Effect of Cabergoline on weight and glucose metabolism in patients with acromegaly.

PURPOSE: Cabergoline (CAB) has shown to have benefic effects on the metabolism in different clinical settings but its metabolic role in acromegaly disease has not been studied yet. Aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of CAB on glucose metabolism and weight in patients with acromegaly. METHODS: All patients with acromegaly undergoing continuous treatment with CAB for at least 6 months were retrospectively screened. Exclusion criteria were discontinuation of CAB for more than one month, change of antidiabetic or other therapy for acromegaly, concomitant untreated hormonal deficiency, initiation of pregnancy and/or breastfeeding. All patients were evaluated in terms of biochemical disease control, glucose metabolism and weight at baseline (T0) and after the introduction of CAB therapy at 6 (T6) and 12 months (T12). RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (15 females and 11 males) were evaluated at T0 and T6 and 19 patients (12 females and 7 males) were also evaluated at T12. Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and prolactin (PRL) levels were significantly lower at T6 and T12 compared to baseline (p < 0.001 for IGF-I, p < 0.05 for PRL) even if no further differences were observed between T12 and T6. Considering the entire cohort, no differences were appreciated regarding the metabolic parameters but a significant reduction in weight and body mass index (BMI) was observed at both T6 (p = 0.009 for weight, p = 0.021 for BMI) and T12 (p = 0.014 for weight, p = 0.017 for BMI) compared to baseline. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm the efficacy of CAB in providing a significant improvement in the biochemical disease control but do not demonstrate a marked benefit on glucose metabolism of acromegaly patients. In such patients, CAB appears to have a rapid effect on weight and BMI, with significant changes noticeable as early as 6 months and persisting for at least 12 months.

Once upon a time: the glucagon stimulation test in diagnosing adult GH deficiency.

PURPOSE: The clinical features of adult GH deficiency (GHD) are nonspecific, and its diagnosis is established through GH stimulation testing, which is often complex, expensive, time-consuming and may be associated with adverse side effects. Moreover, diagnosing adult GHD can be challenging due to the influence of age, gender, and body mass index on GH peak at each test. The insulin tolerance test (ITT), GHRH + arginine test, glucagon stimulation test (GST), and, more recently, testing with macimorelin are all recognized as useful in diagnosing adult GHD. To date GST is still little used, but due to the unavailability of the GHRH all over the world and the high cost of macimorelin, in the next future it will probably become the most widely used test when ITT is contraindicated. The aim of the present review is to describe the current knowledge on GST. METHODS: Narrative review. RESULTS: In the last years several studies have suggested some changes in the original GST protocol and have questioned its diagnostic accuracy when the classic GH cut-point of 3 µg/L is used, suggesting to use a lower GH cut-point to improve its sensitivity and specificity in overweight/obese patients and in those with lower pretest GHD probability. CONCLUSION: This document provides an update on the utility of GST, summarizes how to perform the test, shows which cut-points should be used in interpreting the results, and discusses its drawbacks and caveats referring to the most recent studies.

Neuroendocrine response to diclofenac in healthy subjects: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: The precise effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the neuroendocrine hydro-electrolytic regulation are not precisely understood. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate, in healthy subjects, the neuroendocrine response of the antidiuretic system to intravenous diclofenac infusion. METHODS: For this single-blinded, cross-over study, we recruited 12 healthy subjects (50% women). Test sessions were divided into three observation times (pre-test; test; 48 h post-test), which were repeated equally on two different occasions, with the administration of diclofenac (75 mg in saline solution 0.9% 100 cc) on 1 day, or placebo (saline solution 0.9% 100 cc) on another day. The night before the test the subjects were asked to collect a salivary cortisol and cortisone sample, which was repeated on the night of the procedure session. Serial urine and blood samples were collected on the test day (for osmolality, electrolytes, ACTH, cortisol, copeptin, MR-proADM, MR-proANP; the last three represent more stable and analytically reliable molecules than their respective active peptides). Moreover, the subjects were evaluated with the bioimpedance vector analysis (BIVA) before and after the test. Forty-eight hours after the end of the procedure urine sodium, urine potassium, urine osmolality, serum sodium and copeptin were revaluated together with BIVA. RESULTS: No significant changes in circulating hormone levels were observed; anyway, 48 h after diclofenac, BIVA showed a significant water retention (p < 0.00001), especially in extracellular fluid (ECF) (16.47 ± 1.65 vs 15.67 ± 1.84, p < 0.001). Salivary cortisol and cortisone tended to increase only the night after placebo administration (p = 0.054 cortisol; p = 0.021 cortisone). CONCLUSION: Diclofenac resulted in an increased ECF at 48 h, but this phenomenon seems to be associated with a greater renal sensibility to the action of vasopressin rather than with an increase in its secretion. Moreover, a partial inhibitory effect on cortisol secretion can be hypothesized.

GHRH + arginine test and body mass index: do we need to review diagnostic criteria for GH deficiency?

INTRODUCTION: The proportion of patients with low GH response to provocative tests increases with the number of other pituitary hormone deficiencies, reason why in panhypopituitary patients GH stimulation tests may be unnecessary to diagnose GH deficiency (GHD) PURPOSE: To re-evaluate the diagnostic cut-offs of GH response to GHRH + arginine (ARG) test related to BMI, considering the patients' pituitary function as the gold standard for the diagnosis of GHD. METHODS: The GH responses to GHRH + ARG were studied in 358 patients with history of hypothalamic-pituitary disease. GHD was defined by the presence of at least 3 other pituitary deficits (n = 223), while a preserved somatotropic function was defined by the lack of other pituitary deficits and an IGF-I SDS ≥ 0 (n = 135). The cut-off with the best sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP), was identified for each BMI category using the ROC curve analysis. To avoid over-diagnosis of GHD we subsequently searched for the cut-offs with a SP ≥ 95%. RESULTS: The best GH cut-off was 8.0 µg/l (SE 95%, SP 100%) in lean, 7.0 µg/l (SE 97.3%, SP 82.8%) in overweight, and 2.8 µg/l (SE 84.3%, SP 91.7%) in obese subjects. The cut-off with a SP ≥ 95% was 2.6 µg/l (SE 68.5%, SP 96.6%) in overweight and 1.75 µg/l (SE 70.0%, SP 97.2%) in obese subjects. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that evaluates the diagnostic cut-offs of GH response to GHRH + ARG related to BMI using a clinical definition of GHD as gold standard. Our results suggest that with this new approach, the GHRH + ARG cut-offs should be revised to avoid GHD over-diagnosis.

Development and internal validation of a predictive score for the diagnosis of central adrenal insufficiency when morning cortisol is in the grey zone.

BACKGROUND: When evaluating a patient for central adrenal insufficiency (CAI), there is a wide range of morning cortisol values for which no definite conclusion on hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function can be drawn; in these cases, a stimulation test is required. Aim of this study was to develop an integrated model for CAI prediction when morning cortisol is in the grey zone, here defined as 40.0-160.0 µg/L. METHODS: Overall, 119 patients with history of sellar tumour which underwent insulin tolerance test (ITT) for the evaluation of HPA axis were enrolled. Supervised regression techniques were used for model development. RESULTS: An integrated predictive model was developed and internally validated, and showed a significantly better diagnostic performance than morning cortisol alone (AUC 0.811 vs 0.699, p = 0.003). A novel predictive score (CAI-score) was retrieved, on a 5.5-point scale, by considering morning cortisol (0 points if 130.1-160.0 µg/L, 1 point if 100.1-130.0 µg/L, 1.5 points if 70.1-100.0 µg/L, 2.5 points if 40.0-70.0 µg/L), other pituitary deficits (2 points if ≥ 3 deficits), and sex (1 point if male). A diagnostic algorithm integrating CAI-score and ITT was finally proposed, with an overall accuracy of 99%, and the possibility to avoid the execution of stimulation tests in 25% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: This was the first study that proposed an integrated score for the prediction of CAI when morning cortisol is in the grey zone. This score might be helpful to reduce the number of patients who need a stimulation test for the assessment of HPA axis function.

Biliary adverse events in acromegaly during somatostatin receptor ligands: predictors of onset and response to ursodeoxycholic acid treatment.

PURPOSE: Somatostatin receptor ligands (SRL) are the first-line medical treatment for acromegaly. Gallbladder alterations are one of most important SRL side effect, but according to some authors growth hormone hypersecretion itself is a risk factor for gallstones. This single center, longitudinal retrospective study evaluated the incidence and the predictors of biliary adverse events (BAE) in acromegaly during SRL therapy and their response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). METHODS: 91 acromegaly patients with indication to SRL were enrolled. Evaluations of acromegaly activity (GH, IGF-I, IGF-I/ULN) and metabolic profile were collected before starting treatment, yearly during follow-up and at BAE onset. In patients developing BAE we searched for predictors of UDCA effectiveness. RESULTS: 61.5% of patients developed BAE (58.9% cholelithiasis; 41.1% only sludge). IGF-I and IGF-I/ULN proved to be positive predictor of BAE, which occur about 5 years after SRL starting. None of metabolic markers proved to be associated with BAE. Only five patients (5.5%) underwent cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis. 71% of patients started UDCA treatment, achieving regression of BAE in 60% of cases (88% in patients developing only sludge and 30% in patients affected by cholelithiasis, p < 0.001). BMI and obesity were negative predictors of UDCA efficacy. In 50% of the subjects BAE resolved after 36 months of therapy with a lower rate if cholelithiasis was present. CONCLUSION: Biliary stone disease is a frequent SRL adverse event, although it is often symptomless. Ultrasound follow-up mainly in the first 5 years of therapy, early UDCA starting and proper lifestyle represent a valid strategy in their detection and management.