Stents migration into right atrium from severely calcified superior vena cava in a hemodialysis patient.

Vascular calcification is common among hemodialysis patients. In this report, we presented a case of superior vena cava (SVC) stent migration during endovascular angioplasty in a 50-year-old female hemodialysis patient with severe SVC calcification. The stent migration was refractory to the deployment of a second anchor stent, which shortly resulted in pericardium tamponade and was successfully rescued by emergent thoracotomy. The potential role of vascular calcification as a risk factor to stent migration was discussed. Patients with severe vascular calcification receiving endovascular angioplasty might need a careful risk screening for stent migration.

A 4-year tunneled hemodialysis catheter malpositioned into the azygos vein and how to remedy the hemodialysis circuit.

Mispositioning in the azygos vein is a rare but hazardous complication of central venous catheterization. A patient was admitted for a dysfunctional hemodialysis tunneled cuffed catheter (TCC) placed in the azygos vein for 4 years. Computed tomography angiography revealed multiple sites of occlusion, including the superior vena cava (SVC), right and left innominate veins (IVs), and right femoral vein. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and a TCC replacement based on a segment-by-segment recanalizing strategy were performed. First, an 8-Fr sheath was inserted through the left femoral vein approach to retrogradely traverse the occlusive SVC followed by a guidewire extending to the occlusive left IV. A left transjugular 15-cm snare was inserted to capture the transfemoral guidewire and achieve recanalization from the left IV to the SVC. Second, a transjugular guidewire was advanced through the dysfunctional TCC yet shunted into the left IV due to the inability to cross the SVC. A left transfemoral 15-cm snare was inserted to capture the guidewire and achieve complete recanalization from the right internal jugular vein to the SVC. Balloons were passed over the guidewires to dilate the obstructive lesions sequentially, and a new TCC was inserted successfully with the tip positioned in the right atrium.

Reinsertion of tunneled-cuffed catheter in hemodialysis patients with catheter loss and limited access options.

PURPOSE: Maintenance hemodialysis patients who rely on tunneled-cuffed catheters (TCCs) often face difficulty in reinserting a new catheter when the original catheter has been extruded or removed. Potential pathological changes of vessel caused by long-term indwelling of a catheter may contribute to this predicament. The aim of this study was to report and evaluate a re-catheterization technique through the same exit site and tunnel for hemodialysis patients with TCC loss. METHODS: A retrospective review of 19 patients with TCC loss was conducted from January 2020 to August 2022. These patients underwent reinsertion through the same exit site and subcutaneous existing tunnel. Procedure-related complications and clinical follow-up data were collected. RESULTS: All 19 patients with catheter loss underwent this procedure and the median duration of catheter loss was 14 days (5-57 days). Five of them had central venous occlusion, and four of them experienced catheter loss due to removal for catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBI). In the end, 18 case received successful catheterization using this technique. The most common complication was minimal bleeding after the operation. There were no procedure-related deaths or serious complications. The average blood flow was 265.79 ± 25.89 ml/min at the end of the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: This maneuver is a safe and convenient technique that can be used to reinsert a TCC for patients with long-time catheter loss. It helps to preserve the limited central venous resources for patients who have difficulty establishing other stable vascular access.

Risk factors for hypotension in patients with hemodialysis-associated superior vena cava syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: We analyzed the risk factors for hypotension in patients with hemodialysis-associated superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) and effectiveness of endovascular intervention in hypotension related to SVCS. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. A total of 194 maintenance hemodialysis patients diagnosed with SVCS who were admitted to the Department of Nephrology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2019 to December 2021 were selected and divided into a hypotension group and a nonhypotension group. Demographic and clinical data were compared. Hypotension simply refers to blood pressure levels of <90/60 mm Hg on a nondialysis day. All patients received endovascular intervention. RESULTS: Hypotension was found in 85 of the 194 patients. The following factors were significantly different between the hypotension and nonhypotension groups: body mass index, history of hypertension, tunneled-cuffed catheter as the means of dialysis access, azygos ectasis, SVC stenosis of >70% or occlusion, occlusion at the cavitary junction, serum calcium, diastolic left ventricular (LV) posterior wall thickness, LV end-diastolic volume, stroke output, and LV ejection fraction. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that hypertension history (OR, 0.314; P = .027), tunneled-cuffed catheter as vascular access (OR, 3.997; P < .001), SVC stenosis of >70% or occlusion (OR, 5.243; P < .001), LV posterior wall thickness (OR, 0.772; P = .044), and serum calcium (OR, 0.146; P = .005) were independent risk factors for hypotension. The mean values of systolic and diastolic blood pressure after intravascular treatment were significantly elevated from those before intervention (P < .001). The primary patency rates of SVC were 66.8%, 58.7%, and 50.0% at 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of hypotension in patients with hemodialysis-associated SVCS is high. The identification of risk factors of hemodialysis-related hypotension provides insight into potential treatment strategies. Endovascular treatment is expected to improve hypotension related to SVCS in hemodialysis patients.

Blood Pressure Variability and the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Blood pressure variability (BPV) is a risk factor for poor prognosis including cardiovascular events, chronic kidney disease, and mortality, independent of elevated BP. METHODS: We searched PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from inception to November 23, 2022. Cohort studies reporting the association between BPV and chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression were selected. Hazard ratios were pooled using a random-effects model. Meta-regression, subgroup analyses, and sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 23 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Increased BPV was associated with progression of CKD (HR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.09-1.33) and incidence of ESRD (HR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.08-1.30). Among the different BPV metrics, high variation independent of mean (VIM), coefficient of variation (CV), standard deviation (SD), and average real variability (ARV) were indicated as predictors of CKD progression. DISCUSSION: Increased BPV was associated with CKD progression.

Percutaneous superior vena cava puncture for hemodialysis catheter placement.

OBJECTIVE: Central venous occlusion (CVO) refractory to endovascular angioplasty is a critical challenge that threatens hemodialysis vascular access. In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of tunneled, cuffed central venous catheter (tCVC) placement via percutaneous superior vena cava (SVC) puncture in patients with refractory CVO. METHODS: Patients requiring maintenance hemodialysis with refractory CVO who had undergone percutaneous SVC puncture and tCVC insertion at a university-affiliated hospital from January 2016 to June 2020 were included. The patients were followed up until May 2021. The demographic information, complications, and catheter patency were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 205 patients (105 women [51.2%]; mean age, 61 ± 15 years) were included. The SVC puncture and tCVC insertion were successfully performed in 194 patients, for a technical success rate of 94.6%. One patient had experienced a pleura injury and hemothorax and had required urgent thoracotomy. A total of 37 patients had presented with mild chest pain and were prescribed oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. During follow-up of the 194 patients with a successful procedure, catheter dysfunction due to thrombosis had occurred in 66 patients, catheter malposition had occurred in 5 patients, and catheter-related blood stream infection had developed in 6 patients. The 3-year primary patency rate was 64.2%, and the 3-year secondary patency rate was 76.3%. CONCLUSIONS: A tCVC placed through a percutaneous SVC puncture had a satisfactory technical success rate and long-term patency rate in patients requiring hemodialysis, providing an optional vascular access for those with exhausted central vein resources. SVC puncture also avoided the use of left-sided catheters and preserved central vein resources. Caution should be given to avoid potential complications such as pleura injury and hemothorax.

[Catheter Replacement Methods in Hemodialysis Patients With Dysfunctional Tunneled-Cuffed Catheters With Fibrin Sheaths]. / 对形成纤维蛋白鞘的带涤纶套和隧道透析导管的更换方式探索.

Objective: Tunneled-cuffed catheters (TCCs) are frequently used for establishing hemodialysis access for maintenance hemodialysis in older patients with exhausted resources of peripheral vessels. Fibrin sheath formation around the catheter is one of the most common complications of long-term use of indwelling catheter, which may cause the malfunction of the catheter. In this study, we intend to compare the prognosis of two catheter replacement methods, in situ replacement and replacement through a fibrin sheath crevice, with both being assisted by balloon dilation, and to explore the optimal catheter replacement process. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted with 52 patients who underwent a replacement of their TCCs. Among them, 27 cases had their TCC replaced by the modified method of replacement through a fibrin sheath crevice and were referred to as the sheath crevice group, while 25 cases underwent in situ catheter replacement and were referred to as the in situ group. The primary outcome indicators included maximum blood flow in hemodialysis catheter and the urea clearance rate calculated by Kt/V values at the 1, 3, and 6-month follow-ups. The secondary outcomes included dialyzer alarms being set off and catheter-related infections during follow-up. Results: There was no significant difference between the general data of the two groups. There was no massive blood loss during the replacement procedure. Neither were there cardiac tamponade, catheter-associated infections, or other complications. Follow-ups were made 1, 3, and 6 months after the replacement procedure. The sheath crevice group had higher catheter blood flow and Kt/V values at the 6-month follow-up than the in situ group did ([241.85±9.62] mL/min vs. [234.40±11.21] mL/min, P=0.014 and 1.31±0.55 vs. 1.27±0.49, P=0.005, respectively). During the follow-up process, access alarms were reported in 5 patients (three in the in situ group and two in the sheath crevice group) during dialysis. No catheter-associated infection occurred in either group. Conclusion: The catheter replacement method of balloon dilation-assisted catheter insertion through a fibrin sheath crevice is safe and effective, resulting in better long-term catheter blood flow compared with that of in situ catheter replacement.

Kidney health in the COVID-19 pandemic: An umbrella review of meta-analyses and systematic reviews.

Background: This umbrella review aims to consolidate evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses investigating the impact of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) on kidney health, and the associations between kidney diseases and clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Methods: Five databases, namely, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Ovid Medline, were searched for meta-analyses and systematic reviews from January 1, 2020 to June 2, 2022. Two reviewers independently selected reviews, identified reviews for inclusion and extracted data. Disagreements were resolved by group discussions. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of all included reviews using ROBIS tool. A narrative synthesis was conducted. The characteristics and major findings of the included reviews are presented using tables and forest plots. The included meta-analyses were updated when necessary. The review protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021266300). Results: A total of 103 reviews were identified. Using ROBIS, 30 reviews were rated as low risk of bias. Data from these 30 reviews were included in the narrative synthesis. Ten meta-analyses were updated by incorporating 119 newly available cohort studies. Hospitalized COVID-19 patients had a notable acute kidney injury (AKI) incidence of 27.17%. AKI was significantly associated with mortality (pooled OR: 5.24) and severe conditions in COVID-19 patients (OR: 14.94). The pooled prevalence of CKD in COVID-19 patients was 5.7%. Pre-existing CKD was associated with a higher risk of death (pooled OR: 2.21) and disease severity (pooled OR: 1.87). Kidney transplant recipients were susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection (incidence: 23 per 10,000 person-weeks) with a pooled mortality of 18%. Conclusion: Kidney disease such as CKD or recipients of kidney transplants were at increased risk of contracting COVID-19. Persons with COVID-19 also had a notable AKI incidence. AKI, the need for RRT, pre-existing CKD and a history of kidney transplantation are associated with adverse outcomes in COVID-19. Systematic review registration: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021266300, identifier: CRD42021266300.

Percutaneous endovascular arteriovenous fistula: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: Currently, percutaneous endovascular creation of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) shows excellent outcomes. However, few systematic research evidence to support clinical decision making on the benefit of endovascular AVF is available. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endovascular AVF (endoAVF) in patients with renal failure. Methods: We searched the Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for studies on endovascular or endovascular versus surgery for the creation of AVF. Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed by Review Manager 5.4 software (Revman, The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, United Kingdom) and Stata 15.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, United States). Results: A total of 14 case series and 5 cohort studies, with 1,929 patients, were included in this study. The technique success was 98.00% for endoAVF (95% CI, 0.97-0.99; I 2 = 16.25%). There was no statistically significant difference in 3 cohort studies between endovascular and surgical AVF for procedural success (OR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.04-11.98; P = 0.80; I 2 = 53%). The maturation rates of endoAVF were 87.00% (95% CI, 0.79-0.93; I 2 = 83.96%), and no significant difference was observed in 3 cohort studies between the 2 groups (OR = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.20-2.63; P = 0.63; I 2 = 88%). Procedure-related complications for endoAVF was 7% (95% CI, 0.04-0.17; I 2 = 78.31%), and it did not show significant difference in 4 cohort studies between the 2 groups (OR = 1.85; 95% CI, 0.37-9.16; P = 0.45; I 2 = 59%). Conclusion: The endovascular creation of AVF is potentially effective and safe. These important data may provide evidence to support clinicians and patients in making decisions with endovascular AVF. But further research is great necessary due to lack of randomized controlled studies.

