Economic burden of recurrent hyperkalemia in patients with chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Hyperkalemia is a common complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and can become recurrent in half of cases. However, the incremental economic burden associated with recurrent hyperkalemia is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate all-cause health care resource utilization (HRU) and medical costs in patients with stage 3/4 CKD with recurrent hyperkalemia vs normokalaemia and vs nonrecurrent hyperkalemia. METHODS: Data were from Optum's de-identified Market Clarity Data (January 1, 2016, to August 1, 2022). This retrospective observational cohort study compared patients with stage 3/4 CKD with recurrent hyperkalemia (≥2 hyperkalemia events within 1 year [hyperkalemia event: hyperkalemia diagnosis or potassium [K+]>5 mmol/l]; index was the first hyperkalemia event) with an exact- and propensity score-matched cohort of patients with normokalemia (K+ ≥3.5 to ≤5 mmol/l; random K+ as index) and separately with a matched cohort of patients with nonrecurrent hyperkalemia (1 hyperkalemia event within 1 year; index was hyperkalemia event). Patient characteristics, medication use, HRU, and medical costs were compared between cohorts using standardized mean differences during the 12-month baseline period. All-cause HRU and medical costs during the 12-month follow-up were compared using Wilcoxon rank sum tests for continuous variables and McNemar tests for categorical variables. Substudies of recurrent hyperkalemia vs normokalemia were conducted for patients with Medicare coverage and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi) use. RESULTS: The recurrent hyperkalemia vs normokalemia sample comprised 4,549 matched pairs (Medicare substudy: 3,151; RAASi substudy: 3,535) and the recurrent hyperkalemia vs nonrecurrent hyperkalemia sample comprised 1,599 matched pairs. Baseline characteristics, HRU, and medical costs of the cohorts were similar after matching. During follow-up, patients with recurrent hyperkalemia had a mean of 11.2 more health care encounters (0.5 more inpatient admissions, 0.3 more emergency department visits, and 7.2 more outpatient visits) than patients with normokalemia. Patients with recurrent hyperkalemia also had double the total annual medical costs vs normokalemia ($34,163 vs $15,175; P < 0.001), mainly driven by inpatient costs ($21,250 vs $7,392), which accounted for 62.2% and 48.7% of total costs, respectively. Results were similar in the RAASi and Medicare substudies. Recurrent hyperkalemia was associated with a mean 4.3 more all-cause health care encounters and $14,057 higher medical costs (both P < 0.001) than nonrecurrent hyperkalemia. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent hyperkalemia in patients with stage 3/4 CKD was associated with higher all-cause HRU and medical costs compared with normokalemia (including in patients with Medicare coverage and RAASi use) and nonrecurrent hyperkalemia. Research is needed to understand if long-term treatment strategies aimed at preventing hyperkalemia recurrence may alleviate this economic burden.

Hyperkalemia and risk of chronic kidney disease progression: A propensity score matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hyperkalemia is a known complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, it is not known whether hyperkalemia directly contributes to CKD progression and the risk of death. Clarifying the extent to which hyperkalemia is associated with CKD progression and mortality can inform clinical practice and guide future research. The objective of this study was to quantify the risks of CKD progression and mortality associated with hyperkalemia in patients with stages 3b/4 CKD. METHODS: This was a real-world, exact and propensity score-matched, observational cohort study using data (January 2016-December 2021) from Optum's deidentified Market Clarity Data, a large US integrated insurance claims/electronic medical record database. The study included matched adult patients with stages 3b/4 CKD with and without hyperkalemia, not regularly treated with an intestinal potassium (K+) binder. Measured outcomes were CKD progression and all-cause mortality. CKD progression was defined as diagnosis of CKD stage 4 (if stage 3b at index), CKD stage 5 or kidney failure, or receipt of dialysis or kidney transplantation. RESULTS: After matching, there were 6,619 patients in each of the hyperkalemia and non-hyperkalemia cohorts, with a mean (standard deviation) follow-up time of 2.12 (1.42) years. Use of any renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) during baseline was common (75.9%) and most patients had CKD stage 3b (71.2%). Patients with hyperkalemia had a 1.60-fold (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.50, 1.71) higher risk of CKD progression and a 1.09-fold (1.02, 1.16) higher risk of all-cause mortality relative to patients without hyperkalemia. Relative risks of CKD progression associated with hyperkalemia were similar within the subset of patients receiving RAASi and across CKD stages, and when alternative definitions of CKD progression were used. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CKD stages 3b/4 and hyperkalemia experienced significantly higher risks of CKD progression and all-cause mortality than propensity score-matched patients without hyperkalemia.

