Collaboration between maternal-fetal medicine and family planning: a survey of Northeast US academic medical centers.

OBJECTIVES: To explore how complex family planning (CFP) and maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) in Northeast academic medical centers work together to provide abortion care. METHODS: We distributed an exploratory cross-sectional online survey to CFP and MFM faculty and fellows at academic medical centers in the Northeast between July and September of 2020. The survey included demographic information, assessment of practice patterns, hospital/administration support and assessment of collaboration. Likert scale questions examined opinions about collaboration and an open-ended question solicited ideas for improvement. We performed bivariate analysis to examine the association between subspecialty and practice location regarding provision of abortion care and perceived barriers to care. RESULTS: The response rate was 31 % and was similar by specialty. Of the 69 respondents, 83 % were MFMs, 75 % were faculty, and 54 % practiced in New York. More than 85 % reported personal participation in some portion of abortion care. The two most common perceived barriers to care were "lack or reluctance of physicians/staff" and state laws prohibiting termination. Nearly all (95 %) stated there was a good working relationship between CFP and MFM divisions; however, almost one-third agreed with or were neutral to the statements "MFM and CFP are siloed in terms of work/patient care." CONCLUSIONS: Academic MFM and CFP providers in the Northeast collaborate well in providing abortion care, though our findings highlight areas that would benefit from improvement. Optimizing collaboration in the Northeast is important given its regional role for ensuring abortion access in the current national landscape. Improved education of all members of the patient care team on the importance of abortion access may also help provide optimal patient care where abortion services still legally exist.

Physician beliefs about abortion safety and their participation in abortion care.

OBJECTIVE: To document physicians' beliefs about abortion safety and the associations between these beliefs and physician support for, referral for, and participation in abortion care. METHODS: In a 2019 survey at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, we assessed physicians' abortion attitudes, beliefs, and practices (N = 893). We conducted bivariate analyses followed by logistic regression to document relationships between physician beliefs about abortion safety and their support for, referral to, and participation in abortion care. RESULTS: Four-in-five physicians (78%, n = 690) believed that abortion is very or extremely safe. Medical specialty (Obstetrics-Gynecology vs. other; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 10.58, 95% CI: 1.41-79.56), educational exposure to abortion (aOR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.02-2.01), and religiosity (aOR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.41-0.85) were associated with physicians' beliefs about the safety of abortion. Providers who believed that abortion was very/extremely safe were more likely to support medication (aOR = 2.99, 95% CI: 1.93-4.65) and procedural abortion (aOR = 3.56, 95% CI: 2.31-5.50) and refer patients for abortion care (aOR = 3.14, 95% CI: 1.90-5.01). CONCLUSION: Although abortions are associated with extremely few adverse events, a sizable portion of surveyed physicians had incorrect perceptions of the safety of abortion. These beliefs were associated with decreased support and referrals for abortion care. Educational exposure to abortion is associated with more accurate assessments of abortion safety, underscoring the importance of training in this area. Considering the current abortion policy landscape, it is imperative for physicians to hold accurate knowledge about abortion so they can provide comprehensive counseling and, when indicated, referrals for safe and legal care.

Sexual Harassment in Surgery-Is Operating Room Culture the Culprit?

BACKGROUND: Sexual harassment is a known problem in surgical training and a focus of growing attention in recent years. However, the environments where sexual harassment in surgical training most commonly takes place are not yet described. METHODS: An anonymous, voluntary, electronic survey was distributed to surgical trainees, and all programs nationally were invited to participate. RESULTS: Sixteen general surgery training programs elected to participate, and the survey achieved a response rate of 30%. 48.9% of respondents reported experiencing sexual harassment. The most common location for harassment was in the operating room (OR) (74% of harassed respondents). The second most common location for harassment was the wards (67.4% of harassed respondents). In the OR, attendings and nurses were the most common harassers. The most common harassment in the OR was being called a sexist slur or intimate nickname. DISCUSSION: Surgical trainees report that the OR was the most common location for trainee harassment. Given that harassment is most commonly perpetrated by both attendings and nurses, harassment in surgical training may not entirely be due to hierarchies but may also be attributed to a flawed and permissive OR culture. Surgical training programs should vigilantly eliminate the circumstances that permit sexual harassment in the OR.

Characterizing physician concerns with publicly supporting abortion at Wisconsin's largest medical school.

