Review: Manipulation of follicle development to improve fertility of cattle in timed-artificial insemination programs.

The development of an ovulatory follicle is a fundamental premise for any reproductive management program that aims to optimize fertility in cattle. Controlling follicular development comprises the synchronized emergence of a new follicular wave, selection and growth of the dominant follicle, and synchronized ovulation of a high-quality oocyte. All these follicular events, primarily driven by gonadotropin secretion, occur under a very dynamic hormonal environment. In this sense, controlling follicular development demands essentially a precise manipulation of the hormonal environment to modulate gonadotropin secretion. Furthermore, the effectiveness of hormonal manipulation strategies in the management of follicular development depends on specific particularities of each situation, which can vary widely according to genetic groups (Bos taurus vs Bos indicus), nutritional, metabolic, and reproductive status. In this regard, the constant search for the refined synchrony between the hormonal treatments and reproductive events, considering these distinctions and particularities, have provided valuable information that contributed to the development of efficient reproductive programs. This manuscript discusses the physiological bases behind the development of fine-tuned timed-artificial insemination protocols for beef and dairy cattle that resulted in great improvements in reproductive efficiency of beef and dairy herds.

Effect of dose and timing of prostaglandin F2α treatments during a Resynch protocol on luteal regression and fertility to timed artificial insemination in lactating Holstein cows.

Our objective was to evaluate the effect of a second PGF2α treatment (25 mg of dinoprost) or a double dose of PGF2α (50 mg of dinoprost) during a Resynch protocol on luteal regression and pregnancies per artificial insemination (P/AI) in lactating dairy cows. Lactating Holstein cows (n = 1,100) were randomly assigned at a nonpregnancy diagnosis to receive (1) Ovsynch (control: 100 µg of GnRH; 7 d, 25 mg of PGF2α; 56 h, 100 µg of GnRH), (2) Ovsynch with a second PGF2α treatment (GPPG: 100 µg of GnRH; 7 d, 25 mg of PGF2α; 24 h, 25 mg of PGF2α; 32 h, 100 µg of GnRH), or (3) Ovsynch with a double dose of PGF2α (GDDP: 100 µg of GnRH; 7 d, 50 mg of PGF2α; 56 h, 100 µg of GnRH). All cows received timed artificial insemination (TAI) approximately 16 h after the second GnRH treatment (G2). Pregnancy diagnosis was performed by transrectal palpation 39 ± 3 d after TAI, and pregnancy status was reconfirmed 66 d after TAI. Blood samples collected from a subset of cows in each treatment at the first PGF2α treatment (n = 394) and at G2 (n = 367) were assayed for progesterone (P4). Data were analyzed by logistic regression using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). At 39 d after TAI, GPPG cows tended to have more P/AI than control cows [35% (137/387) vs. 31% (107/349)], whereas P/AI for GDDP cows [32% (118/364)] did not differ from that for control cows. Pregnancy loss from 38 to 66 d did not differ among treatments and was 8% (30/362). The percentage of cows with complete luteal regression (P4 <0.4 ng/mL at G2) tended to differ among treatments and was greater for GPPG cows than for GDDP and control cows (94% vs. 88% vs. 88%, respectively). Overall, cows with P4 <1 ng/mL at the first PGF2α treatment had fewer P/AI than cows with P4 ≥1 ng/mL (27% vs. 38%), whereas cows with P4 ≥0.4 ng/mL at G2 had fewer P/AI than cows with P4 <0.4 ng/mL (15% vs. 38%). We conclude that adding a second PGF2α treatment 24 h after the first within a Resynch protocol tended to increase the proportion of cows undergoing complete luteal regression and P/AI, whereas treatment with a double dose of PGF2α at a single time did not.