Stratified Patient Profiling for Vedolizumab Effectiveness in Crohn's Disease: Identifying Optimal Subgroups for Enhanced Treatment Response in the EVOLVE Study.

INTRODUCTION: This analysis evaluated the relative performance of vedolizumab and anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) agents in subpopulations of biologic therapy-naive patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and assessed whether patients in whom vedolizumab would have a larger treatment effect vs anti-TNFα agents could be identified. METHODS: Data were from EVOLVE, a real-world, multicountry, retrospective cohort study of patients with inflammatory bowel disease who initiated first-line biologic treatment with vedolizumab (n = 195) or anti-TNFα agents (n = 245). Prediction models for time to clinical remission were developed in vedolizumab- and anti-TNFα-treated patients and used to estimate effect scores, a metric of predicted comparative efficacy, for each patient. Patients were ranked by effect scores and potential subpopulations were investigated. Simplified rules to identify these subpopulations were also developed using classification tree analysis. RESULTS: Among all patients, median time to clinical remission was 7.8 months (vedolizumab) and 11.1 months (anti-TNFα) (P < 0.05). Among patients in the top 40% of the effect score distribution, the median time to clinical remission was 4.8 months (vedolizumab) vs 18.1 months (anti-TNFα) (adjusted hazard ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.3-2.9). A simplified rule for identifying a subpopulation more likely to benefit from vedolizumab was based on having an ongoing CD exacerbation, no prior emergency visits, and non-stricturing disease. CONCLUSIONS: Subpopulations of biologic-naive patients with CD in whom vedolizumab appeared to have a larger effect relative to anti-TNFα agents for the outcome of clinical remission were identified. Validation of the identified subpopulations and simplified rules are warranted to confirm these findings. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03710486. Graphical Abstract available for this article.

Assessment of women's treatment preferences for vasomotor symptoms due to menopause.

BACKGROUND: Several therapies for vasomotor symptoms (VMS) due to menopause are available. Treatment preferences and willingness-to-pay for VMS treatment among US women with VMS were evaluated. METHODS: An online survey of women with perimenopausal or postmenopausal VMS was conducted (3/15/21-4/23/21). A discrete choice experiment quantified the impact of 7 treatment attributes on VMS treatment choice: VMS frequency/severity reduction, sleep improvement, risk of breast cancer/cardiovascular events in 6 years, risk of short-term side effects, and out-of-pocket costs. Preference weights (PWs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated and reported. RESULTS: Among 467 women, 86.5% and 87.8% reported moderate to very severe VMS and sleep problems during the preceding month, respectively. Sleep improvement (PW: 0.843; 95% CI: 0.721, 0.965) and reduction in VMS frequency (PW: 0.658; 95% CI: 0.520, 0.796) and severity (PW: 0.628; 95% CI: 0.500, 0.756) most influenced treatment preference; risk of cardiovascular events (PW: 0.150; 95% CI: 0.069, 0.232) or breast cancer (PW: 0.401; 95% CI: 0.306, 0.496) in 6 years had lesser effect. Willingness-to-pay was an additional $35-$46/month for substantially improved sleep, 80% VMS frequency reduction, and reduction from severe to mild VMS. CONCLUSIONS: Sleep improvement and reductions in VMS frequency/severity were the most important treatment attributes.

Hormone and non-hormone treatments are available to reduce vasomotor symptoms (hot flashes and night sweats) due to menopause. We conducted an online survey of 467 women with moderate to very severe vasomotor symptoms during perimenopause or postmenopause to learn what treatment attributes are most important to women when selecting from among the available therapies and how much women were willing to pay for the attributes. Women were shown 14 cards, each with a side-by-side comparison of 2 treatments with varying descriptions of the following 7 treatment attributes: reduction in frequency of vasomotor symptoms, reduction in severity of vasomotor symptoms, improvement in sleep, risk of breast cancer in 6 years, risk of cardiovascular events in 6 years, risk of short-term side effects, and out-of-pocket costs. Women picked their preferred treatment on each card. Results showed that improvement in sleep was the most important attribute to women, and they were willing to pay an extra $46/month for a treatment that substantially improved sleep. The next most important attributes were reduction in frequency and reduction in severity of vasomotor symptoms. Women were willing to pay $36/month more for a treatment that reduced symptom frequency by 80% compared with one that reduced frequency by 50%, and they were willing to pay $35/month more for treatment that reduced symptoms from severe to mild compared with one that did not reduce symptom severity. These results may help guide development of new treatment options and may help physicians recommend treatments that best fit women's preferences.

