Histologic examinations of teeth treated with 2 scaffolds: a pilot animal investigation.

INTRODUCTION: A growing body of evidence is building a case for the possibility of tissue regeneration within the root canal of necrotic teeth, allowing for continued root development. However, it remains unknown what type of tissue is produced after regenerative endodontics. The purpose of this study was to use blood clots and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as scaffolds in regenerative endodontics under ideal conditions in a ferret model to examine the tissues generated within the root canals. METHODS: The pulps of 21 canine teeth from 7 young ferrets were extirpated using broaches without filing the canal walls. Bleeding was stimulated from the periapical tissues, and a blood clot was induced in the canal space to the level of the cementoenamel junction in 12 teeth. PRP was prepared and placed in the canals to the level of the cementoenamel junction in 9 teeth. The coronal access was sealed with mineral trioxide aggregate. Seven canines were not operated on and served as controls. Three months later, block sections including each canine and its surrounding tissues were removed for histologic evaluation. The tissues found in the canals of experimental teeth were compared with those in the control teeth. RESULTS: Almost all of the experimental teeth showed the presence of intracanal bonelike tissue. No evidence of dentinal wall thickening or apical narrowing was noted in the experimental teeth. CONCLUSIONS: In this experimental model, the use of either PRP or blood clots during regenerative endodontics leads to the formation of intracanal bonelike tissue without continual root maturation.

An animal model to study regenerative endodontics.

INTRODUCTION: A growing body of evidence is demonstrating the possibility for regeneration of tissues within the pulp space and continued root development in teeth with necrotic pulps and open apices. There are areas of research related to regenerative endodontics that need to be investigated in an animal model. The purpose of this study was to investigate ferret cuspid teeth as a model to investigate factors involved in regenerative endodontics. METHODS: Six young male ferrets between the ages of 36-133 days were used in this investigation. Each animal was anesthetized and perfused with 10% buffered formalin. Block sections including the mandibular and maxillary cuspid teeth and their surrounding periapical tissues were obtained, radiographed, decalcified, sectioned, and stained with hematoxylin-eosin to determine various stages of apical closure in these teeth. RESULTS: The permanent mandibular and maxillary cuspid teeth with open apices erupted approximately 50 days after birth. Initial signs of closure of the apical foramen in these teeth were observed between 90-110 days. Complete apical closure was observed in the cuspid teeth when the animals were 133 days old. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the experiment, ferret cuspid teeth can be used to investigate various factors involved in regenerative endodontics that cannot be tested in human subjects. The most appropriate time to conduct the experiments would be when the ferrets are between the ages of 50 and 90 days.

Outcomes of nonsurgical retreatment and endodontic surgery: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of nonsurgical retreatment with those of endodontic surgery to determine which modality offers more favorable outcomes. METHODS: The study began with targeted electronic searches of MEDLINE, PubMed, and Cochrane databases, followed with exhaustive hand searching and citation mining for all articles reporting clinical and/or radiographic outcomes for at least a mean follow-up of 2 years for these procedures. Pooled and weighted success rates were determined from a meta-analysis of the data abstracted from the articles. RESULTS: A significantly higher success rate was found for endodontic surgery at 2-4 years (77.8%) compared with nonsurgical retreatment for the same follow-up period (70.9%; P < .05). At 4-6 years, however, this relationship was reversed, with nonsurgical retreatment showing a higher success rate of 83.0% compared with 71.8% for endodontic surgery (P < .05). Insufficient numbers of articles were available to make comparisons after 6 years of follow-up period. Endodontic surgery studies showed a statistically significant decrease in success with each increasing follow-up interval (P < .05). The weighted success for 2-4 years was 77.8%, which declined at 4-6 years to 71.8% and further declined at 6+ years to 62.9% (P < .05). Conversely, the nonsurgical retreatment success rates demonstrated a statistically significant increase in weighted success from 2-4 years (70.9%) to 4-6 years (83.0%; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of these results it appears that endodontic surgery offers more favorable initial success, but nonsurgical retreatment offers a more favorable long-term outcome.