Neurofilament light chain: A possible fluid biomarker in the intrahippocampal kainic acid mouse model for chronic epilepsy?

OBJECTIVE: In the management of epilepsy, there is an ongoing quest to discover new biomarkers to improve the diagnostic process, the monitoring of disease progression, and the evaluation of treatment responsiveness. In this regard, biochemical traceability in biofluids is notably absent in contrast to other diseases. In the present preclinical study, we investigated the potential of neurofilament light chain (NfL) as a possible diagnostic and response fluid biomarker for epilepsy. METHODS: We gained insights into NfL levels during the various phases of the intrahippocampal kainic acid mouse model of temporal lobe epilepsy-namely, the status epilepticus (SE) and the chronic phase with spontaneous seizures. To this end, NfL levels were determined directly in the cerebral interstitial fluid (ISF) with cerebral open flow microperfusion as sampling technique, as well as in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma. Lastly, we assessed whether NfL levels diminished upon curtailing SE with diazepam and ketamine. RESULTS: NfL levels are higher during SE in both cerebral ISF and plasma in kainic acid-treated mice compared to sham-injected mice. Additionally, ISF and plasma NfL levels are lower in mice treated with diazepam and ketamine to stop SE compared with the vehicle-treated mice. In the chronic phase with spontaneous seizures, higher NfL levels could only be detected in ISF and CSF samples, and not in plasma. No correlations could be found between NfL levels and seizure burden, nor with immunohistological markers for neurodegeneration/inflammation. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings demonstrate the translational potential of NfL as a blood-based fluid biomarker for SE. This is less evident for chronic epilepsy, as in this case higher NfL levels could only be detected in ISF and CSF, and not in plasma, acknowledging the invasive nature of CSF sampling in chronic epilepsy follow-up.

Current Approaches to Monitor Macromolecules Directly from the Cerebral Interstitial Fluid.

Gaining insights into the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of lead compounds is crucial during drug development processes. When it comes to the treatment of brain diseases, collecting information at the site of action is challenging. There are only a few techniques available that allow for the direct sampling from the cerebral interstitial space. This review concerns the applicability of microdialysis and other approaches, such as cerebral open flow microperfusion and electrochemical biosensors, to monitor macromolecules (neuropeptides, proteins, …) in the brain. Microdialysis and cerebral open flow microperfusion can also be used to locally apply molecules at the same time at the site of sampling. Innovations in the field are discussed, together with the pitfalls. Moreover, the 'nuts and bolts' of the techniques and the current research gaps are addressed. The implementation of these techniques could help to improve drug development of brain-targeted drugs.

Applicability of cerebral open flow microperfusion and microdialysis to quantify a brain-penetrating nanobody in mice.

The use of biologics in the therapeutic landscape has increased exponentially since the last 3 decades. Nevertheless, patients with central nervous system (CNS) related disorders could not yet benefit from this revolution because the blood-brain barrier (BBB) severely hampers biologics from entering the brain. Considerable effort has been put into generating methods to modulate or circumvent the BBB for delivery of therapeutics to the CNS. A promising strategy is receptor-mediated transcytosis (RMT). Recently, Wouters et al. (2020) discovered a mouse anti-transferrin receptor nanobody that is able to deliver a biologically active peptide to the brain via RMT. The present study aims to sample a derivative of this brain-penetrating nanobody (Nb105) in the CNS. Therefore, we compared the applicability of cerebral open flow microperfusion (cOFM) and microdialysis as sampling techniques to directly obtain high molecular weight substances from the cerebral interstitial fluid. A custom AlphaScreen™ assay was validated to quantify nanobody concentrations in the samples. In vitro microdialysis probe (AtmosLM™, 1 MDa cut-off) recovery by gain and by loss for Nb105 was 18.3 ± 3.2% and 27.0 ± 2.5% respectively, whereas for cOFM it was 87.2 ± 4.0% and 97.3 ± 1.6%. Although a large difference in in vitro recovery is observed between cOFM and microdialysis, in vivo similar results were obtained. Immunohistochemical stainings showed an astrocytic and microglial reaction in the immediate vicinity along the implantation track for both probe types. Coronal sections showed higher fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran and immunoglobulin G extravasation around the microdialysis probe track than after cOFM sampling experiments, however this leakage was clearly limited compared to a positive control where the BBB was disrupted. This is the first study that samples a bispecific nanobody in the brain's interstitial fluid in function of time, providing a pharmacokinetic profile of nanobodies in the CNS. Furthermore, this is the first time a cOFM study is performed in awake freely moving mice, providing data on inflammation and blood-brain barrier integrity in the mouse brain. Overall, this work demonstrates that, while taking into account the (bio)analytical considerations, both microdialysis and cOFM are suitable in vivo sampling techniques for quantification of nanobodies in the CNS.