RESUMO
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is still a potentially curative option for B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (B-NHL) in the modern immunotherapy era. The objective of this study was to analyze long-term outcomes of patients with B-NHL who received allo-HSCT. We analyzed overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and graft versus host disease (GVHD) relapse-free survival (GRFS) in 53 patients undergoing allo-HSCT from two institutions. The median follow-up of the study was 72 months (range 29-115 months). The median number of lines of therapy before allo-HSCT was 3 (range 1-6) and twenty-eight patients (53%) had received a previous autologous transplant. The 3-year PFS, OS and GRFS were 55%, 63%, and 55%, respectively. One-year non-relapse mortality was 26%. Karnofsky Performance Scale < 90 was associated with worse OS in multivariable analysis. A non-comparative analysis of a cohort of 44 patients with similar characteristics who received chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy was done, showing a 1-year PFS and OS were 60% and 66%, respectively. Our data shows that allo-HSCT is still a useful option for treating selected patients with R/R B-NHL. Our retrospective analysis and review of the literature demonstrate that allo-HSCT can provide durable remissions in a subset of patients with R/R B-NHL.
Assuntos
Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Linfoma não Hodgkin , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transplante Homólogo , Recidiva , Linfoma não Hodgkin/terapiaRESUMO
The study aimed to determine the association of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) diagnosis and severity with the development of subsequent neoplasms (SN) and nonmalignant late effects (NM-LE) in 2-year disease-free adult survivors following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for a hematologic malignancy. To do so, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 3884 survivors of HCT for hematologic malignancy in the Center of International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database. We conducted a landmark analysis at the 2-year post-transplantation date, comparing first SN and NM-LE in survivors with and without cGVHD. The cumulative incidence (CuI) of SN and NM-LE were estimated through 10 years post-HCT in both groups, with death or disease relapse as a competing risk. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the associations of cGVHD and its related characteristics with the development of SN and NM-LE. The estimated 10-year CuI of SN in patients with GVHD (n = 2669) and patients without cGVHD (n = 1215) was 15% (95% confidence interval [CI], 14% to 17%) versus 9% (7.2% to 11%) (P < .001). cGVHD by 2 years post-HCT was independently associated with SN (hazard ratio [HR], 1.94; 95% CI, 1.53 to 2.46; P < .0001) with a standardized incidence ratio of 3.2 (95% CI, 2.9 to 3.5; P < .0001). Increasing severity of cGVHD was associated with an increased risk of SN. The estimated 10-year CuI of first NM-LE in patients with and without cGVHD was 28 (95% CI, 26% to 30%) versus 13% (95% CI, 11% to 15%) (P < .001). cGVHD by 2 years post-HCT was independently associated with NM-LE (HR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.81 to 2.76; P < .0001). Multivariate analysis of cGVHD-related factors showed that increasing severity of cGVHD, extensive grade, having both mucocutaneous and visceral involvement, and receiving cGVHD treatment for >12 months were associated with the greatest magnitude of risk for NM-LE. cGVHD was closely associated with both SN and NM-LE in adult survivors of HCT for hematologic malignancy. Patients identified as having more severe involvement and both mucocutaneous and visceral organ involvement may warrant enhanced monitoring and screening for SNs and NM-LEs. However, caution is warranted when interpreting these results, as patients with cGVHD may have more vigilant post-transplantation health care and surveillance for late effects.
Assuntos
Síndrome de Bronquiolite Obliterante , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Adulto , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/epidemiologia , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/etiologia , Aloenxertos/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/complicações , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Neoplasias Hematológicas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Progressão da DoençaRESUMO
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapy has revolutionized the treatment of hematologic malignancies in patients with relapsed or refractory disease without other treatment options. However, only a very small proportion of patients with an indication for CAR T-cell can access the treatment. The imbalance between supply and demand is magnified in minority and vulnerable populations. Limited access is multifactorial and in part a result of factors directly related to the cellular product such as cost, complex logistics and manufacturing limitations. On the other hand, the impact of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and their social and structural context are also key to understanding access barriers in cellular therapy and health care in general. CAR T-cell therapy provides us with a new opportunity to better understand and prioritize this gap, a key step towards proactively and strategically addressing access. The aim of this review is to provide an analysis of the current state of access to CAR T therapy with a focus on the influence of DEI. We will cover aspects related to the cellular product and the inseparable context of social and structural determinants. Identifying and addressing barriers is necessary to ensure equitable access to this and all future novel therapies.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Hematológicas , Imunoterapia Adotiva , Humanos , Imunoterapia Adotiva/efeitos adversos , Diversidade, Equidade, Inclusão , Terapia Baseada em Transplante de Células e TecidosRESUMO
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy presents a promising treatment for hematologic malignancies, displaying high efficacy but not being exempt from toxicity. In this observational study, we assessed adverse events (AEs) reported to the Food and Drug Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) including any of the six approved CAR T-cell therapies. A total of 5249 reports mentioning a CAR T-cell as a suspect product were retrieved from the FAERS database, containing a total of 24333 AEs, of which 3236 (13.3%) were cytopenias. The highest number of AEs mentioned by the report was observed for tisagenlecleucel (mean = 6.7), with the lowest for ciltacabtagene (mean = 1.3). Among all reports, hematopoietic leukopenia was the most frequently reported AEs (n = 1386, 5.7%), with hematopoietic erytropenia the least reported (n = 291, 1.2%). Tisagenlecleucel showed a high reporting odds ratio for hematopoietic erythropenia (27.28, 95%CI 14.04-53.00), leukopenia (4.04, 95%CI 3.52-4.64), and thrombocytopenia (4.01, 95%CI 3.19-5.03). Cytopenias represent one of the most frequently reported AEs in FAERS, a CAR T-cell therapy is indicated, with haematopoetic leukopenia being the most common. When comparing different CAR-T cell therapies, the cytopenias' reporting odds ratio was particularly high for tisagenlecleucel, especially in relation to hematopoietic erythropenia.
Assuntos
Citopenia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Leucopenia , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos , Trombocitopenia , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/etiologia , Imunoterapia Adotiva/efeitos adversos , Leucopenia/etiologia , United States Food and Drug Administration , Linfócitos TRESUMO
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy targeting CD19 has significantly improved outcomes in the treatment of refractory or relapsed (R/R) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Several risk factors including CAR-T cell-related toxicities and their treatments often lead to infectious complications (ICs); however, the pattern and timeline is not well established. We evaluated ICs in 48 patients with R/R B-cell NHL following CAR-T cell therapy at our institution. Overall, 15 patients experienced 22 infection events. Eight infections (4 bacterial, 3 viral and 1 fungal) occurred within the first 30 days and 14 infections (7 bacterial, 6 viral, 1 fungal) between days 31 to 180 following CAR-T infusion. Most infections were mild-to-moderate and fifteen infections involved the respiratory tract. Two patients developed mild-to-moderate COVID-19 infection and one patient a cytomegalovirus reactivation after CAR-T infusion. Two patients developed IFIs: one case each of fatal disseminated candidiasis and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis at day 16 and 77, respectively. Patients with more than 4 prior antitumor regimens and patient's ≥ 65 years had a higher infection rate. Infections in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell NHL are common after CAR-T despite the use of infection prophylaxis. Age ≥ 65 years and having > 4 prior antitumor treatments were identified as risk factors for infection. Fungal infections carried significant impact in morbidity and mortality, suggesting a role for increase fungal surveillance and/or anti-mold prophylaxis following high-dose steroids and tocilizumab. Four of ten patients developed an antibody response following two doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Linfoma de Células B , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos , Humanos , Idoso , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Linfoma de Células B/terapia , Terapia Baseada em Transplante de Células e Tecidos , Antígenos CD19RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is frequently utilized in the treatment of steroid-refractory acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Although the mechanism of action is not fully understood, it has been postulated that its therapeutic effect is immunologic tolerance linked to the associated apoptosis of the treated cells. Despite significant advances in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), prophylaxis and treatment of GVHD remain a challenge and major limitation associated with this therapy. Use of ECP is a valuable strategy; however, it is time, cost, resource intensive, and not readily accessible. OBJECTIVE: In an effort to expand access to this therapy, we are investigating the use of cryopreserved ECP-treated cells. This will provide the ability to administer a significant proportion of the treatment at a facility closer to the patient's residence, thereby decreasing the number of visits to the primary treatment center with the goal of improving and expanding access to this therapy. Here we report the effects of cryopreservation on ECP-treated leukocytes. STUDY DESIGN: Mononuclear cells were pheresed from human patients, ECP-treated, and collected for viability and apoptotic analysis. Cells were then cryopreserved at -80°C or -150°C for 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months. Following thaw, repeat viability and apoptosis studies were performed on the leukocytes. RESULTS: WBC viability for freshly ECP-treated leukocytes was 84.5% ± 3.5 at 1 week, 87.3% ± 5.2 at 1 month, and 79.1% ± 1.1 at 3 months post thaw. Similar results were seen for cells frozen in cryovials. Leukocytes frozen the day after ECP treatment had 1 week and 1 month WBC viabilities of 84.0 ± 4.1 and 83.1 ± 2.1, respectively. Apoptotic potential was well preserved at 3 months, with cryopreserved ECP-treated lymphocytes being 19.2%, 44.5%, 75.5%, and 94.0% apoptotic after thaw on days 0, 1, 2, and 3 in culture, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ECP-treated leukocytes cryopreserved at -80°C or -150°C for 3 months remain viable and as capable of apoptosis as freshly treated cells. Cryopreservation of an ECP-product warrants further in vivo investigation as a strategy to facilitate access to this needed therapy.
