Purification of monoclonal antibodies using novel 3D printed ordered stationary phases.

3D printing offers the unprecedented ability to fabricate chromatography stationary phases with bespoke 3D morphology as opposed to traditional packed beds of spherical beads. The restricted range of printable materials compatible with chromatography is considered a setback for its industrial implementation. Recently, we proposed a novel ink that exhibits favourable printing performance (printing time ∼100 mL/h, resolution ∼200 µm) and broadens the possibilities for a range of chromatography applications thanks to its customisable surface chemistry. In this work, this ink was used to fabricate 3D printed ordered columns with 300 µm channels for the capture and polishing of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. The columns were initially assessed for leachables and extractables, revealing no material propensity for leaching. Columns were then functionalised with protein A and SO3 ligands to obtain affinity and strong cation exchangers, respectively. 3D printed protein A columns showed >85 % IgG recovery from harvested cell culture fluid with purities above 98 %. Column reusability was evaluated over 20 cycles showing unaffected performance. Eluate samples were analysed for co-eluted protein A fragments, host cell protein and aggregates. Results demonstrate excellent HCP clearance (logarithmic reduction value of > 2.5) and protein A leakage in the range of commercial affinity resins (<100 ng/mg). SO3 functionalised columns employed for polishing achieved removal of leaked Protein A (down to 10 ng/mg) to meet regulatory expectations of product purity. This work is the first implementation of 3D printed columns for mAb purification and provides strong evidence for their potential in industrial bioseparations.

Evaluating 3D-printed bioseparation structures using multi-length scale tomography.

X-ray computed tomography was applied in imaging 3D-printed gyroids used for bioseparation in order to visualize and characterize structures from the entire geometry down to individual nanopores. Methacrylate prints were fabricated with feature sizes of 500 µm, 300 µm, and 200 µm, with the material phase exhibiting a porous substructure in all cases. Two X-ray scanners achieved pixel sizes from 5 µm to 16 nm to produce digital representations of samples across multiple length scales as the basis for geometric analysis and flow simulation. At the gyroid scale, imaged samples were visually compared to the original computed-aided designs to analyze printing fidelity across all feature sizes. An individual 500 µm feature, part of the overall gyroid structure, was compared and overlaid between design and imaged volumes, identifying individual printed layers. Internal subvolumes of all feature sizes were segmented into material and void phases for permeable flow analysis. Small pieces of 3D-printed material were optimized for nanotomographic imaging at a pixel size of 63 nm, with all three gyroid samples exhibiting similar geometric characteristics when measured. An average porosity of 45% was obtained that was within the expected design range, and a tortuosity factor of 2.52 was measured. Applying a voidage network map enabled the size, location, and connectivity of pores to be identified, obtaining an average pore size of 793 nm. Using Avizo XLAB at a bulk diffusivity of 7.00 × 10-11 m2s-1 resulted in a simulated material diffusivity of 2.17 × 10-11 m2s-1 ± 0.16 × 10-11 m2s-1.

Flexible material formulations for 3D printing of ordered porous beds with applications in bioprocess engineering.

BACKGROUND: 3D printing is revolutioning many industrial sectors and has the potential to enhance also the biotechnology and bioprocessing fields. Here, we propose a new flexible material formulation to 3D print support matrices with complex, perfectly ordered morphology and with tuneable properties to suit a range of applications in bioprocess engineering. FINDINGS: Supports were fabricated using functional monomers as the key ingredients, enabling matrices with bespoke chemistry, such as charged groups, chemical moieties for further functionalization, and hydrophobic/hydrophilic groups. Other ingredients, e.g. crosslinkers and porogens, can be employed to fabricate supports with diverse characteristics of their porous network, providing an opportunity to further regulate the mechanical and mass transfer properties of the supports. Through this approach, we fabricated and demonstrated the operation of Schoen gyroid columns with (I) positive and negative charges for ion exchange chromatography, (II) enzyme bioreactors with immobilized trypsin to catalyse hydrolysis, and (III) bacterial biofilm bioreactors for fuel desulphurization. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a simple, cost-effective, and flexible fabrication of customized 3D printed supports for different biotechnology and bioengineering applications.