Examining potentially inappropriate medication use among elderly individuals in palliative care: A comprehensive study.

This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of polypharmacy, the presence of potentially inappropriate medications and related factors in older adults receiving palliative care. This cross-sectional descriptive study was performed in 213 patients who were served from palliative care services. Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form, Katz Activities of Daily Living Scale and Charlson Comorbidity Index were applied. Polypharmacy was defined as the use of 5 or more medicines while the use of 10 or more medicines was considered as hyper-polypharmacy. PIM was assessed according to the TIME-to START and TIME-to STOP criteria. A total of 213 patients were included, mean age was 78.00 ± 9.08 years. Polypharmacy was present in 59.2 % of the patients and hyper-polypharmacy was present in 10.8 %. There was a statistically significant correlation between polypharmacy and marital status, history of falls, mid-upper arm, and calf circumference (p = 0.017, p = 0.022, p = 0.010, p = 0.003, respectively). The rate of inappropriate medication use of the cardiovascular system, gastrointestinal system, analgesics, musculoskeletal system, and nervous system drugs was high. There was at least one inappropriate medication use in 56.3 % of older adults. PIMs use was 18.3 % according to TIME-to-START criteria and was 48.4 % according to TIME-to-STOP criteria. There was a higher rate of PIMs use according to TIME criteria in the group with polypharmacy than non-polypharmacy (p < 0.001). The prevalence of polypharmacy and the presence of PIMs is high in older adults receiving palliative care. Polypharmacy could increase the PIMs use. The use of TIME criteria to evaluate palliative care patients may be helpful in reducing inappropriate medication use.

Effect of Education on Symptom Management and Control in Cancer Patients Receiving Palliative Care.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the effect of an educational intervention on cancer patients receiving palliative care and their caregivers concerning symptom management and family needs. METHODS: This study involved 120 participants-60 cancer patients and their respective caregivers-divided into intervention and control groups. Over a 2-week period, the intervention group received a comprehensive educational program focusing on symptom management, while the control group did not receive any educational intervention. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) and Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) were used to assess patients' symptoms, their intensity, and performance, while the Family Need Scale (FNS) was utilized to evaluate caregivers' needs. These assessments were conducted at the beginning and end of the study. Primary outcomes focused on symptom assessment using ESAS and PPS, along with evaluating caregivers' needs through FNS. Secondary outcomes involved assessing participant satisfaction with the intervention. RESULTS: At the end of the study, comparing initial and second evaluations, both ESAS and PPS scores significantly increased in the intervention and control groups (p = .003, p = .002, respectively). Additionally, a statistically significant decrease in the severity of symptoms, except for lethargy/hypokinesis, was observed in the intervention group compared to the control group. The FNS scale indicated that family needs satisfaction was higher in the intervention group compared to the control group. The data obtained demonstrated that there was a reduction the pain, fatigue, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, and shortness of breath levels in the intervention group compared to the control group, but there was no significant difference other than these symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The educational intervention positively impacted symptom management and family needs. Optimizing symptom control would greatly benefit palliative care patients and their caregivers.

Care Burden and Life Satisfaction of Caregivers Who are Providing Home Health Care to Patients.

Background: This study aims to evaluate the care burden and life satisfaction in caregivers who are providing home health care to patients and determine the relationship between life satisfaction and care burden. Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive study was performed on 133 caregivers who provided home health care to patients and 133 control groups between February and December 2020. Care burden was evaluated using the Zarit Burden Inventory (ZBI), and life satisfaction was evaluated using the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). Results: The mean age of hundred thirty-three caregivers was 52.5±10.5 years, and that of the control group was 51.2±9.9 years. The mean ZBI score of the caregivers was 47.0±16.4. According to the ZBI score, 46.6% of the caregivers had a moderate care burden and 21.8% had a heavy caregiver burden. The caregiver burden was higher in those with a low education level, those without social insurance, those who felt insufficient in care, and those who did not receive help from other family members. The SWLS score of caregivers was significantly lower than that of control group (p<0.001). The SWLS score was lower in those with a low education level and those without an employee as a caregiver. There was a negative correlation between SWLS and ZBI score (p<0.001). Conclusion: Caregivers of patients receiving home health-care services are exposed to a significant care burden. The care burden was higher in those with a low education level, those without social insurance, those who felt insufficient in care, and those who did not receive help from other family members. The care burden affects the satisfaction of life.

Evaluation of quality of life in caregivers who are providing home care to cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The author aimed to evaluate the quality of life and the factors affecting the caregivers of cancer patients receiving home care. METHODS: This cross-sectional descriptive study was performed in 48 cancer patients who were served from home care unit and 48 caregivers between 01 and 28 February 2014. Patients' functional status was evaluated with Katz Index for Activities of Daily Living and the Lawton Scale for Instrumental Activities of Daily Living. The levels of quality of life of caregivers of patients with cancer were determined with Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer (CQOLC). RESULTS: The mean age of forty-eight patients was 69.79 ± 16.09 years; 62.5% of them were female. The mean duration of home care was 5.99 ± 5.26 years; 25% of patients were fully dependent on the bed. 83.3% of caregivers were female, mean age of caregivers was 50.75 ± 14.89 years, and 77.1% of them were family members. The mean CQOLC score was 74.43 ± 24.45. The highest score was detected in the financial distress and the lowest score was detected in the positive adaptation. The quality of life is increasing as the length of care is reduced and income status increased. CONCLUSION: The quality of life of caregivers is very low. Each characteristic of the caregiver will affect the care he/she gives. From this point of view, it is important to consider the characteristics of caregivers in improving the care given to cancer patients. In this respect, there is a need to support caregivers both materially and spiritually.

Insulin initiation status of primary care physicians in Turkey, barriers to insulin initiation and knowledge levels about insulin therapy: A multicenter cross-sectional study.

AIMS: Our aim was to evaluate the insulin initiation status, barriers to insulin initiation and knowledge levels about treatment administered by primary care physicians (PCP). METHODS: We conducted our study in accordance with a multicenter, cross-sectional design in Turkey, between July 2015 and July 2016. A questionnaire inquiring demographic features, status of insulin initiation, obstacles to insulin initiation and knowledge about therapy of the PCPs was administered during face-to-face interviews. RESULTS: 84 PCPs (19%) (n=446, mean age=41.5±8.4years, 62.9% male and 90.0% ministry certified family physicians) initiated insulin therapy in the past. Most of the stated primary barriers (51.9%, n=230) were due to the physicians. The most relevant barrier was "lack of clinical experience" with a rate of 19% (n=84 of the total). The average total knowledge score was 5.7±2.0 for the family medicine specialist, and 3.8±2.1 for the ministry certified family physicians (p=0.000, maximum knowledge score could be 10). CONCLUSIONS: The status of insulin initiation in Turkey by the primary care physicians is inadequate. Medical education programs and health care systems may require restructuring to facilitate insulin initiation in primary care.

Teaching medical students how to break bad news: a Turkish experience.

BACKGROUND: To assess the effect of teaching breaking bad news. METHODS: The session incorporated brainstorming, presentation, discussion, small-group exercises using standardized patients. Course was evaluated through a pre-objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), first post-OSCE (post-OSCE1), second post-OSCE (post-OSCE2) (6th month), and questionnaires. RESULTS: Pre-OSCE, post-OSCE1, post-OSCE2 scores: preparing the environment 5.83 +/- 0.23, 7.93 +/- 0.19, 9.78 +/- 0.07; understanding what patient knows and wants to learn 1.83 +/- 0.33, 6.47 +/- 0.27, 9.68 +/- 0.11; giving information 3.25 +/- 0.34, 7.43 +/- 0.19, 9.67 +/- 0.10; developing empathy 2.50 +/- 0.32, 6.92 +/- 0.28, 9.87 +/- 0.06; closing the interview 2.28 +/- 0.28, 6.98 +/- 0.25, 9.83 +/- 0.07. The differences between OSCEs were significant. In the questionnaire, 54.1% of 146 students perceived more competent. CONCLUSIONS: Course seems beneficial.

Factors affecting choice of specialty among first-year medical students of four universities in different regions of Turkey.

AIM: To determine the factors affecting medical students' choice of the specialty of family medicine. METHODS: The study was conducted in the period from 2004-2006 and comprised 770 first-year medical students from Ondokuz Mayis, Karadeniz Technical, Kocaeli, and Adnan Menderes Universities, Turkey. The questionnaire included questions on demographic data and 6 "yes/no" or open-ended questions on students' career aspirations and the specialty of family medicine. RESULTS: The response rate was 93.1% (n=717, 54.7% male). Nearly all students (n=714, 99.6%) showed an intention to specialize after receiving the medical doctor degree. A total of 187 students (26.2%) showed an intention to work in primary care without specialization "for a temporary period" to "gain some experience." Family medicine was the least preferred specialty (n=7, 0.9%). The most important reasons for the choice of specialty were "better financial opportunities" and "prestige" (n=219, 30.5%), followed by "personal development" (n=149, 20.8%), "more benefits for the patient" (n=128, 17.9%), and "wish to work in an urban area" (n=32, 4.5%). The most preferred specialties were cardiology (n=179, 25.0%), pediatrics (n=121, 16.9%), ophthalmology (n=47, 6.6%), physical therapy and rehabilitation (n=34, 4.7%), and obstetrics and gynecology (n=32, 4.5%). CONCLUSION: Prestige, money, and personal development are important factors in career decision-making among medical students in Turkey. This should be taken into consideration when conducting reforms at the primary level.