Evaluating the pharmacokinetics of beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate/glycopyrronium bromide delivered via pressurised metered-dose inhaler using a low global warming potential propellant.

INTRODUCTION: Use of propellants with high global warming potential (such as HFA-134a) for pressurised metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) is being phased down. Switching to dry-powder inhalers may not be clinically feasible for all patients; an alternative is reformulation using propellants with low global warming potential. The combination of beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate/glycopyrronium bromide (BDP/FF/GB) is available for asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease via pMDI using HFA-134a as propellant. This is being reformulated using the low global warming potential propellant HFA-152a. This manuscript reports three studies comparing BDP/FF/GB pharmacokinetics delivered via pMDI using HFA-152a vs HFA-134a. METHODS: The studies were four-way crossover, single-dose, randomised, double-blind, in healthy volunteers. In Studies 1 and 2, subjects inhaled four puffs of BDP/FF/GB (Study 1: 100/6/12.5 µg [medium-strength BDP]; Study 2: 200/6/12.5 µg [high-strength]), ingesting activated charcoal in two of the periods (once per propellant). In Study 3, subjects inhaled medium- and high-strength BDP/FF/GB using a spacer. All three studies compared HFA-152a vs HFA-134a in terms of lung availability and total systemic exposure of beclometasone-17-monopropionate (B17MP; active metabolite of BDP), BDP, formoterol and GB. Bioequivalence was concluded if the 90 % confidence intervals (CIs) of the ratios between formulations of the geometric mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve between time zero and the last quantifiable timepoint (AUC0-t) for the analytes were between 80 and 125 %. RESULTS: In Studies 1 and 2, systemic exposure bioequivalence (i.e., comparisons without charcoal block) was demonstrated, except for GB Cmax in Study 2 (upper 90 % CI 125.11 %). For lung availability (i.e., comparisons with charcoal block), B17MP and formoterol demonstrated bioequivalence in both studies, as did BDP in Study 2; in Study 1, BDP upper CIs were 126.96 % for Cmax and 127.34 % for AUC0-t). In Study 1, GB AUC0-t lower CI was 74.54 %; in Study 2 upper limits were 135.64 % for Cmax and 129.12 % for AUC0-t. In Study 3, the bioequivalence criteria were met for BDP, B17MP and formoterol with both BDP/FF/GB strengths, and were met for GB AUC0-t, although not for Cmax. Both formulations were similarly well tolerated in all three studies. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, while formal bioequivalence cannot be concluded for all analytes, these data suggest therapeutic equivalence of the new formulation with the existing BDP/FF/GB pMDI formulation, therefore supporting reformulation using a propellant with low global warming potential.

The effect of inhaled extrafine beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate/glycopyrronium bromide on distal and central airway indices, assessed using Functional Respiratory Imaging in COPD (DARWiIN).

BACKGROUND: This study, in patients with symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), explored switching therapy from non-extrafine high-dose inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting ß2-agonist (ICS/LABA; fluticasone propionate/salmeterol [FP/SLM]) to extrafine medium-dose beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate dihydrate/glycopyrronium (BDP/FF/G), both via dry-powder inhaler. Functional Respiratory Imaging, a quantitative computed tomography method with 3D reconstructions of pulmonary anatomy, was used to assess airway geometry and lung function. METHODS: Patients receiving a stable ICS/LABA regimen for ≥ 8 weeks were switched to FP/SLM 500/50 µg, one inhalation twice-daily (high-dose ICS) for 6 weeks. After baseline assessments (Visit 2 [V2]), therapy was switched to BDP/FF/G 100/6/10 µg, two inhalations twice-daily (medium-dose ICS) for 6 weeks, followed by V3. The primary endpoints were percentage changes in specific image-based airway volume (siVaw) and resistance (siRaw) from baseline to predose at V3 (i.e., chronic effects), assessed at total lung capacity (TLC) in central and distal lung regions. Secondary endpoints included siVaw and siRaw changes from pre-dose to post-dose at V2, and from pre-dose to post-dose at V3 at TLC (i.e., acute effects), and chronic and acute changes in siVaw and siRaw at functional residual capacity (FRC). Pre-dose forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) were also assessed. RESULTS: There were no significant changes in pre-dose siVaw or siRaw at TLC from baseline to V3, although at FRC there was a significant decrease in mean siRaw in the distal airways (- 63.6%; p = 0.0261). In addition, in the distal airways there were significant acute effects at TLC on mean siVaw and siRaw (siVaw: 39.8% and 62.6%; siRaw: - 51.1% and - 57.2%, V2 and V3, respectively; all p < 0.001) and at FRC at V2 (siVaw: 77.9%; siRaw: - 67.0%; both p < 0.001). At V3, the mean change in pre-dose FEV1 was 62.2 mL (p = 0.0690), and in CAT total score was - 3.30 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with symptomatic COPD receiving high-dose ICS/LABA, adding a long-acting muscarinic antagonist while decreasing the ICS dose by switching to medium-dose extrafine BDP/FF/G was associated with improved airway indices, especially in the distal airways, together with improvements in respiratory health status. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04876677), first posted 6th May 2021.

