Treatment Outcomes of Low-grade Lymphoma of the Orbit.

AIMS: Radiation therapy can be used with curative intent in patients with low-grade orbital non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) stages IE and IVE (limited to the bilateral orbits). This study evaluated local control and survival outcomes of patients with unilateral or bilateral orbital lymphoma treated in a provincial population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study subjects were 176 patients with low-grade orbital or conjunctival lymphoma referred for management from 1980 to 2016. Demographic, tumour and treatment characteristics were abstracted by chart review. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival were assessed with competing risks analysis and Gray's test. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 8.5 years (range 0.4-29.5 years). The median age at diagnosis was 65 years (range 20-97 years). The most common histological subtype was mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) (73%). Stage IVE accounted for 20.5% of the cohort. Orbital radiation therapy was used in 122 patients with stage IE (87%) and 12 patients with stage IVE (28%). The median dose was 25 Gy (range 2-35 Gy). Other treatments were antibiotics (seven patients), chemotherapy (10 patients), radioimmunotherapy (six patients), surgery (three patients) and observation (16 patients). Within the group treated with orbital external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) there were no local recurrences. Among those with stage IE NHL, EBRT was associated with improved local RFS (P ≤ 0.001) but did not have an impact on contralateral or distant RFS. In patients with stage IVE NHL limited to the bilateral orbit, bilateral EBRT was associated with improved RFS (P = 0.012) but did not affect distant recurrences or overall survival. CONCLUSION: There were no local recurrences after EBRT for stage IE and IVE orbital low-grade NHL. The treatments offered over the study period varied, but only EBRT for stage IVE disease improved RFS. This supports EBRT as the preferred primary treatment for patients with localised orbital low-grade lymphoma, including those with bilateral disease.

Survival Outcomes Following Discontinuation of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab for Advanced Melanoma in a Population-based Cohort.

AIMS: Induction ipilimumab and nivolumab followed by maintenance nivolumab improve overall survival compared with ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma, but immune-related adverse events (irAE) occur commonly. The need for induction discontinuation because of irAE and the relationship between irAE and survival in non-trials patients are unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with unresectable stage III-IV melanoma receiving first-line combination immunotherapy at one of six centres between December 2017 and February 2020 outside of trials were identified retrospectively. Landmark 12-week Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank tests were used to evaluate associations between discontinuation of induction therapy on overall survival and time to treatment failure (TTF). Multivariable analysis of factors influencing overall survival and TTF was undertaken. RESULTS: Among 95 patients, the median age was 62 years, 38.9% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥1 and 22.1% had brain metastases. The median follow-up for the whole cohort was 19.8 months by the reverse Kaplan-Meier method. Any grade and grade 3-4 irAE were noted in 78.9% and 44.2% of the cohort, respectively. 44.2% of patients completed induction immunotherapy, whereas 41.1% did not due to irAE. Twelve-week landmark overall survival and TTF were similar in patients who completed induction versus those who did not due to irAE. On multivariable analysis, any grade irAE (versus none) was associated with longer overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.15-0.82, P = 0.02) and TTF (hazard ratio = 0.38, 95% confidence interval = 0.17-0.81, P = 0.01). Grade 3-4 irAE correlated with longer TTF (hazard ratio = 0.45, 95% confidence interval = 0.20-1.01, P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: In this population-based cohort, discontinuation of induction immunotherapy as a result of irAE did not adversely affect overall survival or TTF. irAE observed during ipilimumab and nivolumab induction were associated with improved survival outcomes.

Individualized prescribing portraits to reduce inappropriate initiation of opioid analgesics to opioid naïve patients in primary care: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Background Opioid analgesics are frequently initiated for chronic and acute pain despite weak evidence of benefit, although prescribing rates of some analgesics decreased in the context of the epidemic. In some populations, up to a quarter of opioid naïve persons prescribed opioids for non-cancer pain develop prescription opioid use disorder (OUD). Audit and feedback interventions rely on constructive use of routinely collected data to align professional behaviours and clinical practice with best evidence. These interventions have been shown to help reduce inappropriate initiation. However, effectiveness and acceptability of individualized "portraits" of physicians' prescribing patterns, to reduce inappropriate initiation of opioid analgesics to opioid naïve persons, have not been evaluated. Methods REDONNA is a mixed-methods randomized study testing the effectiveness of individualized prescribing Portraits to reduce inappropriate initiation of opioid analgesics. This intervention to improve safety of opioid prescribing in primary care in British Columbia (BC), Canada involves mailing individual prescribing portraits to an 'early group' of 2604 family physicians, followed in 6 months by a mailing to 2553 family physicians in the 'delayed group'. Primary outcome is number of new opioid prescriptions initiated in opioid naïve people, measured using administrative data from a centralized medication monitoring database covering all prescription opioids dispensed from BC community pharmacies. Secondary endpoints will compare prescribing impact between the two groups. A qualitative sub-study will examine feasibility among a purposive sample of physicians and patients. Discussion This trial provides important evidence on the intervention's potential to steer policy and practice on inappropriate opioid analgesics initiation. Trial registration: The study was registered prospectively on 30 March 2020 at the ISRCTN Register (https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN34246811).

Treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer after progression on nivolumab or pembrolizumab.

Background: Although PD-1 antibodies (PD1 Ab) are the standard of care for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (ansclc), most patients will progress. We compared survival outcomes for patients with ansclc who received systemic therapy (st) after progression and for those who did not. Additionally, clinical characteristics that predicted receipt of st after PD1 Ab failure were evaluated. Methods: All patients with ansclc in British Columbia initiated on nivolumab or pembrolizumab between June 2015 and November 2017, with subsequent progression, were identified. Eligibility criteria for additional st included an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ecog) performance status (ps) of 3 or less and survival for more than 30 days from the last PD1 Ab treatment. Post-progression survival (pps) was assessed by landmark analysis. Baseline characteristics associated with pps were identified by multivariable analysis. Results: Of 94 patients meeting the eligibility criteria, 33 received st after progression. In 75.6%, a PD1 Ab was received as first- or second-line treatment. The most common sts were erlotinib (36.4%) and docetaxel (27.3%). No statistically significant difference in median pps was observed between patients who did and did not receive st within 30 days of their last PD1 Ab treatment (6.9 months vs. 3.6 months, log-rank p = 0.15.) In multivariable analysis, factors associated with increased pps included an ecog ps of 0 or 1 compared with 2 or 3 [hazard ratio (hr): 0.42; 95% confidence interval (ci): 0.24 to 0.73; p = 0.002] and any response compared with no response to PD1 Ab (hr: 0.54; 95% ci: 0.33 to 0.90; p = 0.02). Conclusions: In this cohort, only 35.1% of patients eligible for post-PD1 Ab therapy received st. Post-progression survival was not significantly affected by receipt of post-progression therapy. Prospective trials are needed to clarify the benefit of post-PD1 Ab treatments.

Differential Proteomics for Distinguishing Ischemic Stroke from Controls: a Pilot Study of the SpecTRA Project.

A diagnostic blood test for stroke is desirable but will likely require multiple proteins rather than a single "troponin." Validating large protein panels requires large patient numbers. Mass spectrometry (MS) is a cost-effective tool for this task. We compared differences in the abundance of 147 protein markers to distinguish 20 acute cerebrovascular syndrome (ACVS) patients who presented to the Emergency Department of one urban hospital within < 24 h from onset) and from 20 control patients who were enrolled via an outpatient neurology clinic. We targeted proteins from the stroke literature plus cardiovascular markers previously studied in our lab. One hundred forty-one proteins were quantified using MS, 8 were quantified using antibody protein enrichment with MS, and 32 were measured using ELISA, with some proteins measured by multiple techniques. Thirty proteins (4 by ELISA and 26 by the MS techniques) were differentially abundant between mimic and stroke after adjusting for age in robust regression analyses (FDR < 0.20). A logistic regression model using the first two principal components of the proteins significantly improved discrimination between strokes and controls compared to a model based on age alone (p < 0.001, cross-validated AUC 0.93 vs. 0.78). Significant proteins included markers of inflammation (47%), coagulation (40%), atrial fibrillation (7%), neurovascular unit injury (3%), and other (3%). These results suggest the potential value of plasma proteins as biomarkers for ACVS diagnosis and the role of plasma-based MS in this area.