Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Int J Dermatol ; 56(10): 1026-1031, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28631824

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether incidence of detected skin cancer in patients evaluated by store-and-forward teledermatology (SAF) vs. face-to-face consultation (F2F) significantly differs, and whether such differences are because of variations in patient demographics, diagnostic accuracy, or both. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compares patient skin cancer risk profile, pre-post biopsy diagnostic accuracy, and detection rates of any skin cancer, melanoma, and keratinocytic carcinoma between all SAF teledermatology patients and a subset of randomly selected F2F consultations at VA-Boston Healthcare System in 2014. RESULTS: Patients in the teledermatology (n = 434) and F2F visit cohorts (n = 587) had similar baseline demographics except a higher proportion of F2F patients had prior history of skin cancer, 22% (131/587) vs. 10% (45/434), P < 0.001, and received biopsies, 27.2% (160/587) vs. 11.5% (50/434), P < 0.001. When adjusted for age, immunosuppression, and personal and family history of skin cancer, there were no significant differences between the two cohorts in detection rates for any skin cancer (9.5% vs. 5.8%, P = 0.3), melanoma (0.6% vs. 0%, P = N/A), or keratinocytic carcinoma (8.5% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.7). The two cohorts also had similar pre-post biopsy perfect diagnostic concordance, time from initial consult request to biopsy (45.5 d vs. 47.3 d, P = 0.8), and time from biopsy to definitive treatment (67.5 d vs. 65.4 d, P = 0.8). CONCLUSION: F2F patients were more likely to have prior history of skin cancer and receive biopsies. When adjusted for presence of skin cancer risk factors, incidence of detected melanoma, keratinocytic carcinoma, and any skin cancer was similar between SAF teledermatology and F2F patients.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Carcinoma/diagnóstico , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico , Telemedicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biópsia , Carcinoma/patologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Melanoma/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Pele/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Telemedicina/métodos , Fatores de Tempo , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
4.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 14(8): 881-6, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26267734

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: No systemic drugs are approved by the Food and Drug Administration to treat pediatric psoriasis due to a lack of supporting data. The purpose of this study is to present cases demonstrating the use of systemic drugs in pediatric psoriasis. METHODS: In this case series, data were collected on patients ≤ 18 years old with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with systemic medications (traditional systemic drugs or biologics) from 2008 through 2014. Efficacy was measured using the validated simple measure for assessing psoriasis activity (S-MAPA), and the product of the body surface area and Physician Global Assessment. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients aged 5 to 18 years were eligible, and 56 treatment courses were analyzed. Methotrexate (MTX) was the most frequently prescribed systemic (70%), followed by etanercept (59%). Clearance rates were highest on biologic medications (67% for etanercept and adalimumab, 33% for ustekinumab). Phototherapy, cyclosporine, and MTX were less effective in clearing psoriasis, although they were successful in improving S-MAPA ≥ 50% from baseline 100%, 67%, and 36% of the time, respectively. The most common adverse events were sunburn for patients on narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy (14%), gastrointestinal intolerance and minor infections for patients on MTX (16% each), and minor infections for patients on etanercept (25%) and adalimumab (33%). The most common reasons for discontinuation were secondary failure (38% for etanercept, 33% for adalimumab) or lack of response (37% for MTX, 33% for cyclosporine). CONCLUSION: Although phototherapy, MTX, and cyclosporine are effective for controlling resistant pediatric psoriasis, concerns about long-term safety or inconvenience have led people to consider biologics in their place. However, there is a lack of literature on the use of biologics in pediatric psoriasis. These cases attest to the safety and efficacy of etanercept, adalimumab, and ustekinumab in pediatric psoriasis, expanding the treatment repertoire and guiding dermatologists in better managing recalcitrant pediatric psoriasis.


Assuntos
Adalimumab/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Etanercepte/uso terapêutico , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Ustekinumab/uso terapêutico , Adalimumab/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Ciclosporina/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efeitos adversos , Etanercepte/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Infliximab/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Metotrexato/efeitos adversos , Psoríase/radioterapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Terapia Ultravioleta/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA