Amivantamab plus chemotherapy with and without lazertinib in EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC after disease progression on osimertinib: primary results from the phase III MARIPOSA-2 study.

BACKGROUND: Amivantamab plus carboplatin-pemetrexed (chemotherapy) with and without lazertinib demonstrated antitumor activity in patients with refractory epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in phase I studies. These combinations were evaluated in a global phase III trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 657 patients with EGFR-mutated (exon 19 deletions or L858R) locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC after disease progression on osimertinib were randomized 2 : 2 : 1 to receive amivantamab-lazertinib-chemotherapy, chemotherapy, or amivantamab-chemotherapy. The dual primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) of amivantamab-chemotherapy and amivantamab-lazertinib-chemotherapy versus chemotherapy. During the study, hematologic toxicities observed in the amivantamab-lazertinib-chemotherapy arm necessitated a regimen change to start lazertinib after carboplatin completion. RESULTS: All baseline characteristics were well balanced across the three arms, including by history of brain metastases and prior brain radiation. PFS was significantly longer for amivantamab-chemotherapy and amivantamab-lazertinib-chemotherapy versus chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) for disease progression or death 0.48 and 0.44, respectively; P < 0.001 for both; median of 6.3 and 8.3 versus 4.2 months, respectively]. Consistent PFS results were seen by investigator assessment (HR for disease progression or death 0.41 and 0.38 for amivantamab-chemotherapy and amivantamab-lazertinib-chemotherapy, respectively; P < 0.001 for both; median of 8.2 and 8.3 versus 4.2 months, respectively). Objective response rate was significantly higher for amivantamab-chemotherapy and amivantamab-lazertinib-chemotherapy versus chemotherapy (64% and 63% versus 36%, respectively; P < 0.001 for both). Median intracranial PFS was 12.5 and 12.8 versus 8.3 months for amivantamab-chemotherapy and amivantamab-lazertinib-chemotherapy versus chemotherapy (HR for intracranial disease progression or death 0.55 and 0.58, respectively). Predominant adverse events (AEs) in the amivantamab-containing regimens were hematologic, EGFR-, and MET-related toxicities. Amivantamab-chemotherapy had lower rates of hematologic AEs than amivantamab-lazertinib-chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Amivantamab-chemotherapy and amivantamab-lazertinib-chemotherapy improved PFS and intracranial PFS versus chemotherapy in a population with limited options after disease progression on osimertinib. Longer follow-up is needed for the modified amivantamab-lazertinib-chemotherapy regimen.

Management of lung cancer patients' quality of life in clinical practice: a Delphi study.

BACKGROUND: The assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has seen exponential growth in oncology clinical trials. However, the measurement of HRQoL has yet to be optimised in routine clinical practice. This study aimed at exploring the operationalisation of HRQoL in clinical practice with the goal of reaching a consensus from a panel of physicians. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Physicians involved in the management of lung cancer patients in France were recruited to participate in a Delphi study. The study involved three rounds of iterated queries to gain consensus on management aspects of HRQoL, including timing of discussion on HRQoL, which specific domains of HRQoL should be discussed, and what was the most appropriate method of assessment. The threshold adopted for consensus was at least 70% agreement among physicians. A scientific committee reviewed results following each round of the Delphi study. RESULTS: A representative panel of 60 physicians participated in this study. Consensus was obtained for HRQoL management at all time points in the patient care pathway. Panellists agreed that HRQoL discussions should occur during routine visits and hospitalisation. The involvement of patients' relatives was also recognised as important, except when discussing side-effects and involvement of a multidisciplinary team. There was a lack of consensus on a systematic assessment for all patients at each visit and no consensus on how HRQoL should be measured in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: HRQoL discussions are considered an integral part in the management of lung cancer patients, and are deemed key to success in patient-physician interaction. Further research is required to harmonise how best to implement HRQoL assessment.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with advanced lung cancer and oncogenic driver alterations: results from the IMMUNOTARGET registry.