Impact of benralizumab on asthma exacerbation-related medical healthcare resource utilization and medical costs: results from the ZEPHYR 2 study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Benralizumab is a biologic add-on treatment for severe eosinophilic asthma that can reduce the rate of asthma exacerbations, but data on the associated medical utilization are scarce. This retrospective study evaluated the economic value of benralizumab by analyzing healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and medical costs in a large patient population in the US. METHODS: Insurance claims data (11/2016-6/2020) were analyzed. A pre-post design was used to compare asthma exacerbation rates, medical HRU and medical costs in the 12 months pre vs. post index (day after benralizumab initiation). Patients were aged ≥12 years, with ≥2 records of benralizumab and ≥2 asthma exacerbations pre index, and constituted non-mutually exclusive cohorts: biologic-naïve, biologic-experienced (switched from omalizumab or mepolizumab to benralizumab), or with extended follow-up (18 or 24 months). RESULTS: In all cohorts (mean age 51-53 years; 67-70% female; biologic-naïve, N = 1,292; biologic-experienced, N = 349; 18-month follow-up, N = 419; 24-month follow-up, N = 156), benralizumab treatment reduced the rate of asthma exacerbation by 53-68% (p < .001). In the biologic-naïve cohort, inpatient admissions decreased by 58%, emergency department visits by 54%, and outpatient visits by 58% post index (all p < .001), with similar reductions in exacerbation-related medical HRU in other cohorts. Exacerbation-related mean total medical costs decreased by 51% in the biologic-naïve cohort ($4691 pre-index, $2289 post-index), with cost differences ranging from 16% to 64% across other cohorts (prior omalizumab: $2686 to $1600; prior mepolizumab: $5990 to $5008; 18-month: $3636 to $1667; 24-month: $4014 to $1449; all p < .001). Medical HRU and cost reductions were durable, decreasing by 64% in year 1 and 66% in year 2 in the 24 month follow-up cohort. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with benralizumab with prior exacerbations experienced reductions in asthma exacerbations and exacerbation-related medical HRU and medical costs regardless of prior biologic use, with the benefits observed for up to 24 months after treatment initiation.

Benralizumab is a biologic approved as an add-on treatment for severe eosinophilic asthma. Previous real-world studies and clinical trials have shown that benralizumab can reduce the rate of asthma exacerbations and systemic corticosteroid use. However, there is little information on the economic value of benralizumab in real-world patient populations. This study showed that patients with severe asthma in the United States had lower rates of asthma exacerbations after starting treatment with benralizumab. The patients also had fewer asthma exacerbation-related hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and outpatient visits as well as lower medical costs related to asthma exacerbations compared with before the treatment. These benefits were observed in patients who had never taken and those who had been previously treated with biologic therapies, and for up to 24 months after starting benralizumab treatment. These results show that the clinical value of benralizumab translates into reduced medical utilization for patients with severe asthma.

Real-world outcomes associated with vonoprazan-based versus proton pump inhibitor-based therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection in Japan.

Background: Japanese guidelines recommend triple therapy with vonoprazan or a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) in combination with antibiotics to treat Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. While studies have shown improved eradication rates and reduced costs with vonoprazan versus PPIs, there is little data describing healthcare resource use (HCRU) and treatment patterns. Objectives: To compare patients treated with a vonoprazan-based or PPI-based regimen for H. pylori infection in Japan in terms of their characteristics, HCRU, healthcare costs, clinical outcomes, and treatment patterns. Design: Retrospective matched cohort. Methods: We used data from the Japan Medical Data Center claims database (July 2014-January 2020) to identify adult patients with H. pylori infection and a first observed use of vonoprazan or a PPI in 2015 or later (index date). Patients prescribed a vonoprazan-based or a PPI-based regimen were matched 1:1 using propensity score matching. HCRU, healthcare costs, diagnostic tests, a proxy for H. pylori eradication (i.e. no triple therapy with amoxicillin in combination with metronidazole or clarithromycin >30 days after the index date), and second-line treatment were described during the 12-month follow-up period. Results: Among 25,389 matched pairs, vonoprazan-treated patients had fewer all-cause and H. pylori-related inpatient stays and outpatient visits than PPI-treated patients, resulting in lower all-cause healthcare costs [185,378 Japanese yen (JPY) versus 230,876 JPY, p < 0.001]. Over 80% of patients received a post-treatment test for H. pylori. Fewer vonoprazan-treated than PPI-treated patients subsequently received an additional triple regimen for H. pylori infection (7.1% versus 20.0%, p < 0.001) or a prescription for vonoprazan or a PPI as monotherapy (12.4% versus 26.4%, p < 0.001) between 31 days and 12 months after the index date. Conclusion: Patients with H. pylori infection who were treated with vonoprazan-based therapy had lower rates of subsequent H. pylori treatment, lower overall and H. pylori-related HCRU, and lower healthcare costs than patients treated with PPI-based therapy.

Real-World Modifications of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors in Patients with Hyperkalemia Initiating Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate Therapy: The OPTIMIZE I Study.

INTRODUCTION: Hyperkalemia (HK) may result in disruptions of guidelines-concordant renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi), a standard of care in persons with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Such disruptions-dose reduction or discontinuation-diminish the benefits of RAASi, placing patients at risk of serious events and renal dysfunction. This real-world study evaluated RAASi modifications among patients who initiated sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) for HK. METHODS: Adults (≥ 18 years) initiating outpatient SZC (index date) while on RAASi were identified from a large US claims database (January 2018-June 2020). RAASi optimization (maintain same or up-titration of RAASi dosage), non-optimization (down-titration of RAASi dosage or discontinuation), and persistence were descriptively summarized following index. Predictors of RAASi optimization were assessed using multivariable logistic regression models. Analyses were conducted by subgroups, including patients without end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), with CKD, and with CKD + diabetes. RESULTS: A total of 589 patients initiated SZC during RAASi therapy (mean age 61.0 years, 65.2% male), and 82.7% patients (n = 487) kept RAASi after index (mean follow-up = 8.1 months). Most patients (77.4%) optimized RAASi therapy after initiating SZC; 69.6% maintained the same dosage while 7.8% had up-titrations. A similar rate of RAASi optimization was observed among subgroups without ESKD (78.4%), with CKD (78.9%), and with CKD + diabetes (78.1%). At 1-year post-index, 73.9% of all patients who optimized RAASi were still on therapy, while only 17.9% of patients who did not optimize therapy were still on a RAASi. Among all patients, predictors of RAASi optimization included fewer prior hospitalizations (odds ratio = 0.79, 95% CI [0.63-1.00]; p < 0.05) and fewer prior emergency department (ED) visits (0.78 [0.63-0.96]; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Consistent with clinical trial findings, nearly 80% of patients who initiated SZC for HK optimized their RAASi therapy. Patients may require long-term SZC therapy to encourage continuation of RAASi therapy especially after inpatient and ED visits.

Real-World Effectiveness Study of Benralizumab for Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: ZEPHYR 2.

BACKGROUND: Benralizumab is an mAb therapy for severe eosinophilic asthma. Real-world data on its clinical impact in various patient populations such as patients with varying eosinophil levels, previous biologic use, and extended follow-up in the United States are limited. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of benralizumab in different asthmatic patient cohorts and its long-term clinical impact. METHODS: Patients with asthma treated with benralizumab from November 2017 to June 2019 with 2 or more exacerbations in the 12 months before benralizumab initiation (index) were included in this pre-post cohort study that used medical, laboratory, and pharmacy US insurance claims. Asthma exacerbation rates in the 12 months pre and post index were compared. Nonmutually exclusive patient cohorts were defined by blood eosinophil counts (<150, ≥150, 150-<300, <300, and ≥300 cells/µL), a switch from another biologic, or follow-up for 18 or 24 months post index. RESULTS: There were 429 patients in the eosinophil cohort, 349 in the biologic-experienced cohort, and 419 in the extended follow-up cohort. In all eosinophil cohort subgroups, the asthma exacerbation rate decreased from 3.10-3.55 per patient-year (PPY) pre index to 1.11-1.72 PPY post index (52%-64% decrease; P < .001). Similar decreases were observed in patients switching from omalizumab (3.25 to 1.25 PPY [62%]) or mepolizumab (3.81 to 1.78 PPY [53%]) to benralizumab and those followed up for 18 months (3.38 to 1.18 PPY [65%]) or 24 months (3.38 to 1.08 PPY [68%]) (all P < .001). In the extended follow-up cohort, 39% and 49% had no exacerbations in the 0 to 12 months and the 12 to 24 months post index, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Benralizumab achieved significantly improved asthma control in real-world patients with different blood eosinophil counts, including eosinophil counts ranging from less than 150 to greater than or equal to 300 cells/µL, switching from other biologics, or treated for up to 24 months.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of REBYOTA™ (Fecal Microbiota, Live-jslm [FMBL]) Versus Standard of Care for the Prevention of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection in the USA.

INTRODUCTION: Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) is common and associated with considerable clinical and economic consequences. REBYOTA™ (fecal microbiota, live-jslm [FMBL]) is a microbiota-based live biotherapeutic approved for the prevention of rCDI following antibiotic treatment for rCDI. We sought to evaluate cost-effectiveness of FMBL compared to standard of care (SOC) from a US third-party payer perspective among patients with one or more (≥ 1) recurrences. METHODS: A Markov model with a lifetime time horizon was developed. The model population included adult patients who had ≥ 1 recurrence after a primary CDI episode and had completed ≥ 1 round of antibiotics, or had ≥ 2 severe CDI episodes resulting in hospitalization within the last year. The model consisted of six health states with an 8-week model cycle: rCDI, absence of CDI after recurrence, colectomy, ileostomy, ileostomy reversal, and death. Drug costs and rCDI-related medical costs were estimated in 2022 US dollars and discounted at 3% annually. Deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Compared to SOC, FMBL at $9000/course resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $18,727 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. The incremental cost was $5336 (FMBL $79,236, SOC $73,900) and the incremental effectiveness was 0.285 QALYs (FMBL 10.346, SOC 10.061). The cumulative drug acquisition and administration costs for the FMBL and SOC arms were $24,245 and $16,876, while rCDI-related medical costs for FMBL and SOC were $54,991 and $57,024, respectively. The ICER in the subgroup of patients at first recurrence was $13,727 per QALY gained. FMBL remained cost-effective across all sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: FMBL was found to be cost-effective compared to SOC for the prevention of rCDI with more benefits among patients at first recurrence, with an ICER far below the payer ICER threshold of $100,000. Patients treated with FMBL experienced higher total QALYs and reduced healthcare resource utilization, including reduced hospitalizations.

Budget Impact Analysis of REBYOTA™ (Fecal Microbiota, Live-jslm [FMBL]) for Preventing Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection in the US.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) often experience recurrences (rCDI), which are associated with high morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditures. REBYOTA™ (fecal microbiota, live-jslm [FMBL]) is a microbiota-based live biotherapeutic approved for the prevention of rCDI following antibiotic treatment for rCDI. We quantified the budget impact of FMBL during the first 3 years following introduction from a third-party US payer perspective. METHODS: A decision-tree model was used to estimate the budget impact of one-course FMBL by comparing costs under the scenario with FMBL to the scenario without FMBL (standard of care) in patients with one or more (≥ 1) recurrences after a primary episode of CDI and had completed ≥ 1 round of antibiotic treatments. Drug costs, rCDI-related medical costs, and budget impact over 1-3 years were estimated in 2022 US dollars. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: For an insurance plan with a population size of 1,000,000, 468 patients per year were estimated to have ≥ 1 rCDI. The budget impact of one-course FMBL at $9000/course was cost-saving at an¼ average of -$0.0039 on a per-member-per-month (PMPM) basis, an average of -$8.30 on a per-treated-member-per-month (PTMPM) basis, and a total of -$139,865 on a plan level assuming 5%, 15%, and 20% of patients receive FMBL over 1-3 years, respectively. The scenario with FMBL entry was associated with higher drug costs (difference at $0.0474 PMPM; $101.26 PTMPM; $1,706,445 total plan) and lower rCDI-related medical costs (difference at -$0.0513 PMPM; -$109.56 PTMPM; -$1,846,309 total plan). The budget impact of FMBL in patients at first rCDI was cost-saving at -$0.0139 PMPM, -$84.78 PTMPM, corresponding to an annual savings of $500,022. CONCLUSIONS: FMBL has a cost-saving budget impact for a US payer, with higher initial drug costs being offset by savings in rCDI-related medical costs. Greater cost saving was found in patients at first recurrence.

Association of Serum Calcium and Phosphate With Incident Cardiovascular Disease in Patients With Hypoparathyroidism.

The pathophysiological basis for the increased incidence of cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic hypoparathyroidism is poorly understood. To evaluate associations between levels of albumin-corrected serum calcium, serum phosphate, and calcium-phosphate product with the odds of developing cardiovascular events in patients with chronic hypoparathyroidism with ≥1 calcitriol prescription, we conducted a retrospective nested case-control study of patients who developed a cardiovascular event and matched controls without an event. The primary outcome was the instance of cardiovascular events. An electronic medical record database was used to identify 528 patients for the albumin-corrected serum calcium analysis and 200 patients for the serum phosphate and calcium-phosphate product analyses. Patients with ≥67% of albumin-corrected serum calcium measurements outside the study-defined 2.00 to 2.25 mmol/L (8.0 to 9.0 mg/100 ml) range had 1.9-fold higher odds of a cardiovascular event (adjusted odds ratio, 95% confidence interval 1.89, 1.10 to 3.25) compared with patients with <33% of calcium measurements outside the range. Likewise, patients with any serum phosphate measurements above 0.81 to 1.45 mmol/L (2.5 to 4.5 mg/100 ml) had 3.3-fold higher odds (3.26; 1.24 to 8.58), and those with any calcium-phosphate product measurements above 4.40 mmol2/L2 (55 mg2/dL2) had 4.8-fold higher odds of a cardiovascular event (95% confidence interval 1.36 to 16.81) compared with patients with no measurements above these ranges. In adult patients with chronic hypoparathyroidism, a cardiovascular event was more likely in those with a higher proportion of albumin-corrected serum calcium measurements outside 2.00 to 2.25 mmol/L (8.0 to 9.0 mg/100 ml) or any serum phosphate and any calcium-phosphate product measurements above the normal population range.