Recruitment in randomized clinical trials: The MeMeMe experience.

INTRODUCTION: Recruitment is essential for the success of clinical trials. We are conducting a randomized clinical trial to test the effect of a Mediterranean dietary intervention with or without 1700 mg/day of metformin for the prevention of age-related chronic diseases, the MeMeMe trial (Trial registration number: EudraCT number: 2012-005427-32 ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02960711). MeMeMe recruiting experience, highlighting strengths, limitations encountered and results is reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Statistical analysis focused on the reasons for withdrawal according to the recruitment method ("active" versus "passive" criterion) and the time of withdrawal. Logistic regression models were used to explore the associations between the risk of withdrawal and sex, recruitment method, randomization arm, and with markers of compliance to the intervention, such as one-year change in body weight. RESULTS: Out of 2035 volunteers, 660 (32.4%) were recruited "actively" and 1375 (67.6%) "passively". Among people who dropped out of the trial after randomization, there were 19.5% for the "active" and 22.0% for the "passive" method (p = 0.28). The risk of withdrawal was significantly higher in women (OR:1.91; 95% CI:1.17-3.12; p = 0.01), in volunteers older at recruitment (OR:1.25; 95% CI:1.07-1.45; p = 0.004), and in those with a higher BMI at baseline (OR:1.23; 95% CI:1.07-1.43; p = 0.004). Volunteers who lost at least 2 kg (the median weight change) in the first year of intervention were significantly less (53%) likely to withdraw from the trial (OR:0.48; 95% CI:0.30-0.75; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the "passive" recruitment method was more effective than the "active" one to advance recruitment. The benefits of "passive" recruitment hardly outweighed the drawbacks. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number: EudraCT number: 2012-005427-32. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02960711.

Adherence to the 2018 WCRF/AICR recommendations and sleep behaviour in people with metabolic syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: to investigate the association between the adherence to the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) recommendations and the prevalence of parameters of sleep quality and quantity in people with metabolic syndrome (MS). DESIGN: cross-sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: 126 people with MS included in a randomized controlled trial of Mediterranean diet and metformin for the primary prevention of age-related chronic diseases (Me.Me.Me. study) wore for one week an actigraph called Actiwatch to assess restful sleep parameters (sleep efficiency - SE, actual sleep time - AST, immobile time - IT) and fragmented sleep parameters (moving time - MT, movement and fragmentation index - MFI, sleep latency - SL). At the baseline visit, each participants completed a 24-hour food frequency diary listing what he/she ate the previous day, and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. These questionnaires were used to build up a score for adherence to seven relevant 2018 WCRF/AICR recommendations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: the prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of sleep parameters associated with each recommendation and with the number of met recommendations were calculated using a binomial regression model. RESULTS: the PRs for SE>=85% and IT>=84% increased with the number of met recommendations. Meeting 5-7 recommendations compared to 0-2 was associated with a better SE (PR 3.24 for SE>=85%; p=0.03) and IT (PR 1.68 for IT>=84%; p=0.04). The PRs for MFI>=34.5 and SL>=18 minutes decreased with the number of met recommendations. Meeting 5-7 recommendations compared to 0-2 was associated with a 46% lower prevalence of MFI (p=0.02) and 40% lower prevalence of SL (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: the findings of this paper suggest that the prevalence of better sleep quality in people with MS might be associated with closer adherence to 2018 WCRF/AICR recommendations.

A management system for randomized clinical trials: A novel way to supply medication.

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled clinical trials require management effort, involving huge organizational, economic and informatics investments. Information technology offers opportunities to approach clinical trial methodology in new ways. However, there are only a few reports of computerized data and drug management systems. OBJECTIVE: This paper describes a novel software created specifically for the management of a randomized trial of diet and metformin in people with metabolic syndrome (the Me.Me.Me. trial). METHODS: Me.Me.Me. is an ongoing phase III randomized controlled trial in healthy people with metabolic syndrome to test the hypothesis that comprehensive lifestyle changes and/or metformin can prevent age-related chronic non-communicable diseases. To manage all the phases of the trial, we created a software which is a state pattern machine, user friendly, web-based, able to maintain the correct balance between randomization groups, and structured in various levels of security in order to guarantee the participant's privacy and compliance with the study protocol. The software achieves budget savings: drug management is not based on patients' packs, but on the actual need for drugs according to each participant's "state", with strict guidelines for the handling and supply of medication. RESULTS: The trial is ongoing and recruitment will close on August 31, 2018. To date, 11737 bottles of metformin/placebo have been dispensed to 1054 randomized participants, with drug savings of 29.5%. CONCLUSIONS: A software which takes into account the "state" of participant might be a powerful resource for developing and managing clinical trials, helping avoid poor treatment allocation, and wastage of drugs and money. ME.ME.ME. TRIAL: EUDRACT no. 2012-005427-32. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02960711.

A randomized controlled trial of Mediterranean diet and metformin to prevent age-related diseases in people with metabolic syndrome.

PURPOSE: Age-related non-communicable chronic diseases (ArCDs) are the leading cause of mortality. The major metabolic risk factor for their development is the metabolic syndrome (MetS), defined as a clustering of risk factors of metabolic origin such as abdominal obesity, high blood pressure, dyslipidemia and high fasting glycemia. There is increasing observational and experimental evidence that improving diet and the use of metformin (a calorie-restriction mimetic drug) may modify the risk of developing MetS and ArCD. We designed a phase III randomized controlled trial (the Me.Me.Me trial) to evaluate the effect of a comprehensive lifestyle intervention (including moderate physical activity and a Mediterranean-macrobiotic diet) and the effect of treatment with metformin in the prevention of ArCDs in healthy people with MetS. This report describes the scientific protocol of this trial. METHODS: The design of the study is 2 × 2 factorial with 2,000 volunteers to be randomized into 4 equal groups of 500 each, which are allocated to the following treatments: metformin (1,700 mg/day) + active lifestyle intervention, placebo + active lifestyle intervention, metformin (1,700 mg/day) alone, and placebo alone. The metformin/placebo component of the study is double blind. The study is planned for a term of 5 years. RESULTS: The Me.Me.Me. trial is ongoing and recruitment of participants is underway. No patient has completed the 5 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that the results of the trial will clarify the importance of lifestyle for primary prevention and the role of metformin as a potential chemopreventive agent. The trial is registred on ClinicalTrials.gov with the identification NCT02960711.

"Open mesh" or "strictly selected population" recruitment? The experience of the randomized controlled MeMeMe trial.

Among randomized controlled trials (RCTs), trials for primary prevention require large samples and long follow-up to obtain a high-quality outcome; therefore the recruitment process and the drop-out rates largely dictate the adequacy of the results. We are conducting a Phase III trial on persons with metabolic syndrome to test the hypothesis that comprehensive lifestyle changes and/or metformin treatment prevents age-related chronic diseases (the MeMeMe trial, EudraCT number: 2012-005427-32, also registered on ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT02960711]). Here, we briefly analyze and discuss the reasons which may lead to participants dropping out from trials. In our experience, participants may back out of a trial for different reasons. Drug-induced side effects are certainly the most compelling reason. But what are the other reasons, relating to the participants' perception of the progress of the trial which led them to withdraw after randomization? What about the time-dependent drop-out rate in primary prevention trials? The primary outcome of this analysis is the point of drop-out from trial, defined as the time from the randomization date to the withdrawal date. Survival functions were non-parametrically estimated using the product-limit estimator. The curves were statistically compared using the log-rank test (P=0.64, not significant). Researchers involved in primary prevention RCTs seem to have to deal with the paradox of the proverbial "short blanket syndrome". Recruiting only highly motivated candidates might be useful for the smooth progress of the trial but it may lead to a very low enrollment rate. On the other hand, what about enrolling all the eligible subjects without considering their motivation? This might boost the enrollment rate, but it can lead to biased results on account of large proportions of drop-outs. Our experience suggests that participants do not change their mind depending on the allocation group (intervention or control). There is no single answer to sort out the short blanket syndrome.