Pembrolizumab or placebo with chemoradiotherapy followed by pembrolizumab or placebo for newly diagnosed, high-risk, locally advanced cervical cancer (ENGOT-cx11/GOG-3047/KEYNOTE-A18): overall survival results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: At the first interim analysis of the phase 3 ENGOT-cx11/GOG-3047/KEYNOTE-A18 study, the addition of pembrolizumab to chemoradiotherapy provided a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. We report the overall survival results from the second interim analysis of this study. METHODS: Eligible patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk (FIGO 2014 stage IB2-IIB with node-positive disease or stage III-IVA regardless of nodal status), locally advanced, histologically confirmed, squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous cervical cancer were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive five cycles of pembrolizumab (200 mg) or placebo every 3 weeks with concurrent chemoradiotherapy, followed by 15 cycles of pembrolizumab (400 mg) or placebo every 6 weeks. Pembrolizumab or placebo and cisplatin were administered intravenously. Patients were stratified at randomisation by planned external beam radiotherapy type (intensity-modulated radiotherapy [IMRT] or volumetric-modulated arc therapy [VMAT] vs non-IMRT or non-VMAT), cervical cancer stage at screening (FIGO 2014 stage IB2-IIB node positive vs III-IVA), and planned total radiotherapy (external beam radiotherapy plus brachytherapy) dose (<70 Gy vs ≥70 Gy [equivalent dose of 2 Gy]). Primary endpoints were progression-free survival per RECIST 1.1 by investigator or by histopathological confirmation of suspected disease progression and overall survival defined as the time from randomisation to death due to any cause. Safety was a secondary endpoint. FINDINGS: Between June 9, 2020, and Dec 15, 2022, 1060 patients at 176 sites in 30 countries across Asia, Australia, Europe, North America, and South America were randomly assigned to treatment, with 529 patients in the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group and 531 patients in the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group. At the protocol-specified second interim analysis (data cutoff Jan 8, 2024), median follow-up was 29·9 months (IQR 23·3-34·3). Median overall survival was not reached in either group; 36-month overall survival was 82·6% (95% CI 78·4-86·1) in the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group and 74·8% (70·1-78·8) in the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group. The hazard ratio for death was 0·67 (95% CI 0·50-0·90; p=0·0040), meeting the protocol-specified primary objective. 413 (78%) of 528 patients in the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group and 371 (70%) of 530 in the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group had a grade 3 or higher adverse event, with anaemia, white blood cell count decreased, and neutrophil count decreased being the most common adverse events. Potentially immune-mediated adverse events occurred in 206 (39%) of 528 patients in the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group and 90 (17%) of 530 patients in the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04221945. INTERPRETATION: Pembrolizumab plus chemoradiotherapy significantly improved overall survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer These data, together with results from the first interim analysis, support this immuno-chemoradiotherapy strategy as a new standard of care for this population. FUNDING: Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co.

Follow-Up of Patients Diagnosed With Germinal Testicular Tumors (Seminomas and Non-seminomatous) Treated With a Bone Marrow Transplant and a High Dose of Chemotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Germinal testicular tumors are the most common malignant neoplasm in men around 20 to 34 years. Even though they are unusual, they have increased incidence in the last decade; they have an excellent prognosis and overall survival at five years, approximately 95%. Divergent data exists regarding treatment options in patients with first, second, and third relapses with conventional therapy. Some studies describe the possible benefit of using high-dose chemotherapy associated with a bone marrow transplant with variable results. METHODS:  The present study describes clinical outcomes, clinical response, mortality, overall survival, and progression-free survival to two years in a group of patients with germinal malignant tumors, seminoma versus non-seminomatous with evidence of progression of the disease at first, second, or third conventional chemotherapy regimens, and who received high dose chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation at the National Cancer Institute between 2010 and 2021. RESULTS: A retrospective observational study of case series showed that 57% of patients in third-line therapy received high-dose chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation, with progression disease median time from diagnosis more than two years. Patients in the post-graft period presented infectious complications (71%). The most common were febrile neutropenia (29%) with a mortality rate of 71% (n=5), progression-free survival of 2.3 months, and overall survival of 7.4 months. CONCLUSIONS:  These results show that in this group of patients, regimens with high-dose chemotherapy associated with bone marrow transplants, have a worse prognosis compared to other cohorts of patients, and may not be the best candidates for this rescue therapy.

Pembrolizumab or placebo with chemoradiotherapy followed by pembrolizumab or placebo for newly diagnosed, high-risk, locally advanced cervical cancer (ENGOT-cx11/GOG-3047/KEYNOTE-A18): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Pembrolizumab has shown efficacy in persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer. The effect of chemoradiotherapy might be enhanced by immunotherapy. In this phase 3 trial, we assessed the efficacy and safety of adding pembrolizumab to chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 ENGOT-cx11/GOG-3047/KEYNOTE-A18 clinical trial, adults (age ≥18 years) at 176 medical centres in 30 countries with newly diagnosed, high-risk, locally advanced cervical cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) using an interactive voice-response system with integrated web response to receive 5 cycles of pembrolizumab (200 mg) or placebo every 3 weeks plus chemoradiotherapy, followed by 15 cycles of pembrolizumab (400 mg) or placebo every 6 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by planned external beam radiotherapy type (intensity-modulated radiotherapy or volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs non-intensity-modulated radiotherapy or non-volumetric-modulated arc therapy), cervical cancer stage at screening (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2014 stage IB2-IIB node positive vs stage III-IVA), and planned total radiotherapy (external beam radiotherapy plus brachytherapy) dose (<70 Gy vs ≥70 Gy equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions). Primary endpoints were progression-free survival per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1-by investigator or by histopathologic confirmation of suspected disease progression-and overall survival. Primary analysis was conducted in the intention-to-treat population, which included all randomly allocated participants. Safety was assessed in the as-treated population, which included all randomly allocated patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04221945, and is closed to new participants. FINDINGS: Between June 9, 2020, and Dec 15, 2022, 1060 participants were randomly assigned to treatment, with 529 assigned to the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group and 531 to the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group. At data cutoff (Jan 9, 2023), median follow-up was 17·9 months (IQR 11·3-22·3) in both treatment groups. Median progression-free survival was not reached in either group; rates at 24 months were 68% in the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group versus 57% in the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group. The hazard ratio (HR) for disease progression or death was 0·70 (95% CI 0·55-0·89, p=0·0020), meeting the protocol-specified primary objective. Overall survival at 24 months was 87% in the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group and 81% in the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group (information fraction 42·9%). The HR for death was 0·73 (0·49-1·07); these data have not crossed the boundary of statistical significance. Grade 3 or higher adverse event rates were 75% in the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group and 69% in the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group. INTERPRETATION: Pembrolizumab plus chemoradiotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival in patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk, locally advanced cervical cancer. FUNDING: Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co (MSD).

Durvalumab Plus Carboplatin/Paclitaxel Followed by Maintenance Durvalumab With or Without Olaparib as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Endometrial Cancer: The Phase III DUO-E Trial.

PURPOSE: Immunotherapy and chemotherapy combinations have shown activity in endometrial cancer, with greater benefit in mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient (dMMR) than MMR-proficient (pMMR) disease. Adding a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor may improve outcomes, especially in pMMR disease. METHODS: This phase III, global, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial randomly assigned eligible patients with newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer 1:1:1 to: carboplatin/paclitaxel plus durvalumab placebo followed by placebo maintenance (control arm); carboplatin/paclitaxel plus durvalumab followed by maintenance durvalumab plus olaparib placebo (durvalumab arm); or carboplatin/paclitaxel plus durvalumab followed by maintenance durvalumab plus olaparib (durvalumab + olaparib arm). The primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) in the durvalumab arm versus control and the durvalumab + olaparib arm versus control. RESULTS: Seven hundred eighteen patients were randomly assigned. In the intention-to-treat population, statistically significant PFS benefit was observed in the durvalumab (hazard ratio [HR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.89]; P = .003) and durvalumab + olaparib arms (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.43 to 0.69]; P < .0001) versus control. Prespecified, exploratory subgroup analyses showed PFS benefit in dMMR (HR [durvalumab v control], 0.42 [95% CI, 0.22 to 0.80]; HR [durvalumab + olaparib v control], 0.41 [95% CI, 0.21 to 0.75]) and pMMR subgroups (HR [durvalumab v control], 0.77 [95% CI, 0.60 to 0.97]; HR [durvalumab + olaparib v control] 0.57; [95% CI, 0.44 to 0.73]); and in PD-L1-positive subgroups (HR [durvalumab v control], 0.63 [95% CI, 0.48 to 0.83]; HR [durvalumab + olaparib v control], 0.42 [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.57]). Interim overall survival results (maturity approximately 28%) were supportive of the primary outcomes (durvalumab v control: HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.56 to 1.07]; P = .120; durvalumab + olaparib v control: HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.42 to 0.83]; P = .003). The safety profiles of the experimental arms were generally consistent with individual agents. CONCLUSION: Carboplatin/paclitaxel plus durvalumab followed by maintenance durvalumab with or without olaparib demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful PFS benefit in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.