Impact on hospitalizations of long-term versus short-term therapy with sodium zirconium cyclosilicate during routine outpatient care of patients with hyperkalemia: the recognize I study.

BACKGROUND: Hyperkalemia is associated with increased healthcare resource utilization (HRU). This study evaluated the impact of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) use on HRU in outpatients with hyperkalemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective noncomparative study using claims data from the HealthVerity warehouse, which included outpatients in the United States who initiated SZC between January and December 2019 (index date) with ≥6 months' continuous coverage before (baseline) and after (follow-up) the index date (total coverage of 12 months). The study aimed to describe HRU with long-term and short-term SZC (defined as >90 and ≤90 days' supply, respectively, during 180 days' follow-up) and identify characteristics associated with long-term versus short-term therapy. RESULTS: Of 1153 patients, 748 (64.9%) received short-term and 405 (35.1%) received long-term therapy. During follow-up, lower proportions of patients on long-term versus short-term therapy had hyperkalemia-related hospitalizations (10.1% vs 15.1%; P < 0.05) and all-cause hospitalizations (22.5% vs 29.3%; P < 0.05). Hyperkalemia-related and all-cause hospitalization proportions were 33.0% and 23.3% lower, respectively. Predictors of long-term therapy included stage 3 chronic kidney disease. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-third of patients with hyperkalemia received long-term SZC therapy. Hyperkalemia-related and all-cause hospitalization proportions were lower with long-term therapy, although further confirmatory studies are needed.

Association of Calcium and Phosphate Levels with Incident Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients with Hypoparathyroidism: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

Objective: Reasons for the increased incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with chronic hypoparathyroidism are poorly understood. This study evaluated associations between levels of albumin-corrected serum calcium, serum phosphate, and calcium-phosphate product and the odds of CKD development in patients with chronic hypoparathyroidism. Design: A retrospective nested case-control study of adult patients with chronic hypoparathyroidism who had ≥1 prescription for calcitriol who developed CKD and matched controls who did not develop CKD were selected from the IBM® Explorys electronic medical record database. Patients. The study included a cohort of 300 patients for the albumin-corrected serum calcium analysis and 80 patients for the serum phosphate and calcium-phosphate product analyses. Measurements. We examined associations between albumin-corrected serum calcium, serum phosphate and calcium-phosphate product levels, and the risk of devloping CKD (defined as ≥2 outpatient estimated glomerular filtration values <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 occuring ≥3 months apart or ≥1 diagnostic code for CKD stages 3-5). Results: Individuals who had ≥67% of albumin-corrected serum calcium measurements outside, above, or below the study-defined range (2.00-2.25 mmol/L [8.0-9.0 mg/dL]) had 3.5-, 2.9-, and 2.7-fold higher odds of developing CKD (adjusted odds ratios [95% CI]: 3.46 [1.82-6.56], 2.85 [1.30-6.28], and 2.68 [1.16-6.15]), respectively, compared with patients who had <33% of albumin-corrected calcium measurements in those ranges. There was no association between developing CKD and having any serum phosphate measurements or any calcium-phosphate product measurements above normal population ranges. Conclusion: In adult patients with chronic hypoparathyroidism, a higher proportion of albumin-corrected calcium measurements outside of the 2.00-2.25 mmol/L (8.0-9.0 mg/dL) range was associated with higher odds of developing CKD.

Polypharmacy in the Homebound Population.

The number of homebound elders has risen dramatically in the past decade and was accelerated by the Sars-Cov-2 COVID-19 pandemic. These individuals generally have 5 or more chronic conditions, take 6 or more medications, and are at elevated risk for functional decline. Polypharmacy constitutes a major burden for these individuals, putting them at risk for medication nonadherence, medication errors, medication interactions, and reduced quality of life. A team-based approach may help these elders manage medications more effectively.