BACKGROUND: Anti-PD1/PD-L1 directed immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are widely used to treat patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The activity of ICI across NSCLC harboring oncogenic alterations is poorly characterized. The aim of our study was to address the efficacy of ICI in the context of oncogenic addiction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study for patients receiving ICI monotherapy for advanced NSCLC with at least one oncogenic driver alteration. Anonymized data were evaluated for clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes for ICI therapy: best response (RECIST 1.1), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) from ICI initiation. The primary end point was PFS under ICI. Secondary end points were best response (RECIST 1.1) and OS from ICI initiation. RESULTS: We studied 551 patients treated in 24 centers from 10 countries. The molecular alterations involved KRAS (n = 271), EGFR (n = 125), BRAF (n = 43), MET (n = 36), HER2 (n = 29), ALK (n = 23), RET (n = 16), ROS1 (n = 7), and multiple drivers (n = 1). Median age was 60 years, gender ratio was 1 : 1, never/former/current smokers were 28%/51%/21%, respectively, and the majority of tumors were adenocarcinoma. The objective response rate by driver alteration was: KRAS = 26%, BRAF = 24%, ROS1 = 17%, MET = 16%, EGFR = 12%, HER2 = 7%, RET = 6%, and ALK = 0%. In the entire cohort, median PFS was 2.8 months, OS 13.3 months, and the best response rate 19%. In a subgroup analysis, median PFS (in months) was 2.1 for EGFR, 3.2 for KRAS, 2.5 for ALK, 3.1 for BRAF, 2.5 for HER2, 2.1 for RET, and 3.4 for MET. In certain subgroups, PFS was positively associated with PD-L1 expression (KRAS, EGFR) and with smoking status (BRAF, HER2). CONCLUSIONS: : ICI induced regression in some tumors with actionable driver alterations, but clinical activity was lower compared with the KRAS group and the lack of response in the ALK group was notable. Patients with actionable tumor alterations should receive targeted therapies and chemotherapy before considering immunotherapy as a single agent.

[Tumour assessment criteria for immune checkpoint inhibitors]. / Critères d'évaluation de la réponse tumorale aux inhibiteurs des points de contrôle immunitaire.

The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors in thoracic oncology has led to a reconsideration of the rules for radiological tumor assessment. The RECIST criteria are widely used for the assessment of conventional treatments but are not suitable for anti-tumoral immunotherapy. The mechanism of action of this new class of drugs may induce specific patterns of response, which are not fully assessed by the RECIST criteria. Several new criteria have been proposed to better detect these patterns of response. The changes usually include confirmation of progression, new ways of assessing new lesions, and a larger role for clinical assessment. Nevertheless, harmonization and validation of these criteria remains indispensable. In this review, we will detail the different criteria that are currently available, and discuss their strengths and weaknesses.

[MET exon 14 splicing sites mutations: A new therapeutic opportunity in lung cancer]. / Les mutations des sites d'épissage de l'exon 14 de MET. Une nouvelle opportunité thérapeutique dans le cancer du poumon.

The mutations leading to MET exon 14 skipping represent a new class of molecular alterations described in various cancers. These alterations are observed in 2 to 3 % of cases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several cases of NSCLC carrying such alterations and achieving objective response to MET tyrosine kinase inhibitorshave recently been published. This review summarizes the molecular mechanisms responsible for MET exon 14 skipping as well as the consequences of the loss of this exon on receptor activity. We also describe the clinical characteristics of patients with METΔ14 mutations. Finally, we address the issues related to the detection of these mutations in lung cancer, and the need to anticipate resistance to MET inhibitors.

[Systemic treatment of brain metastases from lung cancer]. / Traitement systémique des métastases cérébrales de cancer bronchique.

Systemic treatment of lung cancer patients with brain metastases is based on clinical (presence of symptomatic intracranial lesions), pathological and molecular characteristics of the disease. The efficacy of standard platinum-based chemotherapy is comparable inside and outside the brain, justifying its use as front-line therapy. The intracranial efficacy of targeted therapies (EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, ALK inhibitors) is demonstrated, and is globally superior to the efficacy of standard chemotherapy, justifying their use as front-line therapy in case of EGFR activating mutation or ALK rearrangement (providing the change in the crizotinib label in France). The concomitant use of whole brain radiotherapy and a systemic treatment (chemotherapy or targeted therapy) is not recommended in the absence of a demonstrated better efficacy and/or acceptable safety profile. Several trials are ongoing to assess new whole brain radiotherapy modalities, new targeted therapies alone or in combination, especially exploring immunotherapy.

Identification of microRNA-based signatures for response and survival for non-small cell lung cancer treated with cisplatin-vinorelbine A ELCWP prospective study.

UNLABELLED: Clinical variables, like stage and performance status (PS), have predictive and prognostic values in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with chemotherapy, not allowing adequate individual prediction. MicroRNA (miRNA) are non-coding RNAs regulating gene expression. In a prospective study, we assessed the predictive value for response and survival of tumour miRNA in NSCLC patients treated by 1st line cisplatin and vinorelbine. miRNA expression was analysed on a biopsy obtained during the diagnostic bronchoscopy, using TaqMan Low Density Arrays. The signature for response was derived using logistic regression with stepwise variable selection. The associations between overall survival and miRNA expression levels were estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard regression models to estimate the hazard ratios. In total, 38 patients with adequate tumour biopsies, treated with cisplatin-vinorelbine were included: male (n = 27), 80-100 Karnofsky PS (n = 27), adenocarcinoma (n = 20), stage IV (n = 30). One patient was considered not assessable for response but remained included in the survival analyses. Out of the 37 patients assessable for response, 16 partial responses (43%) were observed. A two miRNA signature (miR-149 and miR-375) was found predictive for response and was also associated to progression-free survival (p = 0.05). Using a linear combination of the miR CT values with Cox's regression coefficients as weights, we constructed a prognostic score for overall survival including four miRNA (miR-200c, miR-424, miR-29c and miR-124). The signature distinguished patients with good (n = 18) and poor (n = 20) prognosis with respective median survival times of 47.3 months (95% CI 29.8-52.4) and 15.5 months (95% CI 9.1-22.8) (p < 0.001; hazard ratio 21.1, 95% CI 4.7-94.9). CONCLUSIONS: miRNA signature allows predicting response and is of prognostic value for survival in patients with NSCLC treated with first line cisplatin and vinorelbine.

[Castleman's disease: unusual presentation of Castleman's disease and review of literature]. / La maladie de Castleman : observations inhabituelles et revue de la littérature.

Castleman disease is a rare disorder of the lymphoid system which can be classified into two clinical groups, monocentric disease versus multicentric disease, and two histological types, the hyaline vascular form versus the plasma cell form. We report three cases of monocentric Castleman disease. The first one is a classical form of Castleman's disease. The second one is characterized by an uncommon radiological presentation, with a calcification within the tumor. The third one is a plasma cell form with monoclonal proliferation associated with a monoclonal gammapathy. These three cases highlight the polymorphic clinical and radiological features of Castleman disease. They underlie the difficulty of surgical resection due to the tumor vascularization. Other diagnosis hypothesis and associated diseases will also be discussed (HIV, Kaposi's sarcoma, POEMS syndrome).

[Malignant pleural mesothelioma: diagnosis and treatment]. / Prise en charge diagnostique et thérapeutique du mésothéliome pleural malin.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and aggressive tumor issued from the mesothelial surface of the pleural space. A previous exposure to asbestos is the main risk factor of mesothelioma. Clinical signs are most of the time late and unspecific. Chest CT-scan, a key imaging procedure, usually shows a (unilateral) pleurisy associated with pleural nodular thickening. PET-scan associated with CT-scan may help to differenciate MPM from pleural benign tumors but it is not recommended for the diagnosis of MPM, as well as chest resonance magnetic imaging and blood or pleural fluid biomarkers, including soluble mesothelin still under investigation. The diagnosis of MPM is based on histology using essentially immunohistochemistry on pleural biopsies best obtained by thoracoscopy. The treatment of MPM relies mostly on chemotherapy. Surgery, pleurectomy/decortication or extrapleural pneumonectomy, is not recommended outside a clinical trial, as well as adjuvant chest radiotherapy. Prophylactic irradiation of chest scars and drains, validated by the French guidelines in 2005, is however highly discussed at the international level. Finally, numerous research studies presently assess the value of targeted therapies and biomarkers in MPM, opening new perspectives in the management of this cancer.

[Should elevated beta-HCG levels be an exclusion criteria in clinical trials? A case report of paraneoplastic secretion associated with lung adenocarcinoma]. / L'élévation du taux de bêta-HCG doit-elle être un critère d'exclusion des essais thérapeutiques ? À propos d'un cas de sécrétion paranéoplasique associée à un adénocarcinome bronchique.