Assuntos
Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Fotoferese , Humanos , Criopreservação , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/prevenção & controle , Leucócitos , LinfócitosRESUMO
The NCCN Guidelines for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) provide an evidence- and consensus-based approach for the use of autologous and allogeneic HCT in the management of malignant diseases in adult patients. HCT is a potentially curative treatment option for patients with certain types of malignancies; however, recurrent malignancy and transplant-related complications often limit the long-term survival of HCT recipients. The purpose of these guidelines is to provide guidance regarding aspects of HCT, including pretransplant recipient evaluation, hematopoietic cell mobilization, and treatment of graft-versus-host disease-a major complication of allogeneic HCT-to enable the patient and clinician to assess management options in the context of an individual patient's condition. These NCCN Guidelines Insights provide a summary of the important recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines for HCT, including the incorporation of a newly developed section on the Principles of Conditioning for HCT.
Assuntos
Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Adulto , Humanos , Transplante Homólogo , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/diagnóstico , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/etiologia , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/prevenção & controle , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) occurs in up to 25% of children following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and continues to be a major cause of late morbidity and poor quality of life among long-term survivors of pediatric HCT. Late effects (LEs) of HCT are well documented in this population, and cGVHD has been identified as a risk factor for subsequent neoplasms (SNs) and several nonmalignant LEs (NM-LEs); however, the reported correlation between cGVHD and LEs varies among studies. We compared LEs occurring ≥2 years following childhood HCT for a hematologic malignancy in 2-year disease-free survivors with and without cGVHD and further evaluated the association of cGVHD features on the development of LEs. This systematic retrospective analysis used data from the Center of International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) on a large, representative cohort of 1260 survivors of pediatric HCT for hematologic malignancy to compare first malignant LEs and NM-LEs in those with a diagnosis of cGVHD and those who never developed cGVHD. The cumulative incidences of any first LE, SN, and NM-LE were estimated at 10 years after HCT, with death as a competing risk for patients with cGVHD versus no cGVHD. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the impact of cGVHD and its related characteristics on the development of first LEs. The estimated 10-year cumulative incidence of any LE in patients with and without cGVHD was 43% (95% CI, 38% to 48.2%) versus 32% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.5% to 36.3%) (P < .001), respectively. The development of cGVHD by 2 years post-HCT was independently associated with any LE (hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.68; P = .001) and NM-LE (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.70; P = .006), but not SN (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, .73 to 2.31; P = .38). cGVHD-related factors linked with the development of an NM-LE included having extensive grade cGVHD (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.23 to 2.08; P = .0005), severe cGVHD (HR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.60 to 3.17; P < .0001), interrupted onset type (HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.21 to 2.05; P = .0008), and both mucocutaneous and visceral organ involvement (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.24 to 2.03; P = .0002). No significant association between cGVHD-specific variables and SN was identified. Finally, the duration of cGVHD treatment of cGVHD with systemic immunosuppression was not significantly associated with SNs or NM-LEs. cGVHD was more closely associated with NM-LEs than with SNs among survivors of pediatric HCT for hematologic malignancy. In this analysis, the development of SNs was strongly associated with the use of myeloablative total body irradiation. cGVHD-related characteristics consistent with a state of greater immune dysregulation were more closely linked to NM-LEs.
Assuntos
Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Criança , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Prognostic biomarkers used to identify likelihood of disease progression have not been identified for chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), the leading cause of late nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in survivors of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Gastrointestinal cGVHD (GI-cGVHD) has been particularly challenging to classify. Here, we analyzed 3 proteomics markers (Regenerating islet-derived protein 3-α [Reg3α], C-X-C motif ligand 9 [CXCL9], and Stimulation-2 [ST2]) in 2 independent cohorts of patients with cGVHD totaling 289 patients. Plasma concentrations of Reg3α were significantly increased in patients with GI-cGVHD (P = .0012) compared with those without (P = .01), but plasma concentrations of CXCL9 and ST2 were not. Patients with high Reg3α (≥72 ng/mL) vs low Reg3α had higher NRM (23% vs 11%; P = .015). Because Reg3α has been identified as a lower GI tract marker in acute GVHD, we correlated Reg3α with lower acute-like GI-cGVHD vs classical fibrotic-like esophageal manifestations and found that Reg3α did not differ between the subtypes. No difference was observed between upper GI tract and lower GI tract subtypes. Patients with extremely high Reg3α (≥180 ng/mL) had higher GI scores but not higher scores for the lower GI tract. In a multivariable Cox regression model, patients with high Reg3α were 1.9 times more likely to die without relapse. Our findings demonstrate the utility of Reg3α as a prognostic marker for GI-cGVHD. These data warrant prospective biomarker validation studies.
Assuntos
Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Proteínas Associadas a Pancreatite , Biomarcadores , Quimiocina CXCL9 , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/diagnóstico , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/etiologia , Humanos , Proteína 1 Semelhante a Receptor de Interleucina-1 , Proteínas Associadas a Pancreatite/genética , Prognóstico , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) can be associated with significant morbidity, in part because of nonreversible fibrosis, which impacts physical functioning (eye, skin, lung manifestations) and mortality (lung, gastrointestinal manifestations). Progress in preventing severe morbidity and mortality associated with chronic GVHD is limited by a complex and incompletely understood disease biology and a lack of prognostic biomarkers. Likewise, treatment advances for highly morbid manifestations remain hindered by the absence of effective organ-specific approaches targeting "irreversible" fibrotic sequelae and difficulties in conducting clinical trials in a heterogeneous disease with small patient numbers. The purpose of this document is to identify current gaps, to outline a roadmap of research goals for highly morbid forms of chronic GVHD including advanced skin sclerosis, fasciitis, lung, ocular and gastrointestinal involvement, and to propose strategies for effective trial design. The working group made the following recommendations: (1) Phenotype chronic GVHD clinically and biologically in future cohorts, to describe the incidence, prognostic factors, mechanisms of organ damage, and clinical evolution of highly morbid conditions including long-term effects in children; (2) Conduct longitudinal multicenter studies with common definitions and research sample collections; (3) Develop new approaches for early identification and treatment of highly morbid forms of chronic GVHD, especially biologically targeted treatments, with a special focus on fibrotic changes; and (4) Establish primary endpoints for clinical trials addressing each highly morbid manifestation in relationship to the time point of intervention (early versus late). Alternative endpoints, such as lack of progression and improvement in physical functioning or quality of life, may be suitable for clinical trials in patients with highly morbid manifestations. Finally, new approaches for objective response assessment and exploration of novel trial designs for small populations are required.
