RESUMO
During the UK's COVID-19 pandemic lockdown there was national guidance to suspend routine dermatology work. As a consequence, over 800 patient appointments in a district general dermatology department were temporarily suspended. Remote consultations were carried out to triage and manage referrals, via telephone or video consultations. Data were prospectively recorded on 488 patient interactions. Outcomes included advice/treatment, discharge, surgery or clinic review; 25% of patients were either uncontactable or their problem had resolved. Over a third of referrals were discharged with advice/treatment initiated remotely; 56% of referred dermatoses required further clinical review; 25% of lesion referrals were booked directly to surgery. This process was time-intensive for the clinicians involved, and triage mechanisms could be improved. Sufficient referral information allows remote diagnosis; implementation of management plans and appropriate discharge of patients. This process has been shown to be feasible, and may be a temporary solution for other COVID-19 impacted dermatology departments.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Infecções por Coronavirus , Dermatologia/métodos , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral , Telemedicina , Triagem/métodos , COVID-19 , Dermatologia/organização & administração , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Reino UnidoRESUMO
A 55-year-old man with severe plaque psoriasis presented with a 2-week history of feeling generally unwell with lethargy and thirst. His symptoms had developed 6 weeks after commencement of the topical vitamin D3 analogue calcitriol. Investigations revealed hypercalcaemia and acute-on-chronic kidney injury, probably directly induced by systemic absorption of vitamin D3 following extensive topical use. Topical calcitriol had been started as a steroid-sparing agent to reduce the patient's liberal potent corticosteroid usage during anti-tumour necrosis factor-alfa therapy. Topical vitamin D analogues are commonly prescribed in dermatological and general practice, with hypercalcaemia being a rare but potentially serious adverse effect. This case serves to outline key factors that may predispose to hypercalcaemia, such as disease extent, quantity of drug applied, comorbidities and concurrent medications, and it highlights the importance of considering these factors when prescribing topical therapies.