Efficacy of local glucocorticoid after local anesthetic in low back pain with lumbosacral transitional vertebra: A randomized placebo-controlled double-blind trial.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of local injection of a local anesthetic with a glucocorticoid versus a local anesthetic with saline to treat low back pain due to lumbosacral transitional vertebras (LSTV) with a pseudoarticulation. METHODS: A randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study was conducted in patients with unilateral low back pain ascribed clinically to LSTV. Patients were randomized to lidocaine plus saline (LS group) or lidocaine plus cortivazol (LC group) injected locally under computed tomography guidance. The primary outcome measure was the 24-hour mean visual analog scale (VAS) score for low back pain 4 weeks after the injection. RESULTS: Of 16 randomized patients, 15 were included in the analysis, 8 in the LS group and 7 in the LC group. The mean VAS pain score at week 4 was not significantly different between the two groups. In the two groups pooled, the mean VAS pain score decreased significantly from baseline to week 4, from 5.52±0.99 to 3.86±2.55 (P≤0.05). The difference remained significant at week 12. Significant improvements occurred in the EIFEL disability index and items of the Dallas Pain Questionnaire. No adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSION: In patients with chronic low back pain consistent with a symptomatic LSTV type II or IV in the Castellvi classification, a local injection of lidocaine with or without cortivazol may provide sustained improvements in pain and function. The underlying mechanism is unclear.

Decreased patient exposure to ionizing radiation during interventional rheumatology procedures after optimization of protection.

OBJECTIVES: To decrease radiation exposure of patients undergoing interventional rheumatology procedures, without adversely affecting quality of care. METHODS: The radiation dose received, assessed by the dose-area product (DAP), was measured during 283 intraarticular injections performed under fluoroscopic guidance between May and July 2013. Then, three steps were taken to decrease patients' radiation exposure: a copper filter was added, the anti-scatter grid was removed, and exposure cell sensitivity was set at the highest value. DAP was measured during 158 intraarticular injections performed in 2014 with these measures in place. RESULTS: Mean DAP before optimization was 175µGray·m2 during facet joint injections (n=4) and 43µGray·m2 during hip injections but was less than 20µGray·m2 for injections into the shoulders (15.7µGray·m2), ankles (7.7µGray·m2), wrists (3.7µGray·m2), and fingers (3.3µGray·m2). After optimization, DAP decreased markedly for all injection sites, by 52% (shoulders) to 87% (facet joints, 22.7µGray·m2). Decreases occurred at all three steps of the procedure, i.e., patient installation, injection, and last image hold. Exposure during facet joint injections varied from 84 (54.5-108.5) µGray·m2 when body mass index (BMI) was <25kg/m2 to 228.9 (161.3-340.4)µGray·m2 when BMI was>30kg/m2. CONCLUSION: Simple technical changes translate into large decreases in patient radiation exposure during fluoroscopically-guided injections, particularly at the facet joints and in obese patients.

[Nurses mobilised in screening for osteoporosis]. / Les infirmières mobilisées dans le dépistage de l'ostéoporose.

The consequences of an osteoporotic fracture are often harmful. The teams of La Roche-sur-Yon general hospital have created a primary and secondary screening programme led by a nurse. Hospitalised female patients between the ages of 50 and 80 are screened for osteoporosis risk factors.