miR-6805-5p as a biomarker of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in patients with head and neck cancer.

Introduction: The standard treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is cisplatin chemoradiotherapy. One of the main treatment adverse reactions is nephrotoxicity, for which there is currently no adequate specific and sensitive biomarker. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the use of microRNAs (miRNAs) as renal biomarker candidates. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. Nephrotoxicity was assessed through blood samples collected before and 5 days (D5) after chemotherapy. MiRNAs were extracted from urine samples collected at baseline and D5, and RNA sequencing identified miRNAs differentially expressed between participants with and without cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. Results: A total of 49 participants were included (n = 49). A significant difference was seen between the two groups for traditional renal markers (serum creatinine and creatinine clearance) and for the acute kidney injury (AKI) categories. Among the six miRNAs evaluated as biomarkers, four were upregulated (hsa-miR-6729-5p, hsa-miR-1238-5p, hsa-miR-4706, and hsa-miR-4322) and two were downregulated (hsa-miR-6805-5p and hsa-miR-21-5p), but only hsa-miR-6805-5p had a significant difference (p < 0.0001). Its receiver operating characteristic curve revealed excellent specificity (0.920) for its expression fluctuation assessment, while its absolute expression in D5 showed greater sensitivity (0.792). Conclusion: So, the integrated use of these two parameters seems to be an interesting approach for AKI.

Data Normalization of Urine miRNA Profiling from Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated with Cisplatin.

The microRNA (miRNA) expression profile by qRT-PCR depends directly on the most appropriate normalization strategy adopted; however, currently there is no universally adequate reference gene. Therefore, this study aimed to determine, considering RNA-Seq results, the most adequate endogenous normalizer for use in the relative quantification of urine miRNAs from head and neck cancer patients, treated with cisplatin chemoradiotherapy. The massive sequencing was performed to identify the miRNAs differentially expressed between the group with cisplatin nephrotoxicity (n = 6) and the one without (n = 6). The candidate endogen normalizer was chosen according to four criteria: (1) the miRNA must be expressed in most samples; (2) the miRNA must have a fold change value between 0.99 and 1.01; (3) the miRNA must have a p-value ≥ 0.98; and (4) the miRNA must not be commented on by the final GeneGlobe (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) analysis. Four miRNAs met all the criteria (hsa-miR-363-5p, hsa-miR-875-5p, hsa-miR-4302, and hsa-miR-6749-5p) and were selected for validation by qRT-PCR in a cohort of 49 patients (including the 12 sequencing participants). Only hsa-miR-875-5p was shown to be an adequate normalizer for the experimental condition under investigation, as it exhibited invariant expression between the two groups.

Assessment of Renal Function in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated with Cisplatin: Different Biomarkers and Acute Kidney Injury Classifications.

Cisplatin is associated with dose-limiting nephrotoxicity, and the timely detection of acute kidney injury (AKI) can affect morbimortality. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the tools for monitoring renal function in AKI. This was a retrospective, cohort study. Cisplatin-treated patients with head and neck cancer were included. Nephrotoxicity was assessed using serum creatinine, estimated creatinine clearance, serum electrolytic alterations, and plasma kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1). The toxicity severity was classified according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), and AKI was classified by Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, and End-stage kidney disease (RIFLE) and Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN). A total of 81 participants were included, of whom only 32 did not have AKI. Almost 90% of participants had a decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate five (D5) days after chemotherapy. The AKI estimate differs between AKIN and RIFLE; more participants were diagnosed by the RIFLE at D5, 19.5% versus 2.4% by AKIN, and fifteen had a discordance between these classifications. All laboratory markers showed significant changes on D5. KIM-1 appeared a possible biomarker when considering CTCAE or AKIN classifications (p < 0.05 on D5), but not when RIFLE classification was used (p = 0.0780). Further studies may seek to understand the profiles of different biomarkers together.

Association between plasmatic oxidative stress and thrombosis in primary antiphospholipid syndrome.

Antiphospholipid antibodies induce a pro-inflammatory and hypercoagulable state that lead to increased risk of thrombosis. Whether oxidative damage contributes thrombosis risk is a matter of debate. We evaluated the association between oxidative stress and thrombosis in primary antiphospholipid syndrome (t-PAPS). Plasma total antioxidant capacity and the levels of malondialdehyde (TBARs), carbonyl protein, and 8-isoprostane in plasma were determined in a group of patients with t-PAPS and in individuals without a history of thrombosis (controls) using commercial ELISA assays. The levels of these plasma markers of oxidative stress were compared between t-PAPS and controls using Mann-Whitney test. A total of 70 patients with t-PAPS and 74 controls were included. Overall, measurements of all plasma oxidative stress markers were similar between t-PAPS patients and controls. In a subgroup analysis, patients with t-PAPS and arterial thrombosis had a higher antioxidant capacity as compared to controls. Thrombotic PAPS was not associated with increased levels of oxidative stress markers, in comparison with individuals without thrombosis. Even though it is not possible to rule out that a mild oxidative damage, not detected by plasma markers, occurs in t-PAPS, our results suggest that measuring plasma oxidative stress markers has limited clinical relevance in t-PAPS.

Self-perceived quality of life of primary antiphospholipid syndrome patients using vitamin K antagonist.

PURPOSE: Primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS) is a chronic autoimmune disorder clinically characterized by thromboembolic events or obstetric complications. Prolonged anticoagulation therapy with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) is the treatment of choice for PAPS patients with thrombosis. However, the efficacy of VKA therapy depends on laboratory monitoring, dose adjustment, adequate lifestyle and adherence to treatment. Difficulties with VKA therapy can affect patients' self-perceived health related quality of life (HRQOL). This study aims to evaluate PAPS patients' HRQOL, therapy adherence and knowledge of treatment. METHODS: A general Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) and the Duke Anticoagulation Satisfaction Scale (DASS) were used to access APS-patients self-perceived HRQOL. Treatment adherence was measured by the Treatment Measure Adhesion (TMA) - oral anticoagulant version instrument, and knowledge of VKA treatment was measured using the MedTake test. RESULTS: 66 PAPS patients using VKA were assessed. 63% of them were female; the mean age was 41.9 years old, approximately 60% had unprovoked venous thrombosis and one third of the patients had recurrent thrombotic events. The most impacted domain of DASS was "psychological impacts" and the factors associated to anticoagulation related poor HRQOL were: female sex, presence of arterial thrombosis and INR lability. Using the SF-36 instrument, PAPS-patients self-perceived HRQOL was poorer than that of the general Brazilian population and was associated with female sex and presence of cardiovascular risk factors. CONCLUSION: Despite the high adherence to treatment and knowledge of VKA therapy, self-perceived HRQOL is poor in patients with PAPS and is mainly affected by VKA therapy. Searching for better treatment options is warranted.

Outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing sorafenib treatment: toxicities, cellular oxidative stress, treatment adherence, and quality of life.

The study of toxicities induced by sorafenib, as well as the identification of possible mechanisms and biomarkers of these toxicities, is important to improve the treatment and quality of life of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. This study focused on toxicities, cellular oxidative stress, adherence, and quality of life of 11 patients with HCC treated with sorafenib. Dermatotoxicity, myelotoxicity, gastro toxicity, nephrotoxicity, pain, and fatigue were investigated. For oxidative stress analysis, the peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated and mitochondrial superoxide anion production was measured using MitoSOX Red test. Medication adherence was evaluated based on Morisky-Green and MedTake tests. Quality of life assessment was performed using EORTC QLQ C-30 and QLQ HCC18 questionnaires. The results showed that hand-foot syndrome (45.5%), thrombocytopenia (45.5%), diarrhea (54.5%), pain (54.5%), and fatigue (36.4%) were the most prevalent toxicities. A non-statistically significant change in the levels of superoxide anion was observed after the sorafenib treatment (Wilcoxon test, P = 0.4131). Moreover, 81.8% of patients had high adherence, 100% knew the correct indication of sorafenib, 81.8% knew the correct intake and drug regimen, and 36.4% knew the correct dose of antineoplastic. There was a significant worsening in the emotional and pain domains of quality of life after the sorafenib (Wilcoxon test, P = 0.0313 and P = 0.0313, respectively). A production of superoxide anion was not correlated with toxicities (Spearman's correlation and Mann-Whitney U tests, P > 0.05). This study suggests that oxidative stress might not be the mechanism of sorafenib toxicities.