Maternal and Fetal Radiation-Induced Cancer Risk From Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography During Pregnancy: A Retrospective Cohort Study Across a Multihospital Integrated Health Care Network.

OBJECTIVE: Computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) is important to evaluate suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy but has maternal/fetal radiation risks. The objective of this study was to estimate maternal and fetal radiation-induced cancer risk from CTPA during pregnancy. METHODS: Simulation modeling via the National Cancer Institute's Radiation Risk Assessment Tool was used to estimate excess cancer risks from 17 organ doses from CTPA during pregnancy, with doses determined by a radiation dose indexing monitoring system. Organ doses were obtained from a radiation dose indexing monitoring system. Maternal and fetal cancer risks per 100,000 were calculated for male and female fetuses and several maternal ages. RESULTS: The 534 CTPA examinations had top 3 maternal organ doses to the breast, lung, and stomach of 17.34, 15.53, and 9.43 mSv, respectively, with a mean uterine dose of 0.21 mSv. The total maternal excess risks of developing cancer per 100,000 were 181, 151, 121, 107, 94.5, 84, and 74.4, respectively, for a 20-, 25-, 30-, 35-, 40-, 45-, and 50-year-old woman undergoing CTPA, compared with baseline cancer risks of 41,408 for 20-year-old patients. The total fetal excess risks of developing cancer per 100,000 were 12.3 and 7.3 for female and male fetuses, respectively, when compared with baseline cancer risks of 41,227 and 48,291. DISCUSSION: Excess risk of developing cancer from CTPA was small relative to baseline cancer risk for pregnant patients and fetuses, decreased for pregnant patients with increasing maternal age, and was greater for female fetuses than male fetuses.

Ten-Year Trend in Advanced Imaging Utilization for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy.

PURPOSE: Advanced imaging is essential to diagnose pulmonary embolism (PE) in pregnancy, but there are associated maternal and fetal radiation risks. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 10-year trend in advanced imaging utilization for the evaluation of suspected PE in pregnancy. METHODS: The authors evaluated pregnant women with advanced imaging using CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) or lung scintigraphy (LS) for evaluation of suspected PE presenting to two tertiary hospitals from 2007 to 2016. The rate of imaging was evaluated relative to positive PE rate and local pregnancy rate. positive PE was defined as a new acute PE finding on any advanced imaging within 3 days of first advanced imaging test. Local pregnancy rates were defined per 1,000 pregnancies in the county serviced by both hospitals. Chi-square testing was used to evaluate statistical significance (P < .05) in the utilization trend of advanced imaging and relative to local pregnancy rates and evaluations positive for PE. RESULTS: A total of 707 pregnant patients were identified, of whom 92.5% (n = 654) underwent CTPA and 7.5% (n = 53) underwent LS. Regression analysis showed an average increase of 5.2 advanced imaging studies per year (P < .001), with 61 and 105 studies performed in 2007 and 2016, respectively. Additionally, there was an average increase of 0.08 (P < .001) advanced imaging studies per 1,000 local pregnancies per year, doubling from 0.7 in 2007 to 1.4 in 2016 (P < .001). Finally, there was a decrease of 0.004 (P = .009) in advanced imaging positive for PE, from 3% (2 of 61) in 2007 to 0% (0 of 100) in 2016. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced imaging utilization increased by 72% over the 10-year window, driven by higher use of CTPA. Although the detection rate of PE on advanced imaging has decreased, the utilization rate among pregnant patients doubled during this period. These results highlight the need to consider the radiation risks and costs of advanced imaging in specific patient populations.

Patient and Fetal Radiation-Induced Malignancy Risk From Imaging For Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Imaging for diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy presents radiation concerns for patient and fetus. OBJECTIVES: Estimate the risks of radiation-induced breast cancer and childhood leukemia from common imaging techniques for the evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. METHODS: Breast and uterine absorbed doses for various imaging techniques were input into the National Cancer Institute Radiation Risk Assessment Tool to calculate risk of breast cancer for the patient and childhood leukemia for the fetus. Absorbed doses were obtained by synthesizing data from a recent systematic review and the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Primary outcomes were the estimated excess incidences of breast cancer and childhood leukemia per 100,000 exposures. RESULTS: Baseline incidences of breast cancer for a 30-year-old woman and childhood leukemia for a male fetus were 13,341 and 939, respectively. Excess incidences of breast cancer were 0.003 and 0.275 for a single and two-view chest radiograph, respectively, 9.53 and 20.6 for low- and full-dose computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA), respectively, 0.616 and 2.54 for low- and full-dose perfusion scan, respectively, and 0.732 and 2.66 for low- and full-dose ventilation perfusion scan, respectively. Excess incidences of childhood leukemia were 0.004 and 0.007 for a single and two-view chest radiograph, respectively, 0.069 and 0.490 for low- and full-dose CTPA, respectively, 0.359 and 1.47 for low- and full-dose perfusion scan, respectively, and 0.856 and 1.97 for low- and full-dose ventilation perfusion scan, respectively. CONCLUSION: Excess cancer risks for all techniques were small relative to baseline cancer risks, with CTPA techniques carrying slightly higher risk of breast cancer for the patient and ventilation perfusion techniques a higher risk of childhood leukemia.

Comparison of Guidelines for Evaluation of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a leading cause of maternal mortality, yet diagnosis remains challenging. International diagnostic guidelines vary significantly in their recommendations, making it difficult to determine an optimal policy for evaluation. RESEARCH QUESTION: Which societal-level diagnostic guidelines for evaluation of suspected PE in pregnancy are an optimal policy in terms of its cost-effectiveness? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We constructed a complex Markov decision model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of each identified societal guidelines for diagnosis of PE in pregnancy. Our model accounted for risk stratification, empiric treatment, diagnostic testing strategies, as well as short- and long-term effects from PE, treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin, and radiation exposure from advanced imaging. We considered clinical and cost outcomes of each guideline from a US health care system perspective with a lifetime horizon. Clinical effectiveness and costs were measured in time-discounted quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and US dollars, respectively. Strategies were compared using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) with a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY. One-way, multiway, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: We identified six international societal-level guidelines. Base-case analysis showed the guideline proposed by the American Thoracic Society and Society of Thoracic Radiology (ATS-STR) yielded the highest health benefits (22.90 QALYs) and was cost-effective, with an ICER of $7,808 over the guidelines proposed by the Australian Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis and the Society of Obstetric Medicine of Australia and New Zealand (ASTH-SOMANZ). All remaining guidelines were dominated. The ATS-STR guideline-recommended strategy yielded an expected additional 2.7 QALYs/100 patients evaluated over the ASTH-SOMANZ. Conclusions were robust to sensitivity analyses, with the ATS-STR guidelines optimal in 86% of probabilistic sensitivity analysis scenarios. INTERPRETATION: The ATS-STR guidelines for diagnosis of suspected PE in pregnancy are cost-effective and generate better expected health outcomes than guidelines proposed by other medical societies.

CT pulmonary angiography in pregnancy: Specific conversion factors to estimate effective radiation dose from dose length product: A retrospective cross-sectional study across a multi-hospital integrated healthcare network.

PURPOSE: Effective dose describes radiation-related cancer risk from CT scans and is estimated using a readily available conversion factor (k-factor), which varies by body part and study type. To purpose of this study is to determine the specific k-factor for CTPA in pregnant patients and its predictive factors. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study evaluates CTPA in pregnancy across a multihospital integrated healthcare network from January 2012 to April 2017. Patient and CTPA-related data were obtained from the electronic health record and a radiation dose index monitoring system. Each patient's effective dose was determined by patient-specific Monte-Carlo simulation with Cristy phantoms and divided by patient dose-length-product to determine the k-factor. K-factor for pregnant patients was compared to the k-factor for adults of standard physique with a one-sample t-test. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were performed for patient and CT predictors of k-factor. RESULTS: A total of 534 patients were included. The mean k-factor for all patients was 0.0249 (mSv·mGy-1·cm-1), 78% greater than k-factor of 0.014 (p < 0.001) suggested for the general adult population. Multivariable analysis demonstrated lower k-factors with increasing pitch (p = 0.0002), patient size (p < 0.001), and scan length (p < 0.0001). The 120 kVp (p < 0.001) and 140 kVp (p = 0.0028) analyses showed a larger k-factor than 80 and 100 kVp studies combined. CONCLUSIONS: Specific k-factor for CTPA in pregnant patients is greater than the previously used generic chest CT k-factor and should be used to estimate the effective dose for CTPA exams in pregnancy.

Interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis quantification of disease classification and progression with high-resolution computed tomography: An observational study.

Introduction: Systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease accounts for up to 20% of mortality in these patients and has a highly variable prognosis. Functional respiratory imaging, a quantitative computed tomography imaging technique which allows mapping of regional information, can provide a detailed view of lung structures. It thereby shows potential to better characterize this disease. Purpose: To evaluate the use of functional respiratory imaging quantitative computed tomography in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease staging, as well as the relationship between short-term changes in pulmonary function tests and functional respiratory imaging quantitative computed tomography with respect to disease severity. Materials and methods: An observational cohort of 35 patients with systemic sclerosis was retrospectively studied by comparing serial pulmonary function tests and in- and expiratory high-resolution computed tomography over 1.5-year interval. After classification into moderate to severe lung disease and limited lung disease (using a hybrid method integrating quantitative computed tomography and pulmonary function tests), post hoc analysis was performed using mixed-effects models and estimated marginal means in terms of functional respiratory imaging parameters. Results: At follow-up, relative mean forced vital capacity percentage change was not significantly different in the limited (6.37%; N = 13; p = 0.053) and moderate to severe disease (-3.54%; N = 16; p = 0.102) groups, respectively. Specific airway resistance decreased from baseline for both groups. (Least square mean changes -25.11% predicted (p = 0.006) and -14.02% predicted (p = 0.001) for limited and moderate to severe diseases.) In contrast to limited disease from baseline, specific airway radius increased in moderate to severe disease by 8.57% predicted (p = 0.011) with decline of lower lobe volumes of 2.97% predicted (p = 0.031). Conclusion: Functional respiratory imaging is able to differentiate moderate to severe disease versus limited disease and to detect disease progression in systemic sclerosis.

Cardiac MRI for Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.

OBJECTIVE. Patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) require cardiac MRI (CMRI) for a variety of reasons. The purpose of this study is to review and evaluate the value and safety of CMRI for patients with in situ CIEDs. CONCLUSION. Late gadolinium enhancement CMRI is the reference standard for assessing myocardial viability in patients with ventricular tachycardia before ablation of arrhythmogenic substrates. The use of late gadolinium enhancement CMRI for patients with CIEDs is safe as long as an imaging protocol is in place and precaution measures are taken.

Impact of the revised haemodynamic definition on the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension in patients with systemic sclerosis.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is one of the leading causes of mortality in systemic sclerosis (SSc). We explored the impact of the updated haemodynamic definition of pulmonary hypertension (PH), as proposed by the 6th World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension. METHODS: In this single-centre retrospective analysis, patients with SSc who had right heart catheterisation (RHC) were included. We compared the prior PH definition to the updated PH definition. The prior definition classified PH as mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) ≥25 mmHg and further divided into pre-capillary PH (PAH and PH due to lung disease and/or hypoxia), post-capillary PH, and combined pre- and post-capillary PH groups. For the updated definition, PH was classified as mPAP >20 mmHg and further divided into the different groups. We validated our findings in the DETECT cohort. RESULTS: Between 2005 and March 2019, 268 RHCs were performed in this single-centre cohort. Using the prior definition, 137 (51%) were diagnosed with PH, with 89 classified as pre-capillary PH (56 with PAH and 33 with PH due to lung disease and/or hypoxia), 29 as post-capillary PH, and 19 as combined pre- and post-capillary PH. When the updated definition was applied to the cohort, seven out of 131 (5%) with no PH were reclassified to pre-capillary PH (PAH (n=1), PH due to lung disease (n=3) and post-capillary PH (n=3)). In those with mPAP 21-24 mmHg, with no left heart or significant lung disease, one out of 28 (4%) in our cohort and four out of 36 (11%) in the DETECT cohort were reclassified as PAH. CONCLUSION: The updated PH definition does not appear to have a significant impact on the diagnosis of PH in two different screening cohorts.

Significant incidental cardiac disease on thoracic CT: what the general radiologist needs to know.

OBJECTIVE: Incidental cardiac findings are often found on chest CT studies, some of which may be clinically significant. The objective of this pictorial review is to illustrate and describe the appearances and management of the most frequently encountered significant cardiac findings on non-electrocardiographically gated thoracic CT. Most radiologists will interpret multidetector chest CT and should be aware of the imaging appearances, significance, and the appropriate next management steps, when incidental significant cardiac disease is encountered on thoracic CT. CONCLUSION: This article reviews significant incidental cardiac findings which may be encountered on chest CT studies. After completing this review, the reader should not only be familiar with recognizing clinically significant cardiac findings seen on thoracic CT examinations but also have the confidence to direct their further management.

Best practices for MRI systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

As defined by the Cochrane Collaboration, a systematic review is a review of evidence with a clearly formulated question that uses systematic and explicit methods to identify, select, and critically appraise relevant primary research, and to extract and analyze data from the studies that are included in the review. Meta-analysis is a statistical method to combine the results from primary studies that accounts for sample size and variability to provide a summary measure of the studied outcome. Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy present unique methodological and reporting challenges not present in systematic reviews of interventions. This review provides guidance and further resources highlighting current best practices in methodology and reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy, with a specific focus on challenges and opportunities for MRI imaging. Level of Evidence: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018.

Building Imaging Institutes of Patient Care Outcomes: Imaging as a Nidus for Innovation in Clinical Care, Research, and Education.

Traditionally, radiologists have been responsible for the protocol of imaging studies, imaging acquisition, supervision of imaging technologists, and interpretation and reporting of imaging findings. In this article, we outline how radiology needs to change and adapt to a role of providing value-based, integrated health-care delivery. We believe that the way to best serve our specialty and our patients is to undertake a fundamental paradigm shift in how we practice. We describe the need for imaging institutes centered on disease entities (eg, lung cancer, multiple sclerosis) to not only optimize clinical care and patient outcomes, but also spur the development of a new educational focus, which will increase opportunities for medical trainees and other health professionals. These institutes will also serve as unique environments for testing and implementing new technologies and for generating new ideas for research and health-care delivery. We propose that the imaging institutes focus on how imaging practices-including new innovations-improve patient care outcomes within a specific disease framework. These institutes will allow our specialty to lead patient care, provide the necessary infrastructure for state-of-the art-education of trainees, and stimulate innovative and clinically relevant research.

Interrater Agreement and Diagnostic Accuracy of a Novel Computer-Aided Detection Process for the Detection and Prevention of Retained Surgical Instruments.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a process incorporating computer-aided detection (CAD) for the detection and prevention of retained surgical instruments using a novel nondeformable radiopaque µTag. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A high-specificity CAD system was developed iteratively from a training set (n = 540 radiographs) and a validation set (n = 560 radiographs). A novel test set composed of 700 thoracoabdominal radiographs (410 with a randomly placed µTag and 290 without a µTag) was obtained from 10 cadavers embedded with confounding iatrogenic objects. Data were analyzed first by the blinded CAD system; radiographs coded as negative (n = 373) were then independently reviewed by five blinded radiologists. The reference standard was the presence of a µTag. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Interrater agreement was assessed with Cohen kappa values. Mean (± SD) image analysis times were calculated. RESULTS: The high-specificity CAD system had one false-positive (sensitivity, 79.5% [326/410]; specificity, 99.7% [289/290]). A combination of the CAD system and one failsafe radiologist had superior sensitivity (98.5% [404/410] to 100% [410/410]) and specificity (99.0% [287/290] to 99.7% [289/290]), with 327 (47%) radiographs not requiring immediate radiologist review. Interrater agreement was almost perfect for all radiologist pairwise comparisons (κ = 0.921-0.992). Cumulative mean image analysis time was less than one minute (CAD, 29 ± 2 seconds; radiologists, 26 ± 16 seconds). CONCLUSION: The combination of a high-specificity CAD system with a failsafe radiologist had excellent diagnostic accuracy in the rapid detection of a nondeformable radiopaque µTag.

How to Perform a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Imaging Studies.

A systematic review is a comprehensive search, critical evaluation, and synthesis of all the relevant studies on a specific (clinical) topic that can be applied to the evaluation of diagnostic and screening imaging studies. It can be a qualitative or a quantitative (meta-analysis) review of available literature. A meta-analysis uses statistical methods to combine and summarize the results of several studies. In this review, a 12-step approach to performing a systematic review (and meta-analysis) is outlined under the four domains: (1) Problem Formulation and Data Acquisition, (2) Quality Appraisal of Eligible Studies, (3) Statistical Analysis of Quantitative Data, and (4) Clinical Interpretation of the Evidence. This review is specifically geared toward the performance of a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (imaging) studies.

A Clinically Meaningful Interpretation of the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED) II and III Data.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to calculate the multiple-level likelihood ratios (LRs) and posttest probabilities for a positive, indeterminate, or negative test result for multidetector computed tomography pulmonary angiography (MDCTPA) ± computed tomography venography (CTV) and magnetic resonance pulmonary angiography (MRPA) ± magnetic resonance venography (MRV) for each clinical probability level (two-, three-, and four-level) for the nine most commonly used clinical prediction rules (CPRs) (Wells, Geneva, Miniati, and Charlotte). The study design is a review of observational studies with critical review of multiple cohort studies. The settings are acute care, emergency room care, and ambulatory care (inpatients and outpatients). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were used to estimate pulmonary embolism (PE) pretest probability for each of the most commonly used CPRs at each probability level. Multiple-level LRs (positive, indeterminate, negative test) were generated and used to calculate posttest probabilities for MDCTPA, MDCTPA + CTV, MRPA, and MRPA + MRV from sensitivity and specificity results from Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED) II and PIOPED III for each clinical probability level for each CPR. Nomograms were also created. RESULTS: The LRs for a positive test result were higher for MRPA compared to MDCTPA without venography (76 vs 20) and with venography (42 vs 18). LRs for a negative test result were lower for MDCTPA compared to MRPA without venography (0.18 vs 0.22) and with venography (0.12 vs 0.15). In the three-level Wells score, the pretest clinical probability of PE for a low, moderate, and high clinical probability score is 5.7, 23, and 49. The posttest probability for an initially low clinical probability PE for a positive, indeterminate, and negative test result, respectively, for MDCTPA is 54, 5 and 1; for MDCTPA + CTV is 52, 2, and 0.7; for MRPA is 82, 6, and 1; and for MRPA + MRV is 72, 3, and 1; for an initially moderate clinical probability PE for MDCTPA is 86, 22, and 5; for MDCTPA + CTV is 85, 10, and 4; for MRPA is 96, 25, and 6; and for MRPA + MRV is 93, 14, and 4; and for an initially high clinical probability of PE for MDCTPA is 95, 47, and 15; for MDCTPA + CTV is 95, 27, and 10; for MRPA is 99, 52, and 17; and for MRPA + MRV is 98, 34, and 13. CONCLUSIONS: For a positive test result, LRs were considerably higher for MRPA compared to MDCTPA. However, both a positive MRPA and MDCTPA have LRs >10 and therefore can confirm the presence of PE. Performing venography reduced the LR for a positive and negative test for both MDCTPA and MRPA. The nomograms give posttest probabilities for a positive, indeterminate, or negative test result for MDCTPA and MRPA (with and without venography) for each clinical probability level for each of the CPR.

2016 SCCT/STR guidelines for coronary artery calcium scoring of noncontrast noncardiac chest CT scans: A report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and Society of Thoracic Radiology.

The Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT) and the Society of Thoracic Radiology (STR) have jointly produced this document. Experts in this subject have been selected from both organizations to examine subject-specific data and write this guideline in partnership. A formal literature review, weighing the strength of evidence has been performed. When available, information from studies on cost was considered. Computed tomography (CT) acquisition, CAC scoring methodologies and clinical outcomes are the primary basis for the recommendations in this guideline. This guideline is intended to assist healthcare providers in clinical decision making. The recommendations reflect a consensus after a thorough review of the best available current scientific evidence and practice patterns of experts in the field and are intended to improve patient care while acknowledging that situations arise where additional information may be needed to better inform patient care.

A Clinically Meaningful Interpretation of the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED) Scintigraphic Data.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Diagnostic test characteristics reported in terms of sensitivity and specificity are difficult to translate at the clinical level. More relevant measures are likelihood ratios (LRs), which can convert a pretest into a posttest probability. The aim of our study was to calculate the LRs and posttest probabilities for multiple-level test result for ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) lung scintigraphy and for perfusion scintigraphy combined with chest radiography using modified Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED) II and the Prospective Investigative Study of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PISAPED) criteria for each clinical probability level for the most commonly used clinical prediction rules (CPR) using the PIOPED data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PE pretest probability was estimated for the most commonly used CPRs (Wells, Geneva, Miniati, and Charlotte) at each clinical probability level (two-, three-, and four-level). Multiple-level LRs (high, indeterminate, low, very low probability, and normal) and the positive, indeterminate, and negative results for V/Q scintigraphy, and the positive, indeterminate, and negative results for perfusion scintigraphy were generated and used to calculate posttest probabilities based on the sensitivity and specificity data from PIOPED for each clinical probability level (low, intermediate, and high) for each CPR. Nomograms were also created. RESULTS: The LRs for a positive V/Q and perfusion scintigraphy test using modified PIOPED II and PISAPED criteria were 20.6, 11, and 23.7, and for a negative test result were 0.15, 0.16, and 0.2, respectively. In the three-level Wells score, the posttest probability for an initial low clinical probability PE for a positive, indeterminate, and negative test result, respectively, for V/Q scintigraphy is 56, 5, and 0.9; for perfusion scintigraphy with modified PIOPED 40, 7, and 0.9, and with PISAPED 59, not available (N/A), and 1.2; for an initial moderate clinical probability PE for V/Q scintigraphy 86, .22, and 4; for perfusion scintigraphy with modified PIOPED 77, 26, and 5, and with PISAPED 88, N/A, and 6; for an initial high clinical probability of PE for V/Q scintigraphy 95, 48, and 13; and for perfusion scintigraphy with modified PIOPED 92, 53, and 13, and with PISAPED 96, N/A, and 16. CONCLUSIONS: With LRs >10, a positive test result for V/Q and perfusion scintigraphy can confirm the presence of PE. Only a normal test result has low enough LR to exclude PE.

2016 SCCT/STR guidelines for coronary artery calcium scoring of noncontrast noncardiac chest CT scans: A report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and Society of Thoracic Radiology.

The Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT) and the Society of Thoracic Radiology (STR) have jointly produced this document. Experts in this subject have been selected from both organizations to examine subject-specific data and write this guideline in partnership. A formal literature review, weighing the strength of evidence has been performed. When available, information from studies on cost was considered. Computed tomography (CT) acquisition, CAC scoring methodologies and clinical outcomes are the primary basis for the recommendations in this guideline. This guideline is intended to assist healthcare providers in clinical decision making. The recommendations reflect a consensus after a thorough review of the best available current scientific evidence and practice patterns of experts in the field and are intended to improve patient care while acknowledging that situations arise where additional information may be needed to better inform patient care.