Do vasoactive medications impact donor hearts clinical outcomes in pediatric heart transplantation?

OBJECTIVES: There is limited data examining donor vasopressor and/or inotrope medications (vasoactives) on pediatric orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) outcomes. We aim to evaluate the effects of vasoactives on pediatric OHT outcomes. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was retrospectively reviewed from January 2000 to March 2018 for donor hearts. Exclusion criteria included multiorgan transplants and recipient age >18. Donors receiving vasoactives at the time of procurement were compared to donors not on vasoactives, including the number of vasoactives and the type. End-points of interest were survival at 30 days and 1 year as well as post-transplant rejection at 1 year. Logistic and Cox models were used to quantify survival end-points. RESULTS: Of 6462 donors, 3187 (49.3%) were receiving at least one vasoactive. Comparing any vasoactive medication versus none, there was no difference in 30-day survival (p = .27), 1 year survival (p = .89), overall survival (p = .68), or post-transplant rejection (p = .98). There was no difference in 30-day survival for donors receiving 2 or more vasoactive infusions (p = .89), 1 year survival (p = .53), overall survival (p = .75), or post-transplant rejection at 1 year (p = .87). Vasopressin was associated with decreased 30-day mortality (OR = 0.22; p = .028), dobutamine with decreased 1-year mortality (OR = 0.37; p = .036), overall survival (HR = 0.51; p = .003), and decreased post-transplant rejection (HR = 0.63; p = .012). CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in pediatric OHT outcomes when the cardiac donor is treated with vasoactive infusions at procurement. Vasopressin and dobutamine were associated with improved outcomes. This information can be used to guide medical management and donor selection.

Does donor treatment with inotropes and/or vasopressors impact post-transplant outcomes?

PURPOSE: The purpose was to evaluate the effects of the most commonly used cardiac donor inotropes/vasopressors on subsequent post-heart transplant survival. METHODS: Adult heart transplant recipients from January 2000 to June 2022 were identified in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. Exclusion criteria included: multiorgan transplants, donor age < 15, and recipient age < 18. Donors receiving vasoactive medications at the time of procurement were compared to donors not receiving these medications. Those on vasoactive medications were stratified by medication: phenylephrine, dopamine, dobutamine, norepinephrine and epinephrine, the combination of these agents, and the concomitant administration of vasopressin with any single agent alone or in combination. The primary area of interest was short-and-long-term survival. Survival at 30 days, 1 year, and long-term (Median = 13.6 years) was compared using logistic and Cox models to quantify survival endpoints. RESULTS: A total of 45,198 donors met inclusion criteria and had data on the use of vasoactive agents available. Mean donor age was 32.3 years with 71% male. Vasoactive medications and potential combinations included phenylephrine in 8156 donors (18.0%), dopamine in 9550 (21.1%), dobutamine in 718 (1.6%), epinephrine in 332 (.73%), and norepinephrine in 4854 (10.7%). A total of 25,856 donors (57.2%) were receiving vasopressin at the time of procurement. There was no impact of donor inotropes on 30-day survival. Donors receiving one inotrope and no vasopressin were associated with increased 1 year mortality (OR 1.14; p = .021), as were donors receiving 2+ inotropes and no vasopressin (OR 1.26; p = .006). For individual agents, 1 year mortality was increased for dopamine (OR 1.11; p = .042) and epinephrine (OR 1.59; p = .004). CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in heart transplant recipient survival at 30 days when the donor is receiving inotropes without vasopressin at the time of procurement. Inotropic support without vasopressin is associated with greater 1 year mortality. The impact of donor inotropic support on long term heart transplant survival, and the interaction with vasopressin warrants further study.

Donor Utilization in the Recent Era: Effect of Sex, Drugs, and Increased Risk.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation volumes have increased in recent years, yet less than a third of donors are typically accepted for transplantation. Whether donor sex, donor drug use, or perception of increased risk affects utilization for transplantation is unclear. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried for donors from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2017. Donor toxicology was collected when available. Multivariate analysis was conducted to examine correlations with donor utilization. RESULTS: Between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2017, there were 87 816 heart donors aged ≥15 years. The mean age was 42.7±15.8 years, and 24 831 donors (28.3%) were utilized for heart transplantation. Subsequent analyses focused on donors between 15 and 39 years old. The strongest associations with donor acceptance were for male donor sex, blood type, hepatitis C antibody, donor age, left ventricular hypertrophy, and history of donor drug use. After removing hepatitis C, Public Health Service Increased Risk was identified as a strong negative predictor. Most positive drug toxicology results were associated with donor nonuse except for donors between 15 and 19 years of age. Exceptions included alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine. Opiates were associated with less utilization at all donor ages. The Public Health Service Increased Risk status was associated with significantly less utilization in all age groups except 15- to 19-year-old donors. CONCLUSIONS: While male donors were preferentially utilized, donors with drug use or those deemed Public Health Service Increased Risk were significantly less utilized for heart transplantation. Further consideration of such donors would be appropriate particularly as the demand for transplantation continues to increase.

"It Works." Every heart transplant program should have one.

The total artificial heart (TAH) provides full biventricular cardiac replacement, pulsatile perfusion at flows of 7-9 L/min at low filling pressures. This allows organs that are failing to recover and for the potential cardiac recipient to become a better transplant candidate. Postimplant patients are mobile and able to go through physical rehabilitation in a hospital or at home. The risks are acceptable as shown by the authors. TAH use in more transplant centers could save lives in many transplant candidates.

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a viable option as a bridge to heart transplant.

OBJECTIVE: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a rescue therapy for patients in cardiogenic shock. We hypothesize that patients bridged to heart transplant with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation have decreased survival. METHODS: The United Network of Organ Sharing database was retrospectively reviewed from January 1, 1999, to March 31, 2018, for heart transplant recipients. Recipients bridged with any form of mechanical support and those without support were compared with recipients bridged with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The primary end point was restricted mean survival time through 16.7 years. RESULTS: Of 26,918 recipients, 15,076 required no pretransplant mechanical support (56.0%). Support patients included 9321 with left ventricular assist devices (34.6%), 53 with right ventricular assist devices (0.2%), 258 with total artificial hearts (1.0%), 686 with biventricular assist devices (2.6%), 1378 with intra-aortic balloon pumps (5.1%), and 146 who required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (0.5%). In the first 16.7 years post-transplant, compared with recipients bridged with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, estimated adjusted restricted mean survival time was higher in patients who required no mechanical support (16.6 months [14.0-19.4]) and patients with a left ventricular assist device (16.5 months [99% confidence interval, 13.9-19.2]), an intra-aortic balloon pump (11.2 months [8.3-14.7]), or a biventricular assist device (6.6 months [3.6-10.3]). Restricted mean survival time in patients with a right ventricular assist device or a total artificial heart was similar to patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. CONCLUSIONS: Recipients bridged with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were estimated to survive 16.6 months less than nonmechanical circulatory support recipients. Bridge to heart transplant with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a viable option, and these patients should be considered transplant candidates.

Better together: a reappraisal of heterotopic heart transplantation.

Heterotopic heart transplantation (HHT) is rare in the modern era. When used as a biologic left ventricular assist, HHT provides pulsatile flow, supports the left ventricle with a physiologic cardiac output, responds to humoral stimuli, and with modern immunosuppression may offer long-term untethered survival. This study was undertaken to compare survival of HHT with orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) to assess its viability in the modern era. In the United Network for Organ Sharing database, from January 1999 to December 2020, there were 27691 bicaval OHT, 13836 biatrial OHT, 1271 total OHT, and 51 HHT with sufficient follow-up. Survival was analyzed using restricted mean survival time (RMST) through 4 years as the outcome. In the first 4 years after transplant, compared with HHT, differences in RMST were 0.1 years (99% CI: -0.4 to 0.5 years) for bicaval OHT, 0.0 years (99% CI: -0.4 to 0.5 years) for biatrial OHT, and 0.0 years (99% CI: -0.5 to 0.4 years) for total OHT. In this cohort, survival was indistinguishable between HHT and OHT recipients in the first four years. Thus, HHT might be a viable alternative to durable mechanical circulatory assist particularly with size mismatched grafts or for patients with refractory pulmonary hypertension.

The effects of increased donor support time from organ donation referral to donor procurement on heart transplant recipient survival.

INTRODUCTION: Given the known deleterious cardiac effects of brain death (BD) physiology, we hypothesized that time from cardiac donation referral to procurement (donor support time [DST]), would negatively impact cardiac transplant recipient survival. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried from 2007 to 2018, identifying 22,593 donor hearts for analysis. Multivariate logistic models for 30-day and 1-year survival, as well as Cox models for overall survival and posttransplant rejection, were used to assess adjusted outcomes. RESULTS: median DST was 3 days (interquartile range: 2-5 days). Ischemic time; distance between donor and recipient hospitals; and recipient age, creatinine, waitlist time, and length of stay were adjusted predictors of survival and rejection. DST was not associated with either outcome in aggregate; however, differential association by donor race was identified, with DST in any race recipient associated with 4% higher odds of 1-year mortality (p = .001; p value for interaction .005) but only a trend towards worse overall mortality (p = .064; p value for interaction .046). CONCLUSION: Thus, duration of exposure to BD physiology may have a differential impact on recipient outcomes based on donor race, suggesting that additional research is needed on donor immunologic, socioeconomic, and healthcare access factors that may impact cardiac transplant recipient outcomes.

Looking at cardiac transplantation through a 20-year retrospective study-invited commentary.

The authors present an excellent large cohort review and complete analysis of long-term heart transplant survival including multiple institutions. Most studies on long-term heart transplant survival have single-center institutional experience. The authors present a comprehensive national review of the United Network for Organ Sharing Database (UNOS). The paper reflects the early transplant era through 1998 and demonstrates the long-term survival of this time.

Does pediatric heart transplant survival differ with various cardiac preservation solutions?

BACKGROUND: Few studies directly compare outcomes between the most commonly used preservation solutions in pediatric heart transplantation in a large cohort of recipients. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of cardiac preservation solution on survival in pediatric heart transplant recipients. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was retrospectively reviewed from 01/2004-03/2018 for pediatric donor hearts. Saline, University of Wisconsin (UW), "cardioplegia," Celsior, and Custodiol preservation solutions were evaluated. The primary endpoints were recipient survival at 30 days, 1 year, and long term. RESULTS: After exclusion criteria, 3012 recipients had preservation solution data available. The most common preservation solution used was UW in 1203 patients (40%), followed by Celsior in 542 (18%), cardioplegia in 461 (15%), saline in 408 (14%), and Custodiol in 398 (13%). Survival of recipients whose donor hearts were procured with UW was as follows: 97%-30 day, 92%-1 year; Celsior: 97%-30 day, 92%-1 year; cardioplegia: 97%-30 day, 91%-1 year; saline: 97%-30 day, 91%-1 year; and Custodiol: 96%-30 day and 92%-1 year. Analysis of Cox models for 30-day and long-term survival revealed no statistical differences when comparing UW to Celsior (p = .333), cardioplegia (p = .914), saline (p = .980), or Custodiol (p = .642) in adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in 30-day or 1-year survival detected between commonly used preservation solutions in the pediatric heart transplant population.

Donor heart and lung procurement: A consensus statement.

Heart and lung procurements are multiphased processes often accompanied by an array of complex logistics. Approaches to donor evaluation and management, organ procurement, and organ preservation vary among individual procurement teams. Because early graft failure remains a major cause of mortality in contemporary thoracic organ transplant recipients, we sought to establish some standardization in the procurement process. This paper, in this vein, represents an international consensus statement on donor heart and lung procurement and is designed to serve as a guide for physicians, surgeons, and other providers who manage donors to best optimize the clinical status for the procurement of both heart and lungs for transplantation. Donation after brain death (DBD) and donation after circulatory determination death (referred to as donation after circulatory death [DCD] for the remainder of the paper) for both heart and lung transplantation will be discussed in this paper. Although the data available on DCD heart donation are limited, information regarding the surgical technique for procurement is included within this consensus statement. Furthermore, this paper will focus on adult DBD and DCD heart and lung procurement. Currently, no certification, which is either recognized and/or endorsed by the transplant community at large, exists for the training of a cardiothoracic procurement surgeon. Nevertheless, establishing a training curriculum and credentialing requirements are beyond the scope of this paper.

The Effect of Cardiac Preservation Solutions on Heart Transplant Survival.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist that compare the predominant cardiac preservation solutions (CPSs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was retrospectively reviewed from January 1, 2004 to March 31, 2018, for donor hearts. Of 34,614 potential donors, 21,908 remained after applying the exclusion criteria. The CPS analyzed included saline, the University of Wisconsin (UW), cardioplegia, Celsior, and Custodiol. The primary endpoints were recipient survival and posttransplant rejection. Logistic and Cox models were used to quantify survival endpoints. RESULTS: Saline was used as the CPS in 2549 patients (12%), UW in 10,549 (48%), cardioplegia in 1307 (6%), Celsior in 5081 (23%), and Custodiol in 2422 (11%). Donor age ranged from 15 to 68 y (mean = 32.0 y, median = 30.0 y), and 71% were male. Adjusted survival probabilities of recipients whose donor hearts were procured with saline was 96% 30 d, 90% 1 y, UW: 97% 30 d, 92% 1 y, cardioplegia: 95% 30 d, 87% 1 y, Celsior: 96% 30 d, 90% 1 y, and Custodiol: 97% 30 d, 92% 1 y. When these comparisons were adjusted for donor age, sex, ethnicity, ischemic time, recipient age, sex, ethnicity, creatinine, ventricular assist device (VAD), length of stay, region and days on waiting list, cardioplegia solution was demonstrated to have a higher risk of death (30 d, 1 y, overall) and posttransplant rejection versus UW (odds ratio 1.70, P = 0.001; odds ratio 1.63, P < 0.001; hazard ratio 1.22, P < 0.001; hazard ratio 1.21, P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Cardioplegia solutions for cardiac preservation are associated with a higher mortality in heart transplant recipients.

Total Artificial Heart Implantation after Excision of Right Ventricular Angiosarcoma.

Primary cardiac sarcomas, although rare, are aggressive and lethal, requiring thorough surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy for the best possible outcome. We report the case of a 32-year-old woman who underwent total artificial heart implantation for right-sided heart failure caused by right ventricular angiosarcoma. For the first several weeks in intensive care, the patient recovered uneventfully. However, a postoperative liver biopsy indicated hepatocellular injury consistent with preoperative chemotherapy. She developed continuing liver failure, from which she died despite good cardiac function.

First North American 50 cc Total Artificial Heart Experience: Conversion from a 70 cc Total Artificial Heart.

The 70 cc total artificial heart (TAH) has been utilized as bridge to transplant (BTT) for biventricular failure. However, the utilization of 70 cc TAH has been limited to large patients for the low output from the pulmonary as well as systemic vein compression after chest closure. Therefore, the 50 cc TAH was developed by SynCardia (Tucson, AZ) to accommodate smaller chest cavity. We report the first TAH exchange from a 70 to 50 cc due to a fit difficulty. The patient failed to be closed with a 70 cc TAH, although the patient met the conventional 70 cc TAH fit criteria. We successfully closed the chest with a 50 cc TAH.

Cardiac transplantation in African Americans: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: In view of limited data on the subject of graft and patient survival differences between African American (AA) and non-AA heart transplant recipients, we reviewed our experience. HYPOTHESIS: There is a higher mortality among AA recipients compared with non-AA recipients after cardiac transplantation. METHODS: The study included all AA patients who have received a heart transplant in our center since 1983. Stepwise Cox regression was used for covariates affecting the survival. The χ(2) test was employed to identify the effects of a mechanical assist device and pretransplant creatinine (Cr) on the outcomes in AA and non-AA patients. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to examine survival. RESULTS: The average survival among AA recipients was 5.4 years, compared with 12 years for the non-AA recipients, with 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates of 80%, 55%, and 25%, respectively. This was found to be statistically inferior to the survival probabilities of 92%, 78%, and 58% for the non-AA group (P < 0.005). Based on stepwise Cox regression, the variables such as ethnicity (P < 0.05), pretransplant Cr (P < 0.05), presence of a mechanical assist device (P < 0.005), and United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status at transplant (P < 0.05) independently predicted the outcomes. Kaplan-Meier analysis of pretransplant Cr level and survival showed that the AA group did significantly worse for all Cr classes. CONCLUSIONS: There is a statistically significant difference in outcomes between AA and non-AA patients after cardiac transplantation. African American patients have decreased survival over a period of time. Pretransplant Cr, ethnicity, presence of a mechanical assist device, and UNOS status at transplantation are independent predictors of outcomes.

Home discharge and out-of-hospital follow-up of total artificial heart patients supported by a portable driver system.

To enhance ambulation and facilitate hospital discharge of total artificial heart (TAH)-supported patients, we adapted a mobile ventricular assistance device (VAD) driver (Excor) for TAH use and report on the performance of Excor-driven TAH patients discharged home. Ten patients stabilized on a TAH, driven by the CSS ("Circulatory Support System"), were progressively switched over to the Excor in hospital over 14 days as a pilot, with daily hemodynamics and laboratory parameters measured. Twenty-two stable TAH patients were subsequently placed on the Excor, trained, and discharged home. Clinical and hemodynamic parameters were followed. All pilot study patients were clinically stable on the Excor, with no decrease in TAH output noted (6.3 + 0.3 L/min [day 1] vs. 5.8 + 0.2 L/min [day 14], p = 0.174), with a trend suggesting improvement of both hepatic and renal function. Twenty-two TAH patients were subsequently successfully discharged home on the portable driver and were supported out of hospital for up to 598 days (range, 2-598; mean = 179 ± 140 days), remaining ambulatory, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I or II, and free of readmission for 88.5% of the time of support. TAH patients may be effectively and safely supported by a mobile drive system. As such, the utility of the TAH may be extended to support patients beyond the hospital, at home, with overall ambulatory freedom.

Fourth time cardiac retransplantation.

Beginning at age 11 years, our patient has had four heart transplants. Now, 26 years later at age 37, he is fully active. This case is presented to document a unique experience and to consider the difficult decision-making process and ethical issues of multiple cardiac retransplantation.