RESUMO
ABSTRACT: Globally, the burden of musculoskeletal conditions continues to rise, disproportionately affecting low and middle-income countries (LMICs). The ability to meet these orthopaedic surgical care demands remains a challenge. To help address these issues, many orthopaedic surgeons seek opportunities to provide humanitarian assistance to the populations in need. While many global orthopaedic initiatives are well-intentioned and can offer short-term benefits to the local communities, it is essential to emphasize training and the integration of local surgeon-leaders. The commitment to developing educational and investigative capacity, as well as fostering sustainable, mutually beneficial partnerships in low-resource settings, is critical. To this end, global health organizations, such as the Consortium of Orthopaedic Academic Traumatologists (COACT), work to promote and ensure the lasting sustainability of musculoskeletal trauma care worldwide. This article describes global orthopaedic efforts that can effectively address musculoskeletal care through an examination of 5 domains: clinical care, clinical research, surgical education, disaster response, and advocacy.
Assuntos
Doenças Musculoesqueléticas , Ortopedia , Países em Desenvolvimento , Saúde Global , Humanos , Renda , VoluntáriosRESUMO
In 2006, surgeons at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) established the Institute for Global Orthopedics and Traumatology (IGOT), an initiative within the department of orthopedic surgery. The principal aim of IGOT is to create long-term, sustainable solutions to the growing burden of musculoskeletal injury in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) through academic partnership. IGOT currently has relationships with teaching hospitals in Ghana, Malawi, Tanzania, Nicaragua, and Nepal. The organizational structure of IGOT is built on four pillars: Global Surgical Education (GSE), Global Knowledge Exchange (GKE), Global Research Initiative (GRI), and Global Leadership and Advocacy. GSE focuses on increasing surgical knowledge and technical proficiency through hands-on educational courses. The GKE facilitates the mutual exchange of surgeons and trainees among IGOT and its partners. This includes a global resident elective that allows UCSF residents to complete an international rotation at one of IGOT's partner sites. The GRI strives to build research capacity and sponsor high-quality clinical research projects that address questions relevant to local partners. The fourth pillar, Global Leadership and Advocacy aims to increase awareness of the global impact of musculoskeletal injury through national and international courses and events, such as the Bay Area Global Health Film Festival. At the core of each tenet is the collaboration among IGOT and its international partners. Over the last decade, IGOT has experienced tremendous growth and maturation in its partnership model based on cumulative experience and the needs of its partners.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In high- and middle-income countries, elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) is the commonest treatment of femur fractures in children 5-11 years of age. At Komfo Anokye Teaching hospital (KATH) in Kumasi, Ghana, prior to this study all pediatric femur fractures were treated with skin traction to union. This study was designed to report the early results and costs of the adoption of ESIN at KATH to provide data to other low- and middle-income sites considering adoption of this surgical technique. METHODS: An observational cohort study that included 84 pediatric patients ages 3-14 years presenting with closed femur fractures and treated with either skin traction or ESIN. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare the rate of treatment success between treatment groups. RESULTS: Treatment success (coronal and sagittal angulation less than 10 ° and shortening less than 15 mm at osseous union) was achieved in 92 % of the ESIN group versus 67 % of the skin traction group (odds ratio for ESIN group 9.28 (1.6-54.7); p = 0.0138). Average length of stay was significantly lower in the ESIN group (p = 0.001), but charges to patients were higher in the ESIN group (p < 0.001) because of the high cost of implants. CONCLUSIONS: The initial experience of operative treatment of femoral shaft fractures in children using ESIN was positive, with improved rates of treatment success and no surgical complications. Because of the high cost of implants, direct costs of treatment remained higher with ESIN despite reductions in length of hospital stay.
Assuntos
Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/economia , Consolidação da Fratura , Tração/economia , Adolescente , Pinos Ortopédicos/economia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Fraturas do Fêmur/terapia , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/instrumentação , Gana , Humanos , Lactente , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use of time intervals in the treatment of fractured femurs as indicators of the quality of trauma systems. METHODS: Time intervals from injury to admission, admission to surgery and surgery to discharge for patients with isolated femur fractures in four low- and middle-income countries were compared with the corresponding values from one German hospital, an Israeli hospital and the National Trauma Data Bank of the United States of America by means of Student's t-tests. The correlations between the time intervals recorded in a country and that country's expenditure on health and gross domestic product (GDP) were also evaluated using Pearson's product moment correlation coefficient. FINDINGS: Relative to patients from high-income countries, those from low- and middle-income countries were significantly more likely to be male and to have been treated by open femoral nailing, and their intervals from injury to admission, admission to surgery and surgery to discharge were significantly longer. Strong negative correlations were detected between the interval from injury to admission and government expenditure on health, and between the interval from admission to surgery and the per capita values for total expenditure on health, government expenditure on health and GDP. Strong positive correlations were detected between the interval from surgery to discharge and general government expenditure on health. CONCLUSION: The time intervals for the treatment of femur fractures are relatively long in low- and middle-income countries, can easily be measured, and are highly correlated with accessible and quantifiable country data on health and economics.
Assuntos
Fraturas do Fêmur/terapia , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Centros de Traumatologia/normas , Adulto , Comparação Transcultural , Países Desenvolvidos , Países em Desenvolvimento , Feminino , Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Financiamento Governamental/estatística & dados numéricos , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/economia , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/métodos , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Prontuários Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alocação de Recursos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Distribuição por Sexo , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Fatores de Tempo , Tração/efeitos adversos , Tração/economia , Tração/métodos , Centros de Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Índices de Gravidade do Trauma , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal disease is a growing burden in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), yet little research exists to describe the problem. The purposes of this study were to characterize orthopedic surgery in an LMIC and compare the findings to those from a developed country. METHODS: The study location was the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital (KATH) in Kumasi, Ghana. Orthopedic surgeon, resident, and postgraduate training program numbers were compared to analogous data from a developed nation, the United States. Annual surgical volumes were compared to those at a level I trauma center in the United States, the San Francisco General Hospital (SFGH). RESULTS: There were 24 surgeons in Ghana compared to 23,956 in the United States. There were 7 orthopedic residents and 1 residency program in Ghana versus 3,371 residents and 155 residencies in the United States. Annual case volume was 2,161 at KATH and 2,132 at SFGH. Trauma accounted for 95 % of operations at KATH compared to 65 % at SFGH. The proportion of surgeries devoted to severe fractures was 29 % at KATH compared to 12 % at SFGH. Infections comprised 15 % of procedures at KATH and 5 % at SFGH. CONCLUSIONS: Annual case volume at a referral hospital in an LMIC is equivalent to that of a level I trauma center in an industrialized country. Total case volume is similar, but the LMIC institution manages a disproportionately large number of trauma cases, severe fractures, and infections. There is a large burden of orthopedic disease in the developing nation, and there are too few providers and training programs to address these conditions.
Assuntos
Países Desenvolvidos , Países em Desenvolvimento , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Ortopedia , Médicos/provisão & distribuição , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Gana , Hospitais de Ensino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Internato e Residência , Ortopedia/educação , São Francisco , Centros de Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Recursos HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The developing world contains more than ¾ of the world's population, and has the largest burden of musculoskeletal disease. Published studies provide crucial information that can influence healthcare policies. Presumably much information regarding burden in the developing world would arise from authors from developing countries. However, the extent of participation of authors from the developing world in widely read orthopaedic journals is unclear. PURPOSE: We surveyed four influential English-language orthopaedic journals to document the contributions of authors from developing countries. METHODS: We surveyed Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, and the American and British volumes of The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, from May 2007 through May 2010. The country of origin of all authors was identified. We used the designations provided by the International Monetary Fund to define countries as either developed or developing. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-five of 3964 publications (7%) included authors from developing countries. Ninety percent of these had authors from developing countries with industrialized and emerging-market economies. Publications from Sub-Saharan Africa accounted for only 0.4% of the 3964 articles reviewed and 5.6% of the 265 articles with developing world authorship. Countries with the least robust economies were least represented. Less than 1/3 of articles with authors from the developing world had coauthors from developed or other developing countries. CONCLUSION: Additional studies are needed to determine the reasons for the low representation noted and to establish strategies to increase the number of orthopaedic publications from parts of the world where the burden of musculoskeletal disease is the greatest.