Implementing a Chronic Wound Care Workshop for Internal Medicine Residents.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of a piloted wound care curriculum within a busy internal medicine (IM) curriculum. METHODS: This prospective pilot study was conducted with 89 IM residents at an academic teaching hospital. The residents were provided a 90-minute workshop in chronic wound care. They anonymously completed a clinical vignette to target practice behavior prior to the workshop. The workshop was mixture of didactic and hands-on practice of sharp debridement and wound dressing selection. Three months later, the residents completed the same clinical vignette along with questions on changes and barriers to change in their practice. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in behavior of chronic wound care management, measurements of barriers to change in participant continuity clinics. MAIN RESULTS: Of the participants, 57 residents (64%) and 25 residents (28%) completed a pre- and postvignette, respectively. Ten (40%) of the postvignette respondents stated that they had made changes in their care. Barriers to change included having a supervising attending physician who is not comfortable with wound care, a lack of wound care resources available in clinic, and a lack of confidence even after the session. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to insert a chronic wound care education into a busy IM curriculum. Future efforts will be aimed at assessing the wound care needs/resources of the IM outpatient clinics, addressing the comfort of the supervising attending physicians and residents with wound care, and focusing the curriculum on high-yield interventions.

Implementing a Chronic Wound Care Curriculum for Internal Medicine Residents.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine if participation in a practice-based learning session would change the residents' reported wound care practice. METHODS: A 90-minute didactic and skills workshop in chronic wound care was provided to 89 internal medicine (IM) residents divided into 4 groups, who were asked to complete an anonymous clinical vignette survey prior to the session and again 3 months after the practice-based learning session. RESULTS: Comparisons of the pretest and posttest scores (Mann-Whitney U Test) showed only ordering moisture-retentive dressing changed significantly. Residents reported likelihood of preventing/managing wounds in their future career on a 10-point Likert scale (mean 4.92). CONCLUSION: Future directions aimed at assessing the wound care needs/resources of the IM outpatient clinics, the comfort of the supervising clinicians and residents, and targeting the curriculum to those most likely to benefit should be addressed before further refining the curriculum.

Consensus principles for wound care research obtained using a Delphi process.

Too many wound care research studies are poorly designed, badly executed, and missing crucial data. The objective of this study is to create a series of principles for all stakeholders involved in clinical or comparative effectiveness research in wound healing. The Delphi approach was used to reach consensus, using a web-based survey for survey participants and face-to-face conferences for expert panel members. Expert panel (11 members) and 115 wound care researchers (respondents) drawn from 15 different organizations. Principles were rated for validity using 5-point Likert scales and comments. A 66% response rate was achieved in the first Delphi round from the 173 invited survey participants. The response rate for the second Delphi round was 46%. The most common wound care researcher profile was age 46-55 years, a wound care clinic setting, and >10 years' wound care research and clinical experience. Of the initial 17 principles created by the panel, only four principles were not endorsed in Delphi round 1 with another four not requiring revision. Of the 14 principles assessed by respondents in the second Delphi round, only one principle was not endorsed and it was revised; four other principles also needed revision based on the use of specific words or contextual use. Of the 19 final principles, three included detailed numbered lists. With the wide variation in design, conduct, and reporting of wound care research studies, it is hoped that these principles will improve the standard and practice of care in this field.

The AAWC conceptual framework of quality systems for wound care.

When the Association for Advanced Wound Care Quality of Care Task Force members determined there was no unanimously accepted definition of quality as it relates to wound care, they: 1) identified relevant components of quality wound care, and 2) created a framework of quality wound care indicators to enable the creation or assessment of wound care delivery systems. The framework is an innovative conceptual model that serves as a basis for the Association strategies to facilitate high quality wound care for patients/clients across the continuum of care and recognizes the role of the supporting systems necessary to provide wound care services. It uses the Institute of Medicine's Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century to define quality systems for wound care and includes safety and effectiveness coupled with the delivery of timely, efficient, equitable, collaborative, patient-centered care. This framework can be utilized during clinical, managerial, or regulatory review of wound care service delivery.