Assuntos
Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Doença Crônica , Consenso , Humanos , Incidência , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Qualidade de Vida , Estados UnidosAssuntos
Anilidas/farmacologia , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/tratamento farmacológico , Proteínas Hedgehog/antagonistas & inibidores , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Piridinas/farmacologia , Administração Oral , Anilidas/administração & dosagem , Anilidas/efeitos adversos , Anilidas/uso terapêutico , Biópsia , Doença Crônica , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/patologia , Proteínas Hedgehog/farmacologia , Humanos , Piridinas/administração & dosagem , Piridinas/efeitos adversos , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Esclerose/diagnóstico , Pele/patologia , Esteroides/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Positive results from recent clinical trials have significantly expanded current therapeutic options for patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). However, new insights into the associations between clinical characteristics of chronic GVHD, pathophysiologic mechanisms of disease, and the clinical and biological effects of novel therapeutic agents are required to allow for a more individualized approach to treatment. The current report is focused on setting research priorities and direction in the treatment of chronic GVHD. Detailed correlative scientific studies should be conducted in the context of clinical trials to evaluate associations between clinical outcomes and the biological effect of systemic therapeutics. For patients who require systemic therapy but not urgent initiation of glucocorticoids, clinical trials for initial systemic treatment of chronic GVHD should investigate novel agents as monotherapy without concurrently starting glucocorticoids, to avoid confounding biological, pathological, and clinical assessments. Clinical trials for treatment-refractory disease should specifically target patients with incomplete or suboptimal responses to most recent therapy who are early in their disease course. Close collaboration between academic medical centers, medical societies, and industry is needed to support an individualized, biology-based strategic approach to chronic GVHD therapy.
Assuntos
Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Doença Crônica , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Consenso , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Steroids remain the initial therapy for acute graft-vs.-host disease (AGVHD). Strategies to improve response and minimize steroid exposure are needed. We report results of a randomized, adaptive, Bayesian-designed, phase II trial of prednisone with or without extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) as an initial therapy for patients with newly diagnosed AGVHD. The primary endpoint was success at day 56 defined as: alive, in remission, achieving AGVHD response without additional therapy, and on <1 mg/kg at day 28 and <0.5 mg/kg on day 56 of steroids. Eighty-one patients were randomized to the ECP arm (n = 51) or steroids alone (n = 30). Median age was 54 years (range: 17-75); 90% had grade II AGVHD and 10% had grades III and IV AGVHD, with skin (85%), upper (22%)/lower (22%) gastrointestinal, and liver (10%) involvement. The ECP arm had a higher probability of success (0.815) and exceeded the predefined threshold for determining the investigational arm promising. ECP was potentially more beneficial than steroids-alone in skin-only AGVHD (response rate: 72% vs. 57%, respectively) than for visceral-organ AGVHD (47% vs. 43%, respectively). The addition of ECP to steroids may result in higher GVHD response as initial therapy for AGVHD, especially for patients with skin-only involvement.
Assuntos
Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Fotoferese , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Teorema de Bayes , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Major ABO incompatible hematopoietic progenitors from bone marrow (HPC(M)) donor collections that are destined for clinical transplantation are typically processed to deplete products of red blood cells (RBCs). The purpose of this study was to compare RBC depletion when using the Spectra Optia® relative to a 2-step method involving a COBE2991 instrument to obtain a buffy coat followed by a hydroxyethyl starch (HES) density gradient (COBE+HES) of the buffy coat. METHODS: Post-processing recoveries of products undergoing 4, 8, and 10 bone marrow processing (BMP) cycles (i.e. 1 cycle=1 volume of HPC(M)) with the Spectra Optia® were determined for volume, RBC content, viable total nucleated cells (vTNC), viable CD34+ cells (vCD34), viable CD3+ cells (vCD3) and colony-forming-cells (CFC). Subsequent RBC depletions with Spectra Optia® were then performed with 10 BMP cycles on additional HPC(M) collections and were compared against a retrospective analysis of historical COBE+HES post-processing data. RESULTS: Ten BMP cycles of HPC(M) (n=6) products were identified as optimal with volume reductions of 81.3±1.6 % and RBC reductions of 97.0±0.6 % with the Spectra Optia®. This also resulted in an average of 0.28 ±0.14 mL of RBC/kg (mean±SD; n=6) with vTNC yields of 65.0±10.9%, vCD34+ yields of 98.5±12.7%, and vCD3+ yields of 90.6±10.0%. Recoveries with the COBE+HES methodology resulted in vTNC recoveries of 62.9±20.5% (mean±SD; n=30) and 0.63±0.71 mL of RBC/kg (mean±SD; n=30). CONCLUSIONS: The Spectra Optia® is a viable option for depleting HPC(M) harvests of contaminating RBC in situations of ABO incompatibility. Target cells from a MNC rich fractionation were preserved through processing while eliminating RBC contaminants.