We report the case of a 55-year-old woman with pulmonary adenocarcinoma and bone metastases who was diagnosed with paraneoplastic secretion of the beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-HCG) while being screened for inclusion in a clinical trial. Immunohistochemistry analysis of a bone biopsy revealed strong staining of cancer cells with anti-beta HCG antibodies. Serial measurements of circulating Beta HCG seemed to be influenced by antineoplastic treatments, although they were not strictly associated with tumour evolution assessed by CT scans. Little is known about paraneoplastic secretion of beta HCG, although it has been found in 12% to 24% of non-small cell lung cancers. Usefulness of serial measurements of beta HCG for monitoring NSCLC has yet to be demonstrated, but its use as a criterion for inclusion in clinical trials needs to be questioned.

From randomized trials to the clinic: is it time to implement individual lung-cancer screening in clinical practice? A multidisciplinary statement from French experts on behalf of the French intergroup (IFCT) and the groupe d'Oncologie de langue francaise (GOLF).

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in cancer therapy, mortality is still high except in early-stage tumors, and screening remains a challenge. The randomized National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), comparing annual low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) and chest X-rays, revealed a 20% decrease in lung-cancer-specific mortality. These results raised numerous questions. The French intergroup for thoracic oncology and the French-speaking oncology group convened an expert group to provide a coherent outlook on screening modalities in France. METHODS: A literature review was carried out and transmitted to the expert group, which was divided into three workshops to tackle specific questions, with responses presented in a plenary session. A writing committee drafted this article. RESULTS: The multidisciplinary group favored individual screening in France, when carried out as outlined in this article and after informing subjects of the benefits and risks. The target population involves subjects aged 55-74 years, who are smokers or have a 30 pack-year smoking history. Subjects should be informed about the benefits of quitting. Screening should involve LDCT scanning with specific modalities. Criteria for CT positivity and management algorithms for positive examinations are given. CONCLUSIONS: Individual screening requires rigorous assessment and precise research in order to potentially develop a lung-cancer screening policy.

[EGFR inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer: more than yesterday (but less than tomorrow)]. / Les inhibiteurs d'EGFR dans le cancer bronchique non à petites cellules: plus qu'hier et moins que demain.

Molecular targeted agents represent a major breakthrough in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Among these agents, Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) inhibitors are probably the more important so far. Whether inhibition is obtained by targeting the tyrosine kinase of the receptor (gefitinib or erlotinib) or by using a monoclonal antibody (cetuximab), the place of these treatments will increase in the next years. This article details the role of EGFR in lung carcinogenesis and the main therapeutic approaches used to inhibit EGFR activity. The results of the major clinical trials evaluating these agents are also discussed.

[Pulmonary MALT lymphoma revealing AIDS]. / Lymphome pulmonaire du MALT révélant un sida.

INTRODUCTION: We report the case of a patient with an isolated pulmonary mucosa associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma that revealed an acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). CASE REPORT: A 30 year old man from Central Africa was admitted to hospital with cough, dyspnoea and general weakness. A diagnosis of HIV infection was made promptly. The thoracic CT scan revealed diffuse bilateral ground glass opacities as well as consolidation of the right upper lobe. After a non-diagnostic endoscopy the diagnosis of a low grade B cell MALT lymphoma (CD20+) was made by lung biopsy and confirmed by the presence of the t(11;18) translocation. No extrathoracic lymphoma was found. Treatment with rituximab and triple anti-retroviral therapy led to a rapid and complete remission that was maintained for 3 years after the diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Pulmonary MALT lymphoma may reveal AIDS. A combination of rituximab and anti-retroviral therapy led to complete remission in this patient.

Phase II trial of temozolomide and cisplatin followed by whole brain radiotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases: a GLOT-GFPC study.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases (BM) considerably worsen the prognosis of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The usefulness and choice of chemotherapy remain uncertain in this indication since these patients are excluded from most clinical trials. We conducted a phase II study to determine the efficacy and tolerability of up-front chemotherapy with association of temozolomide and cisplatin in NSCLC patients with BM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty NSCLC patients with BM received temozolomide (200 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days every 28 days) and cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) at day 1 of each cycle), up to six cycles, followed by whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). An evaluation was carried out every two cycles and after WBRT. WBRT was performed earlier in case of progressive disease at any time or stable disease after cycle 4. RESULTS: Eight objective responses were achieved (16%). Overall median survival was 5 months. Median time to progression was 2.3 months. Ten patients (20%) presented a grade 3/4 neutropenia and 11 patients (22%) presented a grade 3/4 thrombopenia. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a lack of efficacy of up-front chemotherapy with association of temozolomide and cisplatin in these patients. Nevertheless, it supports the feasibility of chemotherapy before brain radiotherapy in NSCLC patients with BM.