Correction: Exploring diabetes status and social determinants of health influencing diabetes-related complications in a Northwestern community, Ontario, Canada: A mixed method study protocol.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273953.].

Key performance indicators to inform evaluation of wound care programmes for people with complex wounds: a protocol for systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the systematic review is to examine and summarise the available evidence in the literature of the use of key performance indicators (KPIs) to inform evaluation of wound care programmes and services for people with hard-to-heal (complex) wounds. The need for wound care is expected to grow with the continued ageing of the population and the resulting increased development of chronic conditions. This expected increase necessitates improvement of wound care programmes and services and their ability to deliver quality, evidence-based and cost-effective practice. The current literature lacks a systematic assessment of KPIs to inform evaluation of wound care services and programmes across various settings, and how the KPIs are used to improve the quality of wound care and achieve desired outcomes. This protocol sets out how the systemtic review will be undertaken. METHOD: Primary studies will be screened from databases such as MEDLINE, CINAHL and Scopus, with unpublished studies and grey literature retrieved from Google Scholar and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. The study titles and abstracts will be screened by two independent reviewers, using Covidence systematic review software to ensure they meet the inclusion criteria, who will then proceed with data extraction of the full-text using the standardised data extraction instrument. The reference lists of all studies selected for critical appraisal will be screened for additional publications. The two independent reviewers will critically appraise all studies undergoing full-text data extraction using the appropriate checklist from JBI SUMARI. At all stages, differences between reviewers will be resolved through discussion, with adjudication by a third, independent reviewer. RESULTS: Data points will be analysed with descriptive statistics and grouped, based on programme characteristics and publication status. Grey literature and peer-reviewed publications will form separate analyses. To answer review questions, the data will be summarised in a narrative format. A meta-analysis is not planned. At the time of writing, this protocol has been implemented up to the preliminary literature search. CONCLUSION: This review will address a current literature gap and systematically identify KPIs in wound care, allowing for programmes to evaluate their quality of care and improve their services in a methodical manner.

The Current State of Kidney Supportive Care in Nephrology Nursing Practice: A Literature Review.

Kidney disease is associated with a high physical and psychological symptom burden. For patients whose condition is more compromised, receiving dialysis as a life-sustaining therapy may not improve longevity or quality of life. Palliative care for patients with kidney disease (also termed kidney supportive care [KSC]) is appropriate for this patient population. Nephrology nurses working in dialysis are well positioned to talk with patients about what patients perceive constitutes a meaningful life or death. A literature review was undertaken to find evidence about if and how nephrology nurses engage in KSC with patients receiving dialysis. Based on the 29 articles included in this review, the overarching finding was nephrology nurses working in dialysis are not routinely engaging in KSC. Reasons for this are varied and warrant further investigation.

Exploring diabetes status and social determinants of health influencing diabetes-related complications in a Northwestern community, Ontario, Canada: A mixed method study protocol.

Diabetes is a common chronic condition affecting the many spheres of individuals' lives. It can also lead to severe complications without continuous management. Accordingly, this paper describes a study protocol aimed at 1) determining the status and prevalence of diabetes complications in a Northwestern Ontario community; 2) exploring the internal (e.g., demographic and clinical variables) and external factors (e.g., access to services and resources) affecting diabetes outcomes (e.g., complications, emergency room visits, hospitalizations); 3) critically exploring how the social determinants of health affect self-management for individuals living with diabetes; and 4) identifying individuals' needs, concerns, and challenges to monitor and regulate diabetes. The study uses a cross-sectional design and a social constructivist approach based on qualitative data collection. The proposed study will include patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes with or without diabetes complications who have been attending the Centre for Complex Diabetes Care (CCDC) in Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada, since January 2019. Quantitative data related to diabetes complications and other outcomes, diabetes management, and demographic and clinical status will be retrieved from patients' charts using a data extraction form. Analyses of the quantitative data will include the prevalence of diabetes complications, rate of hospitalizations, and their associations with diabetes management, access to services, and social determinants of health. Additionally, interviews will occur with at least 10 participants with or without diabetes complications to understand their needs, concerns, and struggle to self-manage diabetes daily. The results of this study will generate evidence to support future research and policy on the development and implementation of an educational program to improve self-care management and outcomes for individuals living with diabetes and its complications in Northwestern Ontario.

Diabetes self-management education (DSME) for older persons in Western countries: A scoping review.

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic metabolic health condition affecting millions globally. Diabetes is a growing concern among aging societies, with its prevalence increasing among those aged 65 and above. Enabling disease self-management via relevant education is part of high-quality care to improve health outcomes and minimize complications for individuals living with diabetes. Successful diabetes self-management education (DSME) programs usually require tailoring for the intended audience; however, there is limited literature about the preferences of older persons in Western countries concerning DSME. As such, a broad overview of DSME for older persons was an identified need. To map the available evidence on DSME for persons aged 65 years and older in Western countries, the JBI methodology for conducting and reporting scoping reviews was used. In this scoping review, we considered all studies about DSME for older persons with T1D and T2D in Western countries where lifestyles, risks, prevention, treatment of diabetes, and approaches to self-management and DSME are similar (e.g., North America, Western and Northern Europe and Australasia). Systematic keyword and subject heading searches were conducted in 10 databases (e.g., MEDLINE, JBI EBP) to identify relevant English language papers published from 2000 to 2022. Titles and abstracts were screened to select eligible papers for full-text reading. Full-text screening was done by four independent reviewers to select studies for the final analysis. The review identified 2,397 studies, of which 1,250 full texts were screened for eligibility. Of the final 44 papers included in the review, only one included participants' understanding of DSME. The education programs differed in their context, design, delivery mode, theoretical underpinnings, and duration. Type of research designs, outcome measures used to determine the effectiveness of DSME, and knowledge gaps were also detailed. Overall, most interventions were effective and improved clinical and behavioural outcomes. Many of the programs led to improvements in clinical outcomes and participants' quality of life; however, the content needs to be adapted to older persons according to their culture, different degrees of health literacy, preference of education (e.g., individualized or group), preference of setting, degree of frailty and independence, and comorbidities. Few studies included the voices of older persons in the design, implementation, and evaluation of DSME programs. Such experiential knowledge is vital in developing educational programs to ensure alignment with this population's preferred learning styles, literacy levels, culture, and needs-such an approach could manifest more substantive, sustained results.

Collaboration and Partnership in a 5-Level Engagement Framework for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Management: A Patient-oriented Scoping Review.

OBJECTIVE: The management of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) is complex, and patient engagement is essential for DFU healing, but it often comes down to the patient's consultation. Therefore, we sought to document patients' engagement in terms of collaboration and partnership for DFUs in 5 levels (direct care, organizational, policy level, research, and education), as well as strategies for patient engagement using an adapted engagement framework. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of the literature from inception to April 2022 using the Joanna Briggs Institute method and a patient-oriented approach. We also consulted DFU stakeholders to obtain feedback on the findings. The data were extracted using PROGRESS+ factors for an equity lens. The effects of engagement were described using Bodenheimer's quadruple aims for value-based care. RESULTS: Of 4,211 potentially eligible records, 15 studies met our eligibility criteria, including 214 patients involved in engagement initiatives. Most studies were recent (9 of 15 since 2020) and involved patient engagement at the direct medical care level (8 of 15). Self-management (7 of 15) was the principal way to clinically engage the patients. None of the studies sought to define the direct influence of patient engagement on health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Very few studies described patients' characteristics. Engaged patients were typically men from high-income countries, in their 50s, with poorly managed type 2 diabetes. We found little rigorous research of patient engagement at all levels for DFUs. There is an urgent need to improve the reporting of research in this area and to engage a diversity of patients.

The processes of engagement in information-seeking behavior for individuals with diabetes who developed diabetic foot ulcer: A constructivist grounded theory study.

To describe the process of engagement in information seeking behavior for individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Methodology: Constructivist grounded theory. The data was gathered through thirty semi-structured interviews of participants attending a wound care clinic in Southeast, Ontario, Canada. The waiting period taken to seek appropriate help varied from weeks to months. Results: "The processes of engagement in information-seeking behavior about diabetes" are organized as follows: 1) discovering diabetes, 2) reactions to the diagnosis, and 3) engaging in self-directed learning. For most participants, the diagnosis of diabetes was unexpected and usually confirmed after a long period of experiencing a diversity of symptoms. The terms used mostly by participants were "I started to wonder" and "Something was wrong with me." After being diagnosed with diabetes, participants sought information to learn about it. Most of them engaged in self-directed learning to acquire knowledge about their illness. Conclusion: Although the Internet is often used to seek information, healthcare providers and support network also played an important role in supporting participants information-seeking behavior learn about diabetes. The unique needs of people with diabetes must be taken into consideration during their diabetes care journey. These findings call for the need to provide education about diabetes from the time they are diagnosed and direct them to reliable resources of information.

The Impact of Diabetic Foot Ulcer on Individuals' Lives and Daily Routine: A Qualitative Study Informed by Social Constructivism and Symbolic Interactionism Frameworks.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) on individuals' lives and daily routines. DESIGN: Qualitative design informed by social constructivism and symbolic interactionism frameworks. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: The sample comprised 30 individuals attending a wound care clinic in Southeast Ontario, Canada. Most participants (n = 17) were between the ages of 65 and 92 years, were male (n = 20), married (n = 21), living with their family (n = 23), and had completed high school (n = 26). METHODS: One-to-one semistructured interviews were conducted by the first author until saturation of each emerging theme was achieved. Interviews were audio-recorded and lasted from 45 to 90 minutes. Data collection and analysis occurred simultaneously and included intensive semistructured interviews, field notes, and researcher's journal. RESULTS: Participants with DFUs were found to perceive a "sense of life change," impacting their lives across physical, psychological, and social spheres. They reported 4 key themes indicating that DFUs were (1) limiting their outings; (2) restricting leisure activities; (3) impacting personal and social life; and (4) contributing to emotional fluctuations. CONCLUSION: Sense of life changes resulting from DFUs were associated with participant reporting loss of freedom and enjoyment. These findings underscore the need for holistic support for patients with DFUs that simultaneously address physical, psychological, and social needs and areas of impact.

Diabetes self-management education for older adults in Western countries: a scoping review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: This scoping review will map the available evidence on diabetes self-management education programs for older adults in Western countries. INTRODUCTION: Self-management and education are crucial for controlling diabetes and its associated complications. The successful uptake of diabetes self-management education programs is not straightforward, and little is known about diabetes programs for older adults. Within this context, a broad overview of diabetes self-management education for older adults, considering all types of related evidence, is needed. INCLUSION CRITERIA: All studies in English concerning diabetes self-management education for older adults (aged 65 years and older) living with type 1 or 2 diabetes will be included. This review will not be specific to gender, sex, ethnicity, frailty, or other demographic variables. The review will be restricted to Western countries (North America, Western and Northern Europe, and Australasia), where approaches to diabetes self-management education will be similar. Studies including older adults with or without diabetes will not be considered unless they provide separate analyses for the 2 cohorts. METHODS: This scoping review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. We will conduct searches of electronic databases, including CINAHL, MEDLINE, and PubMed, from January 1, 2000, to the present to capture eligible articles. The review will consider all study designs, including quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods designs, as well as text and opinion papers, and systematic reviews that meet the inclusion criteria. After duplicates are removed, titles and abstracts will be screened independently by 2 reviewers, and the full texts will be reviewed. The screening criteria and data extraction protocol will be pilot-tested by the research team. The results will be summarized in tables accompanied by narrative text.

Patients' Perceptions of Reasons Contributing to Delay in Seeking Help at the Onset of a Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Grounded Theory Study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to explore patients' perception of reasons contributing to delay in seeking help and referral to a wound care specialist at the onset of a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). DESIGN: Constructivist grounded theory study. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: The sample comprised 30 individuals with active DFU attending a wound care clinic in southeastern Ontario, Canada. METHODS: Participants were selected through purposive and theoretical sampling. Semistructured interviews were conducted with participants until no new properties of the patterns emerged. All interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed using methods informed by constructivist grounded theory. RESULTS: The reasons contributing to delay to seek help and referral to a wound care specialist were (1) limited knowledge about foot care, (2) unaware of diabetic foot problems, (3) underestimation of ulcer presentation, (4) I thought I could fix it myself, (5) inaccurate diagnosis, and (6) trial and error approach by a nonspecialized wound care provider. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings suggest that patients and primary healthcare providers need additional education regarding the management of diabetic foot disease and DFU.