Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 44
Filtrar
1.
Neurology ; 103(3): e209651, 2024 Aug 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38986044

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Despite the growing evidence of the clinical utility of blood-brain biomarkers in adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI), less is known about the performance of these biomarkers in children. We characterize age-dependent differences in levels of ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in children without TBI. METHODS: Plasma biobank specimens from children and adolescents aged 0-<19 years without TBI were obtained, and UCH-L1 and GFAP levels were quantified. The relationship between age and biomarker expression was determined using previously defined aged epochs (<3.5 years, 3.5 years to <11 years, 11 years and older), then biomarker levels were compared with established thresholds for ruling out the need for a head CT in adults with a mild TBI (mTBI) (UCH-L1 400 pg/mL, GFAP 35 pg/mL). RESULTS: The age range of the 366 control patients was 3 months-18 years. There was a significant negative association between age and GFAP but not UCH-L1. Only 1.4% of samples exceeded the UCH-L1 cutoff; however, 20% of samples exceeded the GFAP cutoff and 100% children younger than 3.5 years had values that exceeded the cutoff. DISCUSSION: Age seems to modify physiologic plasma GFAP levels. Diagnostic cutoffs for TBI based on GFAP but not UCH-L1 and may need to be adjusted in children younger than 11 years.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores , Proteína Glial Fibrilar Ácida , Ubiquitina Tiolesterase , Humanos , Ubiquitina Tiolesterase/sangue , Criança , Proteína Glial Fibrilar Ácida/sangue , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Masculino , Feminino , Lactente , Biomarcadores/sangue , Fatores Etários , Recém-Nascido
2.
BMJ Open ; 14(6): e082644, 2024 Jun 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38904136

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Paediatric concussion is a common injury. Approximately 30% of youth with concussion will experience persisting postconcussion symptoms (PPCS) extending at least 1 month following injury. Recently, studies have shown the benefit of early, active, targeted therapeutic strategies. However, these are primarily prescribed from the specialty setting. Early access to concussion specialty care has been shown to improve recovery times for those at risk for persisting symptoms, but there are disparities in which youth are able to access such care. Mobile health (mHealth) technology has the potential to improve access to concussion specialists. This trial will evaluate the feasibility of a mHealth remote patient monitoring (RPM)-based care handoff model to facilitate access to specialty care, and the effectiveness of the handoff model in reducing the incidence of PPCS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a non-randomised type I, hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial. Youth with concussion ages 13-18 will be enrolled from the emergency department of a large paediatric healthcare network. Patients deemed a moderate-to-high risk for PPCS using the predicting and preventing postconcussive problems in paediatrics (5P) stratification tool will be registered for a web-based chat platform that uses RPM to collect information on symptoms and activity. Those patients with escalating or plateauing symptoms will be contacted for a specialty visit using data collected from RPM to guide management. The primary effectiveness outcome will be the incidence of PPCS, defined as at least three concussion-related symptoms above baseline at 28 days following injury. Secondary effectiveness outcomes will include the number of days until return to preinjury symptom score, clearance for full activity and return to school without accommodations. The primary implementation outcome will be fidelity, defined as the per cent of patients meeting specialty care referral criteria who are ultimately seen in concussion specialty care. Secondary implementation outcomes will include patient-defined and clinician-defined appropriateness and acceptability. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (IRB 22-019755). Study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated at national and international meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05741411.


Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Síndrome Pós-Concussão , Telemedicina , Humanos , Adolescente , Concussão Encefálica/terapia , Síndrome Pós-Concussão/terapia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Masculino , Feminino
3.
Lancet Child Adolesc Health ; 8(7): 482-490, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38843852