Seguimiento de la paciente con diagnóstico de cáncer de mama. Revisión de la evidencia y abordaje terapéutico en el Instituto Nacionalde Cancerología - Colombia / Follow-up of the patient with breast cancer history. Review of the evidence and approach at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología - Colombia

Los supervivientes de cáncer se definen como aquellos individuos que han completado su tratamiento inicial y no tienen evidencia de la enfermedad. Para el caso de las pacientes supervivientes de cáncer de mama, el seguimiento involucra no sólo la vigilancia de la recaída locorregional y a distancia, así como la tamización de segundos primarios mamarios, sino también la evaluación de los efectos relacionados con las terapias recibidas. Hoy en día, existe controversia sobre cuál debe ser el método, la frecuencia, la duración y tipo de personal de la salud que realice el seguimiento de estas pacientes. Las guías de las distintas sociedades científicas muestran una variabilidad importante en las recomendaciones a este respecto. Este documento pretende revisar la mejor evidencia disponible sobre los procedimientos para la detección de la recaída locorregional, de las metástasis a distancia, de un segundo cáncer de mama contralateral y de los eventos adversos relacionados con los tratamientos para el cáncer de mama. Adicionalmente, se examinan los porcentajes y sitios de recidiva tumoral con relación al estadio clínico y a la biología tumoral

Cancer survivors are defined as those individuals who have completed their initial treatment and have no evidence of disease. In the case of breast cancer survivors, follow-up involves not only surveillance of locoregional and distant relapse, as well as screening for second primary breast cancers, but also evaluation of the effects related to the therapies received. Nowadays, there is controversy about what should be the method, the frequency, the duration and the type of health personnel that carry out the follow-up of these patients. The guides of the different scientific societies show a significant variability in the recommendations in this regard. This document aims to review the best available evidence on procedures for the detection of locoregional relapse, distant metastases, contralateral second breast cancer, and adverse events related to breast cancer treatments. Additionally, the percentages and sites of tumor recurrence are examined in relation to clinical stage and tumor biology

Tratamiento sistémico para el cáncer de mama HER2 positivo avanzado. Revisión de la evidencia y abordaje terapéutico en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología - Colombia / Systemic treatment for advanced HER2 positive breast cancer. Review of the evidence and therapeutic approach at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología - Colombia

El cáncer de mama es la neoplasia más frecuente y de mayor mortalidad en las mujeres en todo el mundo. El receptor 2 del factor de crecimiento epidérmico humano (HER2) se sobreexpresa en aproximadamente el 20% de las pacientes con cáncer de mama y se asocia a mayor riesgo de recidiva tumoral y mortalidad. Antes del desarrollo de los anticuerpos monoclonales dirigidos contra HER2, el cáncer de mama HER2 positivo estaba asociado con un pronóstico desfavorable. El uso de las terapias dirigidas anti HER2 ha mejorado significativamente las tasas de supervivencia global tanto en el escenario adyuvante como en la enfermedad metastásica. En los últimos años han surgido nuevos medicamentos que bloquean esta vía de señalización, lo cual ha permitido establecer varias líneas de tratamiento con terapia anti HER2 en las pacientes con enfermedad metastásica. Por esta razón, las unidades funcionales de Oncología Clínica/Seno y Tejidos Blandos tomaron la decisión de realizar una revisión de la evidencia científica disponible a octubre de 2021, para establecer las recomendaciones en el abordaje terapéutico de las pacientes con cáncer de mama metastásico HER2 positivo en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INC).