OBJECTIVE: To examine factors associated with physicians' level of concern and perceived consequences of publicly supporting abortion at Wisconsin's largest and only publicly funded medical school. METHODS: We surveyed physicians at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health about their knowledge, attitudes, and referral practices regarding abortion care. Among those who expressed support for abortion (N = 701), we analyzed perceived concerns about making their support public. RESULTS: Nearly a quarter (22%) of respondents felt very or extremely concerned that taking a strong public stance on abortion would alienate patients and 17% felt very or extremely concerned that doing so would alienate coworkers. More than a quarter (27%) felt very or extremely concerned that publicly supporting abortion would lead to harassment or harm. Those with greater concerns about expressing public support for abortion were comparatively less willing to refer for or participate in abortion care themselves. CONCLUSIONS: Many physicians supportive of abortion reported concerns over publicizing their support for this common health care service. These concerns may render physicians less likely to refer patients for needed abortion care or weigh in on abortion policy.

The Impact of First-Person Abortion Stories on Community-Level Abortion Stigma: A Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the impact of first-person abortion stories on community-level abortion stigma. METHODS: Between November 2018 and March 2019, we recruited participants and analyzed data from a nationally representative, probability-based online panel of U.S. adults, randomized to watch three first-person abortion video stories (intervention, n = 460) or three nature videos (control, n = 426). We measured community-level abortion stigma using the Community Abortion Attitudes Scale, Reproductive Experiences and Events Scale, and Community Level Abortion Stigma Scale at baseline, immediately after video exposure, and 3 months later. We dichotomized stigma change scores as decreased stigma compared with no change or increased stigma. Bivariate and logistic regression analysis accounted for complex survey methodology and sample weighting. RESULTS: Sample demographics reflected U.S. Census benchmarks (51% female, 68% White, 47% aged 18-44 years). Most participants (83.1%) completed the 3-month follow-up. Viewing the intervention videos was not associated with decreased stigma measured by Community Abortion Attitudes Scale or Community Level Abortion Stigma Scale immediately (odds ratio [OR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-1.09; OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.93-1.75) or at the 3-month follow-up (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.62-1.19; OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.70-1.37). Intervention exposure was associated with decreased stigma as measured by Reproductive Experiences and Events Scale immediately (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.23-2.46); however, this association was not observed at the 3-month follow-up (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.70-1.37). CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to first-person video stories may not decrease community-level abortion stigma among U.S. adults.

Characterizing community-level abortion stigma in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: Estimate community-level abortion stigma among U.S. adults and characterize factors associated with high stigma and less favorable opinions toward policies supportive of abortion care. STUDY DESIGN: We recruited respondents (U.S. adults, English-speaking) from a nationally representative, probability-based online panel in December 2018. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with high abortion stigma using the Community Attitudes Abortion Scale (CAAS), a Reproductive Events and Experiences Scale (REES) subscale, and a Community Level Abortion Stigma Scale (CLASS) subscale. We measured favorability toward policies supportive of abortion care using widely used polling questions. RESULTS: Of 1800 eligible individuals contacted, 984 opened the invitation (54.6%) and 886 (90%) completed the survey. The majority demonstrated midrange stigma scores on all three scales. Increased likelihood of high stigma measured by CAAS was demonstrated among individuals reporting Catholic (OR 2.97, 95%CI 1.49-5.91) and Evangelical or Protestant religion (OR 4.78, 95%CI 2.53-9.00) compared to no religion, and Republican (OR 11.56, 95%CI 6.21-21.52) and Independent political affiliation (5.80, 95%CI, 3.17-10.60) compared to Democratic. Similar trends were seen with REES. Measured by CLASS, we found high stigma in Catholics compared to those with no religion (OR 1.91, 95%CI 1.09-3.32) and Blacks compared to Whites (OR 1.66, 95%CI 1.02-2.68). Identifying as Catholic, Evangelical or Protestant, and Republican were associated with holding less favorable opinions toward policies supportive of abortion care. Identifying as Catholic was the only characteristic associated with high stigma across all measures. CONCLUSIONS: Across multiple measurement tools, factors associated with high stigma and less favorable opinions toward policies supportive of abortion care include Catholic, Evangelical or Protestant religion and Republican political affiliation. IMPLICATIONS: Multiple measures are needed to fully understand the extent of and characteristics associated with community-level abortion stigma. Religion and political identity are frequently associated with high stigma. Understanding these relationships may aid in developing interventions to decrease stigma and in turn reduce barriers to abortion care.

Association of Pregnancy Contexts with Depression and Low Social Support in Early Pregnancy.

CONTEXT: Research into the relationship between pregnancy intention and perinatal depression or low social support is limited. Women's perspectives on pregnancy and their associations with perinatal depression could help in developing targeted efforts for screening and intervention. METHODS: In 2014-2015, 161 women seeking pregnancy testing or abortion care at clinics in New Haven, Connecticut, were surveyed. They were asked about pregnancy context (intentions, planning, wantedness, desirability, timing and happiness), and the Edinburgh Depression Screen (EDS) and the Modified Kendler Social Support Index (MKSSI) were used to identify possible antenatal depression and low social support, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to examine associations between pregnancy context and these outcomes. RESULTS: On average, participants were 27 years old and at nine weeks' gestation. One-fifth reported a previous diagnosis of depression or anxiety, and 22% and 33% screened positive for depression (EDS scores of 13 or higher and 10 or higher, respectively); 52% received low social support (MKSSI score of 3.2 or less). Regression analysis found that pregnancies described as unintended, poorly timed or undesired were associated with depression at the higher cutoff (odds ratios, 3.2-4.5); all unfavorable pregnancy measures were associated with depression at the lower cutoff. Ambivalence regarding pregnancy timing, intention, wantedness and desirability was associated with increased odds of depression by either EDS score. Unplanned pregnancies and those about which the woman was ambivalent were associated with low social support. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the need to screen women for depression early in pregnancy and to integrate assessments of pregnancy context into the evaluation of potential risk factors.

Development and Feasibility Testing of a Video Game to Reduce High-Risk Heterosexual Behavior in Spanish-Speaking Latinx Adolescents: Mixed Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: Similar to broader health disparities, Latinx adolescents have higher rates of high-risk sexual behavior resulting in pregnancy rates that are 2 times higher and sexually transmitted infection rates that are 5 to 8 times higher than non-Hispanic, white adolescents. Novel approaches are needed to reduce high-risk sexual behavior among Spanish-speaking Latinx adolescents who represent the fastest-growing group of US immigrants. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to partner with Spanish-speaking Latinx adolescents in a participatory design process to develop and test a Spanish-language video game intervention to decrease high-risk heterosexual behavior. METHODS: This is an iterative, two-phase, mixed methods study. In phase 1, we conducted focus groups with Spanish-speaking Latinx adolescents to elicit feedback on the content and format of an existing English-language video game. Feedback was then incorporated into an expanded and culturally adapted Spanish-language video game. In phase 2, we pilot tested the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of the new Spanish-language video game intervention by measuring known antecedents to sexual behavior (intentions, self-efficacy, risk perception, and knowledge) assessed at enrollment and 12-week follow-up. We applied a thematic analysis to examine focus group feedback and a bivariate analysis to analyze pre- and postquantitative data. RESULTS: In phase 1, 15 Spanish-speaking Latinx adolescents provided feedback for further video game development. A Spanish-language video game was then produced and tested in phase 2. We recruited and enrolled 24 Spanish-speaking Latinx adolescents aged 15 to 17 years. Participants played the video game for an average of 4.2 hours during monitored sessions. Pilot testing demonstrated feasibility and acceptability; 65% (3/20) of participants stated that they would play it again, and 65% (3/20) said they would recommend it to friends. Condom-specific knowledge did significantly increase between baseline and follow-up (P=.007). Other variables of sexual behavior antecedents did not differ significantly between baseline and 12-week follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: An iterative participatory design process in partnership with Spanish-speaking adolescents produced an innovative and acceptable Spanish-language video game intervention aimed at decreasing high-risk sexual behavior in adolescents. Pilot testing demonstrated preliminary feasibility and yielded essential information for further video game development.

Understanding the Barriers to Reporting Sexual Harassment in Surgical Training.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the occurrence, nature, and reporting of sexual harassment in surgical training and to understand why surgical trainees who experience harassment might not report it. This information will inform ways to overcome barriers to reporting sexual harassment. SUMMARY/ BACKGROUND DATA: Sexual harassment in the workplace is a known phenomenon with reports of high frequency in the medical field. Aspects of surgical training leave trainees especially vulnerable to harassing behavior. The characteristics of sexual harassment and reasons for its underreporting have yet to be studied on the national level in this population. METHODS: An electronic anonymous survey was distributed to general surgery trainees in participating program; all general surgery training programs nationally were invited to participate. RESULTS: Sixteen general surgery training programs participated, yielding 270 completed surveys (response rate of 30%). Overall, 48.9% of all respondents and 70.8% of female respondents experienced at least 1 form of sexual harassment during their training. Of the respondents who experienced sexual harassment, 7.6% reported the incident. The most common cited reasons for nonreporting were believing that the action was harmless (62.1%) and believing reporting would be a waste of time (47.7%). CONCLUSION: Sexual harassment occurs in surgical training and is rarely reported. Many residents who are harassed question if the behavior they experienced was harassment or feel that reporting would be ineffectual-leading to frequent nonreporting. Surgical training programs should provide all-level education on sexual harassment and delineate the best mechanism for resident reporting of sexual harassment.