Assuntos
Remoção de Componentes Sanguíneos/métodos , Eritrócitos/imunologia , Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/metabolismo , Sistema ABO de Grupos Sanguíneos/metabolismo , Medula Óssea/imunologia , Medula Óssea/metabolismo , Transplante de Medula Óssea/métodos , Separação Celular/métodos , Voluntários Saudáveis , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/imunologia , Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/patologia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doadores de TecidosRESUMO
Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) involves the infusion of hematopoietic progenitor cells into patients with hematologic disorders with the goal of re-establishing normal hematopoietic and immune function. HCT is classified as autologous or allogeneic based on the origin of hematopoietic cells. Autologous HCT uses the patient's own cells while allogeneic HCT uses hematopoietic cells from a human leukocyte antigen-compatible donor. Allogeneic HCT is a potentially curative treatment option for patients with certain types of hematologic malignancies, and autologous HCT is primarily used to support patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy. Advances in HCT methods and supportive care in recent decades have led to improved survival after HCT; however, disease relapse and posttransplant complications still commonly occur in both autologous and allogeneic HCT recipients. Allogeneic HCT recipients may also develop acute and/or chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which results in immune-mediated cellular injury of several organs. The NCCN Guidelines for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation focus on recommendations for pretransplant recipient evaluation and the management of GVHD in adult patients with malignant disease.
Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/normas , Feminino , Guias como Assunto , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMO
PURPOSE: There is no consensus on the best choice of an alternative donor (umbilical cord blood [UCB], haploidentical, one-antigen mismatched [7/8]-bone marrow [BM], or 7/8-peripheral blood [PB]) for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for patients lacking an HLA-matched related or unrelated donor. METHODS: We report composite end points of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD)-free relapse-free survival (CRFS) in 2,198 patients who underwent UCB (n = 838), haploidentical (n = 159), 7/8-BM (n = 241), or 7/8-PB (n = 960) HCT. All groups were divided by myeloablative conditioning (MAC) intensity or reduced intensity conditioning (RIC), except haploidentical group in which most received RIC. To account for multiple testing, P < .0071 in multivariable analysis and P < .00025 in direct pairwise comparisons were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In multivariable analysis, haploidentical group had the best GRFS, CRFS, and overall survival (OS). In the direct pairwise comparison of other groups, among those who received MAC, there was no difference in GRFS or CRFS among UCB, 7/8-BM, and 7/8-PB with serotherapy (alemtuzumab or antithymocyte globulin) groups. In contrast, the 7/8-PB without serotherapy group had significantly inferior GRFS, higher cGVHD, and a trend toward worse CRFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.69; P = .002) than the 7/8-BM group and higher cGVHD and trend toward inferior CRFS (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.63; P = .0006) than the UCB group. Among patients with RIC, all groups had significantly inferior GRFS and CRFS compared with the haploidentical group. CONCLUSION: Recognizing the limitations of a registry retrospective analysis and the possibility of center selection bias in choosing donors, our data support the use of UCB, 7/8-BM, or 7/8-PB (with serotherapy) grafts for patients undergoing MAC HCT and haploidentical grafts for patients undergoing RIC HCT. The haploidentical group had the best GRFS, CRFS, and OS of all groups.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Transplante de Células-Tronco de Sangue do Cordão Umbilical , Feminino , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Neoplasias Hematológicas/mortalidade , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Best practice recommendations in cancer care increasingly call for integrated rehabilitation services to address physical impairments and disability. These recommendations have languished primarily due to a lack of pragmatic, generalizable intervention models. This perspective paper proposes a clinically integrated physical therapist (CI-PT) model that enables flexible and scalable services for screening, triage, and intervention addressing functional mobility. The model is based on (1) a CI-PT embedded in cancer care provider clinics, and (2) rehabilitation across the care continuum determined by the patient's level of functional mobility. The CI-PT model includes regular screening of functional mobility in provider clinics via a patient-reported mobility measure-the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care, a brief physical therapy evaluation tailored to the specific functional needs of the individual-and a tailored, skilled physical therapist intervention based on functional level. The CI-PT model provides a pragmatic, barrier-free, patient-centric, data-driven approach to integrating rehabilitation as part of standard care for survivors of cancer. The model standardizes CI-PT practice and may be sufficiently agile to provide targeted interventions in widely varying cancer settings and populations. Therefore, it may be ideal for wide implementation among outpatient oncological settings. Implementation of this model requires a shared approach to care that includes physical therapists, rehabilitation administrators, cancer care providers, and cancer center administrators.
Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Limitação da Mobilidade , Transtornos dos Movimentos/reabilitação , Neoplasias/terapia , Especialidade de Fisioterapia/organização & administração , Institutos de Câncer , Humanos , Modelos Teóricos , Transtornos dos Movimentos/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Fisioterapeutas , Vigilância da População/métodos , TriagemRESUMO
Combination therapy with a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), such as cyclosporine (CSA) or tacrolimus (Tac), and methotrexate (MTX) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a widely used approach to graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prevention. Data on the comparative effectiveness of MMF compared with MTX are limited and conflicting, however. We analyzed data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research for adult patients undergoing first myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from an HLA-identical matched related donor (MRD; nâ¯=â¯3979) or matched unrelated donor (URD; nâ¯=â¯4163) using CSA+MMF, CSA+MTX, Tac+MMF, or Tac+MTX for GVHD prevention between 2000 and 2013. Within the MRD cohort, 2252 patients received CSA+MTX, 1391 received Tac+MTX, 114 received CSA+MMF, and 222 received Tac+MMF. Recipients of CSA+MMF had a higher incidence of acute GVHD grade II-IV (hazard ratio [HR], 1.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24 to 2.20; P < .001) and grade III-IV (HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.31 to 2.83; P < .001) compared with Tac+MTX. The use of CSA+MMF was also associated with inferior overall survival (OS) (HR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.73 to 3.09; P < .001) due to higher transplantation-related mortality (TRM) (HR, 4.03; 95% CI, 2.61 to 6.23; P < .001) compared with Tac+MTX. Within the URD cohort, 974 patients received CSA+MTX, 2697 received Tac+MTX, 68 received CSA+MMF, and 424 received Tac+MMF. CSA+MMF was again significantly associated with a higher incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD (HR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.57 to 3.42; P <0001), worse OS (HR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.67 to 3.35; P < .001), and higher TRM (HR, 3.09; 95% CI, 2.00 to 4.77; P < .001), compared with Tac+MTX and other regimens. Thus, this large retrospective comparison of MMF versus MTX in combination with CSA or Tac demonstrates significantly worse GVHD and survival outcomes with CSA+MMF compared with Tac+MTX.
Assuntos
Ciclosporina/administração & dosagem , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Ácido Micofenólico/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Aloenxertos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/mortalidade , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
We report graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) (a composite end point of survival without grade III-IV acute GVHD [aGVHD], systemic therapy-requiring chronic GVHD [cGVHD], or relapse) and cGVHD-free relapse-free survival (CRFS) among pediatric patients with acute leukemia (n = 1613) who underwent transplantation with 1 antigen-mismatched (7/8) bone marrow (BM; n = 172) or umbilical cord blood (UCB; n = 1441). Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards models. To account for multiple testing, P < .01 for the donor/graft variable was considered statistically significant. Clinical characteristics were similar between UCB and 7/8 BM recipients, because most had acute lymphoblastic leukemia (62%), 64% received total body irradiation-based conditioning, and 60% received anti-thymocyte globulin or alemtuzumab. Methotrexate-based GVHD prophylaxis was more common with 7/8 BM (79%) than with UCB (15%), in which mycophenolate mofetil was commonly used. The univariate estimates of GRFS and CRFS were 22% (95% confidence interval [CI], 16-29) and 27% (95% CI, 20-34), respectively, with 7/8 BM and 33% (95% CI, 31-36) and 38% (95% CI, 35-40), respectively, with UCB (P < .001). In multivariate analysis, 7/8 BM vs UCB had similar GRFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.12; 95% CI, 0.87-1.45; P = .39), CRFS (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.82-1.38; P = .66), overall survival (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.80-1.44; P = .66), and relapse (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.03-2.02; P = .03). However, the 7/8 BM group had a significantly higher risk for grade III-IV aGVHD (HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.16-2.48; P = .006) compared with the UCB group. UCB and 7/8 BM groups had similar outcomes, as measured by GRFS and CRFS. However, given the higher risk for grade III-IV aGVHD, UCB might be preferred for patients lacking matched donors.