The cardiovascular burden of end-stage renal disease patients.

Patients with end-stage renal disease are 10 to 20 times more at risk of cardiovascular death than the general population. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors are not able to explain the increase in the onset of cardiovascular diseases in dialysis patients. Some of the most important non traditional risk factors in uremic patients are: the inflammatory state of the patients, cytokines and growth factors, hyperhomocysteinemia, the presence of alterations of the calcium phosphorous product which can already be in progress when the glomerular filtration rate decreases to less than 60 mL/min. Clinically, these alterations cause vascular calcifications, calcifications of the heart valves and calcific uremic arteriolopathy or calciphylaxis. The pathogenesis of vascular calcification is complex and cannot be assigned to a simple, passive process: in fact, it includes factors which promote or inhibit calcification. In turn, these pathologic conditions have been found to be highly predictive of general and cardiovascular death. Given the serious clinical consequences that vascular calcifications can cause, it is necessary to carry out an early mapping of the traditional and non traditional risk factors of uremic patients as it seems that therapeutic interventions aimed at reducing or inverting the calcification process can improve the outcome of patients, above all when they are started quickly.

A case of Paget's disease in hemodialysis.

Paget's disease is the second most common bone disease after osteoporosis and causes an excessive bone turnover. Moreover, chronic kidney failure causes an impairment of bone mineral metabolism and electrolytes and PTH homeostasis. As far as we know, this is the first reported case of Paget's disease in a hemodialysis patient: the patient was also affected by secondary hyperparathyroidism and was successfully treated with clodronate, cinacalcet and paracalcitol. The safety and efficacy of this combined therapy was periodically revised in a 12-month follow-up considering the common markers of bone turnover as well as the dosage of OPG, RANKL, IL-6 and MCSF, involved in the pathophysiology of Paget's disease.

Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies after bone-graft transplantation. Impact on a subsequent renal transplantation: a case report.

Immunological evaluation by panel-reactive antibody (PRA) and determination of anti-HLA specificity are important phases in the evaluation of patients awaiting kidney transplantation. The main causes of immunization are previous solid organ transplantation, hemotransfusion, and pregnancy. It is also possible that immunogenicity can be triggered by vascularized tissue grafts. Immune induction by cryopreserved bone prostheses is not yet understood. A 19-year-old patient with osteosarcoma had undergone resection of the left proximal tibia with reconstruction using human bone in 1997. The donor HLA typing was as follows: A3, A29 (19); B44 (12), Bw4; DR13 (6), DR7, DR52, DR53. The patient was subsequently enrolled onto the waiting list for cadaveric donor kidney transplantation due to chronic kidney failure caused by cisplatin toxicity. Pretransplantation immunological screening using the complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) technique revealed a PRA of 63%. IgG antibody specificities were detected against class I and class II donor antigens, specifically anti-A3, B44, DR7 antibodies, using flow cytometry (Tepnel Luminex). Further immunological studies using single HLA specificity analysis (LSA Class I degrees -II degrees , Tepnel-Luminex) showed direct antibodies against all donor antigen specificities. This case showed immune induction after the implantation of bone prosthesis in a kidney transplant candidate, underlining the importance of the availability of HLA typing data of donors of a human prosthesis.

[Anti-HLA antibodies after bone graft and their impact on kidney transplant programs]. / Riscontri di anticorpi anti-HLA dopo trapianto di tessuto osseo. Impatto su programmi di trapianto di rene.

Immunological evaluation by panel reactive antibody (PRA) and determination of anti-HLA specificity is an important phase in the assessment of patients awaiting kidney transplant. The main causes of immunization are previous solid organ transplants, blood transfusions, and pregnancy; immunogenicity can also be triggered by vascularized tissue grafts. Immune induction by cryopreserved bone allografts is not yet fully understood. We report the case of a 19-year-old patient with osteosarcoma who underwent resection of the left proximal tibia with reconstruction using human bone in 1997 (donor typing: A3, A29 (19) - B44 (12), Bw4 - DR13 (6), DR7, DR52, DR53). The patient was subsequently placed on the waiting list for a cadaver donor kidney transplant because of chronic kidney failure caused by cisplatin toxicity. Pretransplant immunological screening using the CDC (complement dependent cytotoxicity) technique revealed a PRA of 63% and anti-A3 and anti-A68 antibodies. The presence of IgG antibody specificity against class I and class II donor antigens (specifically anti-A3, B44, DR7 antibodies) was highlighted using flow cytometry (Tepnel-Luminex). Further immunological studies using single HLA specificity analysis (LSA Class I - II - Tepnel-Luminex) detected direct antibodies against all donor antigen specificities. This is the first reported case of immune induction after a bone graft in a kidney transplant candidate. It underlines the importance of the availability of HLA typing data of all human allograft donors.