Incidental findings in a series of 2500 gene panel tests for a genetic predisposition to cancer: Results and impact on patients.

With next generation sequencing, physicians are faced with more complex and uncertain data, particularly incidental findings (IF). Guidelines for the return of IF have been published by learned societies. However, little is known about how patients are affected by these results in a context of oncogenetic testing. Over 4 years, 2500 patients with an indication for genetic testing underwent a gene cancer panel. If an IF was detected, patients were contacted by a physician/genetic counsellor and invited to take part in a semi-structured interview to assess their understanding of the result, the change in medical care, the psychological impact, and the transmission of results to the family. Fourteen patients (0.56%) were delivered an IF in a cancer predisposition gene (RAD51C, PMS2, SDHC, RET, BRCA2, CHEK2, CDKN2A, CDH1, SUFU). Two patients did not collect the results and another two died before the return of results. Within the 10 patients recontacted, most of them reported surprise at the delivery of IF, but not anxiety. The majority felt they had chosen to obtain the result and enough information to understand it. They all initiated the recommended follow-up and did not regret the procedure. Information regarding the IF was transmitted to their offspring but siblings or second-degree relatives were not consistently informed. No major adverse psychological events were found in our experience. IF will be inherent to the development of sequencing, even for restricted gene panels, so it is important to increase our knowledge on the impact of such results in different contexts.

Human tissue engineering allows the identification of active miRNA regulators of glioblastoma aggressiveness.

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is among the most aggressive cancers associated with massive infiltration of peritumoral parenchyma by migrating tumor cells. The infiltrative nature of GBM cells, the intratumoral heterogeneity concomitant with redundant signaling pathways likely underlie the inability of conventional and targeted therapies to achieve long-term remissions. In this respect, microRNAs (miRNAs), which are endogenous small non-coding RNAs that play a role in cancer aggressiveness, emerge as possible relevant prognostic biomarkers or therapeutic targets for treatment of malignant gliomas. We previously described a tissue model of GBM developing into a stem cell-derived human Engineered Neural Tissue (ENT) that allows the study of tumor/host tissue interaction. Combined with high throughput sequencing analysis, we took advantage of this human and integrated tissue model to understand miRNAs regulation. Three miRNAs (miR-340, -494 and -1293) active on cell proliferation, adhesion to extracellular matrix and tumor cell invasion were identified in GBM cells developing within ENT, and also confirmed in GBM biopsies. The components of miRNAs regulatory network at the transcriptional and the protein level have been also revealed by whole transcriptome analysis and Tandem Mass Tag in transfected GBM cells. Notably, miR-340 has a clinical relevance and modulates the expression of miR-494 and -1293, emphasizing its biological significance. Altogether, these findings demonstrate that human tissue engineering modeling GBM development in neural host tissue is a suitable tool to identify active miRNAs. Collectively, our study identified miR-340 as a strong modulator of GBM aggressiveness which may constitute a therapeutic target for treatment of malignant gliomas.