Efficacy and safety of an early oral switch in low-risk Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SABATO): an international, open-label, parallel-group, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection is treated with at least 14 days of intravenous antimicrobials. We assessed the efficacy and safety of an early switch to oral therapy in patients at low risk for complications related to S aureus bloodstream infection. METHODS: In this international, open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial done in 31 tertiary care hospitals in Germany, France, the Netherlands, and Spain, adult patients with low-risk S aureus bloodstream infection were randomly assigned after 5-7 days of intravenous antimicrobial therapy to oral antimicrobial therapy or to continue intravenous standard therapy. Randomisation was done via a central web-based system, using permuted blocks of varying length, and stratified by study centre. The main exclusion criteria were signs and symptoms of complicated S aureus bloodstream infection, non-removable foreign devices, and severe comorbidity. The composite primary endpoint was the occurrence of any complication related to S aureus bloodstream infection (relapsing S aureus bloodstream infection, deep-seated infection, and mortality attributable to infection) within 90 days, assessed in the intention-to-treat population by clinical assessors who were masked to treatment assignment. Adverse events were assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of study medication (safety population). Due to slow recruitment, the scientific advisory committee decided on Jan 15, 2018, to stop the trial after 215 participants were randomly assigned (planned sample size was 430 participants) and to convert the planned interim analysis into the final analysis. The decision was taken without knowledge of outcome data, at a time when 126 participants were enrolled. The new sample size accommodated a non-inferiority margin of 10%; to claim non-inferiority, the upper bound of the 95% CI for the treatment difference (stratified by centre) had to be below 10 percentage points. The trial is closed to recruitment and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01792804), the German Clinical trials register (DRKS00004741), and EudraCT (2013-000577-77). FINDINGS: Of 5063 patients with S aureus bloodstream infection assessed for eligibility, 213 were randomly assigned to switch to oral therapy (n=108) or to continue intravenous therapy (n=105). Mean age was 63·5 (SD 17·2) years and 148 (69%) participants were male and 65 (31%) were female. In the oral switch group, 14 (13%) participants met the primary endpoint versus 13 (12%) in the intravenous group, with a treatment difference of 0·7 percentage points (95% CI -7·8 to 9·1; p=0·013). In the oral switch group, 36 (34%) of 107 participants in the safety population had at least one serious adverse event compared with 27 (26%) of 103 participants in the intravenous group (p=0·29). INTERPRETATION: Oral switch antimicrobial therapy was non-inferior to intravenous standard therapy in participants with low-risk S aureus bloodstream infection. However, it is necessary to carefully assess patients for signs and symptoms of complicated S aureus bloodstream infection at the time of presentation and thereafter before considering early oral switch therapy. FUNDING: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. TRANSLATIONS: For the German, Spanish, French and Dutch translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Case Report: Cerebral Nocardiosis Caused by Nocardia cyriacigeorgica Detected by Metagenomics in an Apparently Immunocompetent Patient.

We report a case of meningoencephalitis due to Nocardia cyriacigeorgica diagnosed with metagenomics, while all the standard methods were negative. This diagnosis made adaptation of antimicrobial treatment possible and led to the discovery of a rare, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.

Intrauterine fetal deaths related to antiphospholipid syndrome: a descriptive study of 65 women.

OBJECTIVE: Although one of the three obstetric manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is intrauterine fetal death (IUFD), little is known about it in this context. We report the first large series of patients with APS and IUFD. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the history and clinical data of women at four French hospitals. All had (1) APS diagnosis (Sydney criteria) and (2) IUFD at or after 10 weeks of gestation (weeks) between 2000 and 2016. RESULTS: The study included 65 women. Their median age at the index IUFD was 29 years (IQR 26-33); 38 (58%) were primigravidas. The index IUFD was the first APS clinical manifestation in 48 women (74%). Overall, 35% had a triple-positive antibody profile. IUFD occurred at a median gestational age of 24 weeks (IQR 18-27) and was associated with maternal obstetric complications in 16 women (25%), namely, preeclampsia (n = 12), hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet syndrome (HELLP) (n = 6), and/or placental abruption (n = 5). Half of the 50 women with available data had a small-for-gestational-age fetus. Overall, including during the follow-up period of 4 years (IQR 2-9), 28 women (43%) had at least one thrombosis, and 29% were diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Ultimately, 54 women (83%) had at least one live birth. Only one woman had three consecutive early miscarriages. CONCLUSION: IUFD was most often the inaugural sign of APS. Of the APS classification criteria, IUFD, preeclampsia, and thromboses were common in this cohort, while the "3 consecutive early miscarriages" criterion was met only once. With treatment, most of the women successfully had at least one live birth.

Classification of primary antiphospholipid syndrome as systemic lupus erythematosus: Analysis of a cohort of 214 patients.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the limitations of the SLICC (Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics) classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), in patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS). METHODS: Retrospective study of a cohort of APS patients (Sydney criteria). We successively excluded patients with (1) at least one "SLE-specific" manifestation (biopsy-proven SLE nephropathy, arthritis, cutaneous, or neurologic SLE manifestations, pericarditis, autoimmune haemolytic anaemia, oral and nasal ulcers, non-scarring alopecia, anti-dsDNA, and anti-Sm antibodies), (2) any other autoimmune connective tissue disease, and/or (3) antinuclear antibodies >1/320. Careful file review confirmed PAPS among the remaining patients. We then assessed the number of SLICC criteria each patient met. RESULTS: Among these 214 APS patients, we excluded 85 with at least one SLE-specific manifestation, 8 with another connective tissue disease, and 21 with antinuclear antibodies >1/320, leaving 100 patients with primary APS. Among them, 28% met at least 4 SLICC classification criteria including one clinical and one immunological criterion (antiphospholipid antibodies, aPL, by definition) and could thus theoretically be classified with SLE. Fourteen had an arterial phenotype (50%), 9 a history of catastrophic APS (32%), and 18 a triple-positive profile for aPL (64%). None had developed SLE during a median follow-up of 12 [6.5-17] years. CONCLUSION: Because 28% of our patients with longstanding and strictly defined PAPS could be mistakenly classified as SLE, they were at risk of deleterious therapeutic management. We therefore suggest that any future classification for SLE should specifically require at least one SLE-specific criterion for patients with aPL.

Prognostic Factors in Syphilitic Uveitis.

PURPOSE: To identify predictors of treatment success in syphilitic uveitis (SU). DESIGN: Retrospective multicentric analysis of patients treated for SU. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 95 eyes (66 patients, mean [standard deviation] aged 49 [12.5] years, 31 [47%] of whom were human immunodeficiency virus [HIV]+) were analyzed. METHODS: Activity of SU was assessed at 1 week and 1 month after treatment onset, and at last follow-up. Improvement was defined by a ≥2-step decrease of both anterior chamber and vitreous haze inflammation levels, and by the size reduction in chorioretinal lesions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recovery was defined as the resolution of inflammation in all anatomic structures at 1 month. RESULTS: Panuveitis and posterior uveitis were the most frequent findings. Inflammatory parameters were higher in HIV+ patients. Recovery was reported in 65% and 85% of eyes at 1 month and at last follow-up, respectively. In multivariate analysis, after adjusting for initial best-corrected visual acuity and the antimicrobial treatment regimen, clinical improvement at 1 week (corrected risk ratios [cRR], 3.5 [2.3-3.8]; P = 0.001) was predictive of recovery at 1 month, whereas the use of periocular dexamethasone injections (cRR, 0.05 [0.02-0.6]; P = 0.01) and methylprednisolone pulses negatively affected the outcomes of eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Early improvement is the strongest predictor of ophthalmological recovery in SU.

Prevalence of immune-related systemic adverse events in patients treated with anti-Programmed cell Death 1/anti-Programmed cell Death-Ligand 1 agents: A single-centre pharmacovigilance database analysis.

AIM: The growing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is associated with the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Few data are published on systemic, immunohaematological and rheumatic irAEs. In a pharmacovigilance database analysis, we screened for these irAEs and calculated their prevalence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants were recruited via Registre des Effets Indésirables Sévères des Anticorps Monoclonaux Immunomodulateurs en Cancérologie (REISAMIC)1 a French registry of grade ≥2 irAEs occurring in ICI-treated patients. The pathologies of interest were systemic autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, rheumatic diseases and immune cytopenia. RESULTS: Out of 908 patients treated with anti-Programmed cell Death 1 (PD1)/anti-Programmed cell Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) agents (together with an anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) agent in 40 cases) between December 2012 and December 2016 at a single centre, 21 patients experienced systemic irAEs. The types and the prevalence of irAEs were as follows: immune thrombocytopenia (0.2%), Sjögren syndrome (0.3%), rheumatoid arthritis (0.2%), polymyalgia rheumatica (0.2%), psoriatic arthritis (0.2%), seronegative polyarthritis (0.7%) and sarcoidosis (0.2%). Patients with Sjögren syndrome or seronegative polyarthritis were more likely to have received combination therapy with ipilimumab (2.5% for both). We described these 21 cases, together with nine additional cases from five other centres. Most irAE were moderately severe (grade 2, 63%). The median time to onset was 57°days (interquartile range (IQR) 24-117). The ICI was withdrawn in 12 cases, 25 patients (83%) received corticosteroids, and five patients (17%) received immunosuppressant/immunomodulatory agents. The irAEs resolved fully or partially in 28 cases (93%). CONCLUSION: Although systemic, immunohaematological and rheumatic diseases are rarely associated with ICI use, the prevalence is higher when two ICIs are combined. Corticosteroids are often effective and may enable the continued administration of ICIs. Studies designed to identify at-risk patients are warranted.

Rheumatoid arthritis and polymyalgia rheumatica occurring after immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.

OBJECTIVES: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) have demonstrated improved survival for multiple cancers. However, these new drug classes have led to increased immune-related adverse events (IrAE). Rheumatic IrAEs have not been well described in clinical trials. We report here cases of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) occurring after ICI treatment. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients receiving an ICI in whom symptoms of arthritis or arthralgia developed and revealed a diagnosis of RA or PMR. RESULTS: In 10 patients who received ICI therapy (all anti-PD-1 or anti-PDL1 antibodies), RA or PMR developed at a median of 1 month (1 to 9) after exposure. No patient had pre-existing rheumatic or autoimmune disease. RA developed in six patients; all six were positive for anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies and four for rheumatoid factor. Anti-CCP antibodies were detected in two out of three patients tested before immunotherapy. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs were needed for three patients; the three others received corticosteroids or non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs. PMR was diagnosed in four patients, all responded to corticosteroids. Despite these IrAEs, immunotherapy was pursued for all but one patient until cancer progression. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first description of RA occurring after ICI therapy for cancer. PMR can also occur after ICI, particularly after anti-PD-1 therapy. All cases responded to corticosteroids or with immunosuppressive therapy. Collaboration between rheumatologists and oncologists is crucial and could lead to better recognition and care of these patients.

[2016 review on catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome]. / Syndrome catastrophique des antiphospholipides (CAPS) : revue 2016.

The catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) develops in at least 1% of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome, either primary or associated with systemic lupus erythematosus. CAPS reveals the antiphospholipid syndrome in about 50% of cases. The CAPS is characterized by rapidly-progressive widespread thromboses mainly affecting the microvasculature in the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies. In a few days, the patients develop multiorgan failure with renal insufficiency with severe hypertension, pulmonary, cerebral, cardiac, digestive and/or cutaneous involvement. The vital prognosis is frequently engaged. CAPS is often precipitated by infectious diseases, surgical procedures and/or withdrawal or modification of the anticoagulation. CAPS overall mortality rate has decreased and is currently below 30%. The main differential diagnoses are other thrombotic microangiopathies, and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. The treatment of CAPS consists of the association of anticoagulation and steroids, plus plasma exchange and/or intravenous immunoglobulins. Cyclophosphamide is added only in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus. The potential contribution of some additional therapies (rituximab, eculizumab or sirolimus) needs to be assessed. The prevention of CAPS is essential and is based upon the adequate management of the perioperative period when surgery cannot be avoided, the prompt treatment and the prevention with immunization of infections and the education of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome, especially for the management of oral anticoagulants.

[PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway and cancer]. / Rôle de la voie PI3K-AKT-mTOR dans le cancer et les thérapeutiques antitumorales.

PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is an intracellular signalling pathway composed of different kinases. Many protein mutations are described in that pathway, and are responsible of dysregulation of cell growth, proliferation, survival and angiogenesis. Rapamycin is an antibiotic inhibiting mTOR. Different analogs of rapamycin are developed or being developed in antitumoral therapy, in which temsirolimus, everolimus and deforolimus, demonstrated antitumoral activity in renal cancer and mantle cell lymphoma, and many clinical trials are in progress in other tumors. In the future, predictive factors of response need to be identified; patient selection and associations with chemotherapy or with other targeted therapies should be explored.