The Economic Burden of Eosinophilic Gastritis and Eosinophilic Enteritis in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Eosinophilic gastritis and eosinophilic enteritis (EoG/EoN) are associated with a substantial clinical burden. However, limited information is available regarding the economic burden of EoG/EoN. This study was conducted to compare healthcare resource use (HRU) and costs among patients with EoG/EoN versus without EoG/EoN in the USA. METHODS: Administrative claims data from the IBM MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters (CCAE) and Medicare Supplemental and Coordination of Benefits Databases (2009-2019) was used to identify two cohorts of patients. Patients without EoG/EoN were matched 3:1 to patients with EoG/EoN on sex, year of birth, and healthcare plan type. Study measures included demographic characteristics, select comorbidities, all-cause HRU, and costs. Comparisons were made over a 1-year period following EoG/EoN diagnosis for patients with EoG/EoN and an eligible date for patients without EoG/EoN. RESULTS: A total of 2219 patients with EoG/EoN and 6657 patients without EoG/EoN were analyzed. Significantly higher proportions of patients with EoG/EoN versus without EoG/EoN had comorbid conditions. Rates of all-cause HRU were significantly higher among patients with EoG/EoN versus patients without EoG/EoN (adjusted rate ratio [95% confidence interval]: inpatient visits, 6.26 [5.26, 7.46]; outpatient visits, 1.17 [1.16, 1.19]; emergency department visits, 2.11 [1.98, 2.25]; all p < 0.001). Patients with EoG/EoN incurred significantly higher costs versus patients without EoG/EoN (adjusted mean cost difference $31,180; p < 0.001). Cost differences were largely due to outpatient (adjusted mean cost difference $14,018; p < 0.001) and inpatient (adjusted mean cost difference $11,224; p < 0.001) costs. CONCLUSION: The economic burden associated with EoG/EoN is substantial, with patients with EoG/EoN having a higher rate of HRU and incurring $31,180 more than patients without EoG/EoN on average. Most of the cost difference was attributable to outpatient and inpatient costs. Cost-saving strategies to lower the burden of illness in this patient population are needed.

Real-world effectiveness of benralizumab: Results from the ZEPHYR 1 Study.

BACKGROUND: Real-world evidence characterizing the clinical outcomes and economic impact on patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with benralizumab is limited. OBJECTIVE: To characterize patients with severe asthma treated with benralizumab and assess its clinical and economic impact in the United States. METHODS: A pre-post benralizumab comparison was performed using a large US insurance claims database between November 2016 and November 2019. The primary cohort included patients with asthma aged 12 years or more with 2 or more records of benralizumab. Secondary cohorts included persistent users (6 or more records of benralizumab), patients switching to benralizumab from mepolizumab or omalizumab, and stratified by Medicaid vs non-Medicaid. Exacerbations, concomitant medications, and exacerbation-related health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs were compared in the 12-month periods pre- and post-benralizumab initiation (index). RESULTS: Of the 204 patients in the primary cohort, mean age at index was 45.3 years and 68.6% were of female sex. The patients experienced a significant 55% reduction in rates of exacerbations post-benralizumab initiation (3.25 pre-index vs 1.47 post-index per person-year; P < .001), and 41% of the patients had no exacerbations post-benralizumab initiation. The proportion of oral corticosteroid-dependent patients decreased from 82% to 50% (P < .001). Reductions in HCRU were 42%, 46%, and 57% for asthma exacerbation-related inpatient hospitalizations, emergency department, and outpatient visits, respectively (all P < .001). Exacerbation-related costs decreased by $6439 ($13,559 vs $7120; P < .001). Similar results for all outcomes were observed for the persistent cohort, switch cohorts, and Medicaid vs non-Medicaid cohorts. CONCLUSION: Patients with severe asthma treated with benralizumab experienced clinical and economic benefits in the real world, as demonstrated by the reduction in exacerbations and HCRU.

Real-World Management of Hyperkalemia in the Emergency Department: An Electronic Medical Record Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Hyperkalemia is often managed in the emergency department (ED) and it is important to understand how ED management and post-discharge outcomes vary by hyperkalemia severity. This study was conducted to characterize ED management and post-discharge outcomes across hyperkalemia severities. METHODS: Adults with an ED visit with hyperkalemia (at least one serum potassium lab measure above 5.0 mEq/L) were selected from US electronic medical record data (2012-2018). Patient characteristics, potassium levels, treatments, and monitoring prior to and during the ED visit were compared by hyperkalemia severity (mild [> 5.0-5.5 mEq/L], moderate [> 5.5-6.0], severe [> 6.0]) using unadjusted analyses. Death, immediate inpatient admission, 30-day hyperkalemia recurrence, and 30-day inpatient admission were also assessed by severity. RESULTS: Of 6222 patients included, 4432 (71.2%) had mild hyperkalemia, 1085 (17.4%) had moderate, and 705 (11.3%) had severe hyperkalemia. Chronic kidney disease (39.9-50.1%) and heart failure (21.6-24.3%) were common. In the ED, electrocardiograms (mild, 56.5%; moderate, 69.6%; severe, 81.0%) and patients with at least two potassium laboratory values increased with severity (15.0%; 40.4%; 75.5%). Among patients with at least two potassium laboratory values, over half of patients (60.4%) had potassium levels ≤ 5.0 mEq/L prior to discharge. Use of potassium-binding treatments (sodium polystyrene sulfonate: mild = 4.1%; moderate = 17.1%; severe = 27.4%), temporizing agents (5.6%; 15.5%; 31.6%), or dialysis (0.4%; 0.8%; 3.0%) increased with severity; treatment at discharge was not common. Death (1.1%; 3.7%; 10.6%), immediate admission to inpatient care (5.8%; 8.7%; 12.7%), 30-day hyperkalemia recurrence (2.9%; 19.0%; 32.5%), 30-day inpatient admission with hyperkalemia (6.5%; 7.9%; 9.3%) also increased with severity. CONCLUSION: Patients with moderate and severe hyperkalemia experienced elevated risk of hyperkalemia recurrence and hyperkalemia-related inpatient readmission following discharge from the ED from a descriptive analysis. Future research to assess strategies to reduce hyperkalemia recurrence and inpatient admission in this patient population would be beneficial.

Primary Hyperoxaluria Type 1 Disease Manifestations and Healthcare Utilization: A Multi-Country, Online, Chart Review Study.

Background: Primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) is a rare genetic disease that can result in irreversible damage to the kidneys and, eventually, extrarenal organs. While kidney failure is a known consequence of PH1, few studies to date have characterized clinical consequences of PH1 prior to kidney failure, and data on healthcare resource use outcomes across different stages of disease severity in PH1 are also limited. To help fill this knowledge gap, this study characterized the clinical and healthcare resource use (HRU) burden in patients with PH1 with varying stages of kidney disease. Methods: Nephrologists in the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, France, Germany, and Italy abstracted chart data from patients with PH1 under their care via an online questionnaire. Eligible patients had confirmed PH1 and ≥2 office visits from 2016 to 2019. Results: A total of 120 patients were analyzed (median age at diagnosis, 17.4 years old, median age at index 19.5 years old, median eGFR at index 45 ml/min/1.73 m2; median follow-up 1.7 years). During follow-up, the most common PH1 manifestations were kidney stones and urinary tract infections (UTIs, both 56.8%), and the most common symptoms were fatigue/weakness (71.7%) and pain (64.6%). With regard to HRU during follow-up, 37.4% required lithotripsy, 31.3% required ureteroscopy, and 9.6% required nephrolithotomy. PH1-related hospitalizations and emergency/urgent care visits were noted for 84.0 and 81.6% of patients, respectively. Conclusions: The current study demonstrated that patients with PH1 across various stages of kidney disease exhibited a substantial clinical burden, including kidney stones, UTIs, fatigue/weakness, and pain, and required frequent HRU, including kidney stone procedures, hospitalizations, and emergency visits. These findings highlight the significant morbidity and HRU burden in patients with PH1.

Prevalence of Metabolic Acidosis Among Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Hyperkalemia.

INTRODUCTION: Although hyperkalemia and metabolic acidosis often co-occur in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), the prevalence of metabolic acidosis among patients with CKD and hyperkalemia is understudied. Therefore, we used medical record data from the Research Action for Health Network to estimate this prevalence. METHODS: Adult patients with CKD stage 3-5, ≥ 1 outpatient potassium value > 5.0 mEq/l, and ≥ 1 outpatient bicarbonate value available were identified. Patients with end stage kidney disease (ESKD) in the prior year were excluded. The prevalence of metabolic acidosis in each calendar year from 2014 to 2017 among patients with CKD and hyperkalemia was estimated using two definitions of hyperkalemia (potassium > 5.0 mEq/l and > 5.5 mEq/l) and metabolic acidosis (bicarbonate < 18 mEq/l and < 22 mEq/l). RESULTS: In the 2017 patient cohort and among patients with CKD and hyperkalemia, patients with metabolic acidosis were younger (69 versus 74 years), more likely to have advanced CKD (35% versus 13%), and use oral sodium bicarbonate (21% versus 4%) than patients without metabolic acidosis. The prevalence of metabolic acidosis (< 22 mEq/l) ranged from 25 to 29% when hyperkalemia was defined by potassium > 5.0 mEq/l and ranged from 33 to 39% when hyperkalemia was defined by potassium > 5.5 mEq/l. CONCLUSION: Results demonstrated that prevalence estimates of metabolic acidosis varied based on the definition of hyperkalemia and metabolic acidosis utilized.