Efficacy and safety of SBRT for spine metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis for preparation of an ESTRO practice guideline.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Advances in characterizing cancer biology and the growing availability of novel targeted agents and immune therapeutics have significantly changed the prognosis of many patients with metastatic disease. Palliative radiotherapy needs to adapt to these developments. In this study, we summarize the available evidence for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the treatment of spinal metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using PRISMA methodology, including publications from January 2005 to September 2021, with the exception of the randomized phase III trial RTOG-0631 which was added in April 2023. Re-irradiation was excluded. For meta-analysis, a random-effects model was used to pool the data. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I2-test, assuming substantial and considerable as I2 > 50 % and I2 > 75 %, respectively. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 69 studies assessing the outcomes of 7236 metastases in 5736 patients were analyzed. SBRT for spine metastases showed high efficacy, with a pooled overall pain response rate of 83 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 68 %-94 %), pooled complete pain response of 36 % (95 % CI: 20 %-53 %), and 1-year local control rate of 94 % (95 % CI: 86 %-99 %), although with high levels of heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 93 %, I2 = 86 %, and 86 %, respectively). Furthermore, SBRT was safe, with a pooled vertebral fracture rate of 9 % (95 % CI: 4 %-16 %), pooled radiation induced myelopathy rate of 0 % (95 % CI 0-2 %), and pooled pain flare rate of 6 % (95 % CI: 3 %-17 %), although with mixed levels of heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 92 %, I2 = 0 %, and 95 %, respectively). Only 1.7 % of vertebral fractures required surgical stabilization. CONCLUSION: Spine SBRT is characterized by a favorable efficacy and safety profile, providing durable results for pain control and disease control, which is particularly relevant for oligometastatic patients.

ESTRO clinical practice guideline: Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spine metastases.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recent progress in diagnostics and treatment of metastatic cancer patients have improved survival substantially. These developments also affect local therapies, with treatment aims shifting from short-term palliation to long-term symptom or disease control. There is consequently a need to better define the value of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for the treatment of spinal metastases. METHODS: This ESTRO clinical practice guideline is based on a systematic literature review conducted according to PRISMA standards, which formed the basis for answering four key questions about the indication and practice of SBRT for spine metastases. RESULTS: The analysis of the key questions based on current evidence yielded 22 recommendations and 5 statements with varying levels of endorsement, all achieving a consensus among experts of at least 75%. In the majority, the level of evidence supporting the recommendations and statements was moderate or expert opinion, only, indicating that spine SBRT is still an evolving field of clinical research. Recommendations were established concerning the selection of appropriate patients with painful spine metastases and oligometastatic disease. Recommendations about the practice of spinal SBRT covered technical planning aspects including dose and fractionation, patient positioning, immobilization and image-guided SBRT delivery. Finally, recommendations were developed regarding quality assurance protocols, including description of potential SBRT-related toxicity and risk mitigation strategies. CONCLUSIONS: This ESTRO clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations and statements regarding the selection of patients with spinal metastases for SBRT and its safe implementation and practice. Enrollment of patients into well-designed prospective clinical trials addressing clinically relevant questions is considered important.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spine Oligometastases: A Multicentre Retrospective Study From the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO).

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spine oligometastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a multicentre retrospective study of a series of patients who received SBRT for spine oligometastases. The efficacy of SBRT was evaluated in terms of local control as the primary endpoint. Survival outcomes were also analysed to identify predictive factors for clinical outcomes. Toxicity was assessed according to CTCAE v4.0. RESULTS: Between March 2018 and July 2022, 183 lesions in 177 patients were analysed. In most patients, SBRT was delivered to a single spine metastasis (82%) for a median total dose of 21 Gy (14-35 Gy) in three fractions (one to five fractions) and a median BED10 = 119 Gy (57.7-152 Gy). Local control rates were 90.3% at 1 year, 84.3% at 2 years and 84.3% at 3 years. Distant progression-free survival rates were 33.1%, 18.5% and 12.4% at 1, 2 and 3 years, with prostate histology (P = 0.023), oligorecurrent disease (P = 0.04) and BED10 > 100 Gy (P = 0.04) found to be predictive on univariate analysis. A further oligometastatic progression was observed in 33 patients (18.6%) treated with a second course of SBRT, reporting at univariate analysis improved overall survival rates (P = 0.01). Polymetastases-free survival rates were 57.8%, 43.4% and 32.4%; concurrent therapy was related to improved outcomes at multivariate analysis (P = 0.009). Overall survival rates were 91.8%, 79.6% and 65.9%, with prostate histology and non-cervical metastases related to better overall survival at multivariate analysis. Pain-flare after SBRT was recorded in 3.3%; five patients underwent surgical decompression after SBRT; there were no grade ≥3 adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience of only oligometastatic patients, spine SBRT gave excellent results in terms of safety and efficacy. Prostate histology and oligorecurrent disease were predictive factors for improved clinical outcomes; also, patients who experienced a further oligoprogression after SBRT maintained a survival advantage compared with polymetastatic progression. No severe adverse events were reported.

Pattern of Recurrence After Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer Patients With Nodal Pelvic Relapse. A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Analysis.

AIMS: Currently, when nodal pelvic oligorecurrent disease is detected, no standard treatment option is recommended. One possible salvage option is nodal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Here we analysed recurrence patterns after nodal SBRT in patients affected by pelvic oligometastatic relapse after radical prostatectomy, and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-free survival in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on 93 patients consecutively treated in five different institutions for pelvic oligorecurrent disease were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and imaging showing three or fewer metachronous lymphoadenopathies under aortic bifurcation. Patients underwent SBRT on all sites of disease. Concomitant ADT was allowed. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 20 months (interquartile range 11-41), 57 patients had post-SBRT radiological evidence of relapse, for a median disease-free survival (DFS) of 15 months (95% confidence interval 9-24). Concomitant ADT was administered in 20 patients (21.5%). Overall, eight (8.6%), 21 (22.6%) and 28 (30.1%) patients had prostate bed only, pelvic nodal or distant relapse, respectively. The median ADT-free survival was not reached. Concomitant ADT, International Society for Urologic Pathology pattern at diagnosis < or ≥3, time to relapse ≤ or >12 months, prostate-specific antigen at recurrence < or ≥1.10 ng/ml and prostate-specific membrane antigen staging were not significantly associated with DFS. After relapse, 42 patients (45.2%) received a second SBRT course. CONCLUSION: Nodal SBRT yielded encouraging DFS and ADT-free survival in this population. Only a minority of patients developed prostate bed recurrence, suggesting that local treatment may be safely avoided. A consistent percentage of patients could be managed with a second SBRT course.

Long-term disease outcome and volume-based decision strategy in a large cohort of multiple brain metastases treated with a mono-isocentric linac-based Stereotactic Radiosurgery technique.

PURPOSE: Radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective treatment option for brain metastases (BMs). Long-term results of the first worldwide experience with a mono-isocentric, non-coplanar, linac-based stereotactic technique in the treatment of multiple BMs are reported. METHODS: patients with multiple BMs, life expectancy > 3 months, and good performance status (≤ 2) were treated with simultaneous SRS with volumetric modulated arc technique. Data were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: 172 patients accounting for 1079 BMs were treated at our institution from 2017 to 2020. The median number of treated metastases was 4 (range 2-22). Primary tumor histology was: lung (44.8%), breast (32%), and melanoma (9.4%). The 2-year LPFS was 71.6%, respectively. A biological effective dose (BED) ≥ 51.3 Gy10 correlated with higher local control. Uncontrolled systemic disease and melanoma histology were independent prognostic factors correlated with decreased iPFS. Patients with > 10 BMs had a trend towards shorter iPFS (p = 0.055). 31 patients received multiple SRS courses (2-7) in case of intracranial progression. The median iOS was 22.4 months. Brainstem metastases and total PTV > 7.1 cc correlated with shorter iOS. The 1- and 2-year WBRT-free survival was 83.2% and 61.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Long-term results in a large patient population treated with a mono-isocentric, dedicated technique demonstrated its effectiveness and safety also in the case of multiple courses. The shortened treatment time and the possibility to safely spare healthy brain tissue allows the safe treatment of patients with a large number of metastases and to deliver multiple courses of SRS. In selected cases, the administration of WBRT can be delayed.

Moderate hypofractionated helical tomotherapy for prostate cancer in a cohort of older patients: a mono-institutional report of toxicity and clinical outcomes.

PURPOSE OR OBJECTIVE: To evaluate toxicity and outcomes of moderately hypofractionated helical tomotherapy for the curative treatment of a cohort of patients aged ≥ 75 years with localized prostate cancer (PC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2013 to February 2017, 95 patients with median age 77 years (range 75-88) were treated for PC. 39% were low risk, 33% intermediate risk (IR), 28% high risk (HR). Median iPSA was 9.42 ng/ml (1.6-107). Androgen deprivation was prescribed according to NCCN recommendations. All patients received 70 Gy in 28 fractions to the prostate; 61.6 Gy were delivered to the seminal vesicles for IR; whole pelvis irradiation with a total dose of 50.4 Gy was added in the HR group. Toxicity evaluation was based on CTCAE V4.0 criteria, biochemical failure was defined following Phoenix criteria. Quality of Life was assessed with the EPIC-26 index. Overall survival and biochemical failure-free survival were analysed with Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 36 months (range 24-73), acute and late toxicity were acceptable. No correlation between toxicity patterns and clinical or dosimetric parameter was registered. EPIC-26 showed a negligible difference in urinary and bowel function post-treatment that did not reach statistical significance. The 2- and 3-years OS were 93% and 87% with cancer specific survival of 97.9% and 96.2%. CONCLUSION: Moderate hypofractionated RT reported excellent outcomes in our cohort of older patients. Shorter schedules may be proposed regardless of chronological age facilitating the treatment compliance in the older population.

Protection of intestinal anastomosis with biological glues: an experimental randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare the degree of healing and air tightness of hand-sewn colonic anastomoses provided by different biological glues. METHODS: Thirty colonic anastomoses were fashioned in ten rabbits, at 5, 10, 15 cm from the ileocecal valve, with 4/0 PDS running sutures. Each suture was randomized to treatment with fibrin sealant (Tissucol®), a synthetic glue (Coseal®), or nothing (control). After 15 days, the rabbits were killed and the anastomoses examined for their integrity and resistance to bursting. The van der Hamm scale was used to evaluate postoperative adhesions. A blind histological evaluation of the newly formed tissue was made (Ehrlich-Hunt scale). RESULTS: Two rabbits developed an intraabdominal abscess, one in the control anastomosis group without glue. Postoperative adhesions were present in all animals. Median anastomosis bursting pressures were 0.9 atm in all three groups: Tissucol, Coseal, and control. Pressure values were 0.9, 1.0, and 0.9 atm in the three different proximodistal sites, respectively. A trend toward an increased resistance was observed in the glued anastomosis, although this was not significant. Lymphocyte infiltration, fibroblast activity, blood vessel density, and collagen deposition were lower in controls. Anastomoses treated with Tissucol had the highest lymphocyte infiltration level. The Coseal group developed the highest rates of fibroblast activity, collagen deposition, and blood vessel neogenesis. CONCLUSION: The use of biological glues did not result in a statistically significantly increased bursting resistance. Histological evaluation demonstrated more intense tissue neoformation in the glue groups, particularly in the Coseal group. The role of biological glues in decreasing the leakage rate of intestinal anastomoses is uncertain, and larger trials using different protective agents are warranted.

Factors affecting the outcome of temporary sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence. The value of the new tined lead electrode.

AIM: Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is an effective but expensive treatment for faecal incontinence. About 50% of the patients are unresponsive for unknown reasons, hence knowledge of any factors predictive of success would be highly desirable. The aim of this study was to analyse the potential factors associated with a successful outcome of the temporary test of electrostimulation. METHOD: Eighty-five patients with faecal incontinence were tested for SNS. The cause was idiopathic in 45, iatrogenic or obstetric in 28, spinal lesion or neurological diseases in nine and anal malformation in three patients; 43 were tested with a unipolar electrode and 42 with a quadripolar electrode. The severity of faecal incontinence was evaluated using the American Medical System (AMS) score and Wexner's score. RESULTS: A positive response was obtained in 45 patients (53%); 40 (47%) were implanted with a permanent pulse generator. Responders and nonresponders were comparable in age, duration of incontinence, anal manometry, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency and diabetes. Unipolar electrode test (PNE test) was able to elicit positive responses in 18 of 43 (42%) and the quadripolar in 27 of 42 patients (P < 0.001). Type of incontinence and gender did not affect the success rate. Patients with idiopathic incontinence had a significantly higher response rate (P =0.022). Multivariate regression analysis indicated use of a quadripolar electrode as the only independent variable predicting the success of SNS (OR = 5.58, P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Use of the quadripolar electrode is the only factor significantly related to the success of SNS.

Fecal incontinence: up to date on pathophysiology and treatment.

This study analyzes the most recent insight into the pathophysiology of fecal incontinence considering each of the factors contributing to the mechanism of fecal continence both during urgency to defecate and in resting state. In fact different types of incontinence are caused by different damage to one or more of these physiologic factors. The second part of the study focuses on the therapeutic choices of fecal incontinence. The recent introduction of sacral nerve electrostimulation and the progressive broadening of its clinical indications is progressively replacing and challenging other traditional surgical techniques because of their disappointing long-term results and because they are much more invasive. An emerging new treatment based on the injection of anal bulking agents is nowadays even more preferred for the less severe cases of fecal incontinence. An increasing number of materials is now proposed by the industry in order to identify the best biocompatible material to be injected trans-anally. Traditional surgery could be reserved for patients non-responding to these new treatments.