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cervical spine injuries in children are uncommon but potentially devastating; however, indiscriminate neck imaging after trauma unnecessarily exposes children to ionising radiation. The aim of this study was to derive and validate a paediatric clinical prediction rule that can be incorporated into an algorithm to guide radiographic screening for cervical spine injury among children in the emergency department. METHODS: In this prospective observational cohort study, we screened children aged 0-17 years presenting with known or suspected blunt trauma at 18 specialised children's emergency departments in hospitals in the USA affiliated with the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN). Injured children were eligible for enrolment into derivation or validation cohorts by fulfilling one of the following criteria: transported from the scene of injury to the emergency department by emergency medical services; evaluated by a trauma team; and undergone neck imaging for concern for cervical spine injury either at or before arriving at the PECARN-affiliated emergency department. Children presenting with solely penetrating trauma were excluded. Before viewing an enrolled child's neck imaging results, the attending emergency department clinician completed a clinical examination and prospectively documented cervical spine injury risk factors in an electronic questionnaire. Cervical spine injuries were determined by imaging reports and telephone follow-up with guardians within 21-28 days of the emergency room encounter, and cervical spine injury was confirmed by a paediatric neurosurgeon. Factors associated with a high risk of cervical spine injury (>10%) were identified by bivariable Poisson regression with robust error estimates, and factors associated with non-negligible risk were identified by classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. Variables were combined in the cervical spine injury prediction rule. The primary outcome of interest was cervical spine injury within 28 days of initial trauma warranting inpatient observation or surgical intervention. Rule performance measures were calculated for both derivation and validation cohorts. A clinical care algorithm for determining which risk factors warrant radiographic screening for cervical spine injury after blunt trauma was applied to the study population to estimate the potential effect on reducing CT and x-ray use in the paediatric emergency department. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05049330. FINDINGS: Nine emergency departments participated in the derivation cohort, and nine participated in the validation cohort. In total, 22 430 children presenting with known or suspected blunt trauma were enrolled (11 857 children in the derivation cohort; 10 573 in the validation cohort). 433 (1·9%) of the total population had confirmed cervical spine injuries. The following factors were associated with a high risk of cervical spine injury: altered mental status (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score of 3-8 or unresponsive on the Alert, Verbal, Pain, Unresponsive scale [AVPU] of consciousness); abnormal airway, breathing, or circulation findings; and focal neurological deficits including paresthesia, numbness, or weakness. Of 928 in the derivation cohort presenting with at least one of these risk factors, 118 (12·7%) had cervical spine injury (risk ratio 8·9 [95% CI 7·1-11·2]). The following factors were associated with non-negligible risk of cervical spine injury by CART analysis: neck pain; altered mental status (GCS score of 9-14; verbal or pain on the AVPU; or other signs of altered mental status); substantial head injury; substantial torso injury; and midline neck tenderness. The high-risk and CART-derived factors combined and applied to the validation cohort performed with 94·3% (95% CI 90·7-97·9) sensitivity, 60·4% (59·4-61·3) specificity, and 99·9% (99·8-100·0) negative predictive value. Had the algorithm been applied to all participants to guide the use of imaging, we estimated the number of children having CT might have decreased from 3856 (17·2%) to 1549 (6·9%) of 22 430 children without increasing the number of children getting plain x-rays. INTERPRETATION: Incorporated into a clinical algorithm, the cervical spine injury prediction rule showed strong potential for aiding clinicians in determining which children arriving in the emergency department after blunt trauma should undergo radiographic neck imaging for potential cervical spine injury. Implementation of the clinical algorithm could decrease use of unnecessary radiographic testing in the emergency department and eliminate high-risk radiation exposure. Future work should validate the prediction rule and care algorithm in more general settings such as community emergency departments. FUNDING: The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the Health Resources and Services Administration of the US Department of Health and Human Services in the Maternal and Child Health Bureau under the Emergency Medical Services for Children programme.


Assuntos
Vértebras Cervicais , Regras de Decisão Clínica , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Traumatismos da Coluna Vertebral , Ferimentos não Penetrantes , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Criança , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Vértebras Cervicais/lesões , Vértebras Cervicais/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Lactente , Adolescente , Traumatismos da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Recém-Nascido , Algoritmos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
4.
J Pediatr ; 274: 114157, 2024 Jun 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38901776

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate characteristics of sport-related concussion (SRC), recreation-related concussion (RRC), and nonsport or recreation-related concussion (non-SRRC) in patients 5 through 12 years old, an understudied population in youth concussion. STUDY DESIGN: This observational study included patients aged 5 through 12 years presenting to a specialty care concussion setting at ≤28 days postinjury from 2018 through 2022. The following characteristics were assessed: demographics, injury mechanism (SRC, RRC, or SRRC), point of healthcare entry, and clinical signs and symptoms. Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests were used to assess group differences. Posthoc pairwise comparisons were employed for all analyses (α = 0.017). RESULTS: One thousand one hundred forty-one patients reported at ≤28 days of injury (female = 42.9%, median age = 11, interquartile range (IQR) = 9-12) with the most common mechanism being RRC (37.3%), followed by non-SRRC (31.9%). More non-SRRCs (39.6%) and RRC (35.7%) were first seen in the emergency department (P < .001) compared with SRC (27.9%). Patients with RRC and non-SRRC were first evaluated at specialists 2 and 3 days later than SRC (P < .001). Patients with non-SRRC reported with higher symptom burden, more frequent visio-vestibular abnormalities, and more changes to sleep and daily habits (P < .001) compared with RRC and SRC (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In concussion patients 5 through 12 years, RRCs and non-SRRC were more prevalent than SRC, presenting first more commonly to the emergency department and taking longer to present to specialists. Non-SRRC had more severe clinical features. RRC and non-SRRC are distinct from SRC in potential for less supervision at time of injury and less direct access to established concussion health care following injury.

5.
JMIR Pediatr Parent ; 7: e53186, 2024 May 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722194

RESUMO

Background: A concussion is a common adolescent injury that can result in a constellation of symptoms, negatively affecting academic performance, neurobiological development, and quality of life. Mobile health (mHealth) technologies, such as apps for patients to report symptoms or wearables to measure physiological metrics like heart rate, have been shown to be promising in health maintenance. However, there is limited evidence about mHealth engagement in adolescents with a concussion during their recovery course. Objective: This study aims to determine the response rate and response rate patterns in concussed adolescents reporting their daily symptoms through mHealth technology. It will also examine the effect of time-, demographic-, and injury-related characteristics on response rate patterns. Methods: Participants aged between 11-18 years (median days since injury at enrollment: 11 days) were recruited from the concussion program of a tertiary care academic medical center and a suburban school's athletic teams. They were asked to report their daily symptoms using a mobile app. Participants were prompted to complete the Post-Concussion Symptom Inventory (PCSI) 3 times (ie, morning, afternoon, and evening) per day for 4 weeks following enrollment. The primary outcome was the response rate pattern over time (by day since initial app use and the day since injury). Time-, demographic-, and injury-related differences in reporting behaviors were compared using Mann Whitney U tests. Results: A total of 56 participants were enrolled (mean age 15.3, SD 1.9 years; n=32, 57% female). The median response rate across all days of app use in the evening was 37.0% (IQR 27.2%-46.4%), which was significantly higher than the morning (21.2%, IQR 15.6%-30.5%) or afternoon (26.4%, IQR 21.1%-31.5%; P<.001). The median daily response was significantly different by sex (female: 53.8%, IQR 46.2%-64.2% vs male: 42.0%, IQR 28.6%-51.1%; P=.003), days since injury to app use (participants starting to use the app >7 days since injury: 54.1%, IQR 47.4%-62.2% vs starting to use the app ≤7 days since injury: 38.0%, IQR 26.0%-53.3%; P=.002), and concussion history (participants with a history of at least one prior concussion: 57.4%, IQR 44.5%-70.5% vs participants without concussion history: 42.3%, IQR 36.8%-53.5%; P=.03). There were no significant differences by age. Differences by injury mechanism (sports- and recreation-related injury: 39.6%, IQR 36.1%-50.4% vs non-sports- or recreation-related injury: 30.6%, IQR 20.0%-42.9%; P=.04) and initial symptom burden (PCSI scores greater than the median score of 47: 40.9%, IQR 35.2%-53.8% vs PCSI scores less than or equal to the median score: 31.9%, IQR 24.6%-40.6%; P=.04) were evident in the evening response rates; however, daily rates were not statistically different. Conclusions: Evening may be the optimal time to prompt for daily concussion symptom assessment among concussed adolescents compared with morning or afternoon. Multiple demographic- and injury-related characteristics were associated with higher daily response rates, including for female participants, those with more than 1 week from injury to beginning mHealth monitoring, and those with a history of at least one previous concussion. Future studies may consider incentive strategies or adaptive digital concussion assessments to increase response rates in populations with low engagement.

6.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(4): e245543, 2024 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38587843

RESUMO

Importance: Mood disorders are prevalent among adolescents and young adults, and their onset often coincides with driving eligibility. The understanding of how mood disorders are associated with youth driving outcomes is limited. Objective: To examine the association between the presence of a mood disorder and rates of licensing, crashes, violations, and suspensions among adolescents and young adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was conducted among New Jersey residents who were born 1987 to 2000, age eligible to acquire a driver's license from 2004 to 2017, and patients of the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia network within 2 years of licensure eligibility at age 17 years. The presence of a current (ie, ≤2 years of driving eligibility) mood disorder was identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) or International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes. Rates of licensure and driving outcomes among youths who were licensed were compared among 1879 youths with and 84 294 youths without a current mood disorder from 2004 to 2017. Data were analyzed from June 2022 to July 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Acquisition of a driver's license and first involvement as a driver in a police-reported crash and rates of other adverse driving outcomes were assessed. Survival analysis was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for licensing and driving outcomes. Adjusted rate ratios (aRRs) were estimated for driving outcomes 12 and 48 months after licensure. Results: Among 86 173 youths (median [IQR] age at the end of the study, 22.8 [19.7-26.5] years; 42 894 female [49.8%]), there were 1879 youths with and 84 294 youths without a mood disorder. A greater proportion of youths with mood disorders were female (1226 female [65.2%]) compared with those without mood disorders (41 668 female [49.4%]). At 48 months after licensure eligibility, 75.5% (95% CI, 73.3%-77.7%) and 83.8% (95% CI, 83.5%-84.1%) of youths with and without mood disorders, respectively, had acquired a license. Youths with mood disorders were 30% less likely to acquire a license than those without a mood disorder (aHR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.66-0.74]). Licensed youths with mood disorders had higher overall crash rates than those without mood disorders over the first 48 months of driving (137.8 vs 104.8 crashes per 10 000 driver-months; aRR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.08-1.31]); licensed youths with mood disorders also had higher rates of moving violations (aRR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.13-1.38]) and license suspensions (aRR, 1.95 [95% CI, 1.53-2.49]). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that youths with mood disorders were less likely to be licensed and had higher rates of adverse driving outcomes than youths without mood disorders. These findings suggest that opportunities may exist to enhance driving mobility in this population and elucidate the mechanisms by which mood disorders are associated with crash risk.


Assuntos
Definição da Elegibilidade , Transtornos do Humor , Criança , Adulto Jovem , Humanos , Adolescente , Feminino , Pré-Escolar , Adulto , Masculino , Estudos de Coortes , Transtornos do Humor/epidemiologia , Hospitais Pediátricos , Classificação Internacional de Doenças
7.
J Neurotrauma ; 41(11-12): 1299-1309, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38468511

RESUMO

Concussion is a common injury in the adolescent and young adult populations. Although branched chain amino acid (BCAA) supplementation has shown improvements in neurocognitive and sleep function in pre-clinical animal models of mild-to-moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI), to date, no studies have been performed evaluating the efficacy of BCAAs in concussed adolescents and young adults. The goal of this pilot trial was to determine the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of varied doses of oral BCAA supplementation in a group of concussed adolescents and young adults. The study was conducted as a pilot, double-blind, randomized controlled trial of participants ages 11-34 presenting with concussion to outpatient clinics (sports medicine and primary care), urgent care, and emergency departments of a tertiary care pediatric children's hospital and an urban tertiary care adult hospital, between June 24, 2014 and December 5, 2020. Participants were randomized to one of five study arms (placebo and 15 g, 30 g, 45 g, and 54 g BCAA treatment daily) and followed for 21 days after enrollment. Outcome measures included daily computerized neurocognitive tests (processing speed, the a priori primary outcome; and attention, visual learning, and working memory), symptom score, physical and cognitive activity, sleep/wake alterations, treatment compliance, and adverse events. In total, 42 participants were randomized, 38 of whom provided analyzable data. We found no difference in our primary outcome of processing speed between the arms; however, there was a significant reduction in total symptom score (decrease of 4.4 points on a 0-54 scale for every 500 g of study drug consumed, p value for trend = 0.0036, [uncorrected]) and return to physical activity (increase of 0.503 points on a 0-5 scale for every 500 g of study drug consumed, p value for trend = 0.005 [uncorrected]). There were no serious adverse events. Eight of 38 participants reported a mild (not interfering with daily activity) or moderate (limitation of daily activity) adverse event; there were no differences in adverse events by arm, with only two reported mild adverse events (both gastrointestinal) in the highest (45 g and 54 g) BCAA arms. Although limited by slow enrollment, small sample size, and missing data, this study provides the first demonstration of efficacy, as well as safety and tolerability, of BCAAs in concussed adolescents and young adults; specifically, a dose-response effect in reducing concussion symptoms and a return to baseline physical activity in those treated with higher total doses of BCAAs. These findings provide important preliminary data to inform a larger trial of BCAA therapy to expedite concussion recovery.


Assuntos
Aminoácidos de Cadeia Ramificada , Concussão Encefálica , Suplementos Nutricionais , Humanos , Projetos Piloto , Masculino , Feminino , Adolescente , Método Duplo-Cego , Adulto Jovem , Aminoácidos de Cadeia Ramificada/administração & dosagem , Aminoácidos de Cadeia Ramificada/uso terapêutico , Concussão Encefálica/tratamento farmacológico , Concussão Encefálica/terapia , Adulto , Criança , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Am J Sports Med ; 52(3): 811-821, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38305042

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Studies have evaluated individual factors associated with persistent postconcussion symptoms (PPCS) in youth concussion, but no study has combined individual elements of common concussion batteries with patient characteristics, comorbidities, and visio-vestibular deficits in assessing an optimal model to predict PPCS. PURPOSE: To determine the combination of elements from 4 commonly used clinical concussion batteries and known patient characteristics and comorbid risk factors that maximize the ability to predict PPCS. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: We enrolled 198 concussed participants-87 developed PPCS and 111 did not-aged 8 to 19 years assessed within 14 days of injury from a suburban high school and the concussion program of a tertiary care academic medical center. We defined PPCS as a Post-Concussion Symptom Inventory (PCSI) score at 28 days from injury of ≥3 points compared with the preinjury PCSI score-scaled for younger children. Predictors included the individual elements of the visio-vestibular examination (VVE), Sport Concussion Assessment Tool, 5th Edition (SCAT-5), King-Devick test, and PCSI, in addition to age, sex, concussion history, and migraine headache history. The individual elements of these tests were grouped into interpretable factors using sparse principal component analysis. The 12 resultant factors were combined into a logistic regression and ranked by frequency of inclusion into the combined optimal model, whose predictive performance was compared with the VVE, initial PCSI, and the current existing predictive model (the Predicting and Prevention Postconcussive Problems in Pediatrics (5P) prediction rule) using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: A cluster of 2 factors (SCAT-5/PCSI symptoms and VVE near point of convergence/accommodation) emerged. A model fit with these factors had an AUC of 0.805 (95% CI, 0.661-0.929). This was a higher AUC point estimate, with overlapping 95% CIs, compared with the PCSI (AUC, 0.773 [95% CI, 0.617-0.912]), VVE (AUC, 0.736 [95% CI, 0.569-0.878]), and 5P Prediction Rule (AUC, 0.728 [95% CI, 0.554-0.870]). CONCLUSION: Among commonly used clinical assessments for youth concussion, a combination of symptom burden and the vision component of the VVE has the potential to augment predictive power for PPCS over either current risk models or individual batteries.


Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica , Síndrome Pós-Concussão , Humanos , Criança , Adolescente , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Prospectivos , Concussão Encefálica/etiologia , Síndrome Pós-Concussão/diagnóstico , Síndrome Pós-Concussão/etiologia , Fatores de Risco
9.
Sports Health ; 16(2): 254-268, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38349046

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pre-existing mental health diagnoses may contribute to greater emotional symptom burden and prolonged recovery after concussion. HYPOTHESIS: Youth with pre-existing mental health diagnoses will have greater emotional symptom burden, greater risk for delayed return to exercise, and more prolonged recovery from concussion than those without those diagnoses. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3. METHODS: A prospective registry of youth concussion was examined for differences in emotional symptom burden after injury to develop a predictive risk model for prolonged recovery. The impact of individual and total number of pre-existing mental health diagnoses (0, 1, 2, and 3+) was assessed, and multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with prolonged recovery. RESULTS: Among a cohort of 3105 youth with concussion, those with a history of mental health diagnoses, in a dose-response fashion, had greater postinjury emotional symptom burden (7 emotional symptoms vs 4; P < 0.01), visio-vestibular dysfunction (65% abnormal vs 56% abnormal; P < 0.01), later return to symptom-limited exercise (23 vs 21 days; P < 0.01), and overall longer concussion recovery (38 days, interquartile range [IQR] 18, 80) versus 25 days (IQR 13, 54; P < 0.01). Boys with prolonged recovery after concussion had greater emotional symptom burden than girls (5 emotional symptoms vs 3; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Pre-existing mental health diagnoses are associated with greater postinjury emotional symptom burden and longer concussion recovery in a dose-response fashion. Visiovestibular deficits and delayed return to exercise are also associated with pre-existing mental health diagnoses and prolonged recovery. Boys with prolonged recovery from concussion experience greater emotional symptom burden than girls. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Addressing pre-existing mental health diagnoses is essential to concussion management. Boys with prolonged recovery from concussion may particularly benefit from interventions to address their higher emotional symptom burden. Interventions, including a home visio-vestibular exercise program and symptom-limited exercise, may contribute to improving time to concussion recovery.


Assuntos
Traumatismos em Atletas , Concussão Encefálica , Síndrome Pós-Concussão , Masculino , Feminino , Criança , Adolescente , Humanos , Traumatismos em Atletas/diagnóstico , Saúde Mental , Concussão Encefálica/complicações , Concussão Encefálica/diagnóstico , Concussão Encefálica/psicologia , Emoções
10.
Sports Health ; 16(1): 79-88, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36896665

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: While concussions are common pediatric injuries, a lack of agreement on a standard definition of recovery creates multiple challenges for clinicians and researchers alike. HYPOTHESIS: The percentage of concussed youth deemed recovered as part of a prospective cohort study will differ depending on the recovery definition. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiologic study of a prospectively enrolled observational cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3. METHODS: Participants aged 11 to 18 years were enrolled from the concussion program of a tertiary care academic center. Data were collected from initial and follow-up clinical visits ≤12 weeks from injury. A total of 10 recovery definitions were assessed: (1) cleared to full return to sports; (2) return to full school; (3) self-reported return to normal; (4) self-reported full return to school; (5) self-reported full return to exercise; (6) symptom return to preinjury state; (7) complete symptom resolution; (8) symptoms below standardized threshold; (9) no abnormal visio-vestibular examination (VVE) elements; and (10) ≤1 abnormal VVE assessments. RESULTS: In total, 174 participants were enrolled. By week 4, 63.8% met at least 1 recovery definition versus 78.2% by week 8 versus 88.5% by week 12. For individual measures of recovery at week 4, percent recovered ranged from 5% by self-reported full return to exercise to 45% for ≤1 VVE abnormality (similar trends at 8 and 12 weeks). CONCLUSION: There is wide variability in the proportion of youth considered recovered at various points following concussion depending on the definition of recovery, with higher proportions using physiologic examination-based measures and lower proportions using patient-reported measures. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These results further emphasize the need for a multimodal assessment of recovery by clinicians as a single and standardized definition of recovery that captures the broad impact of concussion on a given patient continues to be elusive.


Assuntos
Traumatismos em Atletas , Concussão Encefálica , Esportes , Adolescente , Criança , Humanos , Traumatismos em Atletas/diagnóstico , Concussão Encefálica/diagnóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Instituições Acadêmicas
11.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open ; 4(4): e13024, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37600900

RESUMO

Objective: Cervical spine imaging decision-making for pediatric traumas is complex and multidisciplinary. Implementing a risk assessment tool has the potential to reduce variation in these decisions and unnecessary radiation exposure for pediatric patients. We sought to determine how emergency department-trauma team dynamics may affect implementation of such a tool. Methods: We interviewed (pediatric and general emergency physicians, trauma surgeons, neurosurgeons, orthopedic surgeons and ED nurses at 21 hospitals to ascertain how team dynamics affect the pediatric cervical spine imaging decision-making process. Data were coded following a framework-driven deductive coding process and thematic analysis was used. Results: Forty-eight physicians, advanced practice providers, and nurses from 21 hospitals (inclusive of three US regions, trauma levels I-III, and serving towns/cities of various population sizes) were interviewed. Overall, emergency physicians and trauma surgeons indicate being generally responsible for pediatric cervical spine imaging decisions. Conflict often occurs between these specialties due to differential weighting of concerns for missing an injury versus avoiding radiation exposure. Participants described a lack of trust and unclear roles regarding ownership for the final imaging decision. Nurses commonly described low psychological safety that prohibits them from participating in the decision-making process. Conclusions: Implementation of a standardized risk assessment tool for cervical spine trauma imaging decisions must consider perspectives of both emergency medicine and trauma. Policies to define appropriate use of standardized tools within this team environment should be developed.

14.
Res Pract Thromb Haemost ; 7(2): 100046, 2023 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36865906

RESUMO

Background: The Pulmonary Embolism Rule Out Criteria (PERC) Peds rule, derived from the PERC rule, was derived to estimate a low pretest probability for pulmonary embolism (PE) in children but has not been prospectively validated. Objective: The objective of this study was to present a protocol for an ongoing multicenter prospective observational study that evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of the PERC-Peds rule. Methods: This protocol is identified by the acronym, BEdside Exclusion of Pulmonary Embolism without Radiation in children. The study aims were designed to prospectively validate, or if necessary, refine, the accuracy of PERC-Peds and D-dimer in excluding PE among children with clinical suspicion or testing for PE. Multiple ancillary studies will examine clinical characteristics and epidemiology of the participants. Children aged 4 through 17 years were being enrolled at 21 sites through the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN). Patients taking anticoagulant therapy are excluded. PERC-Peds criteria data, clinical gestalt, and demographic information are collected in real time. The criterion standard outcome is image-confirmed venous thromboembolism within 45 days, determined from independent expert adjudication. We assessed interrater reliability of the PERC-Peds, frequency of PERC-Peds use in routine clinical care, and descriptive characteristics of missed eligible and missed patients with PE. Results: Enrollment is currently 60% complete with an anticipated data lock in 2025. Conclusions: This prospective multicenter observational study will not only test whether a set of simple criteria can safely exclude PE without need for imaging but also provide a resource to fill a critical knowledge gap about clinical characteristics of children with suspected and diagnosed PE.

15.
Pediatrics ; 151(4)2023 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36897244

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Fatal poisoning is a preventable cause of death among young children. Understanding factors surrounding these deaths will inform future prevention efforts. Our objective was to describe the characteristics of fatal pediatric poisonings using child death review data. METHODS: We acquired data from 40 states participating in the National Fatality Review-Case Reporting System on deaths attributed to poisonings among children aged ≤5 years from 2005 to 2018. We analyzed select demographic, supervisor, death investigation, and substance-related variables using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: During the study period, 731 poisoning-related fatalities were reported by child death reviews to the National Fatality Review-Case Reporting System. Over two-fifths (42.1%, 308 of 731) occurred among infants aged <1 year, and most fatalities (65.1%, 444 of 682) occurred in the child's home. One-sixth of children (97 of 581) had an open child protective services case at time of death. Nearly one-third (32.2%, 203 of 631) of children were supervised by an individual other than the biological parent. Opioids (47.3%, 346 of 731) were the most common substance contributing to death, followed by over-the-counter pain, cold, and allergy medications (14.8%, 108 of 731). Opioids accounted for 24.1% (7 of 29) of the substances contributing to deaths in 2005 compared with 52.2% (24 of 46) in 2018. CONCLUSIONS: Opioids were the most common substances contributing to fatal poisonings among young children. Over-the-counter medications continue to account for pediatric fatalities even after regulatory changes. These data highlight the importance of tailored prevention measures to further reduce fatal child poisonings.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Intoxicação , Criança , Humanos , Lactente , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Pré-Escolar , Intoxicação/epidemiologia
16.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 39(7): 488-494, 2023 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36730797

