Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Trials ; 25(1): 38, 2024 Jan 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38212837

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Adequately selecting the initial follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) dose during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) is key for success in assisted reproduction. The objective of COS is to obtain an optimal number of oocytes to increase the chances of achieving a pregnancy, while avoiding complications for the patient. Current clinical protocols do achieve good results for the majority of patients, but further refinements in individualized FSH dosing may reduce the risk of poor ovarian response while also limiting the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) risk. Models to select the first FSH dose in COS have been presented in literature with promising results. However, most have only been developed and tested in normo-ovulatory women under the age of 40 years. METHODS: This is a randomized, controlled, multicenter, single blinded, clinical trial. This study will be performed in 236 first cycle in vitro fertilization (IVF) and/or ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection) patients, randomized 1:1 in two arms. In the intervention arm, the dose of FSH will be assigned by a machine learning (ML) model called IDoser, while in the control arm, the dose will be determined by the clinician following standard practice. Stratified block randomization will be carried out depending on the patient being classified as expected low responder, high responder, or normo-responder. Patients will complete their participation in the trial once the first embryo transfer result is known. The primary outcome of the study is the number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes retrieved at ovarian pick up (OPU) and the hypothesis of non-inferiority of the intervention arm compared to the control. Secondary outcomes include the number of cycle cancelations (due to low response or no retrieval of mature oocytes), risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), and clinical pregnancy and live birth rates per first transfer. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first randomized trial to test clinical performance of an all-patient inclusive model to select the first dose of FSH for COS. Prospective trials for machine learning (ML) models in healthcare are scarce but necessary for clinical application. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05948293 . Registered on 14 July 2023.


Assuntos
Hormônio Foliculoestimulante , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana , Masculino , Gravidez , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Hormônio Foliculoestimulante/efeitos adversos , Injeções de Esperma Intracitoplásmicas/métodos , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/etiologia , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos , Indução da Ovulação/efeitos adversos , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Sêmen , Fertilização in vitro/métodos , Taxa de Gravidez , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto
2.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 45(5): 1039-1045, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35915001

RESUMO

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is it possible to identify accurately the optimal first dose of FSH in ovarian stimulation by means of a machine learning model? DESIGN: Observational study (2011-2021) including first IVF cycles with own oocytes. A total of 2713 patients from five private reproductive centres were included in the development phase (2011-2019) and 774 in the validation phase (2020-2021). Predictor variables included age, BMI, AMH, AFC and previous live births. Performance was measured with a proposed score based on the number of MII oocytes retrieved and dose received, recommended, or both. RESULTS: The included cycles were from women aged 37.7 ± 4.4 years (18-45 years), with a BMI of 23.5 ± 4.2 kg/m2, AMH of 2.4 ± 2.3 ng/ml, AFC of 11.3 ± 7.6, and an average number of MII obtained 6.9 ± 5.4. The model reached a mean performance score of 0.87 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.88) in the development phase, significantly better than for doses prescribed by clinicians for the same patients (0.83, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.84; P = 2.44 e-10). Mean performance score of the model recommendations was 0.89 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.90) in the validation phase, also significantly better than clinicians (0.84, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.86; P = 3.81 e-05). The model was shown to surpass the performance of standard practice. CONCLUSION: This machine learning model could be used as a training and learning tool for new clinicians, and as quality control for experienced clinicians.


Assuntos
Hormônio Antimülleriano , Fertilização in vitro , Feminino , Animais , Indução da Ovulação , Hormônio Foliculoestimulante , Aprendizado de Máquina
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA