The legacy of hope summit: a consensus-based initiative and report on eating disorders in the U.S. and recommendations for the path forward.

BACKGROUND: Several unsuccessful attempts have been made to reach a cross-disciplinary consensus on issues fundamental to the field of eating disorders in the United States (U.S.). In January 2020, 25 prominent clinicians, academicians, researchers, persons with lived experience, and thought leaders in the U.S. eating disorders community gathered at the Legacy of Hope Summit to try again. This paper articulates the points on which they reached a consensus. It also: (1) outlines strategies for implementing those recommendations; (2) identifies likely obstacles to their implementation; and (3) charts a course for successfully navigating and overcoming those challenges. METHODS: Iterative and consensual processes were employed throughout the Summit and the development of this manuscript. RESULTS: The conclusion of the Summit culminated in several consensus points, including: (1) Eating disorder outcomes and prevention efforts can be improved by implementing creative health education initiatives that focus on societal perceptions, early detection, and timely, effective intervention; (2) Such initiatives should be geared toward parents/guardians, families, other caretakers, and frontline healthcare providers in order to maximize impact; (3) Those afflicted with eating disorders, their loved ones, and the eating disorders community as a whole would benefit from greater accessibility to affordable, quality care, as well as greater transparency and accountability on the part of in-hospital, residential, and outpatient health care providers with respect to their qualifications, methodologies, and standardized outcomes; (4) Those with lived experience with eating disorders, their loved ones, health care providers, and the eating disorders community as a whole, also would benefit from the establishment and maintenance of treatment program accreditation, professional credentialing, and treatment type and levels of care guidelines; and (5) The establishment and implementation of effective, empirically/evidence-based standards of care requires research across a diverse range of populations, adequate private and government funding, and the free exchange of ideas and information among all who share a commitment to understanding, treating, and, ultimately, markedly diminishing the negative impact of eating disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Widespread uptake and implementation of these recommendations has the potential to unify and advance the eating disorders field and ultimately improve the lives of those affected. A cross-disciplinary group of eating disorder professionals, thought leaders, and persons with lived experience have come together and reached a consensus on issues that are fundamental to the battle against the life-threatening and life-altering illnesses that are eating spectrum disorders. Those issues include: (1) the need for early detection, intervention, prevention, and evidenced-based standards of care; (2) the critical need to make specialized care more accessible and affordable to all those in need; (3) the importance of developing uniform, evidenced-based standards of care; (4) the need for funding and conducting eating spectrum disorder research; and (5) the indispensability of advocacy, education, and legislation where these illnesses are concerned. During the consensus process, the authors also arrived at strategies for implementing their recommendations, identified likely obstacles to their implementation, and charted a course for successfully navigating and overcoming those challenges. Above all else, the authors demonstrated that consensus in the field of eating spectrum disorders is possible and achievable and, in doing so, lit a torch of hope that is certain to light the path forward for years to come.

Long-term outcome of residential treatment for anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa.

We analyzed results from surveys of respondents who had completed ≥ 30 days of treatment at Monte Nido Residential Treatment Program over a 10 year period. Participants with anorexia nervosa (AN; n = 66) and bulimia nervosa (BN; n = 52) completed the Eating Disorders Inventory-2 (EDI-2), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and a structured eating disorder assessment at admission and follow-up. Mean duration between discharge and last follow-up was 4.6 years and 3.8 years for AN and BN respectively. For AN there were significant improvements in BMI, BDI, 10 of 11 EDI-2 subscales, and frequencies of bingeing and purging. For BN there were significant improvements in BDI, all EDI subscales, and frequencies of bingeing and purging. Eighty-nine percent of AN graduates and 75% of BN graduates had good or intermediate outcomes. Using linear regression, the best model contained the single variable, discharge BMI, which predicted 23% of the variance explaining full recovery from AN (p ≤ .02). For BN, the best model contained vomiting frequency and the bulimia subscale score of the EDI-2 at discharge, which accounted for 37% of the variance explaining full recovery from BN (p ≤ .02). The great majority of patients showed significant improvement at long-term follow-up after this program of residential treatment. In addition, these results underscore the importance of weight gain for AN patients and cessation of bulimic symptoms for BN patients when predicting long-term recovery.

Treatment results of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa in a residential treatment program.

Data on the effectiveness of residential treatment for patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN) are limited. We analyzed patient survey results at admission and discharge from Monte Nido Residential Treatment Program. Of 287 consecutive admissions, 80% (231) "graduated" (completed ≥ 30 days of treatment), and of these (all of whom gave consent), only patients with AN (N = 120) or BN (N = 95) were included (215 of 231, 93%) in this study. Analyses included a comparison of admission vs. discharge variables (paired t-tests) for each diagnosis. At each assessment, graduates completed the Eating Disorders Inventory-2 (EDI-2), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and a structured eating disorder assessment questionnaire. For patients with AN, there were statistically significant improvements in mean BMI. In addition, for both AN and BN patients, there were statistically significant improvements in BDI scores, all 11 EDI-2 subscales, and frequencies of bingeing, vomiting, laxative abuse, chewing and spitting, stimulant abuse, and restricting behavior. The great majority of patients completing treatment showed significant improvement at discharge from intensive residential treatment.