The efficacy and safety of blunt impingement followed by a sharp recanalization technique in hemodialysis patients with refractory central vein occlusion: a single-center experience.

Background: Central vein occlusion (CVO) is a serious problem in hemodialysis patients. There is an unsatisfactory result for refractory CVO by sharp recanalization alone. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of blunt impingement followed by sharp recanalization for the treatment of CVO in hemodialysis patients. Methods: This study retrospectively examined hemodialysis patients with CVO who failed to recanalize using standard guidewire and catheter techniques in our department. In the first instance, all CVOs were recanalized using blunt impingement techniques, including a 6-Fr long sheath (Cook Incorporated, Bloomington, IN USA) and an 8-Fr sheath of Rosch-Uchida Transjugular Liver Access Set (RUPS-100; Cook Incorporated, Bloomington, IN, USA). If this was not successful, sharp recanalization devices were applied, including the stiff tip of a guidewire (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan), the RUPS-100, and the percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD) needle (Cook Incorporated, USA). All patients were followed up at least 4 months postoperatively. The technical success rate, arteriovenous access patency rates, and operation-related complications were analyzed. Results: The procedural success rate was 100.0% (30 of 30). Thirty patients with CVO underwent blunt impingement with a technique success rate of 70.0% (21 of 30), and 9 patients received sharp recanalization after failed blunt impingement, with a technique success rate of 100.0% (9 of 9). The primary patency rates at 6 and 12 months postoperatively were 86.7% and 53.3%, respectively. The primary assisted patency rates were 93.3% and 63.3%, and the secondary patency rates were 93.3% and 70.0% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. One major procedure-related complication was detected, namely, a small injury of the superior vena cava (SVC) wall in a patient receiving recanalization via the stiff end of a guidewire, but this did not require further treatment. Conclusions: It is potentially effective and safe for interventionalists to use blunt impingement followed by sharp recanalization techniques to treat chronic CVO that is refractory to traversal using traditional catheter and guidewire techniques.

Percutaneous superior vena cava puncture successful recanalization of a long-segment, angled central venous occlusion: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Multiple complete central venous occlusion (CVO) is rare complication among the hemodialysis population. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is the recommended treatment for CVO; however, cases with long-segment occlusion remain challenging. CASE DESCRIPTION: We reported a patient who complained of a swollen right arm for 1 month. On admission, his vital signs were within normal limits. The 76-year-old man had been on hemodialysis with a right forearm arteriovenous fistula (AVF) for 4 years with a history of temporizing catheterization and left forearm AVF failure. One year ago, he gradually developed a slight swelling in his right arm and the swelling in his arm was significantly worse one month ago. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) revealed occlusion in his right innominate vein (IV), proximal subclavian vein (SV), and external and internal jugular veins, as well as stenosis of the ipsilateral cephalic arch and axillary vein (AV). The operation was performed with a pioneered bidirectional approach via ipsilateral superior vena cava (SVC) and AV puncture. The occluded lesions were successfully recanalized, and the patient's symptoms resolved after the operation. The patency of his vascular access was well maintained at the 4-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report regarding the application of SVC puncture in PTA for CVO. This technique could be a possible approach when performed by appropriately qualified operators in patients with limited or no other options.

Blood Pressure Variability and Prognosis in Hemodialysis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of blood pressure variability (BPV) in patients receiving hemodialysis is inconclusive. In this study, we aimed to assess the association between BPV and clinical outcomes in the hemodialysis population. METHODS: Pubmed/Medline, EMBASE, Ovid, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science databases were searched for relevant articles published until April 1, 2020. Studies on the association between BPV and prognosis in patients receiving hemodialysis were included. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies (37,976 patients) were included in the analysis. In patients receiving hemodialysis, systolic BPV was associated with higher all-cause (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-1.19; p < 0.001) and cardiovascular (HR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.10-1.22; p < 0.001) mortality. In the stratified analysis of systolic BPV, interdialytic systolic BPV, rather than 44-h ambulatory systolic BPV or intradialytic systolic BPV, was identified to be related to both all-cause (HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.05-1.17; p = 0.001) and cardiovascular (HR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.06-1.22; p < 0.001) mortality. Among the different BPV metrics, the coefficient of variation of systolic blood pressure was a predictor of both all-cause (p = 0.01) and cardiovascular (p = 0.002) mortality. Although diastolic BPV was associated with all-cause mortality (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.01-1.17; p = 0.02) in patients receiving hemodialysis, it failed to predict cardiovascular mortality (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.52-1.42; p = 0.56). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis revealed that, in patients receiving hemodialysis, interdialytic systolic BPV was associated with both increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Furthermore, the coefficient of variation of systolic blood pressure was identified as a potentially promising metric of BPV in predicting all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. The use of 44-h ambulatory systolic BPV, intradialytic systolic BPV, and metrics of diastolic BPV in the prognosis of the hemodialysis population require further investigation (PROSPERO registry number: CRD42019139215).

Sharp recanalization for long-segment superior vena cava occlusion in a hemodialysis patient with vascular resource exhaustion: a case report.

Hemodialysis is the lifeline of end-stage renal patients, and the correct choice of vascular access is vital to patients with vascular resource exhaustion. A 57-year-old female was admitted to the hospital due to catheter dysfunction. Color-doppler ultrasound (CDU) showed that the patient's inferior vena cava (IVC), right brachiocephalic vein, and long segment of the superior vena cava (SVC) were occluded. During surgery, we found that the obstruction of the SVC extended from the opening of the azygous vein to the junction of the SVC and the right atrium and was 6.9 cm in length. Under fluoroscopic guidance, the original tunneled cuffed catheter (TCC) was pulled out, a 4-French sheath was implanted into the right, and a guidewire was inserted to locate the distal end of the SVC. Another puncture needle was inserted from the right brachiocephalic vein into the distal end of the SVC and the steel core of the Rosch-Uchida Transjugular Liver Access Set (RUPS-100) was then inserted through the puncture needle. After correcting the positive and lateral position and determining the way in which the SVC entered the right atrium from the distal end, a 0.035-inch hard guidewire was then inserted into the right atrium through the steel core and a 6-mm balloon was used to dilate the SVC. The end of the catheter was then implanted into the IVC. No surgical complications occurred and at the 30-month follow-up and time of writing, the catheter remained primarily patent. The use of the RUPS-100 for sharp recanalization of an occluded long segment of the SVC can increase the likelihood of patient survival, but the risks during this operation are still not negligible and require precise guidance.

A case report of sharp recanalization in a hemodialysis patient with severe occlusion of both superior and inferior vena cave.

We present the case of a 53-year-old woman with a history of maintenance hemodialysis through arteriovenous fistula, CUFF catheter (cuffed tunneled catheter) and artificial vascular graft successively. Some signs of superior vena cava syndrome have presented including chronic edema in the face and left arm and varicose veins. Both CT (computed tomography) and angiography showed narrowing and occlusion in multiple veins, especially the right innominate vein, superior vena cava, inferior vena cava, left jugular vein, and bilateral common iliac veins. The first attempt at recanalization of the AVG (arteriovenous graft) failed due to severe occlusion of central venous. Finally, the patient was treated with a minimally invasive surgical approach involving percutaneous direct superior vena cava puncture driven by a single bend and vascular snare that were placed in the right atrium via hepatic vein percutaneous direct puncture under a double C arm angiographic device. The initial attempt failed with RUPS 100 (Cook, Chicago, USA) and was complicated by pericardial tamponade. The second attempt succeeded and the catheter was placed without hindrance and edema or varicose veins and its patency has remained for over 18 months following the intervention. It is the first successful case of sharp recanalization in combined superior and inferior vena cava syndromes with long-segment occlusion. This creative approach to providing vascular access offers a novel way to address refractory lesions in central veins.