the preservation fluid of 60 consecutive prostate core biopsies (29 benign, 31 malignant). The material was inadequate (no DNA found at beta-globin testing) in four benign and five cancer biopsies. HPV DNA was found in 17 of 26 (65.3%) cancer and 12 of 25 (48.0%) benign biopsies (chi2 = 0.94, p = 0.33). High-risk HPV type positivity was observed in 14 of 26 (53.8%) cancer and in five of 25 (20.0%) benign biopsies (chi2 = 4.38, p = 0.03). Twenty-three of 29 cases were positive at L1 region testing with MY09/11 primers; testing with primers directed to the E6/E7 region revealed six further HPV-positive cases (four cancer, two benign). The presence of HPV in prostate tissue suggests a possible reservoir for sexual transmission of types with oncogenic potential. Our findings also suggest a possible role of high-risk HPV infection in the etiology of prostate cancer and encourage further research into this issue.


Assuntos
Papillomaviridae/metabolismo , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Neoplasias da Próstata/virologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biópsia , Primers do DNA/metabolismo , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Risco
19.
Cytopathology ; 14(5): 263-8, 2003 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14510890

RESUMO

The study was aimed at assessing interlaboratory reproducibility in the reporting of cervical smears in the atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) category. A set of 50 selected slides circulated among 89 laboratories, currently involved in population-based screening programmes for cervical cancer, which provided a diagnostic report according to four main reporting categories based on the 1991 Bethesda system. Interlaboratory agreement was determined according to kappa (K) statistics: overall and weighted K values were determined for each laboratory and for single reporting categories. The results showed a very low reproducibility for the ASCUS category. This finding supports the Bethesda system 1991 recommendation to limit the use of this reporting category and suggests that the clinical response to ASCUS reports should be decided locally, based on the observed positive predictive value for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or more severe lesions.


Assuntos
Laboratórios Hospitalares , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/epidemiologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Esfregaço Vaginal/classificação , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Laboratórios , Programas de Rastreamento , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Patologia Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/classificação , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/diagnóstico , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Displasia do Colo do Útero/classificação , Displasia do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/classificação , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico
20.
Diagn Cytopathol ; 29(1): 4-7, 2003 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12827706

RESUMO

The cost-effectiveness of qualifying ASCUS cases into two different subcategories, favoring a reactive (ASCUS-R) or dysplastic process (ASCUS-S), was evaluated at the Centro per lo Studio e la Prevenzione Oncologica of Florence in a prospective study. The study determined the positive predictive value (PPV) for histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) or more (CIN>) severe lesion of the two ASCUS subgroups. ASCUS-S had a PPV (10.78%) comparable to low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) (11.40%). For ASCUS-R cases, the recommendation of 6-mo repeat cytology prompting colposcopy in cases of persistent ASCUS or more severe cytology was also effective, as it selected a subgroup with a relatively high PPV (10.34%). The cost-effectiveness of a protocol based on ASCUS qualification was compared with two other possible options for nonqualified ASCUS cases: immediate colposcopy and colposcopy in persistent ASCUS at 6-mo repeat cytology. The detection rate of CIN2> was substantially higher using ASCUS qualification (35.9 vs 14.8 or 17.1). The cost per ASCUS subject was euro 24.99, 27.11, or 25.14 and that per CIN2> detected was euro 697, 1,831 or 1,470 for the three options, respectively. The evidence that ASCUS detection option implies a higher detection rate of CIN2> and subsequently a lower cost per CIN2> detection must be considered with caution and deserves confirmation by other comparative studies.


Assuntos
Displasia do Colo do Útero/economia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/economia , Esfregaço Vaginal/economia , Colo do Útero/patologia , Colposcopia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Displasia do Colo do Útero/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA