Inequalities in unmet need for health care services and medications in Brazil: a decomposition analysis.

Background: Unmet need is a metric used to assess the performance of health care systems throughout the world. One of the primary objectives of the Brazilian health care system is to identify ways to improve the health outcomes of all citizens. To accomplish this challenging goal, the health care system in Brazil will need to identify and eliminate barriers and provide timely and adequate access to health care services to all. Methods: This study assessed the performance of the Brazilian health care system by focusing on the unmet need for health care services and medications. We evaluated the Brazilian National Health Survey data collected in 2013 and 2019 to determine the magnitude of socioeconomic-related inequalities associated with unmet health care needs. Primary contributing factors were identified via decomposition analysis of the calculated concentration indices (CInds). Findings: Despite the availability of universal health care, 3.8% and 7.5% of the population in Brazil reported unmet needs for health care services and medications, respectively in the 2019 survey. Although the overall unmet need for medications remained unchanged between 2013 and 2019, CInd analysis revealed significant pro-poor inequalities with respect to unmet needs for both health care services and medications. The overall magnitude of these inequalities was higher in the poorer regions of the country. The use of private health insurance as well as individual health and socioeconomic status contributed significantly to the inequalities associated with unmet needs for health care services and medication throughout Brazil. Interpretations: Policy interventions should focus on improving access to health care services, extending coverage to include pharmaceuticals, and targeting both financial and non-financial barriers to obtaining care, particularly those experienced by the poor and vulnerable populations in Brazil. Funding: None.

Persistent inequalities in health care services utilisation in Brazil (1998-2019).

BACKGROUND: One of the primary objectives of the Brazilian health care system is to improve the health and well-being of all citizens. Since the establishment of the Unified Health System/Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) in 1988, Brazil has made strides towards reducing inequalities in health care services utilisation. However, there are currently no comprehensive and up-to-date studies focused on inequalities in both curative and preventive health care services utilisation. METHODS: We evaluated data from the National Household Sample Survey and the Brazilian National Health Survey, which are two nationally representative studies that include findings from 1998, 2003, and 2008 and 2013 and 2019, respectively. We calculated Erreygers-corrected Concentration Indices (CInds) to evaluate the magnitude of socioeconomic-related inequalities associated with five indicators of health care services utilisation, including physician visits, hospital admissions, surgical procedures, Pap smears, and mammograms. The main factors associated with these inequalities were identified via a decomposition analysis of the calculated CInds. RESULTS: While the results of our analysis revealed persistent inequalities in health care services utilisation that favour the wealthy, we found that the overall magnitude of these inequalities decreased over time. The largest inequalities were observed in the utilisation of preventive care services (Pap smears and mammograms) and services available in the poorest regions of the country. Except for admissions for labour and delivery, our findings revealed that wealthier individuals were more likely to utilise hospital services; this represents a change from findings reported in previous years. Private health insurance coverage and individual socioeconomic status are significantly associated with inequalities in health care services utilisation throughout Brazil. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, our findings suggest that we must continue to monitor potential inequalities in health care service utilisation to determine whether Brazilian policy objectives focused on improved health outcomes for all will ultimately be achieved.

The impacts of health systems financing fragmentation in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol.

BACKGROUND: Health systems are often fragmented in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This can increase inefficiencies and restrict progress towards universal health coverage. The objective of the systematic review described in this protocol will be to evaluate and synthesize the evidence concerning the impacts of health systems financing fragmentation in LMICs. METHODS: Literature searches will be conducted in multiple electronic databases, from their inception onwards, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, CINAHL, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Scielo, Cochrane Library, EconLit, and JSTOR. Gray literature will be also targeted through searching OpenSIGLE, Google Scholar, and institutional websites (e.g., HMIC, The World Bank, WHO, PAHO, OECD). The search strings will include keywords related to LMICs, health system financing fragmentation, and health system goals. Experimental, quasi-experimental, and observational studies conducted in LMICs and examining health financing fragmentation across any relevant metric (e.g., the presence of different health funders/insurers, risk pooling mechanisms, eligibility categories, benefits packages, premiums) will be included. Studies will be eligible if they compare financing fragmentation in alternative settings or at least two-time points. The primary outcomes will be health system-related goals such as health outcomes (e.g., mortality, morbidity, patient-reported outcome measures) and indicators of access, services utilization, equity, and financial risk protection. Additional outcomes will include intermediate health system objectives (e.g., indicators of efficiency and quality). Two reviewers will independently screen all citations, abstract data, and full-text articles. Potential conflicts will be resolved through discussion and, when necessary, resolved by a third reviewer. The methodological quality (or risk of bias) of selected studies will be appraised using established checklists. Data extraction categories will include the studies' objective and design, the fragmentation measurement and domains, and health outcomes linked to the fragmentation. A narrative synthesis will be used to describe the results and characteristics of all included studies and to explore relationships and findings both within and between the studies. DISCUSSION: Evidence on the impacts of health system fragmentation in LMICs is key for identifying evidence gaps and priority areas for intervention. This knowledge will be valuable to health system policymakers aiming to strengthen health systems in LMICs. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020201467.