Breast cancer is the most common neoplasm and the one with the highest mortality in women worldwide. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is overexpressed in approximately 20% of breast cancer patients and is associated with an increased risk of tumor recurrence and mortality. Before the development of monoclonal antibodies directed against HER2, HER2-positive breast cancer was associated with a poor prognosis. The use of anti-HER2 targeted therapies has significantly improved overall survival rates both in the adjuvant setting and in metastatic disease. In recent years, new drugs have emerged that block this signaling pathway, which has made it possible to establish several lines of treatment with anti-HER2 therapy in patients with metastatic disease. For this reason, the clinical oncology/breast and soft tissue functional units made the decision to conduct a review of the available scientific evidence as of October 2021 to establish recommendations for the therapeutic approach to patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in the National Cancer Institute (INC).

Criterios para la identificación de síndromes de cáncer de mama hereditarios. Revisión de la literatura y recomendaciones para el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología - Colombia / Criteria for the identification of hereditary breast cancer syndromes. Review of the literature and recommendations for the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología - Colombia

Introducción. Los síndromes de cáncer de mama hereditario (SCMH) corresponden a un 5% a 10% de todos los casos de la enfermedad, en su mayoría explicados por mutaciones en los genes BRCA1 y BRCA2. Se han publicado múltiples guías y recomendaciones internacionales actualizadas, con el fin de dar lineamientos para seleccionar los casos con sospecha de un SCMH. Como antecedentes locales, el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de Colombia cuenta con un "Programa institucional para la identificación y manejo de familias con sospecha de cáncer hereditario", con fines asistenciales, dentro del cual el cáncer de mama es la patología más remitida al servicio de genética (55%; 540/986). En el 21% de los casos con cáncer de mama que cumplieron criterios NCCN se diagnosticó un SCMH, la mayoría asociados a mutaciones en los genes BRCA1 y BRCA2 (12,3%) y en menor proporción a otros genes de susceptibilidad al cáncer de mama (8,6%).Objetivo. Identificar los criterios de selección más implementados para diagnosticar los casos de cáncer de mama hereditarios a través de una revisión de la literatura, y realizar un consenso Institucional sobre las indicaciones de remisión a consejería genética y solicitud de pruebas para fines diagnósticos y de tratamiento sistémico con iPARP. Materiales y métodos. Se realizó una revisión narrativa de la literatura científica publicada en los últimos 10 años, al 30 de agosto del 2021, sobre la prevalencia de mutaciones germinales en los genes BRCA1 y BRCA2, y en otros genes no BRCA, en pacientes con cáncer de mama, obteniéndose en total 146 y seleccionándose un total de 41 artículos. En el interior de las unidades funcionales de mama y tejidos blandos, genética y oncología clínica, se presentó la evidencia disponible, realizando una discusión amplia entre las tres unidades y finalmente se definieron las indicaciones para remisión a genética, para solicitar estudios genéticos y de tratamiento sistémico con iPARP.Resultados. Según lo reportado en la literatura, los principales criterios de sospecha de un SCMH deben incluir: el subtipo triple negativo, la presentación bilateral, la edad muy temprana de diagnóstico y los antecedentes familiares (AF) de cáncer de mama antes de los 50 años o cáncer de ovario a cualquier edad.Conclusiones. Se adoptan las recomendaciones de la NCCN para la remisión a consejería genética y solicitud de estudios genéticos para identificar cáncer de mama hereditario, y se establecen los criterios del estudio OlympiA para la solicitud de estudios genéticos con el fin de guiar el tratamiento sistémico con iPARP en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Lo anterior permitirá que desde nuestra Institución se ofrezca adecuadamente este servicio a la población colombiana.

ntroduction: Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndromes (HBOC) represents 5% to 10% of all breast cancer cases, and BRCA1andBRCA2 explain most of these syndromes. Multiple guidelines and updated recommendations have been published to define which patients should be selected for genetic testing based on a clinical suspicion of a HBOC syndrome. For context, the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología from Colombia developed an "Institutional Program for the identification and management of families with suspected hereditary cancer" for healthcare purposes, within which breast cancer is the most referred pathology to the genetics service (55%; 540/986). Inherited cancer was diagnosed in 21% of the patients with breast cancer who met NCCN criteria; most of these were associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations (12.3%) and to a lesser extent to other breast cancer susceptibility genes (8.6%).Objective: To identify the most implemented selection criteria to diagnose inherited breast cancer cases, through a review of the literature, and to achieve an institutional consensus on the indications for referral to genetic counseling and genetic testing for diagnostic and systemic treatment with PARPi.Materials and methods: A narrative review of the scientific literature published in the last 10 years as of August 30, 2021 on the prevalence of germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, and in other non-BRCA genes, in patients with breast cancer was carried out. Overall, 146 articles were first identified but only 41 were selected. Within the functional units of breast and soft tissue, genetics and clinical oncology, the available evidence was presented and a broad discussion was carried out; finally the indications for referral to genetic counseling, for genetic testing and for systemic treatment with PARPi were defined.Results: As reported in the literature, clinical criteria for HBOC syndrome should include: triple negative subtype, bilateral presentation, very early age of diagnosis and family history (FH) of breast cancer before 50 years of age or ovarian cancer at any age. Conclusions: The NCCN recommendations for referral to genetic counseling and ordering genetic testing to diagnose HBOC cases are adopted at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología from Colombia, as well as the OlympiA study criteria for ordering genetic testing to guide systemic PARPi therapy. This will allow our Institution to adequately offer this service to the Colombian population.

Indicaciones para el uso de pertuzumab en cáncer de mama HER2 positivono metastásico en los escenarios neoadyuvante y adyuvante. Revisión de la evidencia y abordaje terapéutico en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología - Colombia / Indications for the use of pertuzumab in non-metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant. Review of the literature and therapeutic approach at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología - Colombia

La adición de la terapia dirigida a la quimioterapia citotóxica en pacientes con cáncer de mama ha mejorado significativamente los desenlaces oncológicos en las pacientes con tumores HER2 positivo. El uso de pertuzumab durante el manejo neoadyuvante incrementa significativamente la respuesta patológica completa y en la actualidad permite emplear regímenes libres de antraciclinas con una eficacia similar y menores efectos cardiovasculares (en especial sobre la fracción de eyección). El beneficio en supervivencia libre de enfermedad invasiva, de adicionar pertuzumab en el escenario adyuvante en las pacientes sin tratamiento anti HER2 previo, está limitado a aquellas con ganglios positivos. La implementación de esquemas con bloqueo dual anti HER2, durante el tratamiento inicial del cáncer de mama HER2 positivo, mejora significativamente el pronóstico oncológico en este grupo de pacientes.

The addition of targeted therapy to cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer has significantly improved oncologic outcomes in patients with HER2-positive tumors. The use of pertuzumab during neoadjuvant management significantly increases the complete pathological response and currently allows the use of anthracycline-free regimens with similar efficacy and fewer cardiovascular effects (especially on ejection fraction). The benefit of pertuzumab in disease-free survival in the adjuvant setting for patients without prior anti-HER2 treatment is limited to those with positive nodes. The implementation of schemes with dual anti-HER2 blockade during the initial treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer significantly improves the oncological outcomes in this group of patients.

Estudios de extensión para la estadificación del cáncer de mama infiltrante. Revisión de la evidencia y abordaje terapéutico en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología - Colombia / Extension studies for the staging of infiltrating breast cancer. Review of evidence and therapeutic approach at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología - Colombia

La estadificación del cáncer de mama tiene como objetivo determinar la extensión de la enfermedad, definir el tratamiento y el pronóstico de la misma. La American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC) ha asignado el estadio utilizando el tamaño del tumor (T), la presencia de compromiso ganglionar (N), y la presencia o ausencia de metástasis a distancia (M). Con el advenimiento de la biología molecular, se integra a la estadificación anatómica la información pronóstica con el grado histológico, el estado de los receptores hormonales y el resultado del receptor de HER2. En el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INC), la incorporación del TNM pronóstico trajo consigo un aumento de estadio en el 14,47% de los casos y una disminución en el 40,3%; este resultado se atribuyó en parte al mayor porcentaje de tumores localmente avanzados dentro de la institución. Por subtipo biológico, los tumores luminales presentan mayor riesgo de metástasis óseas, los tumores triple negativo a pulmón y sistema nervioso central; y los tumores HER2 a SNC, hígado y pulmón. Teniendo en cuenta este compromiso a distancia, los métodos de estadificación comúnmente utilizados son gammagrafía ósea (GO), radiografía de tórax (RxT), ecografía hepática (UH) y/o tomografía computarizada (TC). En el caso de identificar hallazgos sospechosos en estos exámenes o si el cuadro clínico del paciente lo sugiere, se realizan estudios adicionales como TC o resonancia magnética nuclear (RMN). Los cambios en la estadificación clínica y la biología del cáncer de mama motivaron a las Unidades de Seno y Tejidos Blandos y Oncología Clínica del Instituto Nacional de Cancerología a revisar la evidencia científica disponible para recomendar la pertinencia de los estudios de extensión.

The staging of breast cancer has the objective to determine the extent of the disease, define treatment and prognosis. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) has assigned the stage using the size of the tumor (T), the presence of lymph node involvement (N), and the presence or absence of distant metastases (M). With the advent of molecular biology, prognostic information with histological grade, hormone receptor status, and HER2 receptor is integrated with anatomic staging. In the National Institute of Cancerology (INC) the incorporation of TNM brought with it an increase in stage in 14.47% of cases and a decrease in 40.3%; this result was attributed in part to the higher percentage of locally advanced tumors within the institution. By biological subtype, luminal tumors have a higher risk of bone metastases, triple negative tumors to the lung and central nervous system; and HER2 tumors to CNS, liver and lung. Taking this distant involvement into account, the commonly used staging methods are bone scan (BS), chest radiography (CXR), liver ultrasound (UH) and/or computed tomography (CT) scans. In the case of identifying suspicious findings in these tests or if the patient's clinical condition suggests it, additional studies such as CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are performed. Changes in the clinical staging and biology of breast cancer motivated the Breast and Clinical Oncology Functional Unit of the National Cancer Institute to review the available scientific evidence to recommend the relevance of extension studies.

Actualizaciones en el tratamiento del cáncer de mama - 2 / Updates in the treatment of breast cancer - 2

En el año 2021, la Unidad Funcional de Seno y Tejidos Blandos, junto con la Unidad de Oncología Clínica del Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INC) de Bogotá, D.C., Colombia, publicamos un suplemento sobre actualizaciones de manejo en tres temas quirúrgicos y tres temas clínicos de cáncer de mama y melanoma, con gran acogida por los colegas cirujanos de mama y oncólogos clínicos de todo el país. A mediados de 2021, planeamos realizar un segundo suplemento de actualizaciones seleccionando cinco temas clínicos, que impactan las conductas terapéuticas en los pacientes con cáncer de mama. Siguiendo la misma metodología utilizada para las anteriores actualizaciones, se realizó la revisión y presentación de la evidencia científica relevante en cada uno de los temas, con actualización de la misma a mayo 2022; dicha revisión fue realizada por dos especialistas en entrenamiento de cada uno de los dos servicios, previa supervisión por alguno de los profesores, junto con el análisis de la experiencia de la Unidad Funcional (información de nuestras publicaciones y de la base de datos de cáncer de mama) y la experiencia del grupo de genética del INC. Este proceso fue seguido por la discusión al interior de los grupos involucrados y, finalmente, se establecieron los cambios de conducta en el abordaje terapéutico de cada uno de los temas evaluados.Los cinco manuscritos incluyen: introducción, definición de conceptos clave, justificación, revisión de la evidencia científica y por último, la conducta clínica adoptada después de la discusión conjunta entre las unidades funcionales involucradas en cada tema, basada en los resultados de los ensayos clínicos y la disponibilidad de recursos de nuestro sistema de salud.

Factores pronósticos de la supervivencia en pacientes con melanoma de piel metastásico, que reciben primera línea de tratamiento con inmunoterapia anti PD-1 o régimen con anti PD-1 y anti CTLA-4, en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de Colombia / Prognostic factors for survival in patients with metastatic skin melanoma, receiving first-line treatment with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy regimen at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (Bogotá, Colombia)

Introducción. En melanoma metastásico, uno de los estándares de tratamiento es la inmunoterapia anti-PD-1 y anti-CTLA-4. El objetivo de esta investigación fue determinar factores pronósticos asociados con la supervivencia de pacientes con melanoma metastásico, con primera línea con inmunoterapia anti-PD-1 o anti-PD-1 y anti-CTLA-4, en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de Colombia.Métodos. Se revisaron 63 historias clínicas del Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de enero de 2016 a abril de 2020. Se realizó un análisis de supervivencia con método de Kaplan-Meier, prueba log-rank y regresión de Cox.Resultados. La mayoría de los pacientes fueron mujeres (58,7%); 47,6% tenían subtipo lentiginoso acral, 17,4% BRAF mutado, 20,6% compromiso en SNC, 50,8% recibieron nivolumab, 41,3% pembrolizumab y 7,9% nivolumab + ipilimumab. La mediana de supervivencia libre de progresión fue de 7,3 meses, con una tasa a 1, 2 y 3 años de 38,0%, 22,0% y 12,0% respectivamente; la mediana de supervivencia global fue 12,2 meses con una tasa a 1, 2 y 3 años de 50,0%, 25,0% y 19,0%. Como factor pronóstico protector para SLP se encontró el recibir nivolumab en comparación con pembrolizumab (HR=0,427; IC95% 0,21-0,86) y para SG el estado funcional al diagnóstico (ECOG 2 HR=12,38; IC95% 2,20-69,45).Conclusión. La SLP y SG fueron menores a la de ensayos clínicos aleatorizados en población caucásica, pero similar a la encontrada en estudios que incluyen mayor proporción del subtipo histológico lentiginoso acral, como la nuestra. Se encontraron como factores pronósticos el tipo de inmunoterapia utilizada y el estado funcional al diagnóstico.

Introduction: In metastatic melanoma, one of the standard treatments is anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy. This research aimed to determine prognostic factors associated with the survival of patients with metastatic melanoma who started first-line treatment with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INC) (Bogotá, Colombia).Methods: A total of 63 medical records from the INC were reviewed from January 2016 to April 2020. A survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox regression.Results: Most patients were women (58.7%); 47.6% had acral lentiginous subtype, 17.4% BRAF-mutated melanoma, 20.6% CNS involvement, 50.8% received nivolumab, 41.3% pembrolizumab, and 7.9% nivolumab + ipilimumab. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.3 months with a rate at 1, 2, and 3 years of 38%, 22%, and 12%, respectively, while median overall survival (OS) was 12.2 months with a rate of 50%, 25%, and 19% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. A protective prognostic factor for PFS was to receive nivolumab compared to pembrolizumab (HR=0.427; CI95% 0.21-0.86), and for OS, functional status at diagnosis (ECOG 2 HR=12.38; CI95% 2.20-69.45).Conclusion: PFS and OS were lower than those of randomized clinical trials in the Caucasian population, but similar to those found in studies that include a higher proportion of the acral lentiginous histological subtype, such as ours. The type of immunotherapy used and functional status at diagnosis were found as prognostic factors

Diagnóstico y tratamiento multidisciplinario de melanoma temprano y localmente avanzado. Consenso de expertos. Asociación Colombiana de Hematología y Oncología (ACHO) / Diagnosis and multidisciplinary treatment of early-stage and locally advanced melanoma: Expert consensus, Colombian Association of Hemato-Oncology (ACHO)

Resumen Introducción: El melanoma ocasiona el 75% de las muertes por cáncer de piel. Según GLOBOCAN, en 2018 se presentaron 287.723 casos nuevos de melanoma, con una mortalidad de 60.712 casos, que equivale al 20% del total de los casos incidentes. Las alternativas para el tratamiento del melanoma se fundamentan en la estatificación de la enfermedad, y en las características moleculares de la enfermedad. Objetivo: Consensuar, por común acuerdo de expertos, sugerencias para el diagnóstico y manejo de melanoma temprano basadas en la evidencia y ajustadas al contexto colombiano. Métodos: Se llevó a cabo un consenso de expertos multidisciplinario, constituido por 19 oncólogos clínicos, 2 cirujanos de mama y tejidos blandos, 2 dermatólogos, 2 patólogos y 2 radioterapeutas, miembros activos de la Asociación Colombiana de Hemato Oncología (ACHO). Este consenso se realizó en 4 etapas: 1. Estructuración de 29 preguntas, que se calificaron de 1 a 9. 2. Reenvío de las preguntas no consensuadas. 3. Análisis y discusión de las respuestas. 4. Las respuestas no consensuadas se llevaron a un consenso nominal. Resultados: Se discutieron 29 preguntas relacionadas con el diagnóstico y tratamiento de melanoma temprano, se construyeron sugerencias basadas en evidencia utilizada por los expertos y en guías de manejo de oncología reconocidas internacionalmente, adaptadas al contexto y realidad colombianos. Conclusiones: Se presentan sugerencias multidisciplinarias para el diagnóstico y tratamiento de melanoma temprano, las cuales debe considerarse para orientar la toma de decisiones y homogenizar la práctica clínica de acuerdo al contexto colombiano y a las características propias del sistema de salud del país. Este es un documento académico y no regulatorio.

Abstract Introduction: Melanoma causes 75% of deaths from skin cancer. In 2018, according to GLOBOCAN, 287,723 new melanoma cases were registered, with a mortality of 60,712 cases, which is equivalent to 20% of all incident cases. Alternatives for the treatment of melanoma are based on disease staging and the molecular characteristics of the disease. Objective: To establish a consensus by common agreement of experts and construct suggestions for the diagnosis and management of early-stage melanoma based on evidence and adjusted to the Colombian context. Methods: A multidisciplinary expert consensus was established, wth the participation of 19 clinical oncologists, 2 soft tissue surgeons, 2 dermatologists, 2 pathologists, and 2 radiotherapists, active members of the Colombian Association of Hemato-Oncology (ACHO). This consensus was carried out in four stages: 1) Structuring of 29 questions, which were scored from 1 to 9; 2) Resubmission of non-consensual questions; 3) Analysis and discussion of responses; and 4) Validation of non-consensual responses by nominal consensus. Results: Twenty-nine questions related to the diagnosis and treatment of early-stage melanoma were discussed in order to construct suggestions based on evidence proven by experts, as well as on internationally recognized oncology management guidelines adapted to the Colombian context and reality. Conclusions: Multidisciplinary suggestions are offered for the diagnosis and treatment of early-stage melanoma, which should be considered in order to guide decision-making and homogenize clinical practice according to the Colombian context and the characteristics of the Colombian health care system. This is an academic and non-regulatory document.

Tumor desmoplásico de célula pequeña y redonda paratesticular/testicular: reporte de caso y revisión de la literatura / Paratesticular/testicular desmoplastic round small cell malignant tumor: case report and literature review

Resumen El tumor desmoplásico de célula redonda y pequeña (TDCRP) es una patología neoplásica maligna agresiva y poco común. Afecta predominantemente a hombres entre la segunda y tercera década de la vida. Los pacientes que la padecen tienen un pronóstico pobre, con una supervivencia global a 5 años de hasta el 30%. Por lo general se presenta como una masa en la cavidad abdominal, frecuentemente multifocal. Para su tratamiento se recomienda un enfoque multimodal con cirugía, quimioterapia y radioterapia. Poco más de 20 casos de TDCRP a nivel testicular/paratesticular se han reportado en la literatura. A continuación, se presenta un caso ilustrativo en esta localización, se discute el caso y se realiza revisión de la literatura.

Abstract Desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) is an aggressive and rare malignant neoplasm. It mainly affects young men in their twenties and thirties. Patients with it have a poor prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate of up to 30%. It generally presents as a mass in the abdominal cavity, often multifocal. A multimodal approach is recommended for its treatment, with surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Just over 20 cases of testicular/paratesticular DSRCT have been reported in the literature. Below, we present an illustrative case in this location, we discuss the case and review the literature.