A fluorescein angiography-based computer-aided algorithm for assessing the retinal vasculature in diabetic retinopathy.

OBJECTIVE: To present a fluorescein angiography (FA)‒based computer algorithm for quantifying retinal blood flow, perfusion, and permeability, in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR). Secondary objectives were to quantitatively assess treatment efficacy following panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) and define thresholds for pathology based on a new retinovascular function (RVF) score for quantifying disease severity. METHODS: FA images of 65 subjects (58 patients and 7 healthy volunteers) were included. Dye intensity kinetics were derived using pixel-wise linear regression as a measure of retinal blood flow, perfusion, and permeability. Maps corresponding to each measure were then generated for each subject and segmented further using an ETDRS grid. Non-parametric statistical analyses were performed between all ETDRS subfields. For 16 patients, the effect of PRP was measured using the same parameters, and an amalgam of RVF was used to create an RVF index. For ten post-treatment patients, the change in FA-derived data was compared to the macular thickness measured using optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: Compared to healthy controls, patients had significantly lower retinal and regional perfusion and flow, as well as higher retinal permeability (p < 0.05). Moreover, retinal flow was inversely correlated with permeability (R = -0.41; p < 0.0001). PRP significantly reduced retinal permeability (p < 0.05). The earliest marker of DR was reduced retinal blood flow, followed by increased permeability. FA-based RVF index was a more sensitive indicator of treatment efficacy than macular thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Our algorithm can be used to quantify retinovascular function, providing an earlier diagnosis and an objective characterisation of disease state, disease progression, and response to treatment.

Imaging Biomarkers and Their Impact on Therapeutic Decision-Making in the Management of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

These recommendations, produced by a group of Canadian retina experts, have been developed to assist both retina specialists and general ophthalmologists in the management of vision-threatening neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). The recommendations are based on published evidence as well as collective experience and expertise in routine clinical practice. We provide an update on practice principles for optimal patient care, focusing on identified imaging biomarkers, in particular retinal fluid, as well as current and emerging therapeutic approaches. Algorithms for delivering high-quality care and improving long-term patient outcomes are provided, with an emphasis on timely and appropriate treatment to preserve and maintain vision. In the context of nAMD, increasing macular fluid or leakage on fluorescein angiography (FA) may indicate disease activity regardless of its location. Early elimination of intraretinal fluid (IRF) is of particular relevance as it is a prognostic indicator of worse visual outcomes. Robust referral pathways for second opinion and peer-to-peer consultations must be in place for cases not responding to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy.

Response of Pediatric Choroidal Neovascularization to Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor.

Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) is a rare condition in children but poses a substantial threat to vision. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is commonly used in the pediatric population to treat retinopathy of prematurity. However, the use of anti-VEGF is less common for childhood CNV due to the rarity of CNV in the pediatric population. We report the case of a 10-year-old male presenting with an idiopathic choroidal neovascular membrane. Following a relapse of subretinal fluid after photodynamic therapy, anti-VEGF (bevacizumab) was injected and resulted in remission of the neovascular membrane and improved visual outcome. Further studies are required to elucidate the long-term outcomes associated with the use of anti-VEGF in pediatric patients.

Identifying gaps in patient access to diabetic screening eye examinations in Ontario: a provincially representative cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: Diabetes is the leading cause of acquired blindness in Canadians under the age of 50 years, and diabetic retinopathy affects an estimated 500 000 Canadians. Early identification of retinopathy with screening eye examinations allows for secondary prevention. To understand the need for resource allotment in diabetic screening, we undertook a cross-sectional study of key demographics and geographics of screened and unscreened patients in Ontario. METHODS: Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) records were derived from physician and optometry billing, matched with patients aged >19 years with prevalent diabetes between 2011 and 2013. Data were cross-correlated with demographic covariates, including age, sex, income quintile, immigrant status, as well as geographic covariates such as rurality and patient Local Health Integration Network (LHIN). RESULTS: Of almost 1 146 000 patients included in the analysis, approximately 406 000 were unscreened. Of note, this included 234 000 adults aged 40-64 years. Approximately 818 000 patients with diabetes lived in large cities, and 301 000 (37%) were unscreened. When the City of Toronto was analyzed as an urban area with the highest density of unscreened prevalence, autocorrelation between the percentage of eye examinations among patients with diabetes aged >40 years and low-income revealed that large areas of Toronto Central correlated for low examination rates and low income. The majority (13/22) of Community Health Centres are present in these areas. CONCLUSIONS: Large cross-sectional population statistics for diabetes prevalence and ophthalmic examinations provides a geographic and socioeconomic profile for populations of middle-aged adults in large urban areas at risk for developing diabetic retinopathy and who might benefit from interventions to improve the rates of screening eye examinations.

Effects of intravitreal bevacizumab in Gram-positive and Gram-negative models of ocular inflammation.

BACKGROUND: Exogenous endophthalmitis is a potential complication of intraocular surgery and frequently results in visual impairment. Current treatment involves administration of intravitreal (IVT) antibiotics with or without vitrectomy surgery. Evidence for the use of adjunctive anti-inflammatory agents is conflicting. We set out to determine if bevacizumab, a humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody targeted against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), has anti-inflammatory properties in experimental models of Gram-positive and Gram-negative inflammation. METHODS: BALB/c mice were subjected to lipopolysaccharide- (LPS) or peptidoglycan- (PGN) induced ocular inflammation and treated with IVT bevacizumab. Iris microvasculature was imaged 6 hours following irritant/treatment using intravital microscopy (IVM) before the mice were euthanized and the eyes were enucleated immediately post-mortem. Following enucleation, levels of VEGF and 23 cytokines and chemokines (IL-1α, IL-1ß, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12 (p40), IL-12 (p70), IL-13, IL-17, TNF, KC, G-CSF, GM-CSF, Eotaxin, INF-γ, MCP-1, MIP-1α, MIP-1ß, RANTES) were quantified using a multiplex assay. RESULTS: Levels of VEGF were significantly increased during the inflammatory response, triggered by either PGN or LPS. Both the adherence of leukocytes to the iris vascular endothelium and the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines were significantly increased following administration of either irritant. Treatment with bevacizumab decreased levels of leukocyte adherence in LPS-treated eyes, however, not in PGN-treated eyes. Conversely, bevacizumab treatment decreased levels of cytokines and chemokines (TNF, IL-6, MCP-1, MIP-1α, MIP-1ß, RANTES, KC) in PGN-treated eyes, however, not in LPS-treated eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Within a 6-hour window bevacizumab had anti-inflammatory actions that were distinct in both Gram-positive (PIU) and Gram-negative (EIU) models, respectively. Given our findings, this would suggest that bevacizumab may have utility as an adjunctive therapy to IVT antibiotics and vitrectomy in the management of exogenous endophthalmitis.

Predictors of visual outcomes in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy: post hoc analysis of the VIEW studies.

PURPOSE: Identify predictors for response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy in patients with neovascular (wet) age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). METHODS: Retrospective, post hoc analysis of VIEW 1/2. Patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 to 0.5 mg intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) injection every 4 weeks (0.5q4); 2 mg IVT-AFL every 4 weeks (2q4); 2 mg IVT-AFL every 8 weeks (2q8) after an initial three injections at weeks 0, 4 and 8 or 0.5 mg intravitreal ranibizumab every 4 weeks (0.5q4). RESULTS: 1815 patients [IVT-AFL 2q4 (n = 613); IVT-AFL 2q8 (n = 607); ranibizumab 0.5q4 (n = 595)] were included. Baseline demographics/characteristics were evenly balanced. Younger age (49-69 years), lower visual acuity (VA) [10.0-≤45.0 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters] and smaller choroidal neovascularization (CNV) size [0.0-≤3.1 disc areas (DA)] at baseline were associated with the most vision gain (≥15 letters) over 52 weeks (all nominal p < 0.0001).Younger age, higher baseline VA (>64.0-≤83.0 letters) and smaller CNV size were associated with a VA ≥20/40 at week 52. Predominantly classic CNV at baseline (nominal p = 0.0007), older age (≥90 years), lower baseline VA (10.0-≤ 45.0 ETDRS letters) and larger CNV size (>10.1-≤32.6 DA) were all associated with a VA ≤20/200 at week 52 (all nominal p < 0.0001). Along with treatment (nominal p < 0.0001), lower VA (p = 0.0166) and smaller central retinal thickness (both nominal p = 0.0190) were predictors for dry retina development. CONCLUSION: Younger age, lower VA and smaller CNV size at baseline were all associated with greater vision gains over 52 weeks while younger age, higher VA and smaller CNV size at treatment start were more likely to achieve best-corrected VA 20/40 or better after a year's treatment, suggesting the benefit of early anti-VEGF treatment.

Systemic Safety in Ranibizumab-Treated Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Patient-Level Pooled Analysis.

TOPIC: This study evaluated the cardiovascular/cerebrovascular safety profile of ranibizumab 0.5 mg versus sham ± verteporfin in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). In addition, comparisons of ranibizumab 0.3 mg with sham and ranibizumab 0.5 mg to 0.3 mg were performed. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents carry potential increased systemic risks, including cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events. Pooled safety analyses allow better interpretation of safety outcomes seen in individual clinical trials, especially for less common events. To our knowledge, this is the largest patient-level pooled analysis of patients with nAMD treated with ranibizumab. METHODS: Patient-level pooled analysis of data from 7 Genentech- and Novartis-sponsored phase II, III, and IV studies in nAMD that were completed by December 31, 2013. Pairwise comparisons (primary comparison: ranibizumab 0.5 mg [globally approved dose for nAMD] vs. sham or verteporfin) were performed using Cox proportional hazard regression (hazard ratios [HRs], 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) and rates per 100 patient-years. Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities queries (SMQs) and extended searches were used to identify relevant safety endpoints, including arterial thromboembolic events (ATEs), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), stroke (excluding TIA), vascular deaths, and major vascular events as defined by the Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration (APTC). RESULTS: The HRs (95% CIs) for the primary comparison of ranibizumab 0.5 mg (n=480) versus sham or verteporfin (n=462) were 1.16 (0.72-1.88) for ATE, 1.33 (0.59-2.97) for MI, 1.43 (0.54-3.77) for stroke excluding TIA, 1.25 (0.61-2.55) for stroke or TIA, 0.57 (0.18-1.78) for vascular death, and 1.12 (0.64-1.98) for APTC events. Hazard ratio 95% CIs included 1, indicating no significant treatment differences, for all endpoints for comparison of ranibizumab 0.5 mg versus sham or verteporfin. CONCLUSIONS: The rates of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events were low in these patients with nAMD and not clinically meaningfully different for patients treated with ranibizumab 0.5 mg versus sham or verteporfin, which supports the favorable benefit-risk profile of ranibizumab in the patient population with nAMD. Pooling these studies allows an analysis with higher power and precision compared with individual study analyses.

VEGF-A is increased in exogenous endophthalmitis.

OBJECTIVE: Exogenous endophthalmitis is an ophthalmologic emergency defined by panocular inflammation. Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) contributes to inflammation by promoting chemotaxis of monocytes and granulocytes and by increasing vascular permeability. The purpose of this article is to determine if VEGF-A is elevated in the vitreous samples obtained from individuals with exogenous endophthalmitis. METHODS: Vitreous samples from individuals with exogenous endophthalmitis (n = 18) were analyzed via Luminex assay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the cytokines VEGF-A, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-8 (chemokine [CXCL]-8), IL-1ß, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-33, interferon (IFN)-γ, IFN-α, IFN-ß, chemokine ligand (CCL)-3, IL-2, IL-5, IL-15, CXCL-10, CCL-2, IL-1Ra, CCL-5, IL-17, and CCL-11. Vitreous samples obtained at the time of macular hole surgery served as controls (n = 8). RESULTS: Concentrations of VEGF-A were significantly elevated in vitreous samples from individuals with exogenous endophthalmitis compared with macular hole (p < 0.001). VEGF-A was significantly upregulated in individuals with exogenous endophthalmitis after cataract surgery (p = 0.001), vitrectomy (p = 0.024), and intravitreal injection (p = 0.012). VEGF-A concentrations were similar in both culture-positive and culture-negative populations (p > 0.05). In a linear regression model, levels of VEGF-A correlated significantly with the chemokine CXCL-8 (p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that VEGF-A is potently upregulated in exogenous endophthalmitis. This observation provides a foundation for future studies of targeted VEGF-A blockade in the management of endophthalmitis.

Ranibizumab in Diabetic Macular Oedema - A Benefit-risk Analysis of Ranibizumab 0.5 mg PRN Versus Laser Treatment.

INTRODUCTION: The structured Benefit-risk Action Team (BRAT) approach aims to assist healthcare decision makers in treatment assessments. We applied BRAT to compare the benefit-risk profile of ranibizumab 0.5 mg versus laser photocoagulation for the treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DMO). METHODS: One-year data for the ranibizumab 0.5 mg pro re nata (PRN) and laser arms of the phase III trials RESPOND (NCT01135914; n=220), RESTORE (NCT00687804; n=345), and REVEAL (NCT00989989; n=396) were included in the analysis. The benefit measures included ≥10 letters gain/avoidance of loss in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), achieving central retinal thickness (CRT) <275 µm, and 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25) outcomes. The risks measures included endophthalmitis, intraocular pressure increase, hypertension, proteinuria, arterial/venous thromboembolic events and deaths. RESULTS: Ranibizumab treatment provided significant benefits compared with laser for ≥10 letter BCVA gain at month 12 (387/1,000 versus 152/1,000 patients), CRT <275 µm at 12 months (474/1,000 versus 348/1,000 patients), and improvement of ≥6.06 on the VFQ-25 near activities subscale (325/1,000 versus 245/1,000 patients). Results for the risk measures were similar for both treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Superior clinically relevant outcomes were observed with ranibizumab 0.5 mg PRN compared with laser without compromising on safety. This analysis further supports the positive benefit-risk profile of ranibizumab 0.5 mg PRN.

Efficacy/safety of ranibizumab monotherapy or with laser versus laser monotherapy in DME.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injection, as monotherapy or in combination with laser, with laser monotherapy in patients with visual impairment caused by diabetic macular edema. DESIGN: Twelve-month, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomized, active-control study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 220 (ranibizumab monotherapy: n = 75, ranibizumab + laser: n = 73, laser monotherapy: n = 72) patients with a diagnosis of type I or II diabetes and visual impairment caused by macular edema were included in the efficacy analysis. METHODS: Ranibizumab was initiated with a fixed loading phase of 3 monthly injections followed by as needed therapy until stable vision achievement. Efficacy end points were the change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), change in central retinal thickness (CRT) measured by optical coherence tomography, proportion achieving a 15-letter BCVA gain, and 12-month Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25) score. Safety was assessed with the incidence and severity of adverse events. RESULTS: At 12 months, significant (p < 0.001) mean BCVA improvements were observed for both the ranibizumab monotherapy (+8.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.0-10.7] letters) and the ranibizumab + laser (+8.2 [95% CI 6.0-10.4] letters) groups compared with the laser monotherapy group (+0.3 [95% CI -2.9 to 3.5] letters). Similarly, a better response in terms of CRT improvement, BCVA letter gain, and VFQ-25 was observed in both ranibizumab groups compared with laser monotherapy. The safety profile was comparable in the 2 ranibizumab groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ranibizumab as monotherapy or combined with laser resulted in significantly higher improvements in visual acuity and vision-related quality of life at month 12 as compared with laser monotherapy.

Optimal Treatment of Retinal Vein Occlusion: Canadian Expert Consensus.

BACKGROUND: The availability of new therapeutic approaches, particularly intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapies, has prompted significant changes to the established treatment paradigms for retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Better visual outcomes and significantly lower rates of adverse events have been noted in multiple large randomized clinical trials and have led to a new standard of care for this sight-threatening condition. OBJECTIVE: To develop an expert consensus for the management of RVO and associated complications in the context of recent clinical evidence. METHODS: The development of a Canadian expert consensus for optimal treatment began with a review of clinical evidence, daily practice, and existing treatment guidelines and algorithms. The expert clinicians (11 Canadian retina specialists) met on February 1, 2014, in Toronto to discuss their findings and to propose strategies for consensus. RESULTS: The result of this expert panel is a consensus proposal for Canadian ophthalmologists and retina specialists treating patients presenting with RVO. Treatment algorithms specific to branch and central RVO (BRVO and CRVO) were also developed. CONCLUSIONS: The consensus provides guidelines to aid clinicians in managing RVO and associated complications in their daily practice. In summary, laser remains the therapy of choice when neovascularization secondary to RVO is detected. Adjunctive anti-VEGF could be considered in managing neovascularization secondary to RVO in cases of vitreous hemorrhage. Intravitreal anti-VEGF should be considered for symptomatic visual loss associated with center-involving macular edema on optical coherence tomography. Patients with BRVO and a suboptimal response to anti-VEGF could be treated with grid laser, and those with CRVO and an inadequate response to anti-VEGF may be candidates for intravitreal steroids.

What percentage of patients presenting for routine eye examinations require referral for secondary care? A study of referrals from optometrists to ophthalmologists.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to investigate the percentage of asymptomatic patients presenting for routine optometric eye examinations that have pathology or pathology-related risk factors warranting referral for ophthalmological consultation. METHODS: This was a retrospective, cohort case study and the inclusion criteria for participants included: (i) the patient presented for routine optometric eye care during a specified period of time; (ii) the patient was found to have pathology (or showed enough risk of pathology) resulting in referral to an ophthalmologist; and (iii) a referral report was received from the consulting ophthalmologist stating the diagnosis and the treatment plan. The data set was further reviewed to indicate presenting symptoms and patient age. Adult patients, ages 20 to 64 years, were reviewed separately; this age group is not covered by provincial health services for routine eye care in Nova Scotia. Files were obtained from two clinics through an electronic charting program. A database was created that included date of referral, clinical reasons for the referral, diagnosis and treatment plan. Clinical reasons for referral were extracted from the referral letters and reports and sorted into six disease categories: age-related macular degeneration, cataract, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, retinopathy and 'other'. RESULTS: The overall referral rate for the combined data set was nine per cent for all ages; 2.4 per cent of the overall patients were asymptomatic. There was a similar number of asymptomatic patients referred in the adult (20 to 64 years) age group compared to all ages (2.5 per cent). CONCLUSION: A significant number of patients that present for routine eye examinations without any symptoms indicative of ocular disease are subsequently found to have a degree of pathology or risk thereof requiring referral for ophthalmological consultation. These referrals occur for adults under 64 years as much as for all patients of all ages.

Contemporary management of diabetic retinopathy in Canada: from guidelines to algorithm guidance.

Recent advances in the therapeutic options and approaches for diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME) have resulted in improved visual outcomes for many patients with diabetes. Yet, they have also created many clinical dilemmas for treating ophthalmologists and retina specialists, including treatment selection, initiation, frequency and duration. With this in mind, a panel of Canadian retina specialists met and discussed the current clinical evidence as well as specific situations and scenarios commonly encountered in daily practice. They also shared their experiences and therapeutic approaches. This document, containing a consensus on treatment algorithms for various clinical scenarios, is the result of their lengthy and in-depth discussions and considerations. The intent is to provide a step-by-step approach to the treatment of DR and DME. Although clinicians are encouraged to use and refer to these algorithms as a guide for various situations, they are not meant to be a replacement for sound clinical judgment.

Cardiac issues of noncardiac drugs: the rising story of avastin in age-related macular degeneration.

Emerging safety data, accompanied with recent demographic trends, point to the need for an in-depth review and consideration of potential consequences that might arise from continuing use of bevacizumab (Avastin®) to treat elderly patients presenting with wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Although it is expected that lower doses of Avastin used for intravitreal administration and an intact blood-retina barrier would reduce the systemic exposure of the drug, both animal and human studies suggest that this may not be the case. In addition, emerging real-world and clinical trial data continue to point toward compromises in both cardio- and cerebrovascular safety with Avastin. Thus, clinicians are urged to adopt the highest possible standard of care in the treatment of an already fragile AMD population. Furthermore, postmarketing surveillance and pharmacovigilance with intravitreal anti-VEGF inhibitors should remain a priority.

Balancing risk in ophthalmic prescribing: assessing the safety of anti-VEGF therapies and the risks associated with unlicensed medicines.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor medications such as ranibizumab, pegaptanib and bevacizumab are in use for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and other retinal conditions, although only ranibizumab and pegaptanib are approved for these conditions. In contrast, bevacizumab was developed for the intravenous systemic treatment of colorectal cancer and is not formulated for intravitreal use, but is commonly used off-label in ophthalmology. European Union legislation permits the use of drugs outside the terms of their licence ('off-label') only under certain circumstances, such as during clinical trials, compassionate/named patient use in the absence of a licensed alternative, emergency scenarios (e.g., pandemics) or at the discretion of a treating physician. In such cases, patients should be fully informed regarding their treatment and any potential risks involved. Off-label drug use can be an important tool to provide patients with treatment in cases of unmet medical need. However, the use of an unlicensed medicinal product, when a suitable licensed alternative is available, puts prescribing physicians at risk of liability if safety issues arise. Emerging clinical evidence suggests safety differences exist between ranibizumab and bevacizumab.

Canadian expert consensus: optimal treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

BACKGROUND: New therapeutic approaches, particularly anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapies, prevent, and in some cases reverse, vision damage caused by age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Unequal access to care across Canada remains a problem for many retina specialists and their patients. OBJECTIVE: To develop a consensus concerning the management of patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Consensus document. PARTICIPANTS: Ten Canadian retina specialists. METHODS: The development of a consensus among Canadian experts concerning optimal treatment of AMD began with a review of the clinical evidence, daily practices, existing guidelines, and current national and international approvals and policies. The experts met on June 29, 2010, in Quebec City to discuss their findings and to propose strategies for consensus. RESULTS: The result of this expert panel is a consensus proposal for Canadian ophthalmologists and retina specialists who are treating patients with or at risk for developing neovascular AMD. CONCLUSIONS: The consensus provides guidelines to aid retina specialists in managing exudative AMD. Currently, ranibizumab is the only agent with sufficient Level I evidence and a Health Canada-approved indication for the treatment of wet AMD. Bevacizumab has been shown to be noninferior in preserving and improving visual acuity when compared to ranibizumab. Potential safety differences between the 2 drugs remain to be elucidated. The positioning of ranibizumab in this therapeutic area will be further defined as additional data for existing and emerging therapies become available. Until then, this agent remains the therapy of choice for individuals with neovascular AMD.