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to determine the incentivization strategy that maximizes patient adherence to report symptoms and activity via ecological momentary assessment (EMA) after pediatric concussion, and assess the feasibility of tracking concussed youth using EMA from the emergency department (ED) setting. METHODS: This study was a randomized controlled trial of participants ages 13 to 18 years with concussion presenting to an urban, academic pediatric ED within 5 days of injury. Participants were randomized to 1 of 4 incentive arms: 2 dynamic (loss-based and streak) and 2 control flat-rate (monetary and electronic device). Participants reported symptoms 3 times per day and cognitive activity once each evening for 3 weeks. Physical activity (step count) and sleep were monitored using a Fitbit (kept by participants in the device flat-rate arm). The primary outcome was proportion of prompts to which participants responded. Secondary outcomes included differential response rates by demographics, and comparison of outcome determination between EMA and subsequent clinical visits. RESULTS: Thirty participants were enrolled, with a median age of 15.5 years and 60% female. Median cumulative proportion of prompts responded to was 68.3% (interquartile range, 47.6%-82.5%) in the dynamic arms versus 54.0% (interquartile range. 20.6%-68.3%) in the flat-rate arms, P = 0.065. There were nonsignificant differences in median response by sex (65.9% for female vs 40.0% for male, P = 0.072), race/ethnicity (61.9% for non-Hispanic White vs 43.7% for non-Hispanic Black participants, P = 0.097), and insurance (61.9% for private insurance vs 47.6% for public insurance, P = 0.305). Recovery at 3 weeks was discernible for all but 2 participants (93.3%) using EMA data, compared with only 9 participants (30.0%) ( P < 0.001) from clinical visits. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic incentivization showed higher rates of response to tridaily symptom prompts compared with flat-rate incentivization. These data show tracking concussed youth using EMA from the ED is feasible using a dynamic incentivization strategy, with improved ability to discern outcomes compared with prospective monitoring using follow-up clinical visits.


Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica , Avaliação Momentânea Ecológica , Adolescente , Humanos , Criança , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Prospectivos , Concussão Encefálica/diagnóstico , Exercício Físico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência
17.
J Head Trauma Rehabil ; 38(2): 147-155, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36731016

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the relationship of sociodemographic factors to adherence to provider recommendations for pediatric concussion. SETTING: Primary care (PC) practices within the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia network. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 5 to 18 years old who presented to any PC site for concussion from September 26, 2019, to December 31, 2019. DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was adherence to follow-up recommendations as defined by (1) continued follow-up until provider clearance to return to full activity; (2) no more than 2 no-show visits; and (3) for those referred to specialty care (SC), attending at least 1 visit. We compared adherence by race/ethnicity, insurance, age, sex, injury mechanism, and repeat head injury using bivariate and multivariate analyses. A secondary outcome of referral to SC was compared by sociodemographic factors. RESULTS: A total of 755 patients were included. Overall, 80.5% of the patients met adherence criteria. Following adjustment, non-Hispanic Black patients and publicly insured/self-pay patients were less likely to adhere to recommendations than non-Hispanic White patients (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37-1.00) and privately insured patients (AOR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.30-0.75), respectively. When assessing differences in referral to SC, non-Hispanic Black patients and publicly insured/self-pay patients were more likely to receive a referral than their non-Hispanic White peers (OR = 1.56; 95% CI, 1.00-2.45) and privately insured patients (OR = 1.56; 95% CI, 1.05-2.32), respectively. CONCLUSION: This study highlights disparities in adherence to concussion care recommendations, with non-Hispanic Black and publicly insured/self-pay patients less likely to adhere to follow-up recommendations than non-Hispanic White and privately insured patients, respectively. These disparities may impact recovery trajectories. Future studies should aim to identify specific individual- and system-level barriers preventing adherence to care in order to ultimately inform targeted interventions to achieve equity in care delivery and outcomes.


Assuntos
Etnicidade , Seguro Saúde , Criança , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Razão de Chances , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde
18.
J Athl Train ; 58(11-12): 962-973, 2023 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36645832

