Quo Vadis, ECMO? Multidisciplinary Hybrid Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation Rounds During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The complex care of patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) requires a high level of collaboration between multiple medical specialties and allied health professionals. Effective and timely communication between team members is imperative in ensuring patient safety. The COVID-19 pandemic posed unique challenges in the care of patients on ECMO. Communication between team members was complicated by social distancing recommendations, increased patient volume, and staff turnover. In this article, we describe a hybrid approach to rounds that allowed team members to attend virtually or in-person to improve team communication. Weekly hybrid ECMO rounds were held to discuss patient cases and work collectively to establish patient centered goals for the following week. Critical care and surgical consultants, registered nurse ECMO specialists, RNs, perfusionists, respiratory therapists, physical and occupational therapists, pharmacists, ethics committee members, and patient family members were invited to attend hybrid ECMO rounds. After eight months of rounds, medical care team members were asked to provide feedback regarding the rounds format, strengths, and weaknesses. The most frequently identified strengths were improved multidisciplinary communication and continuity of care. This article demonstrates that hybrid virtual and in-person patient rounds are a feasible way for ECMO programs to improve team communication and overall patient care.

Complete pathologic response in esophageal adenocarcinoma: does it make a difference?

Advancements in neoadjuvant regimens for esophageal adenocarcinoma have enabled some patients to achieve complete pathologic response at time of esophagectomy. There are currently limited data detailing this trend or the implications of complete pathologic response on survival. The National Cancer Database was used to identify 16,169 patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma that received trimodal therapy including esophagectomy between 2006 and 2020. Of these, 11.4% had complete pathologic response at esophagectomy. Patient factors, staging characteristics, and survival trends were evaluated. In patients diagnosed between 2016 and 2020, the rate of complete pathologic response was 17.5%. Female sex (OR 1.295, 95% CI 1.134-1.481, p = 0.0001), Black race (OR 1.729, 95% CI 1.362-2.196, p = 0.0002), Hispanic ethnicity (OR 1.418, 95% CI 1.073-1.875, p = 0.0141), and later era of diagnosis (2016-2020 OR 2.898, 95% CI 2.508-3.349, p < 0.0001) were independent predictors of complete pathologic response. Clinical stage II disease was associated with an increased probability of complete pathologic response (OR 1.492, 95% CI 1.19-1.871) while clinical stage III disease had a decreased probability of complete pathologic response (OR 0.762, 95% CI 0.621-0.936, p < 0.0001). Complete pathologic response conveyed a strong survival benefit, with a median survival of 86.4 months (95% CI 73.9-102.1) versus 30.7 months (95% CI 29.8-31.7, p < 0.0001) in those without complete pathologic response. Four-year median survival was also higher in those with complete pathologic response (63.3%, 95% CI 60.8-66.0% vs. 39.2%, 95% CI 38.4-40.1%, p < 0.0001). In summary, complete pathologic response is associated with a profound survival advantage in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. Such knowledge carries implications for patient counseling, prognostication, and surveillance and demonstrates a need for improved identification of complete clinical response prior to esophagectomy.

Lymphovascular Invasion is an Independent Negative Prognostic Factor in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The significance of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has not yet been described. Potential utility as an adjunct to current staging guidelines remains unknown. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried from 2006 to 2020. Univariate and multivariable models, Kaplan Meier method, and log-rank test were used. Subgroup analyses by pN stage were conducted. RESULTS: Of 9,689 patients, 23.2% had LVI. LVI was an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio [HR] 1.401, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.307-1.502, p < 0.0001) with reduction in median survival to 20.0 months (95% CI 18.9-21.4) from 39.7 months (95% CI 37.8-42.3, p < 0.0001). Multivariable survival analysis adjusted on pN and pT stage found that patients with LVI had decreased survival in a given pN stage (p < 0.001). pN0/LVI+ patients had a similar prognosis to the higher staged pN1/LVI- (28.6 months), although pN1/LVI- patients did slightly worse (p = 0.0135). Additionally, patients with pN1/LVI+ had equivalent survival compared with pN2/LVI- (p = 0.178) as did pN2/LVI+ patients compared with pN3/LVI- (p = 0.995). CONCLUSIONS: In these data, LVI is an independent negative prognostic factor in EAC. LVI was associated with a survival reduction similar to an upstaged nodal status irrespective of T stage. Patients with LVI may be better classified at a higher pN stage.

Dynamic volume-outcome association for esophagectomies: Do current volume thresholds still apply?

BACKGROUND: It is unknown if the current minimum case volume recommendation of 20 cases per year per hospital is applicable to contemporary practice. METHODS: Patients undergoing esophageal resection between 2005 and 2015 were identified in the National Cancer Database. High, medium, and low-volume hospital strata were defined by quartiles. Adjusted odds ratios and adjusted 30-day mortality between low-, medium-, and high-volume hospitals were calculated using logistic regression analyses and trended over time. RESULTS: Only 1.1% of hospitals had ≥20 annual cases. The unadjusted 30-day mortality for esophagectomy was 3.8% overall. Unadjusted and adjusted 30-day mortality trended down for all three strata between 2005 and 2015, with disproportionate decreases for low-volume and medium-volume versus high-volume hospitals. By 2015, adjusted 30-day mortality was similar in medium- and high-volume hospitals (odds ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 0.96-1.91). For hospitals with 20 or more annual cases the adjusted 30-day mortality was 2.7% overall. To achieve this same 30-day mortality the minimum volume threshold had lowered to 7 annual cases by 2015. CONCLUSION: Only 1.1% of hospitals meet current volume recommendations for esophagectomy. Differential improvements in postoperative mortality at low- and medium- versus high-volume hospitals have led to 7 cases in 2015 achieving the same adjusted 30-day mortality as 20 cases in the overall cohort. Lowering volume thresholds for esophagectomy in contemporary practice would potentially increase the proportion of hospitals able to meet volume standards and increase access to quality care without sacrificing quality.

Lung Transplantation in the United States for COVID-19 Related Lung Disease During the Pandemic.

PURPOSE: Lung transplantation (LTx) is a potential intervention for end-stage COVID-19 lung disease. Current literature is sparse regarding the outcomes of LTx for COVID-19 related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and pulmonary fibrosis (PF). This study aims to characterize outcomes and patterns of LTx for COVID-19 related lung disease throughout the pandemic. METHODS: Patients who underwent LTx during the pandemic for COVID-19 related lung disease were retrospectively identified using the UNOS registry. Demographics, as well as outcomes measures and nationwide patterns of care were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 510 adult cases of LTx for COVID-19 (259 ARDS, 251 PF) were compared to 4,031 without COVID-19 (3,994 PF, 37 ARDS). Patients who received LTx for COVID-19 ARDS did not differ in 2-year survival when compared to those with COVID-19 PF (81.9% vs 77.2%, p = 0.4428). Compared to non-COVID-19 etiologies, COVID-19 ARDS patients had higher rates of stroke (2.3% vs 0%, p = 0.0005), lower rates of graft failure (12.8% vs 36.1%, p = 0.0003) and post-transplant ECMO (29.6% vs 41.7%, p = 0.0002), and improved 2-year survival following LTx (81.9% vs 61.7%, p = 0.0064). No difference in 2-year survival following LTx was observed between patients with COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 PF (77.2% vs 71.8%, p = 0.34). Rates of LTx spiked with variant emergence and declined with rounds of vaccination. CONCLUSION: Our results are consistent with early reports of survival outcomes following LTx for COVID-19 ARDS and PF while providing an increased layer of granularity. LTx may be considered as a safe and effective intervention for COVID-19 lung disease.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for general thoracic surgery: case series and narrative review.

Background and Objective: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has historically been utilized as a temporary life support option for patients with severe cardiac and pulmonary dysfunction. Recent advancements have enabled the safe application of ECMO in a wider variety of patients; we present a review of its use in patients undergoing general thoracic procedures supported by a case series at our institution. Methods: We review current literature focusing on ECMO applications in thoracic surgery outside of the traditional use. Additionally, we offer three cases of ECMO utilization to illustrate success stories and key lessons learned regarding the use of ECMO in general thoracic surgery. Key Content and Findings: Technologic advancements and enhanced safety profiles have enabled the safe application of ECMO in a wide array of patients far beyond the historic indications of cardiogenic shock and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). It is now feasible to consider ECMO for management of acute thoracic emergencies, as well as to better facilitate operative safety in complex general thoracic surgical procedures. Both venovenous and venoarterial ECMO can be utilized in carefully selected patients to provide cardiopulmonary support while enabling improved visualization and increased mobilization without concern for respiratory and/or cardiac compromise. Conclusions: Enthusiasm for the use of ECMO has increased in recent years. What was once considered a salvage therapy in cases of life-threatening cardiopulmonary decompensation now plays an increasingly important role in the safe conduct of complex thoracic surgery procedures, provides much needed time for organ recovery, and offers acute resuscitation options. This shift broadens our ability to deliver life-saving care to patients that previously would have otherwise had limited treatment options.

Cancer Surveillance in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients With a Pretransplant History of Malignancy: Multidisciplinary Collaborative Expert Opinion.

With improved medical treatments, the prognosis for many malignancies has improved, and more patients are presenting for transplant evaluation with a history of treated cancer. Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with a prior malignancy are at higher risk of posttransplant recurrence or de novo malignancy, and they may require a cancer surveillance program that is individualized to their specific needs. There is a dearth of literature on optimal surveillance strategies specific to SOT recipients. A working group of transplant physicians and cancer-specific specialists met to provide expert opinion recommendations on optimal cancer surveillance after transplantation for patients with a history of malignancy. Surveillance strategies provided are mainly based on general population recurrence risk data, immunosuppression effects, and limited transplant-specific data and should be considered expert opinion based on current knowledge. Prospective studies of cancer-specific surveillance models in SOT recipients should be supported to inform posttransplant management of this high-risk population.

Ex vivo lung perfusion in donation after circulatory death: A post hoc analysis of the Normothermic Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion as an Assessment of Extended/Marginal Donors Lungs trial.

OBJECTIVE: Donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors offer the ability to expand the lung donor pool and ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) further contributes to this ability by allowing for additional evaluation and resuscitation of these extended criteria donors. We sought to determine the outcomes of recipients receiving organs from DCD EVLP donors in a multicenter setting. METHODS: This was an unplanned post hoc analysis of a multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized trial that took place during 2011 to 2017 with 3 years of follow-up. Patients were placed into 3 groups based off procurement strategy: brain-dead donor (control), brain-dead donor evaluated by EVLP, and DCD donors evaluated by EVLP. The primary outcomes were severe primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours and survival. Secondary outcomes included select perioperative outcomes, and 1-year and 3-years allograft function and quality of life measures. RESULTS: The DCD EVLP group had significantly higher incidence of severe primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours (P = .03), longer days on mechanical ventilation (P < .001) and in-hospital length of stay (P = .045). Survival at 3 years was 76.5% (95% CI, 69.2%-84.7%) for the control group, 68.3% (95% CI, 58.9%-79.1%) for the brain-dead donor group, and 60.7% (95% CI, 45.1%-81.8%) for the DCD group (P = .36). At 3-year follow-up, presence observed bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome or quality of life metrics did not differ among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although DCD EVLP allografts might not be appropriate to transplant in every candidate recipient, the expansion of their use might afford recipients stagnant on the waitlist a viable therapy.

Donor and recipient risk factors for the development of primary graft dysfunction following lung transplantation.

Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) is a major cause of both short-term and long-term morbidity and mortality following lung transplantation. Various donor, recipient, and technical risk factors have been previously identified as being associated with the development of PGD. Here, we present a comprehensive review of the current literature as it pertains to PGD following lung transplantation, as well as discussing current strategies to mitigate PGD and future directions. We will pay special attention to recent advances in lung transplantation such as ex-vivo lung perfusion, thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion, and up-to-date literature published in the interim since the 2016 ISHLT consensus statement on PGD and the COVID-19 pandemic.

Lung Transplant Outcomes for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Are We Improving?

BACKGROUND: After implementation of the Lung Allocation Score in 2005, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) emerged as the most common indication for lung transplantation (LT) in the United States. The age and comorbidity of patients undergoing LT have since increased, and the indications for LT have evolved. However, limited data have been used to analyze more recent outcomes among the IPF population. METHODS: This study analyzed LTs for the primary indication of IPF by using the United Network for Organ Sharing database. An eras-based analysis was performed, comparing patient characteristics, survival, and related outcomes during 2005 to 2009 (era 1) and 2010 to 2014 (era 2) with χ2, Wilcoxon rank sum, and Kaplan-Meier analyses. The study compared 1-year survival from 2005 to 2020 and survival at milestones ranging from 1 month to 5 years. Two adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were conducted: 5-year survival by era and 1-year survival annually from 2010 to 2020. RESULTS: From era 1 (n = 1818) to era 2 (n = 3227), the median age of LT recipients increased from 61 to 63 years (P < .001). The percentage of patients in the intensive care unit before LT climbed from 7.7% to 12.1% (P < .001), and the percentage of patients with diabetes grew from 17.9% to 19.4% (P = .003). Despite increased severity of illness, 5-year survival increased from 51.9% in era 1 to 55.2% in era 2 (P = .02). Adjusted modeling indicated that LT during era 2 featured a 17% hazard reduction compared with era 1 (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Survival is improving for patients undergoing LT for IPF, despite the challenges of transplant recipients with progressively higher risk profiles.

Lung Transplantation for People Living With HIV: Promising Mid-term Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: With increasing life expectancy, patients with HIV are more commonly acquiring other chronic diseases, such as end-stage lung disease, for which transplant may be the only effective solution. Until recently, HIV infection was considered a contraindication to lung transplant (LTx). As LTx in people living with HIV (PLWH) becomes more common, there remain limited data on outcomes in this population. METHODS: Using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Standard Transplant Analysis and Research file, we identified LTx recipients with HIV by either serostatus or nucleic acid testing. A control group of confirmed HIV-negative LTx recipients was propensity score matched on age, body mass index, primary diagnosis, and year of transplant. Patient characteristics, transplant parameters, survival, and postoperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Fifty-nine LTx recipients with HIV were identified and compared with 236 HIV-negative controls. Among PLWH, cytomegalovirus status was more frequently positive (76.3% versus 58.9%, P = 0.014), and the median Lung Allocation Score at match was higher (44 versus 39, P = 0.004). PLWH were more likely to undergo dialysis postoperatively (18.6% versus 8.9%, P = 0.033), although other complication rates were similar. Fifty-three percent of LTx for PLWH occurred since 2020. One-year survival for PLWH was 91.2% versus 88.6% for controls ( P = 0.620). Three-year survival for a smaller subset was also not statistically significant (HIV versus control: 82.6% versus 77.8%, respectively, P = 0.687). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in 1-y survival for LTx recipients living with HIV compared with a matched control group, supporting this group of patients as viable candidates for LTx.

Tracheostomy in high-risk patients on ECMO: A bedside hybrid dilational technique utilizing a Rummel tourniquet.

Objective: Traditionally, critically ill patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation benefit from a long-term airway, thus necessitating tracheostomy. The widespread application of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has exponentially increased in recent years, creating a new subset of patients necessitating tracheostomy with significantly increased bleeding risk. We present a hybrid dilational tracheostomy technique utilizing a Rummel tourniquet developed at our institution to mitigate bleeding risk in patients on ECMO necessitating long-term airway. Methods: A total of 24 patients on ECMO underwent bedside hybrid dilational tracheostomy with utilization of a Rummel tourniquet from 06/2020 to 01/2022 at our institution. These patients were followed longitudinally and evaluated for postoperative bleeding. Particular attention was paid to anticoagulation regimens pre- and post-operatively. Results: The primary outcome of the study, postoperative bleeding, was observed in four of the 24 study participants (16.67 %). Each of these complications were managed with tightening of the Rummel tourniquet and application of hemostatic packing agents; no operative interventions were required. Anticoagulation was held for a mean time of 4.33 h preoperatively and 5.2 h postoperatively. Conclusions: Our data support this hybrid tracheostomy technique with the addition of a Rummel tourniquet to be a safe and effective adjunct for perioperative hemostasis in high-risk patients necessitating tracheostomy while on ECMO. While this technique was initially developed for critically ill COVID-19 patients, we believe it can be applied to all patients on ECMO to help mitigate perioperative bleeding risk.

Hyperthermic intrapleural chemotherapy: an update.

The safety and efficacy of hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITHOC) as an adjunct to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in pleural malignancies has been well demonstrated. This is most often described in cases of mesothelioma, thymoma, or other secondary pleural metastases. The utilization of a direct cytotoxic agent with increased penetration secondary to a hyperthermic environment is especially beneficial in pleural malignancy as a microscopic resection remains immensely challenging. Despite favorable outcomes with a limited associated risk profile, there persists a variety in utilization and technique of HITHOC described in current literature. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines state that though intraoperative adjuvant therapies such as HITHOC have been studied, they remain of unclear benefit and definitive recommendations do not currently exist. This ambiguity limits the standardization of HITHOC, thus hindering its further application in a patient population with exceedingly poor outcomes within current guideline-based therapy. As the prevalence of pleural malignancies necessitating CRS with adjuvant HITHOC remains quite low, we believe a task force initiative to further investigate the role of HITHOC in surgical management of pleural malignancies would enable wider utility of this promising technique. Additionally, we propose that the creation of a pleural cancer index could aid in standardization of HITHOC in those with pleural malignancy.

Photobiomodulation does not provide incremental benefits to patients with knee osteoarthritis who receive a strengthening exercises program: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: There is lack of agreement in the literature about the effectiveness of photobiomodulation (PBM) for reducing pain-related symptoms in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether PBM, when combined to exercises, provides incremental therapeutic benefits for pain, physical function, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with knee OA. METHODS: A six-month double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial was conducted. Patients with knee OA were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: Exercise, Exercise plus Active PBM, or Exercise plus Placebo PBM. Treatment was provided over an eight-week period, three times per week. The primary outcomes were pain at rest and upon movement, assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS). WOMAC global score, QoL, and a core-set of performance-based tests were measured as secondary outcomes. All outcomes were collected at baseline, immediately after treatment, and after three- and six-month post-treatment. RESULTS: 127 participants were allocated as follows: Exercise, N = 41; Exercise plus Active PBM, N = 44; and Exercise plus Placebo PBM, N = 42. There was no between-groups difference in improvement in pain, physical function, and QoL for all follow-up times. However, all groups presented significant, clinically relevant improvements in pain, physical function, and QoL immediately and three months after treatment compared with baseline measures. CONCLUSION: Patients with knee OA who received a strengthening exercises program did not experience incremental benefits regarding pain, physical function, or QoL when adding PBM to their therapeutic exercises.

Spontaneous middle lobe torsion: An institutional case series.

Objective: Lobar torsion is a rare occurrence in which a portion of the lung is twisted on its bronchovascular pedicle. The vast majority are observed in the acute postoperative period often following right upper lobectomy. Spontaneous middle lobe torsion independent of pulmonary resection is exceptionally rarer; fewer than 15 cases have been recorded. We present an institutional case series of 2 patients postorthotopic liver transplantation who developed spontaneous middle lobe torsion due to large pleural effusions. Methods: We provide the medical course as well as intraoperative techniques for our 2 patients along with a review of the literature. Results: Both patients in this case series underwent orthotopic liver transplant complicated postoperatively by a large pulmonary effusion. Patient one developed an abdominal hematoma requiring evacuation and repair, after which he developed progressive shortness of breath. Bronchoscopy revealed a right middle lobe obstruction; upon thoracotomy, 180-degree torsion with widespread necrosis was evident and the middle lobe was removed. He is doing well to date. Patient 2 experienced postoperative pleural effusion and mucus plugging; computed tomography revealed abrupt middle lobe arterial occlusion prompting urgent operative intervention. Again, the middle lobe was grossly ischemic and dissection revealed a 360-degree torsion around the pedicle. It was resected. He is doing well to date. Conclusions: As the result of its rarity, radiographic and clinical diagnosis of spontaneous pulmonary lobar torsion is challenging; a high index of suspicion for spontaneous middle lobe torsion must be maintained to avoid delays in diagnosis. Prompt surgical intervention is essential to improve patient outcomes.

Clinical outcomes of stage-IV non-small-cell lung cancer in young patients and the impact of tumor markers.

INTRODUCTION: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) diagnosed at a younger age have patterns of care, responses to treatment, and outcomes not entirely clear. A particular feature includes more advanced stages at diagnosis. Our objective was to characterize these young patients with advanced disease and evaluate the impact of targeted therapies. METHODS: Analyzing our cohort of 18,252 newly diagnosed NSCLC patients, we defined Young-age versus Norm-age based on the age distribution at the time of diagnosis. Stage-IV patients were investigated on their clinical information and outcomes; deaths were considered lung cancer-related. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Multivariate Cox models were built to evaluate independent prognostic factors in comparative age groups. RESULTS: We found 4,267 patients with stage-IV NSCLC (359 Young-age; 3,908 Norm-age). Young patients had predominance of females (52.6% vs. 43.3%, P = 0.001), never-smokers (43.2% vs. 14.8%, P < 0.001), and adenocarcinoma (73.5% vs. 62.5%, P < 0.001). Mean OS was 21.1 months in the Young and 15.1 months in Norm, respectively (P < 0.001). Young patients were more often treated with surgery (6.7% vs. 5.0%), chemotherapy (53.2% vs. 44.1%), and targeted therapy (10.6% vs. 5.7%). Molecular studies were assessed in patients when the mutation tests became clinically available (93 Young, 875 Norm) and revealed a critical role of targeted therapy in the improved survival of both age groups. DISCUSSION: Young patients with stage-IV NSCLC have a specific profile and benefit more when treated with surgery and targeted therapy. Molecular testing is critical in this population, where improved survival was identified. A more aggressive approach to this population needs to be considered.