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Multiple clinical evaluation tools exist for adolescent concussion with various degrees of correlation, presenting challenges for clinicians in identifying which elements of these tools provide the greatest diagnostic utility. OBJECTIVE: To determine the combination of elements from 4 commonly used clinical concussion batteries that maximize discrimination of adolescents with concussion from those without concussion. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Suburban school and concussion program of a tertiary care academic center. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 231 participants with concussion (from a suburban school and a concussion program) and 166 participants without concussion (from a suburban school) between the ages of 13 and 19 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Individual elements of the visio-vestibular examination (VVE), Sport Concussion Assessment Tool, fifth edition (SCAT5; including the modified Balance Error Scoring System), King-Devick test (K-D), and Postconcussion Symptom Inventory (PCSI) were evaluated. The 24 subcomponents of these tests were grouped into interpretable factors using sparse principal component analysis. The 13 resultant factors were combined with demographic and clinical covariates into a logistic regression model and ranked by frequency of inclusion into the ideal model, and the predictive performance of the ideal model was compared with each of the clinical batteries using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: A cluster of 4 factors (factor 1 [VVE saccades and vestibulo-ocular reflex], factor 2 [modified Balance Error Scoring System double-legged stance], factor 3 [SCAT5/PCSI symptom scores], and factor 4 [K-D completion time]) emerged. A model fit with the top factors performed as well as each battery in predicting concussion status (AUC = 0.816 [95% CI = 0.731, 0.889]) compared with the SCAT5 (AUC = 0.784 [95% CI = 0.692, 0.866]), PCSI (AUC = 0.776 [95% CI = 0.674, 0.863]), VVE (AUC = 0.711 [95% CI = 0.602, 0.814]), and K-D (AUC = 0.708 [95% CI = 0.590, 0.819]). CONCLUSIONS: A multifaceted assessment for adolescents with concussion, comprising symptoms, attention, balance, and the visio-vestibular system, is critical. Current diagnostic batteries likely measure overlapping domains, and the sparse principal component analysis demonstrated strategies for streamlining comprehensive concussion assessment across a variety of settings.


Assuntos
Traumatismos em Atletas , Concussão Encefálica , Esportes , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Concussão Encefálica/diagnóstico , Instituições Acadêmicas , Traumatismos em Atletas/diagnóstico
19.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 39(3): 179-183, 2023 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36109009

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Pediatric concussion patients are frequently managed in the primary care or acute care settings. Optimal care includes vision and vestibular assessments, as well as targeted anticipatory guidance for return to school and activity. We aimed to examine clinical practices related to the evaluation and management of concussion patients at children's hospital-based emergency department (ED) and primary care/urgent care settings. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of children aged 5 to 18 years who presented to either the ED or the primary and urgent care settings during a 2-year period. We evaluated 2 concussion management practices: (1) completion of the visio-vestibular examination and (2) provision of anticipatory guidance and follow-up. RESULTS: Among patients seen in the ED (n = 500), only 12.4% had at least 1 component of the visio-vestibular examination performed compared with 51.3% of patients (n = 78) in the primary and urgent care settings ( P < 0.05). Regarding anticipatory guidance, 86.2% of ED patients were advised to engage in cognitive rest, and 94.2% were told to physically rest compared with 67.9% and 72.8% in the primary and urgent care settings ( P < 0.05), respectively. Follow-up recommendations were provided similarly for both settings (92.0% in the ED and 85.9% in the primary/urgent care, P = 0.077). CONCLUSIONS: Although most pediatric concussion patients receive instructions acutely about cognitive and physical rest, there is opportunity to increase the frequency of visio-vestibular testing in both the ED and the primary care settings. Future efforts should focus on strategies to consistently optimize visio-vestibular assessment given its value in concussion diagnosis.


Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica , Humanos , Criança , Estudos Retrospectivos , Concussão Encefálica/diagnóstico , Concussão Encefálica/terapia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Exame Físico , Descanso
20.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 38(9): e1503-e1507, 2022 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36040470

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare demographic characteristics, medical care, and outcomes among patients with assault-related concussion (ARC) versus sports and recreation-related concussion (SRC). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 124 patients (62 ARC, 62 SRC) aged 8 to 17 years presenting to the care network of a large tertiary care pediatric hospital between July 1, 2012, and June 30, 2014 with a concussion diagnosis at time of presentation. We abstracted patient demographics, initial medical care visit characteristics, and outcome data, and compared proportions using χ2 testing and Fisher exact test and medians using Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS: Patients with ARC were more likely to be Black, publicly insured, and present first for care to the emergency department. Significantly fewer patients with ARC received visio-vestibular testing at initial visit (27% vs 74%, P < 0.001). During recovery, the total number of reported physical, cognitive, emotional, and sleep symptoms did not differ between groups; however, more than twice as many patients with ARC reported decline in grades postinjury compared with patients with SRC (47% vs 20%, P = 0.012). There were trends toward prolonged symptom recovery and time to physician clearance for full return to activities among patients with ARC compared with SRC. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights potential disparities in the initial evaluation and outcomes of pediatric concussion patients based on mechanism of injury. Patients with ARC were less likely to receive a concussion-specific diagnostic evaluation and reported a greater impact on educational outcomes, suggesting differences in concussion diagnosis and management among assault-injured patients. Further examination in larger populations with prospective studies is needed to address potential inequities in concussion care and outcomes among patients with ARC.


Assuntos
Traumatismos em Atletas , Concussão Encefálica , Síndrome Pós-Concussão , Esportes , Traumatismos em Atletas/diagnóstico , Traumatismos em Atletas/epidemiologia , Concussão Encefálica/diagnóstico , Concussão Encefálica/epidemiologia , Concussão Encefálica/terapia , Criança , Humanos , Síndrome Pós-Concussão/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA